|
|
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
MYLIE CYRUS AND APOLOGIES IN GENERAL
In my jaundiced eyes,
Mylie Cyrus’s apology seems like just another one of those mea culpas issued only
because everyone, i.e. everyone on whom she depends for income, got upset. It was a Pyrrhic apology, like when criminals get
all repentant only after they’re sentenced to prison. If Eliot Spitzer hadn’t been caught, would he have apologized to his
constituents? If no one had batted an eye when Jane Fonda said “cunt” on The Today
Show would she have apologized? (Even so, should she have apologized?)
The conundrum is that
Mylie Cyrus is like a girl who can’t live alone (even though she has her own living quarters apart from her family) so she’s
courting her next boyfriend before ditching the old one. She’s fifteen (one year younger than the pregnant Jamie Lynn Spears
AKA Zoey 101) and her Hannah Montana
days are numbered. But she’s made a mint as Hannah Montana and who knows what lies ahead? Hollywood is haunted by former
teen idols (from Shirley Temple to Lindsey Lohan) who were unable to successfully transition into adult careers.
Before all the
brouhaha, Mylie Cyrus, in the upcoming Vanity Fair article, written by Bruce Handy,
was quoted as saying, "Annie [Leibovitz] took, like, a beautiful shot,
and I thought it was really cool. That's what she wanted me to do, and you can't say no to Annie. I think it's really artsy.
It wasn't in a skanky way."
After the shit hit
the fans, she recanted, saying, "I took part in a photo shoot that was supposed to be 'artistic' and now, seeing the photographs
and reading the story, I feel so embarrassed. I never intended for any of this to happen and I apologize to my fans who I
care so deeply about."
Well, of course, she
cares “so deeply” about her (shit-covered) fans since they are her cash cow. (Is there any other reason to care about fans
when you get to her level of celebrity-dom?) But would she have felt it necessary to apologize if it was the AARP who objected
to the photos?
These cover-your-ass
apologies seem to be more and more de rigueur these days but to have less and less
substance and sincerity. I wonder if they’re ultimately undermining the value of a good, old-fashioned, direct amends which
seems to be thriving only in 12-Step programs (and even there it is an endangered species of communication).
Eliot Spitzer certainly
owed an apology to his wife but why couldn’t he have done it in the privacy of his own home instead of humiliating her in
public? I assume the answer is that it’s easier to stare a camera in the eye and confess to anonymous millions who can’t talk
back than to face one single, dear face and possibly get rebuffed.
As one who has gone
out of her way to make many sincere and direct amends in order to clear away the wreckage of my past, I feel that these people
are missing out on a unique spiritual opportunity. For alcoholics, the Big Book
promises that “If we are painstaking about this phase of our development [i.e. the amends process], we will be amazed before
we are halfway through. We are going to know a new freedom and a new happiness. We will not regret the past nor wish to shut
the door on it. We will comprehend the word serenity and we will know peace. No matter how far down the scale we have gone,
we will see how our experience can benefit others. That feeling of uselessness and self-pity will disappear. We will lose
interest in selfish things and gain interest in our fellows. Self-seeking will slip away. Our whole attitude and outlook upon
life will change. Fear of people and of economic insecurity will leave us. We will intuitively know how to handle situations
which used to baffle us. We will suddenly realize that god is doing for us what we could not do for ourselves.
“Are these extravagant
promises? We think not. They are being fulfilled among us – sometimes quickly, sometimes slowly. They will always materialize
if we work for them.”
Ah, work for them – key word, work. As I discovered with most worthwhile things such as my relationship with God and
my husband of twenty-four years, you can never rest on your laurels. It’s work and more work.
Speaking of my husband
(sly segue), here’s a little something from the Internet about men. Disclaimer: this does not reflect my views about my husband,
or men in general.
WHY MEN ARE JUST HAPPIER PEOPLE
What do you expect from such wonderful
creatures?
Your last name stays put.
The garage is all yours.
Wedding plans take care of themselves.
Chocolate is just another snack.
You can be President.
You can never be pregnant.
You can wear a white T-shirt to a
water park. You can wear NO shirt to a water park.
Car mechanics tell you the truth.
The world is your urinal.
You never have to drive to another gas
station restroom because this one is just too icky.
You don't have to stop and think of which
way to turn a nut on a bolt.
Same work, more pay.
Wrinkles add character.
Wedding dress R5000. Tux rental- R100.
People never stare at your chest when you're
talking to them.
The occasional well-rendered belch is practically
expected.
New shoes don't cut, blister, or mangle
your feet.
One mood all the time.
Phone conversations are over in 30 seconds
flat.
You know stuff about tanks.
A five-day vacation requires only one suitcase.
You can open all your own jars.
You get extra credit for the slightest
act of thoughtfulness.
If someone forgets to invite you, he or
she can still be your friend.
Your underwear is R18.95 for a three-pack.
Three pairs of shoes are more than enough.
You almost never have strap problems in
public.
You are unable to see wrinkles in your
clothes.
Everything on your face stays its original
color.
The same hairstyle lasts for years, maybe
decades.
You only have to shave your face and neck.
You can play with toys all your life.
Your belly usually hides your big hips.
One wallet and one pair of shoes -- one
color for all seasons.
You can wear shorts no matter how your
legs look.
You can "do" your nails with a pocket knife.
You have freedom of choice concerning growing
a mustache.
You can do Christmas shopping for
25 relatives on December 24 in 25 minutes.
No wonder men are happier!!
3:29 pm est
Friday, April 25, 2008
GUEST BLOG: SOUTH AFRICAN HAIKUS
Haiku’s on our landscape: the Land Art of Strijdom van der Merwe
Right on the doorstep of Oudtshoorn a couple
of signs read “Haikoes.” Nothing else. The more curious among us would venture up the winding gravel road to see why Japanese
poetry might be presented in Afrikaans, but not a great many. According to Strijdom van der Merwe, acclaimed land artist (among
other things), this is fine with him – he prefers to be away from the maddening crowd (!). Strijdom has a message, one that
travels the world, such an exhibition sponsored by the United Nations is “visiting” Europe right now. Strijdom feels that those who appreciate the subtleties, the silence, the small
variations on the canvas of nature, will venture out to the high ground where he has set up an ensemble of 163 white canvas
sheets on which haiku’s by 45 poets have been printed. All around are the blue of sky and mountains and underfoot the soft
shades of khaki of the Klein Karoo’s humble but powerfully resilient vegetation.
Although no Greenie, Strijdom want people
to look at his work – there has been a canvas shelter erected for that purpose – and to listen. Listen to the wind beating
at the canvas, the singing of the wires, the rustling of leaves and tiny feet: nature breathing, moving, living.
Land art started with artists making huge
holes in the ground, but eventually the approach has become more subtle – it’s not the impact we make on the land so much
as the impact the land makes on us, according to some artists. True enough, but nowadays we are impacting heavily on Mother
Earth. With Strijdom things have come full circle in more than one way – he has returned to the veld which he remembers from
childhood, although in another milieu, that of Meyerton, Gauteng, and he has
also come back to Oudtshoorn, where has last exhibited a decade ago. Most importantly he reminds us of our blessings and responsibilities
– of our collective footprint deep into the bosom of our world.
That’s why he says that when he lies on
this deathbed, he will want to know that he has done everything he could to evolve as a human being; to experience a variety
of landscapes (he is a intrepid traveler), be influenced by others (this explains the international content and structure
of his work) and to have subtly touched (influenced) others.
Monet had to paint several works to depict
the changing of light effects during different times of the day, but Strijdom’s “prayer flags” are changed by nature herself
– as if breathing, moving, living …
“So, Strijdom,” I ask, “which project is
your favourite?” He smiles “The one I am going to do next. Always.” I certainly hope there will be many more.
The
author: Dr Francois Verster, company archivist of Naspers, former teacher at Ladismith High and one of the 45 poets mentioned.
[Note: Francois and I found each other on the internet and believe we are distantly related.]
11:26 am est
Friday, April 18, 2008
KARMA IS A BOOMERANG
KARMA IS A BOOMERANG
While working at a
music licensing firm early in my career, I was asked, as Manager of Advertising & Public Relations, to secure a subscription
to a design magazine. I selected an over-sized, beautifully designed quarterly and sent in the subscription form. I can’t
remember the details but there was a snafu in the billing. I kept writing letters to the billing department and the problem
was not resolved. Finally, I wrote an aggrieved letter to the editor, detailing the shortcomings of his organization (one
might well wonder why I was so hell-bent on retrieving what probably amounted to about twenty-five dollars of someone else’s
money but then that person might well be unfamiliar with the dynamics of self-righteous anger), to which the editor replied,
“You are the most unpleasant person I’ve ever encountered.” That comment felt like an undeserved slap in the face and it throbbed
in my psyche for years. But I know now that I was an angry person who had no outlet for my anger unless it seemed justified,
and I was also unaware that I was an angry person so it leaked out unbeknownst to me in seemingly harmless interactions.
Recently, I had an
experience that brought this editor’s comment to mind. It all started out so wonderfully with this woman – we were comrades-in-arms,
new friends who’d met in an online class – and she asked me to contribute an article about my decision to write a novel versus
a memoir to her e-zine. I read through some back issues to get an idea of tone and content, and then submitted my first attempt.
She gave me lengthy, detailed notes explaining how I’d missed the mark (which included my inclusion of self-promotion), and
again referred me to her e-zine for tone and content. It was not my intention to self-promote but I found it difficult to
write about my novel without referring to it so I returned to her e-zine for another check on tone and content, copied her
notes into my word file and scrupulously incorporated them into my next attempt. Still not right. Still too much self-promotion.
More lengthy, detailed notes explaining how the things I’d added at her suggestion had apparently worsened rather than enhanced
the article. (By this time I was starting to feel guilty about the volume of feedback my failures had engendered.) She also
commented in a helpful way that she could now see why I hadn’t succeeded in one of the class assignments since it required
the kind of finesse I was demonstrating a complete lack of. As further evidence of my all-consuming self-promotion, it seemed
she thought I was intentionally trying to override her guidelines and take over her e-zine: I gather that you perceived my
explaining what I wanted as my being defensive about the e-zine, but I assure you, I was not apologizing for my e-zine 's
standards, nor offering to let a contributing author bend them; I was merely asserting what they were.
I was exceedingly frustrated
because, quite the opposite of carrying out my own agenda, I was trying very hard to please her, and I sent her an email to
that effect, expressing my concern that we were getting off-track in our attempts to communicate with each other. Then, suddenly
liberated by the feeling I had nothing to lose, I went through my article with a machete and took out any specific mention
of my novel, which I also sent to her. She responded with a finite rejection, saying that my piece might be good for writers
seeking inspiration but not for writers seeking practical advice, and she added, I'm sorry that you've found the process frustrating,
and that you felt that my trying to give some practical guidance about how to appeal to my readers was "seriously off-track."
Since literally every sentence of the message that provoked this comment was directly about how to revise the essay you had
sent me, I don't quite understand how it could possibly have been off-track.
To me, her message
indicated that we were so off-track we were at an impasse, an impasse that seemingly came out of nowhere. How had it happened?
I was reminded of an event that occurred in my late teens. I was walking down the street, totally oblivious to my surroundings
and slowly it began to dawn on me that something wasn’t right. I stopped, looked down and saw that I’d walked about six feet
into wet cement. Feeling incredibly foolish (and dismayed that I’d ruined a new pair of boots) I tried without success to
backtrack my way out of the situation in such a way as to diminish the damage that had already occurred.
Marianne Williamson
writes in A Return to Love, “To the extent that we abandon love, to that extent
we will feel it has abandoned us” (33). Ironically, my mother (who lives with me) and I are getting along better than ever
but this is the third surrogate mother with whom I’ve had a run-in in a very short time so I’m forced to examine my part in
this. Here’s a quote from Alcoholics Anonymous (a profound book of wisdom for alcoholics
and non-alcoholics alike) that sums up the situation:
“The first requirement
is that we be convinced that any life run on self-will can hardly be a success. On that basis we are almost always in collision
with something or somebody, even though our motives are good. Most people try to live by self-propulsion. Each person is like
an actor who wants to run the whole show; is forever trying to arrange the lights, the ballet, the scenery and the rest of
the players in his own way. If his arrangements would only stay put, if only people would do as he wished, the show would
be great. Everybody, including himself, would be pleased. Life would be wonderful. In trying to make these arrangements our
actor may sometimes be quite virtuous. He may be kind, considerate, patient, generous; even modest and self-sacrificing. On
the other hand, he may be mean, egotistical, selfish and dishonest. But, as with most humans, he is more likely to have varied
traits.
“What usually happens?
The show doesn’t come off very well. He begins to think life doesn’t treat him right. He decides to exert himself still more.
He becomes, on the next occasion, still more demanding or gracious as the case may be. Still the play does not suit him. Admitting
he may be somewhat at fault, he is sure that other people are more to blame. He becomes angry, indignant, self-pitying. What
is his basic trouble? Is he not really a self-seeker even when trying to be kind? Is he not a victim of delusion that he can
wrest satisfaction and happiness out of this world if only he manages well? Is it not evident to all the rest of the players
that these are the things he wants? And do not his actions make each of them wish to retaliate, snatching all they can get
out of the show? Is he not, even in his best moments, a producer of confusion rather than harmony?” (60-61).
When I relayed
this saga to my fourteen year old daughter, she said, Mom, I think you’re a people pleaser. When I relayed this saga to my
spiritual adviser, she said, Karen, I think you’re a people pleaser. Still, I asked myself why so many people I perceived
as being unpleasant were in my path. I found an answer to this question in A Return
to Love: "Sometimes people think that calling on God means inviting a force into our lives that will make everything rosy.
The truth is it means inviting everything into our lives that which will force us to grow -- and growth can be messy. The
purpose of life is to grow into our perfection. Once we call on God, everything that could anger us is on the way. Why? Because
the place where we go into anger, instead of love, is our wall. Any situation that pushes our buttons is a situation where
we don't yet have the capacity to be unconditionally loving. It's the Holy Spirit's job to draw our attention to that, and
help us move beyond that point" (35).
I’m not a firm believer
in karma, but if I were, my interchanges with these woman would be proof. As it is, I suppose they are merely reflections
of me, and as such are providing me with the growth opportunity to see my character defects in action. As Alcoholics Anonymous advises, “Avoid then, the deliberate manufacture of misery, but if trouble comes, cheerfully
capitalize it as an opportunity to demonstrate His omnipotence” (133).
VOTED BEST JOKE IN AUSTRALIA
I have a hard time
throwing anything away – even junk e-mail – but I never forward these things willy-nilly to everyone on my contact list! If
they are extremely noteworthy I’ll send them to one or two specific people who
seem to like such things. Now I’ve got a better solution – I’ll put them in my blog which will serve two purposes: preserving
the deserving ones for posterity and doing my part to keep in-boxes clutter-free.
I received this
email, voted best joke in Australia, from my South African
“cousin”:
A man walks into his
bedroom with a sheep under his arm and says, "Darling, this is the pig I have sex with when you have a headache."
His wife, who is lying
in bed, replies, "I think you'll find that's a sheep, you idiot."
The man says, "I think
you'll find that I wasn't talking to you."
I will end by saying
how much I despise e-mail chain letters, especially the ones that threaten me with bad karma if I don’t forward them. I used
to return to sender with an apology for my lack of enthusiasm for such things. Now I delete sight unseen, karma be damned.
The current wisdom would have it that karma is a boomerang which I find judgmental and redundant because it presumes: 1) we
are punished for bad behavior by some avenging deity, and 2) that we are then punished by the karma itself returning in flight.
(You can’t eat your cake and have it, too.) However, it appears that the best joke in Australia
is a boomerang since it seems to be on its way back from whence it came.
4:53 pm est
Monday, April 14, 2008
MIND YOUR Ps & Qs
I’ve only been blogging
a short while but it’s already clear to me that humble pie must become a staple diet of the blogger, the Internet user, and
the e-mailer. One has to mind one’s Ps & Qs and I don’t mean pints and quarts, but, rather, the keyboard where restraint
of pen and tongue is required now more than ever since often one is corresponding with someone who is a stranger, and therefore
less likely to grant one the latitude of a friend.
I was fortunate to
have something I’d written called to my attention by a person who had every right to be aggrieved by it, yet was gracious
enough to call and find out if I really meant what I’d written. I was grateful that this person came to me with the intention
of healing the situation and minimizing its gossip potential. I also appreciated the way this person handled the call – by
being direct and open without being judgmental so it allowed me to hear another point of view. I went back and re-read what
I’d written and realized that it was much harsher than I’d intended so I revised it.
Believe it or not,
I was extremely passive for most of my life and somehow menopause has lifted my fear of what people think of me so I’m reveling
in “letting it all hang out,” but also working on bringing the pendulum back to the middle.
I’ve been a journal
writer for many years so I’m used to poring my guts out on the page, both parchment and electronic, and this act for me is
like hang-gliding – a virtuoso soaring on the wind currents of my own hot air. Therefore, it’s easy for me to overlook the
fact that more judicious editing is required in a blog since it, unlike my journal, will be readily accessible to all who
care to read it.
My goal is to become
a producer of harmony rather than confusion, however, I have to wonder if there something I’m gaining from being a producer
of confusion. This reminds me of the time I was in the third grade and there was a girl who came in wearing a ring she’d received.
At that time, an eight year old girl who possessed a ring was the Paris Hilton of the class. Well, everyone oohed and aahed
over it ad infinitum and then she must’ve put it down somewhere and one of the students must’ve officiously put it in the
lost and found box where I stumbled upon it. My first thought was of annoyance – who in that class could possibly not know
that ring belonged to her and why didn’t they just give it directly to her? And then against my will, almost, I stole it.
I really didn’t want the ring and certainly everyone would know it wasn’t mine so I could never wear it even if I did so I
don’t know why I stole it. But perhaps what I wanted was the attention I got by stealing the ring, even if it was negative
attention, which certainly outshone any attention she’d gotten by having the ring.
I stuck the ring in
a drawstring bag that the teacher required every student’s mother to make to hold pencils and crayons and such which was draped
on the back of my chair. The student finally noticed her ring was gone – was she in
a coma? – and a hue and cry went up, as first the students and then the teacher searched high and low. Oh, it was gruesome.
Finally, the teacher had each row of students go outside while other students searched their desks. It was excruciating to
watch row after row get up and leave, knowing I would soon be next yet I was unable to move or speak. And then I was with
the other students from my row standing shivering outside as I leaned against a rough brick wall, my mind a rat scrabbling
at a metal barrier. And then I was in front of the classroom which was silent and airless as an oven on broil while the teacher
excoriated me for a thief and a liar and reminded the class where people like me went straight to. And then my parents were
hovering over me, wringing their hands, castigating themselves for not setting a better example, my father wondering if his
stealing wooden hotel hangers had had a negative influence on me when all along it was something much deeper.
Perhaps I’m the kind
of person who thrives on other people’s attention. Perhaps I’m unable to handle positive attention so I create scenarios that
generate negative attention. Perhaps I should learn to cultivate an appreciation for God’s attention.
6:50 pm est
Wednesday, April 2, 2008
ON GRATITUDE AND WRITER'S CRAMP
I just got my social
security statement, and the good news is that if I work until I’m 70 I’ll get about $1154 a month. The bad news is that “The
law governing benefit amounts may change because, by 2041 [when I’ll be 87], the payroll taxes collected will be enough to
pay only about 75% of scheduled benefits.”
Okay, let’s start with
the good news first. Some years ago, my husband and I met with a financial planner who asked us when we planned to retire.
Brian and I looked at each other and said, never. I can’t imagine not pursuing some kind of creative endeavor, however, my
creative endeavors have so far not been very financially rewarding. Then the planner asked how much money we wanted to set
aside for burial expenses. Since we both wanted to be cremated, I guessed $700 apiece would be sufficient. The planner gawked
in amazement before telling me that would not be enough. “Can’t we use that place in Georgia?” I asked, referring to the funeral home that got
backed up on its cremations and started chucking the bodies into a lake. I figured they’d be looking to build their business
up after all the bad publicity and might be offering discount rates.
I really don’t care
what happens to my body after I’m dead but given my druthers I’d like a simple cremation in a cardboard box and then a sentimental
scattering in a spot significant to the scatterer who will presumably be my daughter if she’s not too mad at me for not setting
up a college fund with the financial planner. Turned out we couldn’t get a plan because the whole thing was geared towards
people who have a steady income which gets divvied up into monthly bills and entertainment, college and retirement funds,
and then those pesky burial plans. Unfortunately, actors and writers at our level of success don’t have steady incomes. With
Brian more so than me it’s like playing the lottery for a living.
Onto the bad news.
With Bush as president, I've been feeling pretty third world lately (like I might have to give my daughter up for adoption
so I can get a son to take care of me in my old age). But here’s a message from a guy in South
Africa (whom I met on the Internet because we might be distantly related) which really gave
me pause to count my blessings:
“Here in South Africa
people are worried about retirement, because of the rising cost of living, no security - against criminals (we have the most
rapists, murderers and child molesters in the world) or financially, because the present government have been in power for
14 years and all service delivery, hospitals, education, police, whatever, has gone down into chaos. Now they have “discovered”
that electricity provision is not in par with the growing population – power cuts are now everyday occurrences and the government
says we should go to bed earlier and that this is actually good, because more sleep make one more intelligent … Anyway, there
is no way anyone can describe our situation to someone living in a first world country – it all seems too far-fetched to be
anything than science fiction!”
One way to count one’s
blessings is to do a gratitude list which I can start by being grateful that I have electricity so I can sit in front of my
computer all day and write. (Although, after reading Christopher Hitchens’s beauty makeover saga in Vanity Fair in which he quoted Brazilian waxers as saying their male clients were mostly Wall Street guys who
got their butts waxed to avoid getting ingrown hairs from sitting all day in front of the computer, I have a new phobia to
add to my list.) God forbid I’d have to go back to the old days of pen and paper although that might severely reduce the competition
that is clogging the publishing world since a place on the bestseller list would be granted to those who could hold out longest
against writer’s cramp!
9:04 am est
|
|
IF YOU'D LIKE TO SUBSCRIBE TO THIS BLOG, SELECT "XML" ABOVE.

|
|
|
|
 |
 |

|
PUBLICATIONS
Karen deBV’s
essay, “Her Eighth Gray Hair,” will appear in the anthology, Of a Certain Age: Voices of Experience, to be published Summer
2009 by Turtle House Ink.
Karen deBV’s
essay, “Anne Frank Redux,” will appear in the anthology, Writers and Their Notebooks, to be published Spring 2009 by the
University of South
Carolina Press.
“The Bad Seed,”
an excerpt from Karen deBV’s second novel, Desperately
Seeking Dutch, won Honorable Mention in UNO’s Third Annual Writing Contest.
PHOTO (LEFT): KAREN DE BALBIAN VERSTER WAS THE FEATURED SPEAKER AT THE 6th ANNUAL BREAST CANCER
FUNDRAISER LUNCHEON AT DELAWARE WATER GAP COUNTRY CLUB, 10/08. PROCEEDS BENEFITTED THE PENNSYLVANIA BREAST CANCER COALITION (TO
WHICH 20% OF BOOB SALES THAT DAY WERE ALSO DONATED).
|
|