Unheeded Lesson of the Bellah Crosstalk
Posted August 19, 2005
The loud brieftone that accompanied the Bellah crosstalk provides an opportunity to measure how Channel-I would have reproduced the brieftone that accompanied the Channel-II Decker broadcast.
At about 12:34, Sargent Bellah asked the dispatcher do you want me to still hold this traffic on Stemmons . . .. The loud squeal, which accompanies this message is a brieftone. Feedback from an operating Channel-II receiver within an earshot of Bellah's microphone created the brieftone.

A microphone operating on Channel-I was also within an earshot of an operating Channel-II receiver and broadcasted Bellah's message and the accidental brieftone as crosstalk.

Contrary to the declaration of the Watson Research Center, the frequency response of Channel-I was adequate to respond to the Channel-II brieftone. In fact, spectrographs of Bellah's broadcast and its crosstalk shows the narrower frequency response of Channel-I attenuated the brieftone by less than four decibels.

Similarly a brieftone mars Decker's Channel-II hold everything secure broadcast. In both cases the brieftones are excessively loud signals and only their narrowband characters prevent them from obscuring the broadcasts.

Unlike the Bellah crosstalk where the loudness of the brieftone is comparable with the voice, the alleged Decker crosstalk contains no audible nor measurable brieftone.

The missing brieftone is the first clue that the alleged Decker crosstalk does not match the corresponding portion of the Decker broadcast. Absence of fidelity is the second hint. The badly garbled voice of the alleged Decker crosstalk contrasts sharply with the clarity of the Bellah crosstalk.


Return to Problems of the Acoustic Evidence

Return to New Leads in JFK Assassination Research


Last Updated on December 10, 2008 by Herbert Blenner