Karen de Balbian Verster author & artist

HOME | BIO | PUBLICATIONS | REVIEWS | NOVEL #1 EXCERPT | NOVEL #2 EXCERPT | NOVEL #3 EXCERPT | POETRY | BOOK CLUBS | MY CANCER CURE | MY SPIRITUAL JOURNEY | ART EXHIBITS | PORTRAITS | WORKS ON PAPER | FAMILY | deBV HISTORY | CONTACT ME
Archive Newer | Older

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

MYLIE CYRUS AND APOLOGIES IN GENERAL

In my jaundiced eyes, Mylie Cyrus’s apology seems like just another one of those mea culpas issued only because everyone, i.e. everyone on whom she depends for income, got upset. It was a Pyrrhic apology, like when criminals get all repentant only after they’re sentenced to prison. If Eliot Spitzer hadn’t been caught, would he have apologized to his constituents? If no one had batted an eye when Jane Fonda said “cunt” on The Today Show would she have apologized? (Even so, should she have apologized?)

The conundrum is that Mylie Cyrus is like a girl who can’t live alone (even though she has her own living quarters apart from her family) so she’s courting her next boyfriend before ditching the old one. She’s fifteen (one year younger than the pregnant Jamie Lynn Spears AKA Zoey 101) and her Hannah Montana days are numbered. But she’s made a mint as Hannah Montana and who knows what lies ahead? Hollywood is haunted by former teen idols (from Shirley Temple to Lindsey Lohan) who were unable to successfully transition into adult careers.

Before all the brouhaha, Mylie Cyrus, in the upcoming Vanity Fair article, written by Bruce Handy, was quoted as saying, "Annie [Leibovitz] took, like, a beautiful shot, and I thought it was really cool. That's what she wanted me to do, and you can't say no to Annie. I think it's really artsy. It wasn't in a skanky way."

After the shit hit the fans, she recanted, saying, "I took part in a photo shoot that was supposed to be 'artistic' and now, seeing the photographs and reading the story, I feel so embarrassed. I never intended for any of this to happen and I apologize to my fans who I care so deeply about."

Well, of course, she cares “so deeply” about her (shit-covered) fans since they are her cash cow. (Is there any other reason to care about fans when you get to her level of celebrity-dom?) But would she have felt it necessary to apologize if it was the AARP who objected to the photos?

These cover-your-ass apologies seem to be more and more de rigueur these days but to have less and less substance and sincerity. I wonder if they’re ultimately undermining the value of a good, old-fashioned, direct amends which seems to be thriving only in 12-Step programs (and even there it is an endangered species of communication).

Eliot Spitzer certainly owed an apology to his wife but why couldn’t he have done it in the privacy of his own home instead of humiliating her in public? I assume the answer is that it’s easier to stare a camera in the eye and confess to anonymous millions who can’t talk back than to face one single, dear face and possibly get rebuffed.

As one who has gone out of her way to make many sincere and direct amends in order to clear away the wreckage of my past, I feel that these people are missing out on a unique spiritual opportunity. For alcoholics, the Big Book promises that “If we are painstaking about this phase of our development [i.e. the amends process], we will be amazed before we are halfway through. We are going to know a new freedom and a new happiness. We will not regret the past nor wish to shut the door on it. We will comprehend the word serenity and we will know peace. No matter how far down the scale we have gone, we will see how our experience can benefit others. That feeling of uselessness and self-pity will disappear. We will lose interest in selfish things and gain interest in our fellows. Self-seeking will slip away. Our whole attitude and outlook upon life will change. Fear of people and of economic insecurity will leave us. We will intuitively know how to handle situations which used to baffle us. We will suddenly realize that god is doing for us what we could not do for ourselves.

“Are these extravagant promises? We think not. They are being fulfilled among us – sometimes quickly, sometimes slowly. They will always materialize if we work for them.”

Ah, work for them – key word, work. As I discovered with most worthwhile things such as my relationship with God and my husband of twenty-four years, you can never rest on your laurels. It’s work and more work.

Speaking of my husband (sly segue), here’s a little something from the Internet about men. Disclaimer: this does not reflect my views about my husband, or men in general.

WHY MEN ARE JUST HAPPIER PEOPLE

What do you expect from such wonderful creatures? 

Your last name stays put. 

The garage is all yours.

Wedding plans take care of themselves.

Chocolate is just another snack. 

You can be President.

You can never be pregnant.

You can wear a white T-shirt to a water park. You can wear NO shirt to a water park. 

Car mechanics tell you the truth.

The world is your urinal. 

You never have to drive to another gas station restroom because this one is just too icky.

You don't have to stop and think of which way to turn a nut on a bolt.

Same work, more pay.

Wrinkles add character. 

Wedding dress R5000. Tux rental- R100.

People never stare at your chest when you're talking to them.

The occasional well-rendered belch is practically expected.

New shoes don't cut, blister, or mangle your feet.

One mood all the time.

Phone conversations are over in 30 seconds flat.

You know stuff about tanks. 

A five-day vacation requires only one suitcase.

You can open all your own jars.

You get extra credit for the slightest act of thoughtfulness.

If someone forgets to invite you, he or she can still be your friend.

Your underwear is R18.95 for a three-pack.

Three pairs of shoes are more than enough.

You almost never have strap problems in public.

You are unable to see wrinkles in your clothes.

Everything on your face stays its original color.

The same hairstyle lasts for years, maybe decades.

You only have to shave your face and neck.

You can play with toys all your life.

Your belly usually hides your big hips.

One wallet and one pair of shoes -- one color for all seasons.

You can wear shorts no matter how your legs look.

You can "do" your nails with a pocket knife.

You have freedom of choice concerning growing a mustache.

You can do Christmas shopping for 25 relatives on December 24 in 25 minutes. 

No wonder men are happier!!

 

3:29 pm est

Friday, April 25, 2008

GUEST BLOG: SOUTH AFRICAN HAIKUS

Haiku’s on our landscape: the Land Art of Strijdom van der Merwe

Right on the doorstep of Oudtshoorn a couple of signs read “Haikoes.” Nothing else. The more curious among us would venture up the winding gravel road to see why Japanese poetry might be presented in Afrikaans, but not a great many. According to Strijdom van der Merwe, acclaimed land artist (among other things), this is fine with him – he prefers to be away from the maddening crowd (!). Strijdom has a message, one that travels the world, such an exhibition sponsored by the United Nations is “visiting” Europe right now. Strijdom feels that those who appreciate the subtleties, the silence, the small variations on the canvas of nature, will venture out to the high ground where he has set up an ensemble of 163 white canvas sheets on which haiku’s by 45 poets have been printed. All around are the blue of sky and mountains and underfoot the soft shades of khaki of the Klein Karoo’s humble but powerfully resilient vegetation.

Although no Greenie, Strijdom want people to look at his work – there has been a canvas shelter erected for that purpose – and to listen. Listen to the wind beating at the canvas, the singing of the wires, the rustling of leaves and tiny feet: nature breathing, moving, living.

Land art started with artists making huge holes in the ground, but eventually the approach has become more subtle – it’s not the impact we make on the land so much as the impact the land makes on us, according to some artists. True enough, but nowadays we are impacting heavily on Mother Earth. With Strijdom things have come full circle in more than one way – he has returned to the veld which he remembers from childhood, although in another milieu, that of Meyerton, Gauteng, and he has also come back to Oudtshoorn, where has last exhibited a decade ago. Most importantly he reminds us of our blessings and responsibilities – of our collective footprint deep into the bosom of our world.

That’s why he says that when he lies on this deathbed, he will want to know that he has done everything he could to evolve as a human being; to experience a variety of landscapes (he is a intrepid traveler), be influenced by others (this explains the international content and structure of his work) and to have subtly touched (influenced) others.

Monet had to paint several works to depict the changing of light effects during different times of the day, but Strijdom’s “prayer flags” are changed by nature herself – as if breathing, moving, living …

“So, Strijdom,” I ask, “which project is your favourite?” He smiles “The one I am going to do next. Always.” I certainly hope there will be many more.

The author: Dr Francois Verster, company archivist of Naspers, former teacher at Ladismith High and one of the 45 poets mentioned. [Note: Francois and I found each other on the internet and believe we are distantly related.]

11:26 am est

Friday, April 18, 2008

KARMA IS A BOOMERANG

KARMA IS A BOOMERANG

While working at a music licensing firm early in my career, I was asked, as Manager of Advertising & Public Relations, to secure a subscription to a design magazine. I selected an over-sized, beautifully designed quarterly and sent in the subscription form. I can’t remember the details but there was a snafu in the billing. I kept writing letters to the billing department and the problem was not resolved. Finally, I wrote an aggrieved letter to the editor, detailing the shortcomings of his organization (one might well wonder why I was so hell-bent on retrieving what probably amounted to about twenty-five dollars of someone else’s money but then that person might well be unfamiliar with the dynamics of self-righteous anger), to which the editor replied, “You are the most unpleasant person I’ve ever encountered.” That comment felt like an undeserved slap in the face and it throbbed in my psyche for years. But I know now that I was an angry person who had no outlet for my anger unless it seemed justified, and I was also unaware that I was an angry person so it leaked out unbeknownst to me in seemingly harmless interactions.

Recently, I had an experience that brought this editor’s comment to mind. It all started out so wonderfully with this woman – we were comrades-in-arms, new friends who’d met in an online class – and she asked me to contribute an article about my decision to write a novel versus a memoir to her e-zine. I read through some back issues to get an idea of tone and content, and then submitted my first attempt. She gave me lengthy, detailed notes explaining how I’d missed the mark (which included my inclusion of self-promotion), and again referred me to her e-zine for tone and content. It was not my intention to self-promote but I found it difficult to write about my novel without referring to it so I returned to her e-zine for another check on tone and content, copied her notes into my word file and scrupulously incorporated them into my next attempt. Still not right. Still too much self-promotion. More lengthy, detailed notes explaining how the things I’d added at her suggestion had apparently worsened rather than enhanced the article. (By this time I was starting to feel guilty about the volume of feedback my failures had engendered.) She also commented in a helpful way that she could now see why I hadn’t succeeded in one of the class assignments since it required the kind of finesse I was demonstrating a complete lack of. As further evidence of my all-consuming self-promotion, it seemed she thought I was intentionally trying to override her guidelines and take over her e-zine: I gather that you perceived my explaining what I wanted as my being defensive about the e-zine, but I assure you, I was not apologizing for my e-zine 's standards, nor offering to let a contributing author bend them; I was merely asserting what they were.

I was exceedingly frustrated because, quite the opposite of carrying out my own agenda, I was trying very hard to please her, and I sent her an email to that effect, expressing my concern that we were getting off-track in our attempts to communicate with each other. Then, suddenly liberated by the feeling I had nothing to lose, I went through my article with a machete and took out any specific mention of my novel, which I also sent to her. She responded with a finite rejection, saying that my piece might be good for writers seeking inspiration but not for writers seeking practical advice, and she added, I'm sorry that you've found the process frustrating, and that you felt that my trying to give some practical guidance about how to appeal to my readers was "seriously off-track." Since literally every sentence of the message that provoked this comment was directly about how to revise the essay you had sent me, I don't quite understand how it could possibly have been off-track.

To me, her message indicated that we were so off-track we were at an impasse, an impasse that seemingly came out of nowhere. How had it happened? I was reminded of an event that occurred in my late teens. I was walking down the street, totally oblivious to my surroundings and slowly it began to dawn on me that something wasn’t right. I stopped, looked down and saw that I’d walked about six feet into wet cement. Feeling incredibly foolish (and dismayed that I’d ruined a new pair of boots) I tried without success to backtrack my way out of the situation in such a way as to diminish the damage that had already occurred.

Marianne Williamson writes in A Return to Love, “To the extent that we abandon love, to that extent we will feel it has abandoned us” (33). Ironically, my mother (who lives with me) and I are getting along better than ever but this is the third surrogate mother with whom I’ve had a run-in in a very short time so I’m forced to examine my part in this. Here’s a quote from Alcoholics Anonymous (a profound book of wisdom for alcoholics and non-alcoholics alike) that sums up the situation:

“The first requirement is that we be convinced that any life run on self-will can hardly be a success. On that basis we are almost always in collision with something or somebody, even though our motives are good. Most people try to live by self-propulsion. Each person is like an actor who wants to run the whole show; is forever trying to arrange the lights, the ballet, the scenery and the rest of the players in his own way. If his arrangements would only stay put, if only people would do as he wished, the show would be great. Everybody, including himself, would be pleased. Life would be wonderful. In trying to make these arrangements our actor may sometimes be quite virtuous. He may be kind, considerate, patient, generous; even modest and self-sacrificing. On the other hand, he may be mean, egotistical, selfish and dishonest. But, as with most humans, he is more likely to have varied traits.

“What usually happens? The show doesn’t come off very well. He begins to think life doesn’t treat him right. He decides to exert himself still more. He becomes, on the next occasion, still more demanding or gracious as the case may be. Still the play does not suit him. Admitting he may be somewhat at fault, he is sure that other people are more to blame. He becomes angry, indignant, self-pitying. What is his basic trouble? Is he not really a self-seeker even when trying to be kind? Is he not a victim of delusion that he can wrest satisfaction and happiness out of this world if only he manages well? Is it not evident to all the rest of the players that these are the things he wants? And do not his actions make each of them wish to retaliate, snatching all they can get out of the show? Is he not, even in his best moments, a producer of confusion rather than harmony?” (60-61).

When I relayed this saga to my fourteen year old daughter, she said, Mom, I think you’re a people pleaser. When I relayed this saga to my spiritual adviser, she said, Karen, I think you’re a people pleaser. Still, I asked myself why so many people I perceived as being unpleasant were in my path. I found an answer to this question in A Return to Love: "Sometimes people think that calling on God means inviting a force into our lives that will make everything rosy. The truth is it means inviting everything into our lives that which will force us to grow -- and growth can be messy. The purpose of life is to grow into our perfection. Once we call on God, everything that could anger us is on the way. Why? Because the place where we go into anger, instead of love, is our wall. Any situation that pushes our buttons is a situation where we don't yet have the capacity to be unconditionally loving. It's the Holy Spirit's job to draw our attention to that, and help us move beyond that point" (35).

I’m not a firm believer in karma, but if I were, my interchanges with these woman would be proof. As it is, I suppose they are merely reflections of me, and as such are providing me with the growth opportunity to see my character defects in action. As Alcoholics Anonymous advises, “Avoid then, the deliberate manufacture of misery, but if trouble comes, cheerfully capitalize it as an opportunity to demonstrate His omnipotence” (133).

VOTED BEST JOKE IN AUSTRALIA

I have a hard time throwing anything away – even junk e-mail – but I never forward these things willy-nilly to everyone on my contact list! If they are extremely noteworthy I’ll send them to one or two specific people who seem to like such things. Now I’ve got a better solution – I’ll put them in my blog which will serve two purposes: preserving the deserving ones for posterity and doing my part to keep in-boxes clutter-free.

I received this email, voted best joke in Australia, from my South African “cousin”:

A man walks into his bedroom with a sheep under his arm and says, "Darling, this is the pig I have sex with when you have a headache."

His wife, who is lying in bed, replies, "I think you'll find that's a sheep, you idiot."

The man says, "I think you'll find that I wasn't talking to you."

I will end by saying how much I despise e-mail chain letters, especially the ones that threaten me with bad karma if I don’t forward them. I used to return to sender with an apology for my lack of enthusiasm for such things. Now I delete sight unseen, karma be damned. The current wisdom would have it that karma is a boomerang which I find judgmental and redundant because it presumes: 1) we are punished for bad behavior by some avenging deity, and 2) that we are then punished by the karma itself returning in flight. (You can’t eat your cake and have it, too.) However, it appears that the best joke in Australia is a boomerang since it seems to be on its way back from whence it came.

4:53 pm est

Monday, April 14, 2008

MIND YOUR Ps & Qs

I’ve only been blogging a short while but it’s already clear to me that humble pie must become a staple diet of the blogger, the Internet user, and the e-mailer. One has to mind one’s Ps & Qs and I don’t mean pints and quarts, but, rather, the keyboard where restraint of pen and tongue is required now more than ever since often one is corresponding with someone who is a stranger, and therefore less likely to grant one the latitude of a friend.

I was fortunate to have something I’d written called to my attention by a person who had every right to be aggrieved by it, yet was gracious enough to call and find out if I really meant what I’d written. I was grateful that this person came to me with the intention of healing the situation and minimizing its gossip potential. I also appreciated the way this person handled the call – by being direct and open without being judgmental so it allowed me to hear another point of view. I went back and re-read what I’d written and realized that it was much harsher than I’d intended so I revised it.

Believe it or not, I was extremely passive for most of my life and somehow menopause has lifted my fear of what people think of me so I’m reveling in “letting it all hang out,” but also working on bringing the pendulum back to the middle.

I’ve been a journal writer for many years so I’m used to poring my guts out on the page, both parchment and electronic, and this act for me is like hang-gliding – a virtuoso soaring on the wind currents of my own hot air. Therefore, it’s easy for me to overlook the fact that more judicious editing is required in a blog since it, unlike my journal, will be readily accessible to all who care to read it.

My goal is to become a producer of harmony rather than confusion, however, I have to wonder if there something I’m gaining from being a producer of confusion. This reminds me of the time I was in the third grade and there was a girl who came in wearing a ring she’d received. At that time, an eight year old girl who possessed a ring was the Paris Hilton of the class. Well, everyone oohed and aahed over it ad infinitum and then she must’ve put it down somewhere and one of the students must’ve officiously put it in the lost and found box where I stumbled upon it. My first thought was of annoyance – who in that class could possibly not know that ring belonged to her and why didn’t they just give it directly to her? And then against my will, almost, I stole it. I really didn’t want the ring and certainly everyone would know it wasn’t mine so I could never wear it even if I did so I don’t know why I stole it. But perhaps what I wanted was the attention I got by stealing the ring, even if it was negative attention, which certainly outshone any attention she’d gotten by having the ring.

I stuck the ring in a drawstring bag that the teacher required every student’s mother to make to hold pencils and crayons and such which was draped on the back of my chair. The student finally noticed her ring was gone – was she in a coma? – and a hue and cry went up, as first the students and then the teacher searched high and low. Oh, it was gruesome. Finally, the teacher had each row of students go outside while other students searched their desks. It was excruciating to watch row after row get up and leave, knowing I would soon be next yet I was unable to move or speak. And then I was with the other students from my row standing shivering outside as I leaned against a rough brick wall, my mind a rat scrabbling at a metal barrier. And then I was in front of the classroom which was silent and airless as an oven on broil while the teacher excoriated me for a thief and a liar and reminded the class where people like me went straight to. And then my parents were hovering over me, wringing their hands, castigating themselves for not setting a better example, my father wondering if his stealing wooden hotel hangers had had a negative influence on me when all along it was something much deeper.

Perhaps I’m the kind of person who thrives on other people’s attention. Perhaps I’m unable to handle positive attention so I create scenarios that generate negative attention. Perhaps I should learn to cultivate an appreciation for God’s attention.

6:50 pm est

Wednesday, April 2, 2008

ON GRATITUDE AND WRITER'S CRAMP

I just got my social security statement, and the good news is that if I work until I’m 70 I’ll get about $1154 a month. The bad news is that “The law governing benefit amounts may change because, by 2041 [when I’ll be 87], the payroll taxes collected will be enough to pay only about 75% of scheduled benefits.”

Okay, let’s start with the good news first. Some years ago, my husband and I met with a financial planner who asked us when we planned to retire. Brian and I looked at each other and said, never. I can’t imagine not pursuing some kind of creative endeavor, however, my creative endeavors have so far not been very financially rewarding. Then the planner asked how much money we wanted to set aside for burial expenses. Since we both wanted to be cremated, I guessed $700 apiece would be sufficient. The planner gawked in amazement before telling me that would not be enough. “Can’t we use that place in Georgia?” I asked, referring to the funeral home that got backed up on its cremations and started chucking the bodies into a lake. I figured they’d be looking to build their business up after all the bad publicity and might be offering discount rates.

I really don’t care what happens to my body after I’m dead but given my druthers I’d like a simple cremation in a cardboard box and then a sentimental scattering in a spot significant to the scatterer who will presumably be my daughter if she’s not too mad at me for not setting up a college fund with the financial planner. Turned out we couldn’t get a plan because the whole thing was geared towards people who have a steady income which gets divvied up into monthly bills and entertainment, college and retirement funds, and then those pesky burial plans. Unfortunately, actors and writers at our level of success don’t have steady incomes. With Brian more so than me it’s like playing the lottery for a living.

Onto the bad news. With Bush as president, I've been feeling pretty third world lately (like I might have to give my daughter up for adoption so I can get a son to take care of me in my old age). But here’s a message from a guy in South Africa (whom I met on the Internet because we might be distantly related) which really gave me pause to count my blessings:

“Here in South Africa people are worried about retirement, because of the rising cost of living, no security - against criminals (we have the most rapists, murderers and child molesters in the world) or financially, because the present government have been in power for 14 years and all service delivery, hospitals, education, police, whatever, has gone down into chaos. Now they have “discovered” that electricity provision is not in par with the growing population – power cuts are now everyday occurrences and the government says we should go to bed earlier and that this is actually good, because more sleep make one more intelligent … Anyway, there is no way anyone can describe our situation to someone living in a first world country – it all seems too far-fetched to be anything than science fiction!”

One way to count one’s blessings is to do a gratitude list which I can start by being grateful that I have electricity so I can sit in front of my computer all day and write. (Although, after reading Christopher Hitchens’s beauty makeover saga in Vanity Fair in which he quoted Brazilian waxers as saying their male clients were mostly Wall Street guys who got their butts waxed to avoid getting ingrown hairs from sitting all day in front of the computer, I have a new phobia to add to my list.) God forbid I’d have to go back to the old days of pen and paper although that might severely reduce the competition that is clogging the publishing world since a place on the bestseller list would be granted to those who could hold out longest against writer’s cramp!

9:04 am est


Archive Newer | Older

IF YOU'D LIKE TO SUBSCRIBE TO THIS BLOG, SELECT "XML" ABOVE.

kdebvbclunch11-08.jpg

boob-frontwithhands.jpg



PUBLICATIONS

Karen deBV’s essay, “Her Eighth Gray Hair,” will appear in the anthology, Of a Certain Age: Voices of Experience, to be published Summer 2009 by Turtle House Ink.

Karen deBV’s essay, “Anne Frank Redux,” will appear in the anthology, Writers and Their Notebooks, to be published Spring 2009 by the University of South Carolina Press.

“The Bad Seed,” an excerpt from Karen deBV’s second novel, Desperately Seeking Dutch, won Honorable Mention in UNO’s Third Annual Writing Contest.

PHOTO (LEFT):  KAREN DE BALBIAN VERSTER WAS THE FEATURED SPEAKER AT THE 6th ANNUAL BREAST CANCER FUNDRAISER LUNCHEON AT DELAWARE WATER GAP COUNTRY CLUB, 10/08. PROCEEDS BENEFITTED THE PENNSYLVANIA BREAST CANCER COALITION (TO WHICH 20% OF BOOB SALES THAT DAY WERE ALSO DONATED).