The Relationship
of Pigment to Health
by Geneva Coats,
R.N.
Rare and exotic colors...one of the most attractive and exciting features of our Pomeranians. Variety is the spice of life!
Different styles appeal to different breeders. However, there are some important pigment-related health issues to consider.
BREED STANDARDS
Since the inception of purebred dog registries, standards have been established for all breeds. The standard serves to
protect a breed from fashion whims. It strives to maintain a breed's traditional "look" and purpose. The standard establishes
desirable conformation and temperament characteristics. It provides a goal for breeding practices, and is a guide for breeders
and judges. You don't need to understand all the details and theories of genetics, but simply aim to follow the standard when
breeding and judging.
But why is a color or pattern so important to the stewards of a breed? Some breed standards disallow excessive white or merle.
Many breed standards specify that parti-color dogs have a certain proportion of color to white, or that they must have color
extending over both eyes and ears. Most all standards call for full, dark pigmentation of nose, lips, eye rims and pads. Albinism
is generally disallowed. Breeders have always been keen scientific observers, even before genetics became an established field. These
guidelines were not e stablished for aesthetics' sake, but because certain colors, patterns, and lack of pigmentation were
known to be associated with an increase in certain health problems.
There is much
documentation and information related to the merle and white spotting patterns, and they will be the focus of this article.
COAT COLOR
DEVELOPMENT
The process of coloration and color patterns in dogs starts with embryonic development. The cells
which become melanocytes (pigment producing cells) are derived entirely from the neural crest of the embryo. Pigment cells
develop from the same cells that give rise to the nervous system. Defects in certain color genes can be associated with
defects in the nervous system, as evidenced by vision and hearing problems. If pigment cells are not present, the coat will
lack pigment and appear white. Color provides a logical genetic indicator, and explains why it is likely that certain patterned
dogs, such as extreme piebalds (>90% white) and merles may be at risk for specific health problems. In studies to date,
the coat patterns resulting from genes producing white are significantly associated with deafness. In addition, suppression
by "white genes" of pigmentation in the iris of the eye is also associated with deafness. On the other hand, the
presence of pigmented, colored patches in the coat is associated with reduced risk of deafness.
WHITE SPOTTING
AND HEARING
A
coat pattern strongly associated with deafness in dogs is the so-called "S" series-commonly known as white spotting, Irish
spotting, or piebalding. Breed examples are the Bull Terrier, Samoyed, Greyhound, Great Pyrenees, Sealyham Terrier,
Beagle, Bulldog, Dalmation, English Setter, Papillon and Fox Terrier. Recent studies done by Schmutz have linked the
MITF gene to various patterns of white spotting in many breeds. There are different types of insertions at MITF affecting
pigmentation in dogs; not all are recessive as has been traditionally believed. Some dogs with white spotting do not have
any mutation at MITF, leading us to believe that there are some other genes that also produce white spotting.
The white spotting
coat patterns are believed to be related to the path of migration taken by the pigment cells in the embryo. During fetal development, the
melanocytes (cells that produce pigment) are concentrated in the neural crest. The neural crest is the area which eventually
becomes the brain and spinal cord. From the neural crest, the pigment cells migrate to the peripheral areas of the body,
such as the head, legs and tail. However, sometimes the melanocytes don't reach the farthest distal areas of the
body. This could be due to the effects of genes, or it might happen because of an environmental factor during development
(such as nutrition or infection). Any areas where the pigment cells fail to migrate will remain white. This is why
sometimes dogs will have a white spot on the end of the tail, the tips of the toes, or on the chest. If pigment-producing
melanocytes fail to reach the inner ear, deafness will result.
The gene insertions
at MITF that produce white spotting patterns are believed to suppress expression of melanocytes during embryogenesis and fetal
development. In addition to regulating the differentiation of neural-crest derived melanocytes, MITF is also involved in several
other developmental processes. It controls the retinal pigment layers in the eye. MITF mutations in mice cause reduced eye
size, failure of secondary bone resorption, and early onset of deafness.
White color
on the head is often, but not always, associated with deafness due to lack of inner ear pigment. Patched-colored dogs with
dark eyes have been selected for in many breeds. These dogs have reduced incidence of hearing impairment when compared to
dogs which are almost totally white.
Not all breeds
with an extreme piebald pattern have been reported to be affected with deafness, and there is also inherited deafness in several
breeds which is totally unrelated to coat color.
Both white
spotting and merle are known to sometimes affect hearing. In breeds which have traditionally included the merle
color pattern, the predominantly white (double-factored) merle has been disallowed in the show ring, as well as selected against
in the whelping box.
WHAT IS MERLE?
“Merle is a coat pattern caused by a dominant mutation in a pigmentation gene called
SILV. The mutation (an insertion of repetitive, mobile DNA) causes dilution of the base fur color and often blue eye color.
Merle affects all coat colors, but is more apparent in dogs with darker colored coats (e.g., black) than those with lighter-colored
coats (e.g., sable). Coat color is determined by another gene. Because of the type of mutation that causes merle, merling
is random and characteristics such as the size and number of colored patches and eye color can not be predicted.” Dr
Leigh Anne Clark
Merle is a
coat pattern, not a color. The merle gene works like other dilution genes, in that it lightens whatever color is already there.
Whatever the basic color of the dog-unless he is all white-the merle gene will cause dilution and splotching imposed on the
base coat color. The appearance is a speckling or marbling, like when bleach is splashed on your clothes. The pigment cells
are affected individually in the fetus. Some are disabled completely, leaving white areas. Some c ells allow partial expression
of pigment, leaving merled or dappled areas. Some cells are unaffected, leaving the coat color normal or non-merled. The amount
of dappling or merling can vary. The dog can have perhaps just a small dappled spot somewhere, or perhaps just a light eye
with a nondappled, normal coat. Or, it might display dappling throughout the coat. The effect is most noticeable on a black
coat; where the black is diluted to grey, the color is called "blue merle".
Merle appears at first glance to be dominant, because if a dog carries one gene for the merle factor, he will be affected
by it. However, merle is different, because it is incompletely dominant. A single merle gene, inherited from one parent, produces
what is known as a "heterozygous" or "single" merle. This single copy of the gene will usually cause the affected dog to
display merling somewhere in the coat. This can range from light dappling to extensive dappling. Sometimes the effect on the
coat is not evident, and there is no way to tell at maturity that the dog carries the merle gene. Sometimes, blue flecks
in the eyes are the the only sign that a dog carries the merle gene.
If two heterozygous
merles are bred together, statistically 25% of the offspring will inh erit two merle factor genes, one from each parent. When
this happens, we produce what is known as a "double (homozygous) merle". The effect of the gene is then doubly intense. There
is so much color dilution that the dog is usually predominantly white, and almost always has impaired hearing or vision-or
both. Many double merle dogs do not survive to birth.
In French,
the word "merle" means "blackbird", and "le merle blanc" ("The white blackbird") is an expression, meaning something that
is impossible or something that cannot exist. This is an admirable goal for the white merle dog!
In Great Danes,
merle interacts with another gene called harlequin, which bleaches the gray areas of the coat to white. In the pure homozygous
form, harlequin is lethal. In Danes and Aussies, the tweed pattern is a variation on merle which adds a third, intermediate
shade to the coat.
HOW MERLE WORKS
Merle is a
"transposon", or transposable element; a mobile parasite segment of DNA in the chromosome. Transposons usually originate from
viruses. A virus is a particle containing DNA which inserts itself into the host cell, thereby infecting it. If the virus
does not kill the host cell, it can leave behind a piece of its genetic material in the DNA of the host cell. When this happens
in the sex or germinal cells, the particle can become a part of th e genetic makeup of some of the offspring. This is a way
that mutation occurs.
Transposons
have also been called "junk DNA or "selfish DNA", as they rarely provide any benefit to the host cell. Transposons are also often
referred to as "jumping genes." The transposon can move to different positions in the cell in a "cut and paste" process. In
so doing, it may cause mutations, or alter the amount of DNA in the genome.
The merle transposon
segment consists of a head, a body and a longer tail segment. During cellular replication of early embryonic development,
the tail segment of the merle gene may lose some of its DNA nucleotide particles. Coat color in that area will then be less
affected by the gene, or possibly even unaffected, and the underlying true coat color will be expressed. This explains
why there are some areas of the coat which are NOT dappled, and other areas which ARE. This may also explain how cryptic
merles can be produced.
The decorative
variegated Indian corn is produced by transposon elements in the corn gene. Many viruses, such as those responsible for AIDS
and feline leukemia, function as transposons. In humans, hereditary diseases such as hemophilia A and B, predisposition
to colon polyps and cancer, and Duchenne muscular dystrophy, are all related to inherited mutations produced through the transposon
process. Genetic engineers sometimes use transposons to try to intentionally introduce certain genes into an organism.
There are also
documented cases (about 3-4% incidence) of homozygous merles producing non-merle offspring. This process is known as "germinal
reversion". This is further evidence of the instability of the gene. Not only can you sometimes get non-merle pups (which
should not happen according to the rules of Mendelian genetics), but worse things can happen. The "cleft palate syndrome"
is a rare and isolated Aussie defect that has been the subject of numerous scientific journal articles and symposia presentations.
It is a sex-linked (on the X chromosome) defect, in which females have minor abnormalities, like extra toes, while males die
of massive skeletal abnormalities and a cleft palate. This disease started with a homozygous merle bitch that was kept for
coat color research.
Researchers
have tested merle dogs in many breeds and found that all merle dogs have the same merle gene, inserted at
the identical location. If this same gene were inserted at a different color location, it would produce
a uniform coat color dilution, similar to other dilution genes, rather than a mottled effect. There was no question in
this regard with any merle dog in any breed researchers have tested: merle is found in a wide variety of breeds
and it is an old mutation. All merle dogs share common ancestry.
MERLE AND EYESIGHT
There
is a complex of eye defects associated with the merle gene. These defects can be superficial in nature, such as a difference
in color between the iris of one eye and the other. The example of this is a dog with one brown eye and one blue eye. (Note
that this trait is not necessarily indicative of possession of the merle gene, because it can also be found in dogs with extreme
white spotting). In addition to superficial indicators there are also major effects, such as absence of the reflective substance
which lines the back of the eye, resulting in reduced ability to see in low light. There can be lack of retinal pigment, which
directly reduces vision. Small or absent eyeballs, irregular or starburst pup ils, and clefts in the iris can occur, as well
as persistent pupillary membrane, strabismus (cross-eyed), lens luxation , and juvenile cataracts.
The exact mechanism
by which merle produces most these eye problems is unknown. Eye pigment reduction to blue is presumed due to suppression of
pigment in the iris.
THE MERLE LINK
TO MICROPHTHALMIA
The term "microphthalmia"
means a smaller than normal, tiny eyeball due to a defect in early development. Microphthalmia is a defect very
commonly associated with merle; particularly homozygous "double" merle, it even rarely occurs in heterozygous
or "single" merles. Complete absence of the eyeball in the eye socket sometimes occurs. This is known as "anophthalmia".
MITF, or "Microphthalmia
Transcription Factor", was recently discovered to be the location of genes that affect pigmentation, causing white spotting
(otherwise known as the particolor or piebald pattern).
The merle gene is
believed to possibly affect eye development through some sort of interaction with MITF. Now, why would microphthalmia occur
in association with merle and not just with white coat color in particolor dogs? I've asked several canine
geneticists, but have received no answer! This relationship is still a mystery. The exact mechanism by which merle interacts
with the white spotting gene and produces the defect of microphthalmia is still waiting to be discovered!
MERLE AND HEARING
Hearing impairment can occur in merles due to a lack of melanin or pigment in the inner ear. Not all merles will develop
problems with hearing, it all depends on whether or not the inner ear is pigmented. If the inner ear isn't pigmented, the
nerve cells responsible for hearing can't develop as they should. Then, the nerve endings atrophy and die off in the first
few weeks of the puppy's life, resulting in partial or total deafness. The deafness is neither dominant nor recessive, but
is linked to the merle gene which disrupts pigmentation and secondarily produces deaf dogs.
Canine geneticist
Dr. Leigh Anne Clark, now working at Clemson University in South Carolina, has done extensive research on the merle
and harlequin coat patterns. Dr. Clark notes: “The biggest factor that I have noticed with deafness in heterozygous
merles is whether there are other coat color genes involved - dogs that also have piebald seem to be more likely to have problems.”
White outer
ear color is often associated with lack of inner ear pigment and deafness. However, sometimes deafness occurs even with patches
of color on the ears. Mild to moderate or unilateral hearing impairment may never be noticed, and is rarely tested for.
ONE COPY
OF THE GENE HARMLESS?
The popular belief is that heterozygous merles are completely normal, and that only homozygous merles have problems. Heterozygous
merles can have expression of lesser defects of the eye such as clefts in the iris, and a thinning of the retina
(similar to what is found with Collie eye anomaly). There are also rare cases of microphthalmia in "single"
merles. Deafness can also sometimes occur, if the merle gene prevents pigment deposition in the nerve cells
of the inner ear during embryonic development.
Heterozygous
"single" merles often have reduced eye pigment which produces the characteristic blue eyes. Interestingly,
the amount of white even in homozygous merles does not correlate to severity of eye defects. In a study of the embryonic origin
of merle eye defects, Dr. Cynthia Cook, of the University of California , San Francisco , observed that the severity of eye
defect and amount of pigment were not related. This is in contrast to hearing impairment in merles; the likelihood
of deafness increases with increasing amounts of white in the hair coat.
According to
researchers, merle combined with piebald increases the risk of deafness. Future testing of vision and hearing in merle
dogs will hopefully paint a clearer picture for us.
GENETIC LINKAGE
CAN CAUSE SPREAD OF DEFECTS
Genes on the
same chromosome are usually inherited together. This process is known as genetic linkage. However, during cellular division
and replication, sometimes chromosomes will randomly break and recombine. Genes that were formerly associated with each other
can then become separated and inherited independently. We have already mentioned the Aussie cleft palate syndrome which
originated with a merle bitch. Iris coloboma, or missing part of the iris, is being reported in non-merle Aussies. Coloboma
appears as a notch at the edge of the pupil, giving the pupil an irregular shape. This sight-altering defect is believed to
have been brought into the breed through linkage with the merle factor. This trait is now inherited independently from merle.
It is likely
more than coincidence that breeds in which merle is most common are also breeds which are heavily plagued with a variety of
eye defects. Yearly CERF testing by a veterinary ophthalmologist can help screen out heritable abnormalities. Further studies
in merle dogs are needed to observe the frequency and exact methods by which eye defects are produced.
BREEDING RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR MERLE
Dogs with one merle gene are generally unaffected with serious health problems, so these can be avoided by breeding
a merle dog only to a non-merle.
Sometimes
a dog is genetically carrying the merle factor gene, but there are no outward signs (cryptic or phantom merle). This dog could
easily be inadvertently bred to another merle and result in the production of homozygous double merles. For this reason, it
is usually recommended to avoid breeding merle to sable, brindle or any predominantly phaeomelanin (orange-red-gold-yellow)
coat color.
It is almost
universally recommended to NEVER breed two merles together, to avoid producing defective double merles. But, unfortunately,
some breeders will intentionally breed merle to merle, hoping to produce a higher percentage of merle offspring. This
is a sadly misinformed idea. Others may breed merle to merle in an attempt to produce a double merle sire to use for
future breeding. Such a double merle dog (even if vision or hearing impaired) will produce 100% merle offspring. There is
a demand for the unusual merle color. Although this method of breeding may be considered unethical, it does happen in many
breeds, by uneducated or uncaring breeders.
A merle dog
should be bred to a dark colored mate, preferably black or black and tan. A dominant black dog will only produce
black offspring half the time, unless he carries two copies of the dominant gene for black. Couple a black with a merle parent,
who will produce merle offspring 50% of the time, and the odds just dropped to 25% for producing a blue merle from a black
to merle mating...the same odds of producing a sable merle from such a breeding.
Black and tanpoint
pattern is recessive and would breed true. If one parent is also merle, you have a 50/50 chance for producing blue merle
offspring, and 50/50 tanpoint who are not merle. Recessive black would also breed true, just as black and tan does, but
recessive black seems to occur only very rarely in our breed. Also, In our breed, there is a widely carried recessive
gene "e" which suppresses all black pigment in the coat. This gene can double up in the offspring to hide the visual appearance
of merle.
Here is part
of a statement by canine geneticist Sheila Schmutz, written for the Pomeranian standard revision committee in April 2006:
"Yet another
gene in the "blue" family that can cause health issues is merle. Merle can not be seen in dogs with an e/e genotype. This
e/e genotype occurs commonly in Pomeranians since orange, red and white probably account for the majority of Poms. The problem
is that M/M (homozygous merle) dogs are always deaf based on our studies. We recently genotyped 24 mostly white Australian
Shepherds and all tested M/M (based on the Clark et al. 2006 PNAS published test) and all were deaf. A proportion of these
dogs were also blind in one or both eyes since microphthalmia is another common side effect in M/M dogs. Although in many
breeds it is possible to educate breeders to never breed two merle dogs together this advice is not possible to follow in
Pomeranians since e/e dogs would not show the merle pattern. It would therefore be necessary instead to advise all persons
who breed a merle dog to use only a black or sable mate or to have DNA testing done on their red, orange or white mate prior
to breeding to be sure it did not carry merle."
Further complicating the picture is the case of breeding a merle to any dog with excessive white in the coat. Breeding merle
to parti-color dogs with more than 50% white coat is advised against; especially if the merle parent also carries genes
for particolor or "white spotting". It would be difficult to determine if the resulting puppies were merle or extreme
piebald white-or both-without DNA testing! In either case, hearing can be affected.
Another factor
to consider is that, according to a canine geneticist involved in a merle deafness study, the risk of deafness with merle
increases when there are other coat color genes involved. Dogs that also have piebald are more likely to have problems.
DNA
TEST FOR MERLE
We now have
a DNA test for merle! This is a wonderful tool for breeders who choose to avail themselves of the technology. A cheek
swab from the dog is sent to the lab, and they can tell you if your dog is merle or not. This test can also tell you if your
dog carries one copy or two copies of the gene. Unfortunately, the US company offering this test closed its doors in
March 2009. However, another company (Idexx) is poised to take over this service.
Unfortunately
DNA testing remains costly, and may not be widely used even if available. AKC registration for Pomeranians now allows
for designation of color as merle. However, merle status will continue to involve guesswork based on visual appearance
until such time as the DNA testing becomes more widespread. Registration can not represent an accurate assessment of
merle status, particularly in our breed, without this testing.
In the future,
as the merle pattern becomes more popular and widespread in our breed, we may notice it will represent an ever-expanding portion
of the gene pool.
HEARING TEST
The only way to know for sure if your dog is hearing impaired is through a Brainstem Auditory Evoked Response Test, or BAER
test. This testing is only available at select facilities and can be expensive. It need only be performed once in a dog's
lifetime (preferably at a young age) to rule out hereditary hearing impairment. A complete list of BAER testing facilities
can befound on Dr. George Strain's website: www.lsu.edu/deafness/deaf.htm. Selective breeding for hearing dogs, as evidenced by normal BAER testing, can reduce the incidence of deafness
in dogs, including those20with high risk factors.
OTHER PROBLEMS
Other
health concerns associated with lack of pigmentation are skin allergies, skin cancer and sunburn, demodicosis (immune-mediated
hair follicle mange), follicular dysplasia (coat which is dull and breaks), reduced fertility and sterility, and photo-induced
epilepsy.
CONCERNS RELATED
TO THE PRODUCTION OF HANDICAPPED DOGS
Some animal welfare specialists endorse humane euthanasia for all dogs
deaf in both ears (bilaterally deaf). Hearing can not be accurately assessed before 5 weeks of age. At this age, euthanasia
can be an agonizing decision for any caring, ethical breeder.
Deaf or blind dogs require special placement arrangements. A breeder is morally and ethically responsible for care and placement
of handicapped dogs. We may see in the future an increase in handicapped Pomeranians turned over to rescue or to shelters.
As there are always so many healthy dogs in shelters and rescue who cannot find homes, the odds of finding homes for handicapped
dogs are even greater. Support for rescue from our parent and regional clubs will likely need to increase.
WHERE DO WE
GO FROM HERE?
Many people
have voiced concern that the merle pattern has only recently been introduced to our breed, through crossbreeding with merle
dogs of other breeds. However, all breeds have been created through such methods at some point in their history. The concern
is not so much HOW the pattern appeared in our breed, but rather WHERE it will take us in the future.
Education about
reducing risky breeding practices is vital for continued good health of the breed. Education should include factors to consider
in selecting a canine companion, as well as methods of developing a breeding program with an emphasis on producing healthy
offspring. Public awareness of health issues may eventually create an increased demand for dogs bred as much for good health
as for physical beauty.
Many breed
clubs promote responsible breeding through the breed standard Itself. (For instance, our Pomeranian standard stipulates that
eyes must be dark).
Guidelines
can also be provided through a breed club's code of ethics.
The
guidelines might contain recommendations such as:
1. Yearly CERF testing for all breeding
stock. (Clinics should be made available at national and regional specialties).
2. BAER
testing should be performed once in a dog's lifetime prior to breeding. This is especially important in merle and extreme
piebald patterns.
3. All dogs from merle litters should be sold only to knowledgeable breeders
or transferred to new owners after being spayed or neutered. This will help prevent uneducated breeding and the production
of handicapped dogs.
4. Vision and hearing health should be guaranteed in all puppy
contracts, Dogs so affected should be readily taken back by their breeder at any point in their lifetime.
5. Any puppies from a litter with a merle parent who do not appear to be merle should be DNA tested to determine merle status,
(unless of course they are going to be sterilized, in which case DNA merle testing would not be necessary).
As breeders, we need to avoid the ostrich syndrome. Let's not stick our heads in the sand and hope problems will go away....they
might get worse if we do!
STUDY!! We should learn all we can about genetics and heredity-of all breeds, not just our own. The other guy's problem today
may well be ours tomorrow.
SUMMARY
Our breed already
has some health concerns. It would seem unwise to encourage an increase in problems purely for the sake of novel
color patterns. Through education and personal responsibility, risky breeding practices can be minimized. We should strive
to produce puppies blessed with the gifts of normal vision and hearing. If this article serves to prevent the birth of just
one handicapped dog through heightened breeder awareness, it will have been worthwhile.
REFERENCES
|
Bowling, Sue. "Canine Color Genetics". "Elementary Merle Genetics for Newcomers". "Basic Genetics, the Relationship
of Genes to Traits”.
Cattanach, Bruce M., "The
Dalmation Dilemma: White Coat Color and Deafness".
Chopson,
Jane, "Inheritance of Great Dane Coat Color" Sept 1992.
Clark, Leigh Anne, Wahl,
Jacqueline M. Rees, Christine A., Murphy, Keith E. “Retrotransposon insertion in SILV
is responsible for merle patterning of the domestic dog.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA . January 31,202006.
Dowd,
Scot E, PhD. "Health and the Merle Pattern". American Dog Breeders Association.
Little,
Clarence C. The Inheritance of Coat Color in Dogs. Comstock Publishing, Ithaca NY . 1957. |
Moll, Kathy,
“The Coat of Many Colors” Collies Online, May 2009.
Sharp,
C. A., "Can You See? Inherited Eye Diseases in Aussies", "Genetic Nightmares", "The Trouble with Merle", "White Fright".
Schmutz,
Sheila M. Berryere, Tom G., and Dreger, Dayna L. “MITF and White Spotting in Dogs: A Population Study”. Journal
of Heredity; June 5, 2009.
Sponenberg, DP. “Germinal Reversion of the merle
allele in Australian Shepherd Dogs.” Journal of Heredity, Jan-Feb 1984.
Sponenberg, DP and Lamoreux,
M Lynn, “Inheritance of Tweed, a modification of merle, in Australian Shepherd Dogs.” Journal of Heredity 76.
Strain, George M. "Deafness Prevalence and Pigmentation and Gender Associations in Dog Breeds at Risk”. May 15,
2003. "Hereditary deafness in Dogs and Cats: Causes, Prevalence, and Current Research.” Oct 2, 2003.
"The Merle", United States Border Collie Club Newsletter, Winter 1995.
Willis, Malcolm B. Genetics of the Dog. Howell Book House, Macmillan Publishing Co, 1989.
Willis, Malcolm B., "Merle Chihuahuas-Time to Call a Halt" Our Dogs, Feb. 17, 2005.
Yousha, J. P., "Whites; is it Worth the Risks?". "The Harlequin Family of Dogs: Harls, Merles, Blacks, Whites and More."
Thanks to Sheila
Schmutz, PhD for her expert advise on canine color genetics:
Thanks to JP
Yousha for her color genetics expertise! Your input was invaluable.