Not all grievances will be listed here. However, many of the grievances filled by the Union can be found here that might have affected you, the member. We will try to keep you informed and updated as much as possible. If you have any questions regarding a specific grievance, contact the Branch President. New information will be updated periodically.

# of Grievance Filed Per Year

2002 - 152              2003 - 260              2004 - 202              2005 - 255              2006 - 298 

07-105 Class Action, SustainedOT Bypass,  Tour 2 PTFs worked OT prior to OTDL,  24 hours OT Paid = $766.40!!!

 

07-063 Class Action, SustainedOT Bypass,  Tour 2 PTFs worked OT prior to OTDL, 16 hours OT Paid = $519.04!!!

 

 

BRANCH GRIEV NO. 07-092 Class Action - ASDO Performing Mail Handler Work - on the Long Dock

CASE DISPOSITION: SUSTAINED Paid 5.5 hours OT

 

BRANCH GRIEV NO. 06-244 Class Action - SDO Performing Mail Handler Work

CASE DISPOSITION: SUSTAINED Paid 0.37 hours OT

 

BRANCH GRIEV NO. 06-109 Class Action PTFs CONVERTED to Full-Time Regular

CASE DISPOSITION: SETTLED at ARBITRATION

 

PTF Conversion grievance settled. Arbitrator Award as follows:

· Based on Article 7.3 and the evidence presented, the Union established the need for Management to convert PTF positions to FTR positions.  Given the volume of data and evidence presented by the Union, the Arbitrator is unable to make a definitive determination as to the number of positions that must be converted.  The matter is remanded to the Parties for determination.  Absent such agreement, the matter shall be returned to the Arbitrator for final determination as noted, below.

· The Arbitrator understands that the Union’s Advocate put a great deal of information on the Postal Service’s plate during the grievance procedure.  The volume of data and records in this case is enormous.  As such, the Arbitrator will give the Postal Service the benefit of the doubt in regards to any deficiencies in its response to the grievance and the Union’s massive display of data. 

          

· Based on the foregoing, in keeping with National Level Arbitrators Garrett and Gamser, this Arbitrator finds that:

1) The Union established the need to convert PTFs to FTR positions;

2) The volume of data presented by the Union in support of its

      position is too vast for the Arbitrator to make a

      definitive determination as to how many of the twenty-one

      (21) PTFs should be converted to FTR positions;

3) The matter is therefore remanded to the Parties for mutual

      agreement as to the number of PTFs that should be converted

      to FTR positions;

4) In the first instance, the Postal Service will make an

evaluation of the data and evidence and present to the Union

      a determination of how many PTFs, over and above five (5)

      that it proposes to convert to FTR status;

5) In making this determination, the Postal Service shall take

      into account and convey to the Union the basis of its

      determination; and this determination shall take into

      consideration the criteria that makes up the “standard of

      practicability” as referred to, above;

6) The Postal Service shall also take into consideration the

      reversion of the FTR positions, referred to, above; in this

      regard, the Postal Service shall conduct an analysis of the

      hours worked by casuals and PTFs performing any work that

      was otherwise performed by FTR employees whose jobs were

      reverted; this shall also include overtime hours worked by

      casuals, PTFs and FTR employees.

7) The Postal Service shall have forty-five (45) days to present

      its findings and determination to the Union;

8) Thereafter, the Parties shall have forty-five (45) days to

      reach mutual agreement as to the number of PTFs that shall

      be converted to FTR positions;

9) Absent such mutual agreement, the matter shall be returned to

      the Arbitrator for final determination.  Such final

      determination shall be made by the Arbitrator choosing the

      last, best and final offer made either Party; and this

      decision will be based on objective and empirical evidence

      and facts.  Put simply, the Arbitrator will chose either

      the Union’s last offer or the Postal Service’s last offer.

 

BELOW IS THE LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD

 

March 21, 2007

 

Labor-Management Agreement

 

Regional Arbitration Award

 

Case #: A00M-1A-C 05207435

Grievance #: 06-109

Grievant: CLASS ACTION

 

Issue: PTF Conversion to FTR

 

 

In accordance with the Arbitration Award dated March 8, 2007, the parties below have arrived at the following final and binding settlement. This settlement applies only to the issue listed above.

 

1.     Nineteen (19) Part-Time Flexible Mail Handlers shall be converted to Full-Time Regular.

a.     Seven (7) Part-Time Flexible Mail Handlers have been already converted to Full-Time Regular on February 17, 2007.

b.    An additional TWELVE (12) Part-Time Flexible Mail Handlers shall be converted to Full-Time Regular.

i.   The twelve employees to be converted shall be notified of their effective date to Full-Time status.

2.     It is mutually agreed that this agreement is non-prejudicial setting and may not be cited by either party. This settlement applies only to the issue above.

 

#07-015 Higher Level Pay

A Full-Time Regular Mail Handler (Tour 3 Destinating Sorter) was ordered by an SDO to get off the Tug for no legitimate reason. The grievant was awarded the difference from Level 4 to level 5 pay for 9 hours = $3.06 ...GRIEVANCE SUSTAINED!!!

 

#05-195 Transfer Request - ARBITRATION SUSTAINED !!!

A Full-Time Regular Mail Handler requested a transfer to Morgan P&DC. The Union filed a grievance since management failed to consider the grievant’s request for transfer and hired new Mail Handlers off-the-street. Management did accept the transfer request in 2006. The grievant’s seniority date was changed to October 1, 2005 and her status to a FULL-TIME REGULAR

 

#07-054 Holiday Schedule President’s Day

Excessive Full-Time Regulars Required

CASE DISPOSITION: PENDING

 

07-036 Notice of Removal

Modified to a LOW to expire in 6 months

 

#07-020 Class Action - SDO Performing Mail Handler craft work

SDO observed doing MH work (presort)

CASE DISPOSITION: Settled - Cease & Desist

 

BRANCH GRIEV NO. 07-013 Class Action—POST 204B’s bid

FTR Mail Handler has been an A/SDO in excess of 4 months

CASE DISPOSITION: SUSTAINED duty assignment shall be reposted for bid. (Job ID # 6493840)

 

#07-006 Holiday Schedule Martin Luther King Day

Excessive Full-Time Regulars Required

CASE DISPOSITION: PENDING

 

#06-295 Holiday Schedule New Years Day

Excessive Full-Time Regulars Required

CASE DISPOSITION: PENDING

 

#06-294 Holiday Schedule Christmas Day

Excessive Full-Time Regulars Required

CASE DISPOSITION: PENDING

 

#06-292 Class Action - No Pay Grievance Settlement

The employer has failed to bargain in good faith. Management agreed to pay Mail Handlers on Tour 1 & 2 administrative leave for the Snow Storm of 2005. They have not been paid. It has been months!!!

CASE DISPOSITION: PENDING

 

#06-280 Letter of Demand

A Member received a Letter of Demand for an alleged overpayment of salary $3164.79

CASE DISPOSITION: SUSTAINED—Rescinded

 

#06-277 Class Action - SDO Performing Mail Handler craft work

SDO observed doing MH work

CASE DISPOSITION: PENDING

 

Columbus Day Holiday

06-225, 06-228, 06-229, 06-230, 06-231, 06-232, 06-233, 06-235, 06-236, 06-237, & 06-242

Various members were denied holiday leave pay by management. Some grievant’s did not volunteer to work but were listed on the holiday schedule. Some were listed as scheduled but called to report their absence.

CASE DISPOSITIONS: SUSTAINED … all grievants paid for their designated holiday.

 

06-254 Class Action - 3 Term Casual - Tour 3

Mail Handler Casual employed for 3 terms. Management claims that the casual was used as a clerk casual. The casual was terminated after the filling of this grievance. CASE DISPOSITION: PENDING

 

06-265 & 06-266 Class Action - POST PIV BIDS APPS Section - Tours 2 & 3.

Management has continuously detailed Level 4 Mail Handlers to Higher Level work. The weekly higher level hours demonstrate a need for Level 5 bids to be posted. CASE DISPOSITION: PENDING

 

BRANCH GRIEV NO. 06-257 Class Action - CASUAL CAP (12.5%) VIOLATION

Management has exceeded the casual cap. During Pay Periods 21 & 22 excessive number of casuals (more than

GRIEVANCES

Text Box: GRIEVANCES Continued...

National Postal Mail Handlers Union

Local 300 - NYL&DC Branch