The Truth About False Confessions

Home
Archives
Purpose
Bio
Reforms
Links
Expert Assistance
Literature
Contact
FAQ
Testimonials
My Other Website

Looking for expert consultation and/or testimony?

Contact Professor Alan Hirsch

 

confession.gif

   

Archive Newer | Older

Thursday, August 30, 2007

False Guilty Pleas
 
I have no idea what Senator Larry Craig did in some bathroom stall, but aspects of this story unrelated to his behavior are quite disturbing. First, the tape of his arrest reveals the kind of bullying interrogation that can and does produce false confessions. Second, many people have already publicly declared that Craig must be guilty because otherwise he never would have pled guilty. In fact, the ranks of proven false confessions include quite a few false guilty pleas. And it's easy to understand that someone in Craig's position might have wished to put the ordeal behind him -- even if innocent.  
 
8:26 pm est

Sunday, August 26, 2007

Videotaping Not A Panacea
 

Videotaping interrogations is a great idea, but no panacea. The best way to prevent convictions based on false confessions is to end the interrogation practices that produce false confessions in the first place. As this article reminds us, a jury seeing a videotaped confession will not always be able to determine its truth or falsity – particularly if it’s not videotaped properly.  

Send a comment

 

9:37 am est

Monday, August 20, 2007

Norfolk Four
 
Make sure to check out the article on the Norfolk Four in yesterday's New York Times Magazine.
 
8:13 am est

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Staggering Arrogance
 

Earlier this year, authorities in Sacramento dropped charges against four middle school students accused of a conspiracy to massacre their classmates.  The basis of the charge was a confession browbeaten out of one of the four – a confession that the authorities now concede was false. The students’ lawyer reports that during the lengthy interrogation of his client, the two detectives used profanity, slammed the table, and wouldn’t take no for an answer. The lead detective does not deny the allegation. Nor apologize for it. “We were aggressive and we would do it again today,” he says. False confessions continue unabated precisely because of this unwillingness to learn.   

Send a comment

 

8:59 am est

Wednesday, August 1, 2007

Injustice In New York
 
Yesterday a day care worker in Queens was sentenced to 20 years in prison for raping a 4 year old boy. The only evidence was a confession she claims was coerced, but the trial court refused to allow her to present testimony from a false confessions expert. Today's New York Times quotes the woman's lawyer as saying that the jury "would have heard a different story" if such testimony were permitted. Indeed.
 
The exclusion of expert testimony about false confessions is a major problem. Jurors, like everyone else, intuitively assume that a confession must be true. There's no excuse for judges to refuse to allow a jury to be educated.  
 
11:25 am est


Archive Newer | Older