The Truth About False Confessions

Home
Archives
Purpose
Bio
Reforms
Links
Expert Assistance
Literature
Contact
FAQ
Testimonials
My Other Website

Looking for expert consultation and/or testimony?

Contact Professor Alan Hirsch

 

confession.gif

   

Archive Newer | Older

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Death And Innocence

 

A visitor writes to express disagreement with my claim, on this site and elsewhere, that the most compelling argument against the death penalty is the inevitable execution of the innocent:

 

Take Ruben Cantu, for instance, who was executed in 1993. Tell any representative group of Texans there is strong evidence Mr. Cantu did not commit the murder for which he was executed and it seems there will be at least one who will point to his gang activity and say, ‘Yeah, well, maybe he didn't do this murder, but he did plenty of other bad things so he got what he deserved.’ . . .  Even if you convince some folks to be horrified (as you and I are) that their government is killing innocent people, the institutions that support capital punishment (prosecutors, the prison system, victims rights groups, etc.) will make meaningless rhetorical adjustments and claim that they have fixed the problem and carry on with the killing.”

 

It may be, as the visitor implies, that many supporters of capital punishment simply accept the execution of the innocent as an acceptable price to pay for what they consider the benefits of state-sanctioned killing. However, I doubt that these people will be any more persuaded by the other arguments against capital punishment.

Send a comment

 

2:22 pm est

Monday, March 26, 2007

Criminal Negligence
 
From an Associated Press article this weekend:
 
"Minnesota, Texas and Virginia have each founded powerful oversight boards in the last two years that can investigate misconduct in crime labs. But not one of the new boards has yet reopened a case -- either because they have refused to do so or because they haven't been funded."
 
 
6:36 am est

Thursday, March 22, 2007

More Mohammed

 

In a Washington Post op-ed, Anne Applebaum notes that the universal distrust of Sheik Khalid Mohammed’s confession is the price we pay for engaging in torture: people will not trust information obtained through blatantly coercive means. If only everyone realized that modern interrogation techniques, utilizing psychological manipulation more than physical abuse, also produce unreliable results.  

Send a comment

 

10:18 am est

Monday, March 19, 2007

Khalid Sheik Mohammed's Confession

 

Conservative columnist John Podhoretz writes of Mohammed's Confession: "there is reason to doubt every word this man says, incuding his claims of responsibility for anything any everything." Podhoretz notes that Mohammed "might be a psychotic megalomaniac with delusions of grandeur. Or he might be shouldering blame to deflect it from others still in detention."

 

Quite so. In addition, Mohammed has been subject to waterboarding and God knows what else. He may have confessed to things he didn't do for the same reason many suspects do: subtle and non-subtle coercive interrogative techniques drive them to conclude that they are better off doing so. But I rejoice at Podhoretz' analysis. The recognition that confessions (whether by average suspects or infamous terrorists) cannot be taken at face value is extremely important.     

Send a comment

 

6:12 am est

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

False Confessions Around The Globe

 

A Japanese newspaper last month noted “the presiding judge’s scathing criticism of the reliability of police and prosecutors’ records of their confessions, has highlighted the lingering tendency of investigators to place too much emphasis on extracting confessions from suspects.”

Send a comment

 

11:36 am est

Sunday, March 11, 2007

Death Penalty Dialogue

 

For a debate about the best reasons to abolish the death penalty, check out http://www.texasobserver.org/article.php?aid=2432

Send a comment

 

9:34 pm est

Thursday, March 8, 2007

Not promising
 

Last month the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit dismissed concern that an interrogator’s promise to help the suspect with his immigration status could have induced a false confession. The Court said that so long as the offer to assist is “not an outright and material lie,” it isn’t problematic. This is the law in most jurisdictions, but it ignores the obvious fact that truthful offers of assistance, no less than false ones, can lead a suspect to conclude that he is better off confessing.

Send a comment

 

10:36 am est

Monday, March 5, 2007

Corporate Interrogation
 

Last month a court in Delaware dismissed a claim by a Home Depot employee that he was discharged after store managers coerced him into a false confession that he used sexually abusive and inflammatory language in the men’s room. The dismissal was based on a technicality, but the case serves as a reminder that many corporations have adopted the police interrogation tactics known to produce false confessions. Even as we learn more about the causes of false confessions, and take some measures to guard against them (especially more and more police departments videotaping interrogations), false confessions are bound to increase.

Send a comment

 

11:23 am est

Thursday, March 1, 2007

False Confessions And Scientific Certainty

 

Last week a court of appeals in Georgia rejected a defendant’s argument that a trial judge erred in refusing to allow testimony from a false confessions expert.  The court of appeals asserted that “the false confession theory” is “not reliable and has not yet reached a verifiable stage of scientific certainty.” False confessions are not theory but fact, as suggested by the 2004 study of 125 proven false confessions.  Presumably the court meant that explanations of the causes of false confessions remain insufficiently grounded to justify expert testimony. But if the standard is “scientific certainty,” virtually no expert on any subject is qualified to testify. In the case of false confessions, there has been extensive research on (among other things) how modern interrogation techniques cause false confessions.  Depriving jurors of knowledge about this subject is indefensible.

Send a comment

 

1:14 am est


Archive Newer | Older