| Jupiter from Griffith Observatory |
|
|
| June 3rd 2006 |
| Mare Nectaris - Griffith Observatory |
|
|
| June 3rd 2006 |
11th
June 2006 --- During the June 3rd public star party at the Griffith Observatory satellite, the seeing
was bad due to the triple digit temperatures during the day, and the subsequent cool down at night to the 70s. Other than
this the skies were pretty good: no clouds, very little haze, and practically no wind.
As night fell,
there were four planetary targets up in the sky, but as would soon become apparent, only two of them were worth looking at,
due to the bad seeing caused by the rising heat currents.
Mars is now, for
all practical purposes, gone. It presents a disk that is less than 5 arc-seconds wide, and its low position near the horizon
makes the view too degraded to see any features, even when one uses imaging equipment. Saturn was only a little higher, and
suffered from the heat currents running off the asphalt parking lot. I didn’t try and image either one. The Moon was
the highest target, and had the advantage that it was large enough that it presented good views at relatively low magnifications
that mitigated the effects of the heat currents to some degree, but high powers here were out of the question.
That left Jupiter
as the main attraction that night. Fortunately it rose above a set of tall trees. Plants in general give off less heat than
concrete or asphalt as things cool down at night, and therefore the seeing above them is better. I got reports that the two
temperate zone belts were visible, as well as the Great Red Spot, and some dark features in the normally white equatorial
zone. However, a few observers asked if I knew where the fourth moon of Jupiter
was. No evidence of it existed in the raw video images I collected, so it was with some astonishment that, after stacking
several hundred images and examining the results, I saw the black spot of a moon shadow clearly on all the processed images! After checking with my planetarium program, I soon identified the spot as the shadow
of Europa, which was transiting the disk of Jupiter during the time of the star party. In fact, it was preparing to exit off
the disk when we all had to stop and pack away our equipment. It shows how bad the seeing was that night; I received no reports
from anyone that they spotted the shadow, but then both Io and Europa cast small shadows, and it’s easy to miss them
if the seeing is bad.
Another feature
everyone was trying to see was Red Spot Jr., the companion to the Great Red Spot that has an interesting history behind it.
Prior to 1998 or so junior was actually three or more white spots, two of which had been in existence and tracked by amateurs
for 90 years, and the third having been tracked since 1939. Over a span of three years the storms collided and combined to
form a white spot about half the size of the Great Red. Then since about the beginning of 2006, the spot quickly got pinker,
until its color rivaled the Great Red’s. Unfortunately, I had misjudged the position, thinking it was still in the position
relative to the Great Red as it appeared in a Hubble image from April, but it had actually moved closer to the Great Red until
it was practically right underneath it. I found it in my stacked images once I corrected for my position error.
I took video of
Jupiter from around 8:40 pm to 9:45 pm. The first image is the result from stacking the images from one of the first videos. It shows Europa’s shadow, Red Jr., and the Great Red Spot, as well as the tremendous
amount of activity in the equatorial region. This image is at the same scale as the raw videos used to generate them, but
with far more clarity of detail and contrast. The second image was generated
from video taken towards the end of the evening. It has been re-sampled to twice the original’s size to help discern
details. It is annotated to identify some of the features. Both images are rotated
to have north at the top and are non-mirror image, and were the result of stacking several hundred images from video files,
then processing through wavelet filters. The camera was operating at the focus point of a 127 mm Maksutov with an equivalent
focal ratio of f/25 or so. Compare the colors for The Great Red and Red Jr. Europa is visible in the second image as a thin
crescent at the edge of Jupiter’s disk. It is easier to perceive such white objects when they reach the limb of Jupiter
due to the phenomenon called limb darkening. Also, an examination of two images taken at slightly different times shows a
thin crescent at the correct position to be Europa, so it is unlikely to be an artifact of image processing, although it might
still be a atmospheric feature. Notice the large number of dark features in the equatorial region. Normally this region is
mostly white with some festoons crisscrossing it, but all throughout that night I wondered at the many features visible in
that region even in the raw images. The stacked and processed images show everything much clearer and more distinctly of course.
The Moon was fine
for imaging if the magnifications were kept low. This image is the result of stacking several hundred images from a video,
with the camera at the prime focus of my 127 mm f/12.1 Maksutov. It has been rotated with north at the top and is non-mirror
imaged. The main feature in the center of the image is Mare Nectaris. A possible remnant of an outer rim for this feature
is visible in the lower left portion of the image. The small crater with the V-shaped ray system leading away to the north
is not Messier A/B, but the crater Rosse. Note that Rosse and two other craters
running south by southwest to north by northeast are lined up, are slightly elongated, and at least one other has a V-shaped
ray system that lines up with Rosse’s. This implies that they are part
of a sequence of bodies impacting along similar trajectories on the lunar surface, and they may be either ejecta material
from a large impact in the opposite direction from the V-shaped rays, or an event similar to comet Shoemaker-Levy impacting
on Jupiter, the product of a comet breakup where the fragments are all traveling on similar paths through space.
| Lunar Mosaic, Sa 04 Mar 2006 |
|
|
Sa 4th Mar 2006 --- Although high cirrus clouds rolled over all of Los Angeles all day long,
I decided I could shoot through them, and after being clouded out in Feb, I wanted to get some imaging done. No low
level haze was observed, and while the temperatures went into the 40s as the night progressed, there was only a slight wind.
Visual magnitude was around 3.5.
Although I don't process the videos into images during the star party, I'm going to change that in the future.
One reason is to show the public how it's done, and I have been asked what I do with these images. The other is that
this time I ran out of memory and had to take time anyway ZIPing some files and saving the results to flashcards.
This public star party, like almost all the ones I do, was at Griffith Observatory at their satellite facility (the
main one at the top of the hill is still undergoing renovations).
The first image is a mosaic of the moon. I noticed the telescope was tracking towards the north, so I let it
and took a series of videos through my Creative Pro eX web camera at the prime focus of my 127-mm f/12.1 Maksutov and planned
on overlaying them later. The jump to the east of the top image was due to my moving the scope to image that region.
All the other images were the result of the north drift of the telescope's track. The five images were created from stacking
videos of the regions using Registax v3. I might upload an annotated version of this image, but there are so many major
features, not counting the lesser things, that only a few can be pointed out.
The second image I consider my best Saturn image to date. The previous best images are in the planet image
section (see above for the link). Saturn is a difficult object for my telescope because it is fainter than the other
bright planets and forces the use of exposure times of 1/5 seconds, the longest exposure times of any planet through my small
telescope. But the seeing was very steady that night, despite of, or perhaps because of the high cirrus and haze, and
this allowed the individual images to be steady enough. In fact, while I was ZIPing files on the computer I took the
web cam off the telescope and used an 8mm eyepiece, and Saturn appeared very steady, with Cassini's Division (seen as the
dark lane in the rings) holding steady, not a typical view from near downtown LA ! This image was taken through the
127-mm f/12.1 Mak but with a 2x Barlow. The image was stacked through Registax v3 and further enlarged 2x through Paint
Shop Pro.
The Cassini division, A and B rings, southern and equatorial cloud belts, south polar hood, and planet and ring shadows
are seen. Also seen is is the mottling on the inner side of the B ring at the ring's ends or anse. what I believe
is the A ring minima is seen; the resolution of the Mak and the conditions preclude that this is evidence of the Keeler Gap.
There are hints of finer details in both the rings and the planet.
--- David Nakamoto
|