FRONT-WHEEL SENSOR PAIR

Last modified:


INTRODUCTION

Inspection of the Front Wheel Assembly has revealed a tricky mechanism that is capable of actuating both, a wheel-down sensing system, and a wheel-revolution sensing system with a single, reciprocating rod. In this section, we look at what has likely turned out to be an electro-optic assembly which transforms the up / down motions of the wheel's push-rod into electrical signals. To be more precise, we won't actually "look" at the dual-sensor's ingredients, but rather deduce what they are by using physical evidence, experience, and common sense.

Dual-Sensors Assembly

Figure 1 illustrates the forward (1-a) and aft (1-b) faces of the subject sensor module. In (1-a), the black Cap hides the parts we need to see; but, by looking at the aft face, we can see that the Cap has been fusion-staked to the PWB (see three pads on the foil-side, each about 3-mm dia.). It would, therefore, require a bit of destructive work to remove the Cap, and a little more work to renew the staking with an equivalent retention method. Hence, that effort gave sufficient deterrent to ward off further investigation -- until a closer look at the silk-screened letters on the PWB revealed the information-path!

    Figure 1-a. Wheel's Push-Rod Actuates Sensors Behind Black Cap           Figure 1-b. Sensor-Parts Under Cap, Mount on this PWB

Fortuitously, the PWB-engineer labeled the group of eight solder pads near the upper-end of the PWB. Readers will have a hard time resolving the letters in the provided, low-resolution, image, but take our word, the pads at the left edge of the PWB are labeled (upper to lower): "E","C", "E", "C"; and the right-column of pads are labeled (upper to lower), "A", "K", "A", "K". And that tells us, as any 'elektroniker' would, there is a diode connected between each A-K (Anode & "K"athode) pad-pair; and since we are studying a sensor, those diodes are likely Light-Emitting Diodes, (LED)! Knowing that much, we say "there ought to be a pair of photo-transistors, (PT), opposite those LEDs, and looking right at them". So, we now recognize the pair of E-C letters as marking the Emitter and Collector, lead positions, for our two PTs! There you have it! We have a stimulus and a detector (slotted, optical-switch) combination, and we deduce these four devices must be packaged as side-lookers -- just like the LED & PT packages seen in the Tachometer Assembly section (Figs.3 & 4). Now, all that's needed is a translatable beam-shutter; to block / un-block one IR-beam, and to modulate the other IR-beam -- depending on what the caster-wheel is doing.

The Sliding Shutter

We must now envision what the beam-shutter might look like. For 'starters', we may say it is a rectangular-block of opaque plastic; and with a hole, about two- to three-millimeters in diameter, passing through the block, from one narrow side-face to the opposite side. Of course it must be sized to fit between the EO-devices, and to slide up and down, as the Wheel-Assembly's push-rod position dictates. It must also be thin enough to fit under the Cap, and a spring must be included to force the block down as the push-rod lowers. If we study Figure 1-b some more, the following information may be deduced:

  1. Block-guide / Lens' Guard: Notice the circular, black dots interior to the two columns of solder-pads. Those are the ends of "pins", cast as part of the black Cap, passing through registration-holes in the PWB. It is reasonable to assume that those four pins also relate to surfaces within the Cap, that serve to guide the sliding-shutter, and to prevent it rubbing on the PT and LED lenses. With those assumptions in mind, we can claim the the left-right width of the block will later be discovered to be a millimeter, or two, less than the horizontal span between left and right pin-pairs.
  2. Scaling-Data: Fairly accurate PWB-scaling information may be obtained by use of the pin-separations of the side-looking EO-devices. Looking at their data sheet(s), we find their leads are spaced 2.52-mm. Further, but without actually measuring, the vertical spacing between adjacent PTs' leads, and LEDs' leads, is such that those neighboring devices are also, approximately, 2.5-mm apart. So, that all goes together to allow us to say the vertical separation between the lower light-beam-axis, and the upper one, is on the order of 5-mm.
  3. Upper & Lower Beam Functions: BTW, we are adopting the notion that an open light-path equates to the logic HI condition (The inverse logic may be used. Which logic is actually in use, is not important to this discussion.). IOW, when the shutter-hole is aligned with the lower beam, the PT's signal would alert the Controller about a dropped Front Wheel. Then, as the "knee-action" travel of the caster-wheel is pushed up to its limit, the push-rod elevates the shutter-block, thus moving the cross-hole off axis to block the lower, light-beam -- which signals the Controller: "the front-wheel is UP".
    When the wheel is elevated to its running height, the push-rod and shutter-block have moved upward about five-millimeters, with respect to the wheel-down position. At that point, the cross-hole may be aligned to the upper-beam's axis or not. However, as Scooba starts traveling, the wheel's rotation will crank the push-rod up and down, and (presumably) translate the cross-hole in and out of the upper beam-path. The upper PT's signal, HI, LO, HI... with each revolution, can then be counted by the Controller.
  4. Cross-hole's Location: If everyone buys into that story, we can claim that the cross-hole must be located very close to the top of the shutter-block. The reason for that is: The upper face of the block can't go much higher than the upper pair of "pins", else it will hit the top wall of the Cap. Therefore, the cross-hole has to be near that top-face, so the hole is in a position to modulate the upper-beam.

The above description ought to be reasonably accurate. If any owner has cause to peel the Cap off his Scooba's Wheel-Sensor Module, we would be interested in seeing photographs of its interior. Now let us talk about replacing those EO- components.

Replacement Electro-Optics

Let us be clear at the start of this paragraph -- we do not know exactly what LED and PT are built into this sensor module. Thus, we cannot say exactly what parts may be used to replace a duff LED or PT. However, it seems reasonable to make the following statements, which will then form a basis for offering suggested replacement-parts:

The nice thing about failures of these devices is this is one of the few items that an owner stands to be able to repair! Here are some EVERLIGHT part-numbers that have been found to fit and work for replacing similar Roomba parts:

Everlight, Side-looking IR-LED: P/N = EL-IR928-6C; in USA proc. from www.mouser.com .

Everlight, Side-looking Photo-transistor: P/N = EL-PT928-6C; in USA proc. from www.mouser.com .

The PT is the more expensive part, of the two. Its unit price, in 2005-2006, was-is $0.22! :-)


If you wish to return to the main (Scooba Technical Comments) document, click Main

Otherwise you may return by pressing the 'Backspace' key.


This page is currently maintained by G. Plews