Coalition for Voting Integrity

Editorial, Courier Times, April 28, 2006
Home
SaveOurVote.com
Join Us!
Donate
Voice of the Voters! Internet/Radio
Voice of the Voters! Radio Archives
Your Questions & Comments
Voting News
2008 Municipal Resolutions
Holt's HR 5036
HR 811
S 1487
Redistricting
Reports
*GAO Reports*
Take Action!
Legislative Efforts
Letters
Editorials
Videos
"If You Want to Be a Voter (The Ballad of Sarasota)"
Voting Principles
Vision and Principles
Facts & FAQs
Rebuttal re Danaher
Blogs, Groups
Cost Comparisons
2005 Municipal Resolutions
Lou Dobbs
Slideshow
Chester County
Lehigh & Northampton County
Facts about HAVA
Vote-PAD
New York Times
Contact Us
Contact Your PA Legislators
Links
Supportive Candidates
Re-examination Request
Songs
Voting Forum October 2005
Voting Integrity Forum, June 2005


Tried and true

 

That we’ll be using the old voting machines for the primary isn’t bad news.

After months of debate and hand-wringing over the future accuracy and secu­rity of elections in Bucks County, what many people saw coming a long time ago is now official: The new voting machines the county needed to have in place by next month’s primary in order to meet a federal deadline won’t be any­where near polling places come May 16.

     For one more election, at least, the county will rely on its 50-year-old, tried-and-true mechanical vot­ing machines. That’s more good news than bad since the integrity of the lever machines has never been an issue. We can’t say that about the new electronic machines the county recently decided to pur­chase and which will be in place for the November general election.

     As far as the primary goes, we’re satisfied that the county made every effort to satisfy the voting law.  Bucks and other coun­ties were hampered because fed­eral and state officials took so long to certify the machines that the counties could buy.  When the commissioners finally settled on a purchase, the vendor said the 700 new machines — costing about $5 million — couldn’t be delivered in time.

     Appeals have been made to Washington to extend the dead­line for compliance with the new law. A law that, while well-inten­tioned, should have focused sole­ly on the few areas of the coun­try where problems with voting have been clearly demonstrated.

     Bucks County had no such problems. The problems here arose because of the law, not in the absence of it.