Oil and Gas Drilling In Madison County Info
Home
What's the Blue Line
TLA Newsletter Spring 2012
Dam Safety
Tioughnioga Lake Preservation Foundation update
Labor Day 2010
Ice Warning Notice
Oil and Gas Drilling In Madison County Info
Camp For Sale
LAKE LEVEL - Readings courtesy of Sue & Bill Orzell
What do I get for my Dues?
DeRuyter Lake Links
Calendar of Events 2012
DEC Trash and Leaf Burning Prohibition
Why Should I Secure My Boat?
1989, 1990 and 1991 Dam Repair Project
2009 Central Region CSLAP Report 2.9 mb in pdf and Deruyter Lake Specific Report 1.1mb in pdf.
The Eagle(s) Have Landed
Save The Islands 1998
1999 Start Of The Big Island
Save The Island Photos- Final 2000

Link To Madison County NATURAL GAS DEVELOPMENT WORKING GROUP Gas drilling map and FAQ's

The Letter Below Is Offered By The Town Attorney
 
The following letter, written by Attorney Denton, is available to all who have received a force majeure letter from Norse Energy. The gas company has decided to use Executive Order #41 as means to justify the force majeure clause on the gas lease. As you can see, the attorney feels that this is not allowable and he has asked that this letter be made available to all lease holders. If you received a letter from Norse, or any other gas company, with notice of a force majeure, feel free to use this letter as a template for your reply.
As with all leasing issues, the Town of DeRyter highly suggests that you seek advice of your personal attorney. It is your property and you should take the steps required to protect you rights to the property.
 
To Norse Energy
 
Dear Sir or Madam:
We have read the letter dated January 10, 2011 which was not signed and which did not indicate which officer or employee was acting as agent for the corporation.  As you are aware, a corporation is an artificial legal entity created with the permission of the State; and therefore no acts of the corporation are valid unless carried out by human agents acting on the behalf of the corporation.  Your letter does not indicate that an employee or agent signed on behalf of the corporation.  We must therefore assume that the letter is a draft and not the final letter.   As a consequence it has no force or effect until signed by a human being acting on behalf of the corporation, whether officer, director or employee with an indication of the authority held by the signer.
For future reference, you may want to review the substance of the letter before you delegate someone to sign on behalf of the corporation.  You have misread the law and the executive order # 41.   There is no moratorium on drilling and fracking in New York State, therefore there is no Force Majeure event.
The Executive Order only removes the "short cut" method of obtaining a drilling permit.  The Generic Environmental Impact Statement which commonly allows a shortened period for the consideration and granting of a drilling permit did not originally address environmental impacts associated with high-volume hydraulic fracturing combined with horizontal drilling.  This has been known to the industry for many years.  Well drilling permits can still be obtained by complying with the normal  'site specific'  SEQRA requirements, which have never disappeared nor been rescinded.   In addition well permits are currently being issued for all wells which do not require high-volume hydraulic fracturing combined with horizontal drilling.  The fact that the "old way" of having to comply with SEQRA by the performance of a site specific EIS is still in existence belies your contention that an event of Force Majeure has occurred. 
You may obtain a drilling permit under the current Executive Order; it simply will take more time and money.  Incidentally, a prominent environmental scientist in the oil and gas industry has repeatedly asserted that once one site specific EIS has been performed that it can serve as a template for all subsequent site specific EIS's at other sites.  He also asserts that such an EIS would take about six months.  Once one EIS has established the common environmental concerns in a "gas field"  all the future EIS's need only insert the site specific variations.  Such subsequent EIS's would take far less time.  This is not rocket science and is commonly done under SEQRA. 
Force majeure is an equitable concept which originated to allow someone who had an obligation under a contract to be relieved 'temporarily' from that obligation when an event, so tragic, so unexpected, so unforeseen, and uninsurable occurred.  Norse has asserted no obligation which it cannot perform.  Without identifying specifically the obligation required of Norse of which Norse seeks to avoid, there can be no obligation which force majeure can act upon.  As Norse has neglected or refused to identify the obligation from which it has it is to be relieved, Norse's letter is of no effect.
The Executive Order is also only an extension of a preexisting order issued several years ago.  Force majeure is an equitable defense under the laws of New York State.  In order to claim force majeure as an equitable defense Norse "must have given equity to receive equity".  Norse's claim of Force Majeure is not timely and at this late date constitutes laches.  The Lessors in the community have relied on the fact that Norse has done nothing to assert Force Majeure in the previous two and one half years of the existence of the original Executive Order.  Moreover, if you at Norse thought that the Executive Orders were invalid or a violation of law, Norse had 120 days from the issuance of the Executive Orders to challenge it by way of an Article 78 proceeding under the NYCPLR.  That time has long passed for the original Executive Order and is still running for the second.  If the recent Executive Order #41, is considered a new order, then Norse must first exhaust all its remedies and seek mandamus relief from the Order by commencing litigation against the State of New York and filing claims with the NY Court of Claims for damages for a 'taking".  Norse could prevail in those suits.
In addition, Norse is not prevented from drilling and completing as there is still available fracking by use of propane gas, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide when combined with horizontal drilling.  The law never has guaranted the use of any specific technology.
Lastly, the letter of January 10, 2011 is a disingenuous attempt to transmute low natural gas prices and a natural gas supply glut and its consequent lack of economic profit into a force majeure event.  Neither a gas glut nor low prices for natural gas constitute a tragic, unexpected, unforeseen and uninsurable event.  In fact Norse commonly buys 'hedges" (a form of unregulated insurance policy to guarantee a certain sale price of its natural gas) to guard against market fluctuations.
Based on the facts set forth above, there is no event of Force Majeure.
We are returning your checks herein.
Very truly yours
___________________
Lessor