| David Rippel specializes in all aspects of family law relating to separation, divorce, children or finances. He offers an extensive range of services that covers pre-nuptial agreements, contact and residential disputes, mediation, child support applications and more. If you need help or advice, please get in touch. There is no charge for the initial interview.
Child Protective Services
Cases
In terms of divorce, there are two types - Contested and Uncontested.
A contested divorce means that the parties cannot agree about
the issues, i.e. property, assets, debts, children, support etc.
Divorce
In terms of divorce, there are two types - Contested and Uncontested.
A contested divorce means that the parties cannot agree about
the issues, i.e. property, assets, debts, children, support etc.
It resembles a standard lawsuit with a trial before a judge. However,
these issues may be resolved at mediation. For a divorce to be
uncontested there must not be any children under the age of 18
and there is an agreement about all of the other issues.
Child Custody
In Texas, it is most common that one parent is the primary residential
parent meaning this is where the child(ren) will live and the
other parent has reasonable, liberal visitation (if no abuse).
Both parents have a shared parental responsibility which means
that important decisions about the child(ren) are decided together.
Child Support
Both parents are responsible for the support of their children.
Texas has child support guidelines. Child support is calculated
by determining the net monthly income of both parents, number
of children, daycare expenses if any and insurance for the children.
Alimony
Either party may be granted alimony. Alimony is either Rehabilitative
Alimony or permanent in nature. The court may consider the adultery
of either spouse and the circumstances thereof in determining
the amount of alimony.
Asset Distribution
In Texas, the proceeding for a dissolution marriage includes the
distribution of marital assets and liabilities between the parties.
The court begins with the premise that these will be divided equally
but if there is justification for an unequal distribution then
it is considered equitable and not necessarily equal.
|