Numbers
as Archetypes of Thought
Charles
Saunders Peirce
-
an interesting thinker
because
he was both a philosopher and a scientist
-
he anticipated many key
findings
simply by thinking about how he and others thought - his assumption was
that the rest of the world would function much as his brain did
-
spontaneity rather
than determinism
-
random swerving of
microscopic
particles
-
the brain has no
central cell
-
small integers as
fundamental
units of organization in the universe - numbers as "archetypes"
Numbers as Archetypes
-
many philosophers have
seen numbers
- particularly the small integers - as "archetypal",
as a fundamental organizing principle for reality. The
Pythagoreans
were especially strong on this idea.
-
Peirce was particularly
taken
with first,
second and third as archetypes. But he also thought about
zero, and about combinations of the first three, e.g., firstness of
second, secondness of third, etc.
-
Carl
Jung also thought numbers were archetypal, but he placed much more
emphasis on the number four which he saw as the archetype of synergy,
or
self-sustaining order. Ben and I agree with Jung on this.
Higher
numbers can also be seen as archetypal
-
this may seem like
foolish speculation,
but it is remarkable that the same imagery occurs both in classical
creation
myths and in the latest astronomical theories of the origins of the
universe
Naught, the Formless Void
-
the original state of
the universe
- some physicists believe that a "zero-point
field" or quantum vacuum underlies all apparent mass and energy in
the universe.
-
scientific astronomy has
reached
the same conclusion
-
not the same as the
integer "0"
- this is something before arithmetic existed, before order of any kind
existed
-
also found in many
religious traditions,
e.g., the Buddhist concept of the "Formless
Void" - meditation seeks to bring the worshipper into this state
-
perhaps this concept is
captured
by The
Really Big Button That Doesn't Do Anything.
-
complex systems theory
also shows
that order can emerge out of chaos
First, Raw Being
-
the conception of being
or existing
independent of anything else
-
the first step in the
emergence
of order out of chaos
-
in human psychology,
firstness
comprises feelings that are immediately present, such as pain, blue,
cheerfulness,
the feeling that arises when we contemplate a consistent theory, when
we
contemplate God.
-
in physics, it is the
quantum
indeterminacy of matter, behavior which does not follow any law
-
in philosophy, it is
usually equated
with idealism, the position that ideas just emerge on their own rather
than being determined by physical realities
Secondness, The Reacting
Object
-
for Peirce, secondness
is the
conception of being relative to, the conception of reaction with,
something
else
-
in psychology,
sensations of reaction
-
in physics, laws of
relationship
between variables
-
in mathematics, a vector
- a line
with an arrow at the end, having both position and direction
-
in complex systems
theory, the
movement from one state to another
Thirdness, The Evolving
Interpretation
-
for Peirce, this is
habit, abstract
thought, the process whereby two things are understood to be in a
relationshp
-
these feelings and
thoughts about
relationships come to have a existence of their own
-
in the physical
sciences, thirdness
is general theories or principles such as the Theory of Evolution,
Quantum
Theory, Newtonian Mechanics
-
in mathematics,
thirdness is a
pattern or equation which explains how systems are related.
Geometrically
it is represented by a triangle
-
in general, it is a
pattern that
emerges from a series of numbers
-
example: "The
Rule of Three"
Fourthness, The Unity of
Consciousness
-
Peirce did not think in
terms
of fourthness, which led him into a lot of confusing terminology such
as
Firstness of Second. Some people like these complex theories,
others
do not
-
Carl Jung stressed the
quaternity,
seeing it as the minimal number for representing a unified
system:
a collection of overlapping, synergetic relationships.
-
fourthness is a pattern
which
emerges from a web of relationships which support and sustain each
other
so that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts
-
this concept is often
captured
by the word "synergy"
-
geometrically,
fourthness is the
tetrahedron
-
Buckminster
Fuller was a creative exponent of the tetrahedron
-
fourthness can also be
represented
as a dual network, combining hierarchy and heterarchy - this is how we
think of it in Webmind
-
this kind of emergence
of thought
is the essence of what we call "thinking" in the brain
-
truly intelligent AI
systems will
have to be able to do this, not just follow instructions
Friedrich Nietszche
-
a philosopher that many
people
have found profoundly inspiring
-
often thought of as a
nihilist,
a person preoccupied with nothingness
-
he saw the "will to
power" as
the force which enabled people to overcome nothingness
-
Neitzsche's "will to
power" is
equivalent to Peirce's "one law of mind". Order emerges out of
chaos
because it just does.
-
the universe is a huge
pool of
entities, struggling with each other, leading to an emerging reality
Archetypal Patterns Can Be
Observed
in Many other systems of metaphysics, e.g.,
Tarot
cards