Article 3014 of alt.swedish.chef.bork.bork.bork:
Path: nntp1.best.com!news1.best.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!visi.com!bitstream.net!magumba.bitstream.net!user
From: farookh@bitstream.net (farookh)
Newsgroups: alt.swedish.chef.bork.bork.bork
Subject: Re: Bursty??
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 11:07:31 -0600
Organization: Bitstream Underground
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <farookh-1312961107310001@magumba.bitstream.net>
References: <58c7rd$5lv@henry.digitaal.nl> <32AB7E4C.6C5E@Hotmail.com> <farookh-0912961709160001@magumba.bitstream.net> <32ADF897.7FA8@Hotmail.com> <farookh-1112961117010001@magumba.bitstream.net> <32B020DB.367D@Hotmail.com> <farookh-1212961031370001@magumba.bitstream.net> <58q3e4$8r0@news.nstn.ca> <32B12E25.5A65@Hotmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: magumba.bitstream.net

In article <32B12E25.5A65@Hotmail.com>, VenomX@Hotmail.com wrote:

])>  >Don Buchan wrote:
])>  >> 
])>  >> In article <farookh-1212961031370001@magumba.bitstream.net>,
])>  >>    farookh@bitstream.net (farookh) wrote:
])>  >> >In article <32B020DB.367D@Hotmail.com>, VenomX@Hotmail.com wrote:
])>  >> >
])>  >> >])>  >farookh wrote:
])>  >> >])>  >>
])>  >> >])>  >> In article <32ADF897.7FA8@Hotmail.com>,
VenomX@Hotmail.com wrote:
])>  >> >])>  >>
])>  >> >])>  >> ])>  >farookh wrote:
])>  >> >])>  >> ])>  >>
])>  >> >])>  >> ])>  >> In article <32AB7E4C.6C5E@Hotmail.com>,
VenomX@Hotmail.com
])>  >> >wrote:
])>  >> >])>  >> ])>  >>
])>  >> >])>  >> ])>  >>>>J.B. Ahlers wrote:
])>  >> >])>  >> ])>  >>>>
])>  >> >])>  >> ])>  >>>> Bursty??
])>  >> >])>  >> ])>  >>>
])>  >> >])>  >> ])>  >>>Bursty??
])>  >> >])>  >> ])>  >>
])>  >> >])>  >> ])>  >> i think that's all he said, "bursty??"
])>  >> >])>  >> ])>  >> yep, that was it.
])>  >> >])>  >> ])>  >
])>  >> >])>  >> ])>  >Yep, that's what he said. Bursty.
])>  >> >])>  >>
])>  >> >])>  >> that's what i thought he said, looks like i was correct.
])>  >> >])>  >
])>  >> >])>  >Yep. Looks like it. If you think about it, I was correct too.
])>  >> >
])>  >> >i have thought about it and i would have to agree.
])>  >> >looks like you were correct as well, yes.
])>  >> 
])>  >> I've thought about it myself.  "Bursty" is indeed what was initially
])>  >> enunciated.
])>  > 
])>  >Yes, the majority rules he said "bursty".


so it's 'bursty' then is it? i'm gonna write this down....
... there, now it's easier to remember, you know, once
you write something down once or twice, it kinda sticks
in your memory a bit better.

fb

http://www2.bitstream.net/~farookh/tpv.html