The True Gospel
An Exegetical Essay
The question which concerns us at this point: what is the precise content of the Gospel which must believed in order to be saved? Or to phrase it a different way, what is the Scriptural distinction between a false gospel and the true Gospel? In order first to answer this question, we need to look at those summaries of the Gospel which we find in Scripture. Primarily, such summaries are found recorded in the preaching segments of the books of Acts, and in certain sections of Paul's writings, and it is to these that we first turn.
This is not to say that other sections of Scripture do not impact our concerns here. However, in formulating doctrine, one naturally begins with a set of Scriptures which function as hermeneutically prior, i.e., they become the grid through which other passages of Scripture are interpreted. Let me suggest that there are two reasons to make my list of Scriptures hermeneutically prior:
Let me suggest by way of overview that these passage are heavily concerned with the person and work of Christ, not in the developed sense of later Christian systematic theology, but in the eschatological sense expressed by the Scrptures themselves. Many passages could be considered, but we will begin with four in the interests of time and space (and perforce our exegesis must be brief, but hopefully accurate!):
2:22 "Men of Israel,
hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man attested to you by
God with mighty works and wonders and signs which God did through him in your
midst, as you yourselves know -- 2:23 this Jesus, delivered up according to the
definite plan and foreknowledge of God, you crucified and killed by the hands
of lawless men.
Now, what are the actual elements which are emphasized in this marvelous, and foundational, homiletical piece (and certainly the passage is best understood in its entirety).
And what is the appropriate response to these truths? Repentence, and baptism in the name of Christ. Once the truths contained in this "Gospel presentation" are believed, they must be publically confessed, and the result of that confession in this passage is receiving the Holy Spirit.
Time does fail us to consider the passage more fully, and particularly how Peter skilfully, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, emphasizes the eschatological finality of the giving of the Spirit as part of the overall Gospel truth (in fulfillment of OT prophecy). But it is not faith in the Spirit which is in view, but faith in Christ crucified, resurrected and exalted, that results in the gift of the Spirit.
Once again, what does another apostle, this
time Paul, find necessary to include as Gospel truth in his evangelistic kerygma, this time to a group of individuals who have
absolutely no biblical background whatsoever? In this case, Paul begins
where the Bible begins: with God as absolute creator and owner of the universe,
and emphasizes God's common grace and his self-revelation through the created
order. To what point does he drive, however? To the
resurrection of Christ from the dead. If we read on in the text,
Luke records Paul's speech as ending at this point, and the Athenians, well
grounded in Greek philosophy with its unbiblical flesh/spirit dichotomy, as
being with him until that point. Regardless of their response (and a few
do end up believing), the following truths may be abstracted:
Ro 10:9 That
if you confess with your mouth, "Jesus is Lord," and believe in your
heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. Ro
In this passage, Paul is explicating the
precise content of the kerygmatic message which the
preacher (cf. the preceding context) must have. Note that this summary is
included in a letter which fully explicates the need for justification by faith
and salvation by grace alone. What are the essential elements of this
summary?
Further significant elements
include "trust/belief" (Grk, pisteuw) and "calling upon the name of the
Lord." This passage also has a number of rich implications and
applications, not the least the essential equality which Christ has with Yahweh
of the OT. It is confession of this "content",
or rather confession of the Lordship and resurrection of Christ himself, which
is defined as "calling on the name of the Lord" and which results in
biblically defined salvation.
And finally:
1Co 15:1 Moreover, brethren,
I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have
received, and wherein ye stand; 1Co 15:2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep
in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 1Co 15:3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also
received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 1Co
15:4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to
the scriptures... [KJV]
Paul is about to embark on a rather
ambitious discourse to defend the validity of the biblical concept of the
resurrection, in a passage which will become one of the defining pillars of
orthodoxy for the church in all its subsequent generations. It is this
Gospel "by which" (Grk. di ou-, note the emphatic use of the preposition to denote
the instrumental) "ye are (present tense) saved." What is the
specific content of this Gospel?
Now, as stated above, these
treatments have necessarily been brief. However, they do indicate the
range of "facts" which must be acknowledged in order to have true
Christian belief, or true Christian salvation. One must ask the question:
are the doctrinal truths which are often held to be essential to the Gospel by
modern Christians included in these biblical Gospel summaries? It has to
be recognized that they are not. Even justification by faith and
salvation by grace are not included. One simply has to confess the
Lordship of Christ, and the truths of his death and resurrection, and one finds
oneself saved...
Also, as stated earlier,
this does not mean that other biblical truths do not inform our understanding
of these summaries. Paul takes great pains to point out that those who
require circumcision have effectively denied the grace of God and stand under
God's judgment for devaluing what the Gospel means. There are certain
beliefs which, if held consistently, deny the very confession of faith which is
made. It is important to realize, however, that the true Gospel begins
with the simple confession of Christ, and that the implications or details
are to be worked out in the progressive sanctification of the believer.
But these and similar passages must form our baseline assumptions regarding
whom to include in the kingdom and whom to exclude. If a person confesses
Christ as Lord, and avows that it is Christ and only Christ that gets him
saved, our extreme prejudice must be to consider that person a brother, and to
work patiently with him regarding any doctrinal misunderstanding that he may
have.