|
Straight
Soprano Sax Data measured by Keith W. Bradbury 7/13/02 |
|
||||||||||
|
Measurements
in inches |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buescher C Soprano
1868871 |
|
|
Conn Bb Soprano M205506 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Length |
OD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
Distance |
OD |
Wall |
Taper |
% Smaller |
% Smaller |
|
Distance |
OD |
Wall |
Taper |
|
Neck end
OD |
0 |
0.441 |
0.042 |
|
|
4.8% |
|
0 |
0.463 |
0.074 |
|
|
1/8"
above high Eb OD |
4.5 |
0.758 |
|
0.070 |
14.3% |
2.7% |
|
5.25 |
0.779 |
|
0.060 |
|
Between
F/F# OD |
10.75 |
1.136 |
|
0.060 |
12.7% |
5.7% |
|
12.3125 |
1.205 |
|
0.060 |
|
Mid low
Bb OD |
19.25 |
1.672 |
0.028 |
0.063 |
15.4% |
9.4% |
|
22.75 |
1.845 |
0.022 |
0.061 |
|
Bell OD |
21.9375 |
3.145 |
|
|
14.2% |
12.6% |
|
25.5625 |
3.598 |
|
|
Line Graph of Data. Bar chart of
the above data.
Wade,Thanks for the measurements on the "C" Buescher. The bell dia. and length are the same as my "C" Artist Model Royal, Bruno, NY. This confirms my feeling that it is a Buescher stencil and not Conn. BTW, the Conn "C" has a 3.475 dia bell and is 22 3/16 long. So the Conn is 1/4 longer! The bell is easy to measure with a micrometer, but you will have to take an average, because they are out of round by .005 to .010 Measuring the length is harder, unless one has a surface plate and a two foot height gauge. I laughed when I read your length of 21.9375! Golly I am sure that you do not measure saxophones to an accuracy of less than .0005 inch. You did a fraction conversion. In my line of work, (Tool & Die Maker) if I tell someone that it is 21 15/16 inches; I imply that this is fact plus or minus 1/32. If I stated that it is actually 21.9375 long, I imply that this is fact within plus or minus .00025 inches. Anyway, keep the information coming!--- Thanks, David K.
A very admirable
comparison between the two horns. Beware:
Buescher and Conn had very different approaches to their soprano dimensions in
general at this time.
Both Buescher and (especially) Conn didn't seem to be interested in research
and development of
their C
sopranos. The C sopranos seemed to be modified versions of their Bb
sopranos (and here Conn
and Buescher
differed once more), and their C sopranos never approached the quality of their
Bb sopranos.
As an saxophone approaches the plucked pitch of the reed itself, all the
acoustical rules change. Since
the C sopranos (and
Eb sopranos even more) approach this pitch, a tremendous change is necessary in
the dimensions of
the instrument. a comparison between any Bb soprano and any C soprano is
rendered
insignificant.
I recommend reading Arthur Benade's Fundamentals of Musical Acoustics.
Please note that I am only the Webmaster for this information.
Keith
W. Bradbury supplied this information for me to post on this site.
Please connect to
the C-Melody Forum and post
comments there under the c-soprano saxophones board
and the c-soprano
acoustics thread. Thanks, Wade.

