WILL
USING AN ARCHITECT SAVE MONEY?
Everyone who has ever considered using an architect
for a small project asks this question. The answer is not simple;
there are projects where an architect may, in fact, represent
an unnecessary expense.
An architect can help you get a better result for
the money that you spend, but will not necessarily save you money
out of pocket. After all, an architect is an additional cost;
additional costs do not usually save money, at least initially.
An architect will, however, help you produce a finished product
that looks better, works better, and meets your needs and desires
more closely.
Particularly when it comes to rehabilitating and
extending old buildings, the time and knowledge required to investigate
and understand what already exists, and to design and specify
changes that respect the building while adapting it to its owner's
program will not be inexpensive, but at the same time may save
money that would otherwise be wasted on unnecessary work and inappropriate
solutions.
A colleague uses an analogy with men's suits. For
one price you can buy a suit off the rack that will look respectable
and fit its average-build wearer reasonably well. If, however,
you are hard to fit, or if you want an unusual style or material,
an off-the-rack suit will not suffice; custom tailoring is essential.
A similar situation applies to buildings: if the
functional, esthetic, and technical needs are simple and routine,
and the building is small, an architect may not add sufficient
value to the finished product to justify the expense. On the other
hand, if the situation is more complex or unusual, money spent
for a sensitive and knowledgeable architect's "custom tailoring"
may make the difference between a winning project and an also-ran.
Back to the top
Return to contents
Return to index
A
MATTER OF PROPORTION
Several years ago we enlarged a house nearby, nearly
doubling its size. I recently visited it with a friend, who commented
on how well she thought the new space went with the old. Her remark
pointed up a critical concern in designing or adding to any building:
Scale.
Scale is the relation among the parts of some larger
entity. A well-scaled thing, whether large or small, presents
a sense of rightness and harmony, while one that is not is--subtly
or sometimes grossly--off balance and unpleasant.
Scale has much to do with proportion and relative
size, and almost nothing to do with absolute size or elaborateness.
Appropriate and harmonious scale is therefore as attainable and
important in a tiny cottage as in a mansion.
An important part of extending a building
rather than merely adding to it is getting the scale
of the new space right, so that the enlarged structure will be
one thing, rather than two objects in collision. The house I just
mentioned was very small. The three principal rooms in each story,
however, were in scale with each other and with the house, which
had a warm and cozy charm.
The challenge came when the owners wanted to double
its size with an addition that would have one principal
room per story--rooms more than twice the size of the existing
ones. Our job was to integrate those new rooms into the house
in such a way that they neither appeared unduly large for the
rest of the house nor made the original rooms seem cramped and
nasty by comparison.
In a rush of bombast, someone once referred to architecture
as "frozen music." Behind that silly language lies an important
idea: Harmonious proportion and scale are an integral part of
good building. This is true whether the building inquestion is
large and lavish or small and sparse. We take this matter of proportion
very seriously in our design work.
Back to the top
Return to contents
Return to index
ARCHITECTURE
AS A THOUGHTFUL DISCIPLINE
A university seeking a new faculty member recently
placed an advertisement calling for an architect who had been
engaged in "the practice of architecture as a thoughtful discipline."
What an apt characterization of what professional practice ideally
ought to be!
Especially when old and antique buildings are involved,
thoughtfulness--taking the time to consider what the building
is, how it is significant, and how its owner's needs can be met
in the least stressful way--is critical to a successful project.
Perhaps when erecting a speculative office building designed to
last no longer than the mortgage, architecture need not be a thoughtful
discipline (although if it were, perhaps new buildings would be
more pleasant to see and use), but when a building has been around
for one hundred years, or two, or three, there's not much question
that thoughtful discipline is essential to keeping it around and
useful for another hundred.
A prospective client once asked a museum director
for whom we had worked about how we practiced preservation architecture.
His response nicely summarized the way we try to operate: "If
you are looking to get your project done 'quick and dirty,' run,
don't walk, in the other direction! If you want to have it done
thoroughly, thoughtfully, and skillfully, though, use him."
I try very hard to live up to that recommendation.
Back to the top
Return to contents
Return to index
QUICK
HELP
Many problems involving old and antique buildings
can benefit from professional help, but don't call for full architectural
services. In situations like these, a brief consultation with
an expert may be the answer. We enjoy doing such consultations;
they are an important part of our practice. In the past months
we've dealt with matters like these: