On July 9, 2007, Henri Wilson repeatedly snipped an argument
that he apparently found too logical to endure:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/838a167f3a68f5cb
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 20:51:15 -0700, Jerry <Cephalobus_alie...@comcast.net> wrote:
>On Jul 9, 4:04 am, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
>> snip rubbish
>I obviously hit you rather hard.
>Let me restore most of your SNIP:
snip rubbish again.
This is most intriguing, since Henri is normally not afraid to counter logical arguments with ever-increasing heights of nonsense. Simply running away is rare for him. Could Henri (gasp!) actually have realized that his sawblade model of photons is fatally flawed?
For the record, this is what he repeatedly snipped (along with some additional context):
On Jul 9, 12:42 am, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:48:47 -0700, Jerry <Cephalobus_alie...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >Femtosecond pulses are not explainable in terms of incompressible
> >Wilsonian sawblades. Or compressible Wilsonian sawblades, for
> >that matter.
> How about Wilsonian rotating charges?
Yes. What about them?
> >They are easily explained in terms of classical wave theory.
> What? you just cut a wave into minute pieces and still call
> it a wave?
As I've said before, the properties of femtosecond pulses are
quite understandable in terms of a certain branch of mathematics
whose utility you have mocked. I will leave you in ignorance
of what I am speaking, except with a hint: Search your posting
history if you want to discover to what I refer.
> How do femtosecond pulses conform with the P.E. effect?
No problem with QM either.
It is only YOUR theory that does not conform with the
existence of femtosecond pulses.
How can incompressible Wilsonian sawblades be crammed into
a femtosecond envelope?