Bobby Z's Editorial Page    

(WWJD)

 

 



online ads

 


social search

 

 

Editorial
Octo
ber  22, 2009

PA and its tracks are NOT fan friendly

The Pennsylvania racetracks and the laws pertaining to the wagering upon these races are NOT fan friendly.

In the early 90’s, the Pa state legislature and the PA Racing Commission changed the accounting methods of tracks retention rates on wagering on their racing product. Up till the change implemented, the procedure would calculate the odds based on subtracting the winning wagers from the total pool leaving the net pool to be multiplied by the retention rate and that money (goes to the track, state and horsemen) to be deducted from the net pool leaving the rest to be returned to the winning wagers. 

Best example I can give you is a total pool of 10,000.00. $4,000 was wagered on the winning horse and the given is the retention rate of 20%. The net pool before retention would be $6,000. Applying the retention rate of 20%, would give you $1,200 to be deducted to go to the state, track and horsemen. The balance of $4,800 would be returned to the winning tickets (in this case 2,000 tickets.) The payoff would be $8,800.00 paid out to the public that translates into a $4.40 Win Ticket for those who bet correctly.

After the change of rules, they have since then to this very day take the retention rate on the total pool prior to deducting the winning tickets. In the example above, $10,000 was the total pool, now the retention rate is deducted which is $2,000.00 leaving the $8,000 balance to be distributed. Since there was $4,000 bet on the winner, would mean the $2 payout would now be $4.00. In essence, instead of winning $2.40 on your winning wager, you now would only win $4.00, a decrease of 16.67% of your winnings. This is what the state and racing commission put in place in the early 90’s.

If anyone thinks this is fan friendly, wait till you see the next example. The above retention of 20% seems high to the slot players, as their retention rate statewide is approximately 8.774% so far in 2009. The tracks highest retention rates tend to be in the trifecta pools. The Meadows is listed at 29%, Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs is 35%, Philly Park 30%, Penn National at 31% and Harrah’s Chester Downs is listed at 30%. I can honestly tell you all that nowhere in North America are the retention rates listed as high as in Pennsylvania.

A decade so or longer ago, the state also gave the horsemen a break by removing the state sales tax on the sale of the horses. No matter if the horse was claimed in a claiming race or a private sale, the state no longer took out the 6% sales tax.

So far, the state has done nothing for the consumer. Sure I got my first tax relief from the slot money last year with a deduction of $99 on my school taxes. I expected more this year as the state revenue from slots increased 30 percent but I only got the same deduction ($99) as last year but my school board rose my taxes both years which negated my so called tax relief. Seems to me the promise of the slots to give the homeowners tax relief was overstated; in that, the extent of the promise has not yet to be fulfilled.

The purse structure today is unreal. Some tracks have Maiden races worth $80k (maiden is a race where the entrants have yet won their first race). Lost in all this legislation is the common fan and homeowner. Seems to me there needs to be a revisiting of the slot bill by the legislature to design something to benefit those who have supported the community and racing in this state for decades.

First suggestion is to reinstate the sales tax on the sale of horses. The state is always increasing the tax on cigarettes and alcohol but who is most able to pay taxes are those who benefited from the Slot Legislation. Secondly I would suggest to change the method of calculating the winning wagers back to the prior system, in that, the tracks should not be permitted in taking a cut off of a winning wager but only take their percentage off of the losing wagers. That would increase the winning wagers by 16.67%. While we are on retention rates, I would suggest that all the rates in the state be reduced to a level where the state is the lowest in North America. You will see all the money pouring in from across the continent once they public is notified of the best return available for their wagering dollar is in PA. 35% of a total pool retention rate is highway robbery. Slot players get a rate of 8.774% and we are taxed 4 times as high.

In the event that the state keeps the present status quo, I suggest that every fan of horse racing in Pennsylvania refuse to attend, wager online, or even refuse to use your bookie for racing at a PA track. Our money can be wagered anywhere in the USA and this state and this racing industry have ignored their fans and tax payers long enough. It is time for the silent majority to be heard. Call your representative, your track operator and let them know that you do not want to be ripped off any more.

 

Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

 

 

 

 

Editorial
Octo
ber  09, 2009

ADIOS!

 

October 8th was the last day of operation for this site. It has been over 6 years since I started this project that came out of my love for horse racing, music and computers.

Bobby Z’s Picks at the Races started out as just my picks for the Meadows. Back then in August of 2003, I was just a little over one year from my Bone Marrow Transplant (stem cell) for my CML (Leukemia).

Since then, I added on friends and people from my online groups who shared a similar interest in horse racing. We eventually added flat racing from time to time. It can be tough job working and updating the site 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year. The site is still a viable option for my hobby still to this day but financial concerns have forced my hand. Many of my friends and some who are also race analysts on the site offered to kick in to defray the costs of the site but I declined. Hopefully someday, things will be different and I can resume my activities for the site. 

For those that are disappointed in our departure I can only say I am truly sorry. I prefer not to make it a pay site and all that it entails so I just will fade away. Someone mentioned that maybe I could accept donations but that would also lead into other problems that I have not foreseen at this juncture. 

I will still keep a keen eye on horse racing whether it be harness or thoroughbred and if I connect on a large enough score, look for me to come back with a vengeance! Although I have been a free site, I still consider all the viewers as my customers. Some, who have contacted me via email, have become online friends. I wish the best for all my patrons over the years and extend a warm thank you for your  participation in my hobby. God Bless you all.

 

Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

 

 

 

Editorial
September
  12, 2009

Caveat Emptor
    (Trackmaster v USTA)
   

The United States Trotting Association sells the rights for the past performances to a company named Trackmaster. The wagering public then purchases the past performances. We expect that the information purchased to be true to form and to be protected by unlisted horses being run in the races that we wager upon.

September 12, 2009 in Race 14 at Pocono Downs, Trackmaster's PP's  lists the horses entered as the following:

 

Unknown to those who used the above page is the fact that Clear Vision (the horse that finished 2nd in the Cane Pace to Vintage Master) was actually wearing head number 4. Those that thought Rusty's All In was # 4 were mislead. Who is responsible to making sure the product we purchased is not defective? 

 

The judges at Pocono Downs should of scratched #4 Clear Vision as a wagering entity but permitted him to run for purse only. The betting public would of been protected. It makes this author think about quitting harness racing all together seeing how we are at risk every time we spend our money betting or buying race past performances. 

 

Race 14 PA Sire Stake Championship Final Three Year Old Colts   ONE MILE    Dirt
Purse: $200000.00     Fast     63 Cloudy

#

Name

 

Jockey/Driver

 Win 

 Place 

 Show 

3

Doubleshotascotch

 

Jim Morrill Jr

 10.00 

 4.20 

 3.00 

4

Clear Vision

 

David Miller

 

 4.00 

 2.80 

1

Astounding Hanover

 

Yannick Gingras

 

 

 2.10 

1a

Dan Carter

 

Dave Palone

 

 

 2.10 

Bet Type

Runners

Pay Out

Exacta

3/4

42.00

Trifecta

3/4/1

111.40


Scratched: 6 Precious Medal , AE9 Rusty's All In , AE10 Picassos Boy

 

Caveat Emptor
Let the Buyer Beware

Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

 

 

Editorial
September
  07, 2009

You only get one shot at a first impression   

Below are two postings regarding the Meadows Racetrack and Casino. Seems Mr. Jeannot has not attained the level of effiencey needed to make certain that his place is up to par.

-------------------

To: pandy@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 7:04 AM
Subject: [pandy] Holiday weekend at the BMM slots


A few out of town friends were visiting this weekend and after going to Wheeling Downs on Friday for the table games and seafood buffet (I think Bobby Z was there because all the crab legs were gone!) we stopped at the Meadows. Now picture this...it's a holiday weekend, at 7PM there was a drawing for $20K...you would think that everything would be shined and ready to go, right? WRONG!! About 95% of the GameMaker machines (poker, blackjack and keno) were down for upgrades on a Friday night. These machines are the most popular on the floor and virtually have constant play and they were turned off. I wonder what management was thinking?? We then decided to go to Cibos and get a slice of pizza (the seafood buffet had worn off) and lo and behold the soda dispenser did not have any CO2 and all the pop was flat!! What a way to impress first time visitors to the BMM!!

By the way, we did venture back down on Sunday evening and after a power outage, about 25% of the machines did not recover and remained disabled. The group consensus was that future outings be limited to Wild and Wonderful West Virginia.


--------------

Another writer states his reply to the above.

that's why they say you never get a second chance to make a good first impression.  lately there have been a number of machines that have been taken out of service for for maintenence, but usually they don't pull them off until 10pm.   the food court has had its share of problems long lines, stickey floors and no ice at the pop machines.   the no ice problem would seem to be an easy fix but they are usually out on the busy nights. 

Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

Editorial
September
  01, 2009

The Employment Executioner is back in control

 

With the Meadows announcement that Mike Jeannot is now running the racetrack and food service at the Meadows look for the hatchet to fall upon the heads of those people who gave their lives to making the Meadows the place that we all come to love.

This so called manager has a track record that dates back to the early 90’s when he came into power after George Goodwill stepped down as head of Ladbroke USA. Mr. Jeannot went straight to work releasing the people who ran Meadows Catering (formerly run by Harry M. Stevens Inc). He gave pink slips to the whole management team, lock stock and barrel. He had people brought in from the outside to run the operation who had no experience of running a racetrack. Basically they took a viable operation and ran it into the ground. When confronted with employees that he wanted gone but were protected by a union, he would offer them a managerial job then after a while would let them go as they no longer have job security via the union contract.

I know he will start cutting jobs that are being served by people who have decades of experience with the company. Some of who knew Delvin Miller personally. Delvin was instrumental in using union help at his track.

I have heard the hatchet has all ready fallen on his first day. All you need to do is to call the Meadows and you will no longer hear the friendly voice of the operator who has been there for over 40 years. Yes, she was let go by the employment executioner, Mike Jeannot.

We learn in racing that we try to predict the future outcome of the race by analyzing the past performances of the horses entered in the race. The same is true for Mike Jeannot, as this horse is running true to form.

 

 

Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

Editorial
July
  28, 2009

43rd Running of the Adios Pace

 

August 1st, 2009 is shaping up to be one of the most memorable and eventful running in the history of this race. In its 43rd year, I have seen 38 of them. Missing only those years that I was too young to attend and the one year I lived in Miami.

 

WELL SAID is one monster of a horse. He will be attempting to do what only two other horses have done. That is to win the North American Cup (the largest purse of all harness racing, 1.5 million Canadian), the Meadowlands Pace (a million US) and the Adios (est. 600k).

 

It was first done in 1994 by Cam's Card Shark (whose part owner is also part owner of Well Said) and David's Pass in 1995. Well Said has a chance to break the all age track record of the Meadows which he set himself last week in 1:49 flat.

 

If the weather cooperates, we can see a world record tied or broken (1:48:2 at Chester) for 3 year old colts on the pace.  We could also see the all age world record be tied or broken as it stands at 1:48 flat.

 

You could not write a better script for the inaugural Adios Pace for the new facility. I thank God that I am alive to see it.

 

Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

   

Editorial
June
  26, 2009

Union Busting (Part II)

 

The following was found at the USTrotting website. My comments follow:

MEC Pennsylvania Racing files for bankruptcy protection
Friday, June 26, 2009 - by John Pawlak, the U.S. Trotting Association

MEC Pennsylvania Racing, which operates the racing and pari-mutuel concession at The Meadows Racetrack and Casino and at the track’s off-track betting parlors, has filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy laws.

The firm says it is losing millions of dollars, but for now will keep operating. MEC lost $2.6 million last year, according to documents filed by the firm, which said it had $4.9 million in assets and $4.7 million in liabilities on May 31 of this year.

"Right now, it's business as usual," William G. Ford, representing Magna Entertainment Corp., MEC Pennsylvania Racing’s parent company told the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.

Magna Entertainment, which operates seven Thoroughbred racetracks in North America, has also filed for bankruptcy protection.

If MEC were to back out of its contract to manage the track’s wagering operations with Cannery Casino Resorts, which bought the Meadows from MEC in 2005, Cannery, according to a spokesman, would take over the pari-mutuel operations.


Related Articles :
There are no related articles

http://www.ustrotting.com/absolutenm/anmviewer.asp?a=32402&z=1


I wrote a letter to the editor and posted an editorial (see December 1, 2006 below) a few years back on the perfect way to break a union shop agreement that has been in place since 1963.

 

Basically it is as the Meadows did. By moving to the temporary slot building and razing the original facility, they laid off all the union employees. Those that went to the slots were hired by another company and it is non-union.

 

In the last two years, most of those old union people have either found new jobs or retired or passed on. Once the facility opened, the employees are non-union. The previous union shop agreement has been broken. Save the mutual tellers union. Seems they were needed and worked in the temporary simulcast trailers so when the new facility opened up, they moved right via seniority and their contract still in place.

 

Now we hear about MEC of PA going bankrupt. Seems they have a contract to run the gaming for horse racing and its concessions. Once the federal judge (bankruptcy) views the filing, he has the power to NEGATE that union contract. Had it been held by Cannery Resorts (Oaktree Millennium), there is no such bankruptcy. Seems to me, the MEC is doing the dirty work. Once the contract is set aside, watch Cannery Resorts assume the ownership of the horse racing mutual wagering and its concessions.

       

 

Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

 

Editorial
May
  26, 2009

La Torre's Propaganda

 

The following was found at the USTrotting website. My comments follow:

Meadows casino players win more than $10 million in first month
Tuesday, May 26, 2009 - by David La Torre, La Torre Communications


Washington, PA --- The Meadows Racetrack & Casino announced players won $10,096,004 in jackpots during the first month of operation.

The Meadows opened its $175 million permanent casino on April 15. Since opening the larger casino, which increased the number of slot machines from 1,800 to 3,700, the jackpot daily average has increased from $200,000 to $336,000. In all, 4,161 players won jackpots of $1,200 or higher from April 15 to May 15.

The first to open in southwestern Pennsylvania, the 350,000-square foot state-of-the-art casino is one of the largest on the East Coast and includes 3,700 slot machines, an electronic table games pit, premier restaurants with spectacular views of the gaming floor and the race track, a new racing grandstand, simulcast area, bowling center and VIP super boxes.


       Translation is that people playing and DID NOT WIN a jackpot, lost a total of $11,054,422.00 to payout that 10 million. Question I have for the author is that since you know 4,161 players won the big cash, HOW MANY LOST to create that $11 million in losses or is that not important? Please tell the whole story.
 
Also, isn't La Torre the one that said we would be bowling at the Meadows in Mid May?.

 

Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

 

Editorial
April
  24, 2009

Opening Day at The Meadows Racetrack and Casino

After reading and hearing about all the horror stories about the test run on Monday that involved traffic tie ups, we decided to take the back route along Johnson Road and use the Holiday Inn parking lot driveway to gain access to the Meadows entrance on Racetrack Road. We needed not to do that as at 11:30am, the roads were at normal traffic and we drove straight to the place without delay.

 

We opted for the garage where we were instructed to go to the 3rd floor to park and either take the stairs or elevator to the 4th floor to gain access to the Casino. No problem there. As you leave the garage via the elevator, you must navigate a long corridor to the one of the two entrances to the place. Both are on the slot machine floor. The area for harness racing is on the bottom floor. You must make a hard right when entering the place and head to the escalators or steps to reach your destination. The main problem with this in the planning stages is that no one under 21 can enter the facility as they must negotiate going through the slot area. Horse racing does permit kids of all ages entry to the place and one needs to be 18 to wager in the state of Pennsylvania. The horseplayer’s area needs its own entrance to keep the youngsters access to the track.

 

I was most impressed with the simulcast area, which had 73 carousals where one has a great flat screen TV per seat and some huge plasma TV’s on the wall in front of you. Only problem was the construction in the bowling alley that is right there. You will be hearing pins falling all the day you are there in the future.

 

The place was loaded with employees on opening day and crowd was not large enough to justify it so expect some cutbacks in future days. Employees are not permitted to wager anywhere in PA according to Act 71 (slot bill) so I was watching to see if the mutual tellers I have known to wager did so on this day. I could not find one teller making a wager though I did see some with pp’s opened to the current race. That used to be an infraction of the rules installed a couple years back but I guess they can now.

 

You all know of my complaints on the over priced food. Hot Dogs are $4.00 to $5.50 each, French Fries at $3.75 to $4.50, Pizza (personal size) $9.00, Large Pizza $17.00. The dining rooms look really nice and have a great view of the track if you are one of the lucky ones gaining access to the 1st row of tables. No so good looking view on the other tables. One also had no access to a self-betting machine for the horses up there, as they are located just off the slot floor and face the racetrack. I heard that they would be installing some in the future. I would of liked some TV’s of the races up there but found none. That too will change I hope. Currently one must leave his/her table and go downstairs to make a wager. I saw what I believe to be mobile wireless wagering done with these roving girls who seem to be mutual tellers of sorts. I then should have inquired about their services but that is what it appeared to be to me.

 

Mutual teller lines were very short due to the number of live tellers. They could use more self-betting machines. Am tote is still the company that handles the wagering (owned by Frank Stronach). Some of the machines could not recognize my player’s card, which is a hassle to cancel my wager and move to another teller to make my bet.

 

The apron outside is much larger than the previous apron and unknown to me was the lengthening of the stretch from the previous one. It seemed to us that the fractions of the races yesterday might indicate that the 3rd quarter distance might be a little short and the last quarter a little long. I know they have to survey the track periodically but that was the way the races were playing on this sloppy track.

 

If one would take the shuttle from his parking lot outside the facility, one could be dropped off at the top of the stretch on the apron. I would suggest that they create an entrance there so that the youngsters can enjoy this place too. Also, they need someone checking ID at the entrance places and use those hospital ID bracelets that are color coded to reflect one’s age. They should issue one color for less than 18, one for 18 to 20 and one color for 21 and over. It would be easy to bet underage based on their security and we did see a couple kids that were under 21 betting the machines in the back. It seemed that they gained entry via the middle doors on the bottom floor and just walked up the steps to the slots on the 2nd floor.

 

The main problem on the apron is the placement of three large transformers (active) right passed the finish line. I do not know if it were there on a temporary basis or long term. They need to place pad locks on the doors of those high voltage transformers and erect a fence around them. It is a major accident waiting to happen.

 

The architect that planned this place is from a warm climate. The small grandstand for the horse racing is outside and the patron will have to endure the weather. Seeing that we are open year round, those seats will not be utilized for many months of the year in our climate. In 1974, the Meadows enclosed the whole grandstand when they went to year round racing. The management then had some insight into running the place. It is not so today.

 

Those very seats will be hard to use if you are of average size for a man or a larger lady. Seems the seats are the narrowest seats in any entertainment venue that I have seen. I would need two sticks of butter to butter up my side to gain access to it and need a can opener and crow bar to get up from it. I would hasten to say that these were purchased from some Asian country where they would be considered for their large girth. The length of my clipboard is longer than the area between the armrests is wide.

 

One must be in fine shape to be a horseplayer who enjoys being on the apron. You will be walking a long way to make you wager as the betting windows are on the far end of the building near the garage right before the Adios Room turn. One needs not to go to the mall any more to get walking in, just go to the track. The place is spread out so you do need your wheels in good working order.

 

The average age of the public is about my age or a little older. It is in the mid to late 50’s. Many of us do have medications we have to take so while it was time for mine, I tried to locate a water fountain so I can take my pill. Not one water fountain in the whole facility. They spent $175,000,000 dollars on this building with great bathrooms but no way to get water from a fountain. Guess the design or planning of the place thinks our water sucks or they just want us to pay $2.00 for bottle water.  Guess we all can go to the Delvin’s Café and request a glass of water but that is a hassle to both the employees and me.

 

The winner's circle is no longer a rectangle but rather a semi-circle. Also, the surface of the circle is the same as the track, limestone. There is no fence or brick wall separating the public from the horse and its connections. I also saw people outside on the apron nearby with bottles of beer in their hands. Nowhere was a security guard in sight. I would be in fear if I were a driver as there is no protection for the horsemen.

 

All in all, the place looks great as it is new but it is not as functional as the old enclosed grandstand. Also they have 7 restaurants but no major clubhouse or an owners club (2 Minute Room). In the old facility we booked parties here and we were able to fill both the Clubhouse and Adios Room for those parties (like AAA). That is about a 1,000 dinners. There is no way one can book a party at the Meadows that has more than 100 customers. It just cannot be done.

 

Somewhere in this building are two VIP Rooms (like a skybox in other sports) which sell for $300 a day during the week, $400 on weekends and $1,000 on major days like Adios, Triple Crown, etc. Rumor had it the Mark Weaver (one of Burke’s owners) already has booked one of them for Adios Day.

 

I know there is more but for some reason, my mind is not able to retrieve it. Will follow up if I recall more of it.

 

It only took me 3 races to get back into the winner circle. Dan Charlino (with whom bowls on my Wednesday night league) won the 3rd race. Randy and I went out and got our pictures taken. You got to love that this aspect of the on-track experience hasn't changed.
      

 

Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

Editorial
April
  23, 2009

Price was not right at several ADW companies

The following with the corresponding link is the result of my injury into the discrepancy of the Pick-6 listed on March's editorial. The link and article are here for your inspection.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Price was not right at several ADW companies

http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/national-news/2009/April/03/Price-was-not-right-at-several-ADW-companies.aspx
 
Posted: Friday, April 03, 2009 9:33 AM
by Frank Angst

A player who discovered a takeout discrepancy for at least one wager handled by several account wagering companies suspects profiteering while the account wagering companies claim an honest mistake committed by the tote company.

Bettors who placed pick six wagers on Standardbred races from the Meadowlands through several account wagering companies this year paid a higher price than most other handicappers did. Until mid-March, Twinspires.com, Xpressbet.com, the Racing Channel, and BetAmerica charged a 25% takeout on the pick six for the New Jersey track.

The correct rate for the Meadowlands pick six wager is 20%. The account wagering provider would have retained the extra 5% from its share of the total pool. TwinSpires said the mix-up stemmed from a problem with the net pool pricing controls in place and also involved two or three racetrack outlets.

Bobby Zanakis, who touts horses on a website, said the Meadowlands pick six problem follows a similar issue with Standardbred track Pompano Park’s pick three wager earlier this year.

Zanakis complained to Twinspires.com, Xpressbet.com, and the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission.

“Only when I brought this to light … did they back down,” Zanakis said.

All four outlets changed to the 20% takeout in mid-March.

Kevin Flanery, spokesman for TwinSpires.com owner Churchill Downs Inc., said that TwinSpires did not intend to charge customers a higher rate on the Meadowlands pick six. Flanery blamed tote company AmTote, which processes wagers for TwinSpires. Flanery said the mistake was limited to the pick six wager at Meadowlands.

“There was a glitch in the entry of information on the takeout rate,” Flanery said. “The two takeout rates didn’t match up.”

On April 2, an AmTote spokesperson declined immediate comment while the company reviews the issue.

Michael Vukcevich, deputy director of the New Jersey Racing Commission, said the account wagering sites did not break state regulations by charging the higher takeout, although he noted 25% was the maximum takeout they could charge for the wager.

Once Churchill was aware of the problem, it worked with the tote company to resolve it. Flanery said AmTote has put measures in place to assure that conflicting takeout rates do not occur in the future. Magna Entertainment Corp. owns AmTote.

“We know customers were affected. It’s a minimal amount of money involved, but we’re going to find those individuals and make their accounts whole on the differential of the takeout,” Flanery said. “Our guys are doing that right now.”

TwinSpires sent an e-mail to its members on Thursday night making note of the problem, blaming the tote company, and saying that it would credit the 37 customers affected.

“There is nothing more important to TwinSpires.com than insuring that you receive full value for your online wagering experience, and we will work on your behalf to make sure the technology providers in this industry do the same,” the e-mail says.

Zanakis suggested as a courtesy to players that account wagering sites list the takeout for each track’s wager somewhere on their sites.

Frank Angst is senior staff writer of THOROUGHBRED TIMES

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

Editorial
March
  25, 2009

Hidden Surcharge

To those that recall earlier this year, Twin Spires has been paying less than track odds at Pompano Park. Well it happened again. The Pick-6 at the Big M is just the tip of the iceberg. Really do not know how many tracks are taking a higher retention that the host but apparently it is being done right under our noses. Twin Spires got back to me on Sunday and said they will look into it.

This started on Saturday's Pick-6 at the Big  M in which most ADW's post the host track's payouts. Not so with Twin Spires, Pha Park's online wagering and Xpressbet to mention a few. YouBet and Ebet USA (Penn National) pay track odds. I can only wager via Xpress Bet in PA due to legislation requiring all addresses with 50 miles of that track has the sole rights to them as customers.

The Ky. Race Commission looked into it and guess what, apparently they are getting away with it. The Host Percentage is 20 percent of all wagered....but some ADW's with permission jack up the rate to 25%. I have to have a larger portion of my proceeds taking  out prior to posting the payouts.

 Here is the Ky. Race Commission and my letter that I sent out to friends online...hence you guys. We are not told anywhere by these online services that we will be raked...only once we find the discrepancy, does it appear.. Here is the Ky Commission and my comments

I just heard from the Ky Race Commission who stated that

"Based on conversations with representatives of the Thoroughbred Racing Protective Bureau (TRPB), a number of Account Wagering companies operating out of the AmTote Oregon Hub (including Twin Spires, Magna Xpress Bet, the Racing Channel, and America Tab) have a takeout of 25%, as compared to the Meadowlands and most of the other associations that bet into the Meadowlands, which have a takeout on the Meadowlands Pick-6 of 20%."

 It appears that we the customer has no protection from this surcharge of (5) Five Percent over other ADW's and the Big M themselves. Nowhere is it listed on all their individual websites. Like a thief in the night, they increase their to 25%. I contacted the Big M (two offices) who have failed to respond to this situation. It appears that the Big M has an agreement with Twin Spires et al. to screw their customer base as they could charge more hence this other snip:

 "Representatives of the TRPB have contacted the Meadowlands, but noted that the other wagering outlets can charge a higher takeout rate than the host track, if the host track (in this case, the Meadowlands) agrees to it."

 

It is ok to take out 25% of the Pick-6 without notifying the wagering public.

 I am here to notify you to stop betting any Pick-6 wagers via Twin Spires. I did not check the others but a couple. The Ebet USA and You Bet pay off at track retention rates.

 Guess I have to change the Meadowlands page to reflect the 25 percent Twin Spires take out. Saturday night payout was short $467. Who has our money? TWIN SPIRES MAGNA et al the ones listed above.. Penn National is looking real good right now..dam the law seeing how they broke the law in charging more than host track odds...they should be booted out.

 It is a fine line between profit and loss during a long wagering year. This 5 percent SURCHARGE without notice can break us. Boycott as you please. Options are to use another wagering service that actually pay track odds or don't bet at all at the Big M and through the robber barons ADWs. At least you have been  warned rather than the tracks and ADW's themselves releasing that info.

 I would call your Attorney General 's office in your home state and key members on the Agriculture Committee in the house and senate. Tell them what is going on behind closed doors.

Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

 

 

Editorial
March
  09, 2009

 

Ten-Cent Superfecta Wagering

With the pending opening of the new facility for casino and horse patrons at the Meadows in April, it would be nice to see the Meadows management do something positive for the horse bettors.

  As I understand the arrangement with the current owners and the previous owners MEC (Magna Entertainment Company), do have a management contract to run the trackside of the business.  Since the public has not been permitted trackside to watch the races, there has been little to manage. I think it is time for the Meadows to do something for its racing patrons.

  In past years, The Meadows has been on the leading edge in harness racing technology. Things like off track betting parlors, phone wagering, inside passing lanes, artificial racing surface (Tartan Surface similar to Astro-Turf) etc, were tried here before most of the other tracks in the sport used them.

  I believe this track is no longer on the leading edge in this sport; but rather, way behind the innovations in horse wagering. The fastest growing wager in the horse wagering business over the last couple years has been the introduction of the 10-cent superfecta wager. The bettor still has to spend a minimum of $2 to wager but can cover 20 different numerical outcomes in an attempt to pick the top four horses in their correct order of finish from 1st to 4th.

  It does not matter if it is the thoroughbred horse racing (flats) or standardbred horse racing (trots); the public loves this wager. Most tracks that implemented this wager not only increased the amount of money wagered (thus increasing their profit margin) but have found it most lucrative that they have added more races where the Superfecta wager is offered.

  Case in point is the premier track in harness racing, The Meadowlands (Big M) in which they added the 10-cent superfecta and doubled the number of races with this bet on each day they race. Pompano Park in Florida also went to the 10-cent Superfecta and offers that wager on nearly half their daily races.  Other tracks have it offered every race.

It has apparently gone unnoticed to Meadow’s management or they may be protecting a few players who like the carryover (if the wager is not hit correctly, it will be added to the next superfecta race offered). The best way to increase the amount of money to the superfecta wagering pool is to get more people to bet into it. The current setup is mostly a joke in which a two or three race carryover might net $10,000 in winnings. The tracks that offer the dime wager currently surpass that amount on a regular basis.

It is time for The Meadows to do something for their patrons as we once start making our trips back to see live racing action. A bowling alley or a ten-cent superfecta…hummmm, you decide!

 

 

 

 

Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

 


 

Editorial
December
  17, 2008

 

Necessity is the Mother of Invention

With the current economic downturn comes an opportunity for those who think out of the box. Case in point is at the Meadows Racetrack and Casino. The slots have infused much needed capital into what was a dieing business. The larger purses have increased the pay scale of the trainers and drivers thus raising their standard of living.

In these cold and windy days as we approach winter and the extra money in the trainers and drivers pocket provides the idea for one smart young driver trainer. He came up with the idea of offering his services of driving horses for their warm up miles prior to their running of the day’s races at the Meadows. He feels $10.00 is a fair price for his braving the cold windy days at the Western Pennsylvania racetrack. Many trainers and drivers agree. It is worth $10.00 of his or her money to have someone else warm the horse up.

On this past Tuesday, he warmed up 13 horses of which 6 came home to win in their respective races. There must be something to this. I cannot wait until the Meadows opens their new facility in April 2009. I just hope the days will be cold and windy!

 

 

Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

 

Editorial
August 
03, 2008

 

Race Analyst v. Touts

I am not a big fan of governmental oversight unless it appears that the powers that be can not be trusted to run an equitable game. As you know, at Bobby Z's Picks at the Races we offer our selections for free with no vested interest in getting the viewer to gamble. It is our hobby. We thank you for your continued support.

It seems now that every track video stream and television race program (TVG and HRTV) have been offering their selections for the races of which they themselves make a profit. It benefits them that you gamble. I do not have a problem with that as I do the same for a different reasoning that is to vicariously wager on the races through my reputation online. I do this by keeping statistics on the various wagers one would of made with our selections. I also keep track of all the winning selections that require your signature to the IRS before receiving payment (signers).

It is all too common that these entities offering selections to you do not tell you of their past record of selections. I refer to the one scene in “Let it Ride” in which the lead, Trotter, is touted by the seller of the race picks who was shouting “hit the daily double”. After Trotter asked him when, the tout gave a date years in the past.

We would not expect to receive false or misleading data in our past performance lines so why should be expect less from these people giving selections without any record of past performances. It is time for some governmental intervention in protecting the public. We need something similar as “truth in advertising” for products so the consumer knows what informed decisions to make in his wagering.

Wherever there exists an unsolicited offer of race selections, there should be a notification of past performances so the consumer to be aware of the race analyst record. Anything less would be considered “touting” which is illegal in many jurisdictions.

 

 

Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

 


Editorial
October
13, 2007

Open Letter to Twin Spires Club at Churchill Downs

 

To whom it may concern:

 

I am a Winticket customer whom just entered your Rewards Program at the Twin Spires.
 
After looking at some of the rewards I am totally disappointed at the level received after playing with your service...
 
In order to gain a $10 wager as a reward, I must turn in 10,000 points. If I wagered only on Non-Twin Spires tracks, that would return $10 on $5,000 wagered. A return of .002 %....what a cheap cheap return.
 
I understand that you have those multiplier effect on  points for those that exceed the $9,999 level, but come on, the majority of your customers DO NOT MEET THAT CRITERIA.
 
Even if I bet TwinSpires tracks, the return will be a mere .004%... Are you sure Churchill can afford giving that high amount? (sarcasm intended).
 
I am personally shocked at the cheap level a organization that gains millions and millions of dollars on a single race card would even try to offer this as something the customers would like (well in Kentucky but outside Ky?).
 
We can move our money off shore and gain up to a .07% rebate given back to us on a next day basis. DO YOU THINK YOUR REWARDS game will keep most of our money in the states? You got to be joking...
 
One of the cheapest companies I came across was at the Magna Meadows track. One receives 8 points for all Magna Tracks per dollar wagered. 4 points for the rest except for some of the special tracks so designated on different days. To get the same $10 wager voucher, one must turn in 8,000 points or in other words, wagered a grand and get $10...even at 4 points, wager $2,000 and get $10.
 
Magna Tracks                                                               Churchill Tracks
8000 points = $1000 wagered = $10 cash voucher          10,000 Points = $2,500 Wagered = $10 cash voucher
Return:  .01%                                                                   Return = .004%
 
Non-Magna Tracks                                                       Non-Churchill Tracks
8000 points = $2,000 wagered = $10 cash voucher         10,000 Points = $5,000 Wagered = $10 cash voucher
Return:   .005%                                                                Return: =  .002%
 
 
 
THE QUESTION:
Please explain why a company like Magna Entertainment Company (a partner of yours in HRTV and has never: repeat never, paid a dividend on either their stock traded in Toronto nor NASDAQ and has never made a profit) is able to more than double their rewards to their clientele than the Grand Empire of the Churchill Twin Spires Club?
 
Or in other words, Is Churchill in such dire financial straights that the Twin Spires Club can not afford to give a decent rebate?
 
I am blind cc: this mailing to my friends whom I had change services from XpressBet to Winticket.

-----------------------------------

The above was emailed on October 6, 2007 and as of this date, I have not received a reply from the  Churchill Down's Twin Spires Club. 

 

 

Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

 

 

 

Editorial
August 25
, 2007

HARNESS RACING TRIPLE CROWN

 

 

 
The Cane eliminations were held today....one horse was all ready in as that "Puke in the Adios" aka "Southwind Lynx" got a BYE....the remaining 8 entrants ran for 7 spots that were still open in the final.
 
This is the first leg of the Triple Crown...like I said in passed years, the triple crown in harness racing has become a joke..can you imagine the Kentucky Derby starting out like this? 
 
The present triple crown lineup has me totally disillusioned with harness racing... harness racing is looking more and more like the unwanted step child of thoroughbred racing. Time for the powers that be to move the triple crown to three races in which more than 9 horses are entered in the 1st leg...otherwise, this joke will continue but it is presently no longer funny.
 
Why not have the Triple Crown be the North American Cup, Meadowlands Pace and The Jug?
 
I know you would have more than 9 horses entered in the 1st leg. The other option is to scrap the whole sport in its entirety and more our wagers to a sport that has competition for its title of Triple Crown Championship.
 
On the trotting side, the 2007 Hambletonian winner (Donato Hanover) passed up the Yonkers Trot. I guess the trotting triple crown is not that coveted a prize as well.

 

 

 

Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

 

 

Editorial
August 12
, 2007

My Letter to the Author and Editor at the OR regarding the Article Written at: 

http://www.observer-reporter.com/OR/Story/08_12_ADIOS_COLOR_w_PIC

Mr. Bradwell:
 
Mr. Shaming (Mr. Magic Car Wash) may of failed to give you the full story or his memory may of faded or you failed to ask the proper questions. Mr. Shaming was barred or kicked off the grounds for having the only two winning tickets and cashing those tickets on the trifecta in which totaled over 14 thousand dollars. Why was he kicked out? His horse in that very same race, which was driven by Bill Fahy and trained by Dennis Ethier (Frenchy), went off as the prohibitive favorite and failed to hit the board (be part of the winning ticket). A most serious infraction of state rules. It is paramount to race fixing. All connections were barred from racing in Pennsylvania. That suspension lasted more than just one year. Trainer went to parts unknown. Bill Fahy went from the Meadows to Scioto to Pompano to the Big M. Bill won many prestigious races and in 1994 returned home to the Meadows..
 
To even post something on an owner who participated in one of the darkest days of the track and to link it to Adios Day is deplorable and a disgrace on your paper for not doing the home work or research needed before you publish the story for the public's consumption. I wish the Meadows and PA would of suspended him for life. For that reason, I will no longer buy your paper.
 
If your intention was to reflect on the house that Delvin Glenn Miller built, then you should of done your homework before you idolize some criminal whom got his hand caught in the cookie jar. His offense was not only illegal but immoral. It is one of the major reasons that forced the decline of racing in South Western Pa.
 
As for the attendance, I assume you were there in person. Did you pass any turnstiles? Did you pass anyone with a hand counter? The numbers you posted are as bogus as Mr. Shaming's infamous ticket cashing. Those numbers are provided by the track and are guesstimates at best. Unless they charge the customers to either park or to attend, those are fictitious numbers and should be rounded off to the nearest thousand. Bottom line is if your paper fails to see the truth something as little as a person's background or fails to question the information given, you have stepped over the line into propaganda. Whatever your reasoning, it just contributes to the belief that the O-R is just another rag. Why should I believe any story written throughout the paper when your credibility is gone. No wonder the readership is not what it is to be expected.
 
You also cited:
"Schaming's friend and fellow horseman Sal Celedonia, also of Upper St. Clair"
 
Did you even think to ask the question if Sal is related to or in fact the same person whom appeared in the caption below? Or are you oblivious to the history of Washington County? A county in which the county seat is just a block from your office.
 

The attorney general's office said Flynn, 62, of East Washington, and a partner, Charles Martin, 50, of South Strabane, worked with eight bookies, identified as Daniel Piccolo, 75, and Charles Skorvan, 58, both of Monongahela; William McGonigle, 69, of Peters; John Pankas, 68, of Canonsburg; William Antonio, 58, of Beallsville; Edmund Cononge, 43, of Canton; James Celedonia, 50, of Upper St. Clair, Allegheny County; and Anthony Cihal, 76, of Pittsburgh.

 
Apparently not. A book-maker interviewed with a man whom was kicked off the track are your main sources and lead in. Are you getting paid to promote the seedy side of the Meadows? You should pray and give thanks to God above that I am not a superior of yours as you would be filling out you Unemployment Application online at this very time.
 
Bob Zanakis
 
       Bobby Z's Picks at the Races
       http://mysite.verizon.net/r.zanakis/frames.htm
       http://zspicks.blogspot.com
 
ps:  I will be posting this email as a page on my website., If you or your editor would like to respond or address my concerns,  I will post same on that page.

----

It has been 3 days since mailing of the above, and no response from the Observer/Reporter or the author of the article presented. 

Here is a copy of said article:

8/12/2007  Email this articlePrint this article 

ADIOS TO THE OLD DIGS


By Michael Bradwell

Business editor

mbradwell@observer-reporter.com

MEADOW LANDS - Jim Schaming has missed only one Adios in the 41 years of its running at The Meadows Racetrack & Casino and has owned pacers that have run at the North Strabane Township track for the past three decades.

Schaming, 74, of Upper St. Clair remembers the glory years of The Meadows just after its 1963 opening, when harness racing was one of the biggest sporting draws in the area. He'd leave his home at 7 p.m. for an 8:15 p.m. post time, fighting traffic to the track that he said was sometimes backed up on Route 19 from Racetrack Road to Donaldsons Crossroads.

On Saturday, eating a buffet lunch at the Top of the Track and overlooking a near-capacity crowd in the grandstands and at trackside, Schaming expressed hope that the track's glory days will soon return, thanks to an influx of cash from The Meadows' adjacent casino operations.

On a warm, bright August afternoon with parking overflowing from the venue's paved lots around the track and casino down to temporary grass lots near the statue of the race's namesake at the Racetrack Road entrance, there were plenty of reasons for horse-racing enthusiasts to be hopeful about the future of the 44-year-old track.

The Adios attracted 5,251 racing fans Saturday, down slightly from 5,439 a year ago. But with the added attraction of the slot machines, The Meadows' parking areas were filled with 4,350 vehicles.

The Meadows' 1,738 slot machines, which began operating June 11 in the temporary casino, already are giving the track a boost, increasing purses by 50 percent over a year ago and pumping about $500,000 a week into horse operations.

On Wednesday, The Meadows announced it soon will begin work on a $151 million permanent casino and 200-room hotel. The project will require demolition of the original grandstand and wagering area, but the new complex, which will include three restaurants, an entertainment area and a luxury spa for hotel guests, will incorporate 3,000 slots with the venue's harness racing tradition by connecting a new grandstand area to the casino.

"I like the fact that there's going to be constant activity 24 hours a day in the same building as the racing," Schaming said, adding that with the revenue from nearly twice as many slot machines, purses for the races will build even higher.

"Because of that, we'll have a purse structure similar to the Meadowlands in New Jersey and Woodbine in Canada," he said of two of the Northeast's premier tracks. "We're going to be watching some of the best horses in the country now and some of the leading drivers."

Schaming's friend and fellow horseman Sal Celedonia, also of Upper St. Clair, agreed that the changes that slots revenue are bringing to horse operations at the track also will make horse owners like him more competitive.

"For years, most of the owners in this business just did it for the fun of racing," he said. "The purse increase means the value of horses is starting to increase. It's nice to know you can invest some new money and look to turn a profit."

Celedonia, who owns several horses, said he's preparing to attend upcoming sales to add more to his stable.

Down at trackside, brothers Fred and Mike Chambers of Avella said they'll miss the old track they've been coming to since 1979 but are glad to see their favorite sport being revived.

While both said they have no interest in wagering on slot machines, Fred, 34, and Mike, 28, said they attend every Adios race and are happy seeing the positive effects from slots revenue.

"It's sad to see the old place go, but they're keeping the racing around, so it's a good thing," said Fred Chambers.

"We'll keep coming back for the horse racing," Mike Chambers said.

Rick Keck of Beaver County, a trainer for horse owner Mark Goldberg for the past 20 years, said that in addition to bigger purses, horsemen are looking forward to a new paddock area and repairs to the barn area that will occur with the new casino project.

"The whole track is excited," Keck said. "It's been a long time coming."


 

Bob Zanakis

Editor

 

 

 

Editorial
August 10
, 2007


ADIOS ADIOS

Goodbye Adios we’re sad to see you go.

Even though in the last few years, your handle has been low.

No more Delvin Miller, no more Adios the horse,

Time the great odds maker has finally run it course.

 

Soon the grand old building, glass façade and all,

Will be razed and torn by the wrecking ball.

Gone will be the tote machines, and the leaking roofs

Gone will be the TV screens and the sounds of hooves.

 

Goodbye grumbling bettors, those not in the fix.

Goodbye to low payoffs, so long losing tix.

Adieu to the clubhouse dining with the steaks so tough

Branded with the whip marks when the drivers were rough

 

So we say goodbye, adios my friends.

Slots, not racing, are the latest trends.

Bells and gongs and whistles, lights that flash

To the slots I say, you can kiss my ass.

 

Adios, goodbye. So long, see you later.

To the ghettos and racing soon to be a crater

Racing will never be the same.

Now it’s a racino, that’s the new game.

 

Adios, Adios

 

 

 

Randy Brownlee

Contributing Race Analyst

 

 

 

 

Editorial
May 27
, 2007


THE JUNE 5, 2007 Opening Of the Meadows Casino

"Slots and Metamorphosis of Racing"

 

As the slots will be opening soon at the Meadows (June 5th), there are some effects worth mentioning. The slot bill (Act 91) will soon produce Million Dollar purses that will jump-start the breeding industry. This will draw more people in the sport, bidding higher prices for the offspring that is good for the breeders and the sport but like most things in life, there are offsetting effects that are never mentioned when slots raise the purse structure. The little guy gets squeezed.

Under the radar of the slots and Pennsylvania racing, is the little known fact of the squeeze on the small stables. Case study is the Meadows. Recently, the Meadows did increase the purses around 25 percent via the advance against future slot income. The purse account currently is about $700,000.00 in the red; no big deal as once the slots start it may only take a couple weeks to pay that amount off out of the slot proceeds. NO ONE is mentioning the hike in costs to almost double for the hay, feed, vet bills, etc. Seems everyone associated with this business wants their cut (capitalism). The larger stables can purchase things they need at a discount due to the economies of scale (more you buy lower the individual item costs). The small stable has no such purchasing power.

When large stables move to the Meadows like some all ready have, the competition is a bit harder to make a profit on the racing itself but the rewards are not covering the higher costs. What we will see (and I sincerely hope I am wrong) is the small business succumbs to the larger operations. We will no longer see the guy with two or three horses on the track supported with slots. Just like the American farmer, the small business stable will be bought out and driven into near extinction. I really do not think the framers of the slot legislation had this in mind when writing the bill.

Bottom line is that as a person who wagers or is a fan, will see more races in which the trainers will have multiple entries in a race but will race with different head numbers as they are owned by different owners. We see it now on many days at the Meadows and in current stake races as well.

I hate to say it but the preverbal cat is out of the bag. Slots are here and racing, as we know it, will change through the process of metamorphosis and leave its cocoon as something it is not today. That is really something I have no desire to see. I pray that I am wrong.


Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

Editorial
March 03
, 2007

Slots Revenue And Its Effects On Racing.

 

With the increase of the states that are implementing or planning on using slots to save their horse industry, they need to be aware of the effects slots have resulted in states that have used this method of revenue enhancement.

One would usually assume that with the increase of the purse structure that slots revenue provides one would see more honest racing. You may think I am alone in this assumption but I do know of others whom believe it. Let us look to Canada and their problems with racing after they combined racing with slot gaming.

EPO (Erythropoietin) seems to be the most serious problem today along with juicing the horses with speed (amphetamine). EPO is a drug that increases the production of red blood cells in the horses system. Although this increases the strength and endurance of the horse, it has a negative and serious effect on the equine’s natural functioning body (homostasis). At times it would be life-threatening. The problem with EPO is that at normal levels of dosages, the administration of this drug would have little if any effect on the equine. In order to get the red blood cell count higher, a high dosage is needed to get the desired result. This high dosage affects the body in its normal functions.

Canada recognizes this serious problem and has taken steps to catch the offending parties. The current list of offenders grows daily. Canada has even traveled to the states to get their blood work in the barns of trainers that ship their horses into Canada. A friend in Michigan had all his horses tested by the Ontario Racing Commission when his horses were stabled in the states. All were negative.

Even with the threat of a 10 year suspension, these cheating owners/trainers are willing to gamble on the use of EPO and other drugs to get an advantage in racing for the higher slot induced purses. Canada is not alone in this problem as tracks in Pennsylvania are now testing for the presence of antibodies formed when horses are administered EPO. New York’s Monticello Racetrack has admitted publicly about having a serious problem with EPO usage.

The reward offered by the enhanced purses apparently outweighs the risk to the cheaters as they are trying to gain an edge in racing. In common terms, it now does pay to cheat.

The racing commissions seem to be on the back end of the drug-testing curve while the owners/trainers who cheat are on the front end. More money from slot revenue is needed for the regulatory agencies to create updated testing programs. If the racing commissions can gain equal footing with the cheaters, we may see a level playing field in racing.

  I will leave you with a partial post from the Toronto Sun that motivated me to write this editorial.

One owner, who shared his story with Sun Media, tells of a horse he claimed recently from a trainer currently under scrutiny by Woodbine officials.

On the night of the claim, the pacer started from an outside post, made multiple moves during the race then drew off to win in one minute and 51 seconds.

Once he changed barns, the horse has been five seconds slower and unable to compete.

"We do a tremendous amount of vet work with all our horses and he is the only one that generally needs nothing," the owner said in an e-mail. "So here we have a perfectly sound horse with perfect blood work and he can't beat 1:57. Yet, he went in 1:51 (with another trainer.)"

Slot revenue may be the savior of racing with the huge cash stream it provides but at what cost? On the other hand, maybe with smaller purses, these same offending parties would be willing to cheat by losing and betting on the other guy’s entrant who has a higher price in odds. Seems we are at risk with slots or without them.

 

 


Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

 

 

 

Editorial
December 21
, 2006

PA GAMING BOARD

 

To all board members:
 
I realize the title of your organization uses the term "gaming" it should not entitle the board to play their own little games. Apparently you all feel it does. Never before have the people see corruption in the light as this Pittsburgh slot license. We
are used to seeing it indirectly, under the cover of darkness.
 
To say the "Fix" was in is an understatement. You can not get 5 people together to agree upon which beer to drink but this board can agree "UNANIMOUSLY" on anything proves that it is a rubber-stamped board. The decision on the Pittsburgh Sot Parlor was a NO-BRAINER....but apparently there are NO BRAINS on the board.
 
This board seeing that there was only ONE minority group that offered a application for a slot license, saw fit to reward that entity with a license without regard to the taxpayers of Western Pa nor the city of Pittsburgh.
 
This board is supposed to do the people's work. You have failed miserably to those in the western part of the state. Let us face it, when the Pens leave town (and whom can blame them), you are the ones that will have to live with knowledge of your decision.
 
At least you were in sync with the public's wishes on the Crossroads proposal. To have a slot parlor in that close proximity of the hallowed grounds of Gettysburg battlefield would of been morally reprehensible. At least you got that No-Brainer correct. As for the rest of the state time will tell.. But this board will always be remembered as hammering the last nail in the Pittsburgh Penguins coffin.
 
LETS GO PENS !!
(as they leave Western PA)

 

 


Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

 

Editorial
December 01
, 2006

Union Busting Blueprint

 

Although this is my theory, I am starting to see it in our life today.

First step is to buy an existing company or business and lease back part of the property and business to the previous owners whom are contractually obligated to the union workers.

Second step is to build a temporary facility (owned and operated by the acquiring company) on the newly acquired property. The new company will seek employees whom are not part of any union. Hence, the new work staff at the new temporary building will be non-union.

Third step is to tear down the existing old business building and start construction of a new facility that is promoted to the public to be “state of the art” or “customer friendly”. The down time of the previous existing business run by union workers will be put out of work while the new construction takes hold. An estimate of a year to two years is very plausible.

The total effect is a layoff of up to 2 years for unionized work force and though the contracts of said workers may of expired depending on the wording in each union contract. Bottom line, the new owners and the old owners (who now are lease the business) now are free to hire whom they care to and no longer are hindered by contractual negotiations for the work force.

I truly hope my theory will NOT be proven valid, as Oaktree-Millennium acquisition of the Meadows property and leasing of the business to MAGNA will bust the union workforce in place presently. Only time will tell. If I am correct, it is an unforeseen event in the present slot legislation that will hurt many people.

 

 

 


Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

 

 

Editorial
November 17
, 2006

Are Slots the cure-all for a bad business?

 

When Oaktree Millennium purchased the Meadows and its Off Track Betting Parlors, they decided to retain the previous owners (MAGNA) to manage their horse racing business.Giving the Oaktree Millennium the benefit of the doubt, I still must question their decision to keep a company whom failed miserably in handling the racing product of the Meadows.

Using the handle (total monies wagered) as a key for the years 2001 to 2005, one can clearly see that the MAGNA management experienced a drastic reduction during those 5 years. In 2001, The Meadows itself and its phone wagering handled $164 million. It has since been falling to the 2005 level of $48 million. That is over 70 percent decrease in its business. Any economist or business would not keep a management in place that oversaw a decline of 70 percent in 5 years.

The total Meadows operation (including the Off Track Betting Parlors) does present a better “worse case scenario” as they had a handle of $128 million in 2001 and recorded a $113 million handle in 2005 for a decrease of 12.2%. Overall, the total Meadows business had a $293 million handle in 2001 and 2005 saw $161 million handle, a 44.9 percent decline.

My question is why would a business pay over $50 million for a slot license, $220 million for a business (minus its Call-A-Bet phone wagering) that was purchased for $50 million a short time ago and spend $450 million on new buildings when the previous business declined over 40 percent in 5 years?  Seems there is gold in those slot machines.

To even think Oaktree Millennium will make a profit is mind blowing. I really think the Slots are not an answer to the horse industry business model. It will only prolong the inevitable. New management techniques and promotions may serve the business more than expending nearly a billion dollars to create a slot environment.

All the above handle totals were from the Pa Dept of Agriculture site via their annual reports from the years 2001 to 2005.

 


Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

Editorial
August 13
, 2006

Decadence on Display - ADIOS DAY 2006

What might have been the best day at the track in a long time turned out to be a display of decadence. The Meadows by way of its MEC Management (oxymoron), gave us a glimpse on the future of gambling for Western Pennsylvania.

A man can not serve two masters is an age-old lesson not recalled by the so called MEC Management. Their attempt to cater to the family aspect of attending a sport with their clowns and balloons and other children entertainment was offset by having a cornucopia of watering holes offering alcohol and tobacco products by scantily clothed young women for the drunken masses.

If I had any children, I would have been ashamed to have them exposed to both the alcohol and smoking. There should have been an area where one of legal age to abide the liquor was beyond the reach or sight of the youngsters. I just wish the Liquor Control Board had undercover people in attendance and offer some protection to our youth.

The playing of music in between races added to the fanfare but made it hard for people to concentrate. The level of the noise generated by their loudspeakers was approaching intolerable limits.

If Meadows founder Delvin Miller were alive today, he surely would have been dismayed. What was intended, as a celebration for the life of Adios, has turned into Sodom and Gomorra.

The Adios Day giveaway contest was a trip to Las Vegas. I guess having been purchased by a Vegas gambling entity, we can expect our morals and those of the future of our children to decay in the same manner as Las Vegas.

The future Grandstand will hold 1,250 and the same for the apron. The attendance yesterday, if repeated, would fill the plant to the gills and beyond. Attending future Adios Day events with this MEC Management Team (oxymoron) is doubtful for this author. I am also second-guessing my thoughts on the slot legislation passed. I feel now that I have supported the wrong side of this issue. I fear it is too late to save our children’s future if we decide to remain in Pennsylvania.

Following is but one of the wateringholes in plain site of the children.




Bob Zanakis
Editor

 


 

Editorial
May 17, 200
6


Track Safety Concerns Need Addressed

 

I hate the fact that someone had to perish for all of us to realize the truth about this sport. By us knowing now the inherit dangers of the sport, it is our responsibility to do everything in our power to insure the safety of those who participate. Seems the ambulance attendants at Harrington Raceway were not in the vehicle during the accident in the first race that resulted in the death of Hal Belote. The attendants had to run to vehicle after accident was known to them. I really cannot say that it may had an impact or not, but it could not hurt to get to the scene of the accident as soon as possible.

I notice that my home track, The Meadows uses the same procedure with the attendants/medical personnel standing on the ground floor during the running of the race. I really do not know if anyone in power at The Meadows recalls Wylie Funeral Home but they had the contract for the Ambulance service during live racing. years ago. Mr. Wylie would start the ambulance at one minute to post, pull it up to the draw-gate and have the security guard open the gate. If anything happened during the race, he was on the track instantly.

I think it is time that we go back to the past in order to save the future. Harness racing should take a page from the thoroughbreds and have the ambulance follow the starter and the horses.  Being in this trailing position, they will be on the scene immediately when something happens. There will not be a several minute delay in offering what may be a life saving medical attention. Some tracks are starting to do this very thing. Maybe all tracks in this game should follow suit. 

I certainly would not want to be the person in charge that denies medical help to those that need it in order to save a gallon or so of gas per day. The cost is way too high, even at today's high price of gasoline.


Bob Zanakis
Editor

 


 

 

Editorial
November 15
, 2005


Why Use XpressBet?

 

MEC (Magna Entertainment Corporation), which purshased the Meadows, knew from the very start that their principle owner, Frank Stronach, was interested in the phone wagering system for his oligopoly of racetracks. Last year, MEC decided to not build the slots casino type building at the Meadows ($77 million) for the less costly ($34 million) to build a slot parlor in Oklahoma.

MEC knew what was about to be the sale of the Meadows and had to diverse the XpressBet from the Meadows operation. With making XpressBet a stand-alone company, the retention rates or dispersal of those funds wagered would be less to the horsemen’s accounts. Now with the pending sale of the Meadows to Millennieum Oaktree organization, a person like myself who wagers at the Meadows has a decision to make.

  If I were to wager on a Meadows race at home via XpressBet, the purse accounts for the horsemen would be lessened than if that same dollar were wagered On Track. I have no effect on the purse structure at the Meadows by wagering via XpressBet.  You and I have options to use other wagering services. In fact, none in Pennsylvania can accept you or I if we live within a 35-mile radius of a harness or thoroughbred track. The decision to use another service to wager is now countrywide. The free market is where we can find a service that suits our needs is the over riding factor in obtaining our wagering accounts.

  I have been told (by XpressBet Management) that wagering with another service like America Tab (whom I endorse) would hurt the horseman, as they would not get their usual cut. Well, the pending sale of the Meadows for $225,000,000.00 has demonstrated that the old ways of doing things have changed with the spin-off of XpressBet from The Meadows umbrella. I personally find the service at America Tab more accurate when posting changes and scratches; their personnel are trained with a customer-orientated attitude. Their system is state of the art with many more video feeds than their competition.

In fact, they believe in their company so much that they are willing to pay you to try them out.  Open a new account with WinTicket.com with a minimum deposit of $50.00. Once you have reached the $100.00 threshold of bets (or wagers), they will deposit $100.00 into your account the next day. So if you placed and wagered $100.00, win, lose or draw, you get another $100.00 back to you. You have been entertained at no cost to you. You may even make money with no risk to your investment.

Any reasons to keep that XpressBet wagering account have been rendered moot with the sale of The Meadows Race Track.

If you are interested in opening an account with WinTicket, call (866) 891-5100 and tell them you are referred by Bobby Zanakis. I get some money when you get yours. The day you get your $100.00, I get $50.00 added to my account. Now after getting your C-note, you can refer others to WinTicket and receive $50 when they get their $100! 

 


Bob Zanakis
Editor

 



Editorial
September 2
6, 2005


If harness racing is ever to become a big time sport like professional baseball, football, hockey or basketball, they better start trying to act professional. I will only report on two major problems I see with today’s racing.

 

First problem is that of territorial jurisdictions having more power over the sport than they need to have. Each year, the USTA collects dues from all the owners, trainers and drivers in this country. One cannot participate without their USTA license. Take the most recent and most pronounced suspension since that of Walter Case Jr., that being of the sports number one man, Brian Sears. He is to serve a 6 month suspension in Pennsylvania with a require stay at a rehab establishment. Is he there now? No, he is driving in Canada and New Jersey. If the states will not recognize each other’s fines/suspensions, what good is it to have them in the first place? I realize there are things like “stay” or “appeals” and I will not want to take a person’s rights away, but who is protecting the rights of Joe Q Public with their wagering money that supports this sport? I think it is high time for the USTA to get into this matter and try to bring something credible to the table. If the USTA could not pull or suspend the licenses of their membership for causation like positive test, felonies, etc, they should write it in their bylaws. If one person in any professional sport is on suspension for something that happened in Pittsburgh, why should he be permitted to participate in the sport in Chicago?  It is time for the USTA to gain some power and start to regulate this sport or otherwise the average age of the crowds in attendance will be ever growing higher with less people supporting the tracks.

 

Problem two as I see it is the level of professionalism or lack thereof in the judges booth. I started paying more attention to this since they announced the fiasco of the judges at Scioto Downs on May 29th 2004. A blatant mistake like that should never happen. Look to just last Saturday at Maywood where the judges posted and made official the wrong set of horses. Not until the winner of the race called the judges to inform them of their mistake, did they correct it. Not to mention the missed calls at Mohawk for those premier races. I could go on, but you get the idea. We have to start testing thess judges and create an oversight bureau, similar to Internal Affairs in the police department. We need to judge the judges. If not, the public suffers once more. Again the responsibility and means is up to the USTA. Stand up and take control of this sport. If not, it will not be a sport of any professional standards.

 

My last thought is that now with the advent of the home computer, news travels quickly. A screw up in Chicago is read about in Pittsburgh in a matter of minutes and not months like years past. We need prompt attention to the matters described above.  


Bob Zanakis
Editor

 


 

 

Editorial
September 2
3, 2005


It has become apparent that the horse racing patron is at risk in Pennsylvania. A company, Xpressbet, which provides online wagering in this state, can and did provide false information on scratches, which misleads the customer to wager on another.

On August 14th of this year, one so-called company did post the horse Immediate Reaction as scratched (would not race) in the 9th race at Mountaineer Park. Said scratched horse did in fact win said race going wire
to wire. Quite a feat for a horse not supposed to be entered.



After going through the so-called legal process, the law sided with the business. It is now apparent that an entity that accepts wagers online, phone or in person, can provide the customer any kind of false information (whether it is intentional to manipulate odds or just a mistake), which cause a monetary hardship upon the customer.

The only solution as I see fit is to take our preverbal "ball and bat" and move the game offshore. There are many legal outfits offshore where we can play ball. Not only horse racing but sports wagering as well.

These offshore wagering venues offers rebates; some up to 10 percent of what is wagered today will be added to your account tomorrow. So in the future, if you feel you got the short end of the deal, you still have options like to move to offshore accounts. Of course the state and tracks will not longer get their cut, you get the cut in the form of rebates. Does that not appeal more to you, having more money in your pocket?


Bob Zanakis
Editor

 


                                                      Editorial
                                                                
May 21, 2005


It has been a while since my last Editorial but I think the time is right for some good news on the sport of harness racing. This time of year we have the opportunity to see for the first time, the up and coming stars of harness racing. We will see across this country, the two year olds making their way to the various racetracks. 

I know for me, this is the most exciting part of the year in racing. All things start new with the new crop of racehorses. They first start in either qualifying or baby races (small purse of a hundred of so dollars). The champions of tomorrow are making their first step on their journey into their racing careers. We have the opportunity to follow that magical right of passage of the freshmen class into what we all hope to be quality racehorses.

I had the pleasure of seeing one monster of a horse in 1970 win his baby race (or was it a qualifier) in 2:07. His last half was in 1:00 flat. That was the first race of the World Champion Albatross. Twenty years later, in 1990, I witnessed the baby race of one of the locals who went in 1:58:0 with his last half in: 58:0 flat. That very first race by Cambest was an indication of goods things to come. By the way, Cambest still holds the fastest mile ever run with his 1:46:1 Time Trial back in 1993. 

If any of you have the chance to make it to the track on these days, when they offer the baby races, please do attend. You may be viewing with your own eyes at one of the sport’s great stars of the future!. It is this aspect of the harness racing game that never gets old. I think we all started into this game as a fan first and foremost; and, we can relive that aspect each year with the new crop of two year olds. I really love this game and all the above are the reasons why. Get out to the track and view the stars of tomorrow!!


Bob Zanakis
Editor

 



                                                      Editorial
                                                                
June 22, 2004


On May 29, 2004, the following  incident at Scioto Downs was reported at the USTA site. I offer their reporting for your inspection:

"The Ohio State Racing Commission has fined the judges at Scioto Downs after they an incorrect placing and posted and paid incorrect mutuels in a recent race at the Columbus, Ohio track.

Presiding judge Larry Richard and associate judges Herman Brickel and Patrick Campana were each fined $2,000, but had all but $500 of that suspended -- provided they commit no more violations prior to January 1, 2005.

In a race on May 29, in a race apparently won by Pegasus Osborne and driver Kyle Ater, the judges ruled that the pair had caused interference with Otto Lotto and driver Kayne Kauffman, who had finished third in the original order of finish.

Instead of placing Pegasus Osborne third in the official order of finish he was posted second and the result made “official” and the mutuels were posted and paid -- though incorrect.

The mistake was discovered shortly after the mutuels were paid and the Commission reported that the public lost approximately $11,000 because of the snafu.

The purse in the race, $3,500, was paid according to the proper order of finish and is noted correctly in the records of the U.S. Trotting Association."

 I am suggesting that these judges need not be fined but rather FIRED for their corrupt or incompetent actions. Until that day arrives, I am encouraging all our readers to BOYCOTT SCIOTO DOWNS. The public loses $11,000 while the owners, drivers and trainers are made whole. A $1,500 fine for The Three Stooges in the judge's box is a warning sign of the public be dammed attitude. I also am thinking about not going to the Jug this year or any future years unless these monkey judges are released into the wild.

BOYCOTT SCIOTO DOWNS NOW and keep an eye on THE JUG!!!


Bob Zanakis
Editor





Editorial
May 01, 2004


On April 24, 2004, Dave Palone obtained the new Harmer Advantage 6.8 at The Meadowlands. Dave used it Saturday and Sunday at the New Jersey racing facility and Dave even lent it out as the picture depicts on this week's Harness and Fair World Magazine cover.

The problem currently is two fold. First there is resentment among a few horsemen at the Meadows with Mark Goldberg being the most vocal. He desires to have the Harmer banned from use at this track. His reasoning is that if permitted, they all will have to go out and buy this new bike.

His actions seem to prove the fact that the Harmer Advantage 6.8 is a superior racing bike. Though his actions are well meaning, they are definitely misguided. Mr. Goldberg has been at this racetrack and seen some major changes. The old conventional bike was replaced with the modern "modified bike" in 1976. In addition, who can forget bikes like the "Super Bike", "Single Shaft" and "Cheetah"? All these came into being and left for various reasons. Bottom line is that the Racing Commissions and the USTA have approved the bike and should be permitted to be purchased and used on our racetracks. Restricting the use of these and other approved bikes is basically against our "free enterprise economy". If Mr. Goldberg desires a fascist or a socialist state, he is very free to leave here and locate the government of his choice to restrict the use of certain equipment.

The second problem of these Harmer bikes developed itself on the sixth day of use by Dave Palone. His tire went flat in the middle of the post parade in one of the races in the middle of the card. These bikes have specially made, high-pressured tires that need spares to be kept on hand when a flat appears. Dave had no such back up in tire so he had to switch race bikes.

Once a few more drivers at the Meadows purchase the Harmer racing bike, maybe Mr. Goldberg can open a tire repair and sales shop on the backside and make enough money to buy his own bike. Free market economy works to fill the needs of the consumer while a socialist one dictates the needs and pretends to satisfy it.

Bob Zanakis
Editor

 

 

Editorial
(04.05.04)


After hearing a public handicapper on the HRTV (Horse Racing TV) state that this horse has no early speed, my teeth were clinched. It is my opinion that ANY horse can leave the gate. This “lack of’ or “void of” early speed is a misnomer. I only have to look at the Meadows history to prove the point.

A former driver for the Mark Goldberg barn once told me that any horse could leave. The discussion (at the local watering hole called Meadow Inn was the locale) soon ended up with a small wager that one trainer (name eludes me) said I will put you up on my horse, Wolfman JK who has the nine hole and bet you will not see the rail (there was no such thing as pylons or passing lanes back then) if you try for the front. Wolfman JK's history had him never left the gate in all his lifetime races.

The anticipated race was held with a driver change announced to the crowd in attendance, “make the driver of the number nine horse, Wolfman JK, Lenny Mancuso Jr.” As soon as that gate unfolded, Wolfman JK (from post nine without the staggered starting gate) left like a bullet. In the crowd words like “ this horse never left in his life” were heard. Lenny had the lead of the race before the 1/8 of the mile was contested. Wolfman faded past the top of the stretch but the wager was won,  a pitcher of draft beer at the Inn.

If you still believe that some horses cannot leave the gate, I pose one serious question for you. If a horse can finish a race with a fast last quarter (after running ¾ of a mile), why could he/she not race that same quarter in the first part of the race when he/she has not expended energy traversing ¾ of a mile?

Bobby Z
Editor
Z’s Picks at the Races



 

Editorial
(02.01.04)



The Meadows' late daily double on Saturday (January 31, 2004) paid out $68.60 for a $2.00 ticket. Race 12 was won by a $41.00 paying horse while the winner of Race 13 paid $6.80 to complete the double.

This produced a payout that was only 1.67 times the win price of the first horse. If you would not bet the double but elected to bet $2 to win on the first horse, you would of had $41.00 returned. Now roll over that money by betting $41.00 to win on the horse that won the second half of the double (20.5 X $6.80). That would give you $139.40 return on your original $2.00 wager. The Meadows expects us to accept the poultry $68.60 the Meadows distributed as legit. In the spirit of the elderly lady in the classic Wendy's commercial, WHERE'S MY MONEY??

These statistically anomalistic race payouts at the Meadows are an all too common occurrence in these recent years. Lost on track management is the fact that most bettors throw more money back into the pools after a nice hit. Not only is the public hurt by these unacceptable practices but the track itself, state and horsemen's purse accounts lose their cut of the money not wagered by the public as they take their dollars elsewhere.

January 30th had the late pick three paid $41.00 while the last two races of the pick-3 were also the late double which paid $112.00. Is it no wonder why Meadows Management is crying for slots as the customers leave to wager elsewhere?

I say once you clean up your own house, maybe you could be entrusted with more gaming devices, but first prove you can handle what you all ready have!!!!!

Do you feel like venting from frustration arising from practices of MAGNA (MEC) Tracks and/or Xpress Bet? Well then, you are not alone. There is a grass roots boycott effort that started in California. Click on this link: MAGNA Boycott and read other people's experiences and you may share one of your own by posting your story there.




Editorial
(01.14.04)


Open Letter To MEC PA VICE PRESIDENT Mike Jeannot



Dear Mr. Jeannot:

You stated in the article "In my view, a real risk exists that more gaming outlets -- be they additional racetracks, land-based casinos, Indian casinos or slots parlors at resorts -- will be authorized than can be supported by the individual markets, especially southwestern Pennsylvania. Market over-saturation could be an immediate reality, with negative consequences for everyone involved. ".

It is nice to see that you are in line with your boss, Frank Stronach, in the protectionist attitude. With both Gulfstream and Santa Anita down about 15 percent from last year, I can see that this really works....NOT. In the age of NAFTA and GATT, Magna and TVG,  both are guilty of returning to the past history of protectionism. All involved are hurt by this action. The public at large gets less tracks and less options. It is no wonder why so much money is now going to off shore wagering sites.

Mr. Jeannot, you should know that we live in a free market society and what you are suggesting is for you and other tracks to have a monopoly on the slots. Well, just look to Comcast to see what a monopoly can do. They raised the level of your program to a level two notches higher than previously had. It costs about 15 bucks more a month to get your Meadows / HRTV signal. Is it worth it? The jury is still out.

As to the integrity of the slots, I have a few problems with the past history of the Meadows. This is the only track to scratch a horse out of a race only to place him back in as the race started and have the scratched horse win, while denying people on call-a-bet, like me the opportunity of wagering on same. Name of the horse was Keystone Quazar. You are the only track to post the results of a race, payoff some customers and then stop paying. The name of those horses in question were named Southampton Henry and Youngwood Flash.

Not to end there, you were the track to leave open the windows after the race started permitting 17 tellers on the bottom floor (yes the Meadows had that many employees selling tickets on the ground floor on a week day) to wager during and after the races. My horse , Nero's Valentine, crossed the wire at 9/1 but paid a poultry $9.00 to win once the Meadows crew stopped wagering.. You think an organization would learn from their mistakes,,,,but not the Meadows. The 10th race at Hollywood Park was running and people both at the Meadows and New Castle otb were able to punch tickets on the race even when the race was concluded. This last event happened under your watch a few years back.

These are but a few examples of reasons why people both do not trust the racing at the Meadows nor want to attend your establishment. You have a major problem here and maybe it is time for new leadership at the helm. I realize that you have been at the Meadows since Ladbroke took control in 1990. You have removed most if not all low, middle and upper management in the mean time. I urge you to step aside and permit another person to run this organization. You truly have not done the job. Your tactics and management techniques are stale at best. To top it all off, what would a Christmas party for your employees cost the Meadows,,,pennies on the dollar. The bad press your establishment received could not be set right if you spent ten times the cost of the party.

Please step down before the Meadows goes under, because of your leadership (or lack thereof).

Bob Zanakis
Editor
Z's Picks at The Races:
http://www.nb.net/~bobbyz/






Copyright ©2007 Bobby Z's Picks at The Races.
All rights reserved.