The New York Times > Opinion > Op-Ed Columnist: No Surrender

Kruggy-baby, you are indeed a moron. Let's take a moment to rip apart your feeble attempts at trying to be a smart little feller.

"President Bush isn't a conservative. He's a radical - the leader of a coalition that deeply dislikes America as it is."

Ok, so President Bush (and doesn't that sound better than President-elect Kerry? Come on Kruggy, admit it.) Fact is, Kruggy, you are the one who hates American as it is. You hate the fact that while you are such a brilliant analyst and academic, the majority of the rest of the country disagrees with you. You hate the fact that your anti-gun, big government, tax (and hate) the rich viewpoints were dealt a serious blow this week. You hate the fact that you are oh-so-smart (and smarmy) and that all of us less than intelligent voters out here voted for the President, and not the pathetic excuse of a candidate that your party (and paper) attempted to prop up.

"And thanks to a heavy turnout by evangelical Christians, Mr. Bush has four more years to advance that radical agenda."

I know hundreds of people personally that all voted for Bush. The vast majority of them don't even go to Church. And, pray tell Kruggy baby, just what the radical evangelical agenda is?? No embryonic stem cell research? No partial birth abortions?? Fact is, the vast majority of Americans support the President's positions. Maybe we're just not as smart as you to figure out why we shouldn't have.

"This election did not prove the Republicans unbeatable. Mr. Bush did not win in a landslide. Without the fading but still potent aura of 9/11, when the nation was ready to rally around any leader, he wouldn't have won at all. And future events will almost surely offer opportunities for a Democratic comeback."

Umm, so tell me exactly how, Kruggy baby, that the Republicans are beatable on the national level?? Bush won more votes than any president. Ever. Bush won the first majority of votes since 1988. I don't seem to remember Blowjob Bill ever doing that. Bush's coattails picked up the first Senatorial seat in Louisiana since reconstruction. That'd be 1877, Kruggy. Those same coattails also kicked out the Senate minority leader - the first time since 1952 that's happened. Bush was the first president since the 1930s to both win re-election AND pick up House and Senate seats. Now, if that's not a landslide victory, maybe you should reconsider. Do I gather from the last sentance there that you are hoping for "future events"?

"The resurgence of Al Qaeda, the debacle in Iraq, the explosion of the budget deficit and the failure to create jobs weren't things that just happened to occur on Mr. Bush's watch. They were the consequences of bad policies made by people who let ideology trump reality."

Here's a reality check for you, Kruggy baby. The resurgence of AlQaeda?? Are you talking about the laughable video tape filmed in a cave somewhere?? The debacle in Iraq?? Yes, there are still assholes over there being killed every time they poke their stinky heads out of their holes. Maybe you didn't hear about the running gunbattle in Plano yesterday so similar to what's being reported in Iraq, but I trust we're not worried about the future stability of the greater Metroplex region. Failure to create jobs?? Maybe you didn't see the job report that came out this morning? Bill Clinton's 5.4% un-employment was stellar, the best ever, yet Bush's 5.4% is tragic somehow? Sounds like you're the one letting ideology trump reality.

I could go on, but unlike you, I have to go to work now.

Oh yeah, by the way, when are you going to show back up on the O'Reilly factor and get your ass kicked again?