|
|
Date |
Assign# |
Topic |
Desc: |
Due |
|
|
|
Case Study: Life Insurance |
|
|
| □ |
28-Oct |
1 |
Transforming to Achieve Linearity |
Rd. pgs. 259-265: 4.2, 4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| □ |
29-Oct |
2 |
Exponential Models (& log models) |
Rd. pgs. 267-273: 4.5, 4.7, 4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| □ |
30-Oct |
3 |
Power Models |
Rd pgs. 280-284: 4.11, 4.12 |
|
|
|
|
special problems 4b, 4c, or 4e |
4.19, 4.20, 4.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31-Oct |
|
Quiz (4.1): prob # 4.2-4.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| □ |
1-Nov |
|
AP Review: Old Faithful |
|
DUE: 1-3 |
| □ |
1-Nov |
4 |
Relationships between categorical var. |
Rd pgs. 292-297: 4.23, 4.24, 4.25 |
|
|
|
|
marginal and conditional distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| □ |
2-Nov |
5 |
Relationships between categorical var. |
rd. pgs. 299-301: 4.29, 4.31-4.35 |
|
|
|
|
Simpson's paradox |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| □ |
3-Nov |
6 |
Establishing Causation |
rd. pgs. 306-311: 4.41, 4.45, 4.50, |
|
|
|
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| □ |
4-Nov |
7 |
Review of ch 4 |
4.37, 4.53, 4.54, 4.57 |
|
|
|
|
Close Case Study: Life insurance |
|
Due: 4-7 |
|
|
|
Frappy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-Nov |
|
Quiz (4.2-4.3): prob# 4.23-4.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7-Nov |
|
Test Ch. 4: Relationship of Two Vars. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter Objectives: |
|
|
|
1. Identify settings in which a transformation
might be necessary in order to achieve linearity. |
|
2. Use tranformations involving powers
and logarithms to linearize curved relationships. |
|
|
3. Explain what is meant by a two-way
table, and describe its parts. |
|
|
4. Give an example of Simson's paradox |
|
|
|
5. Explain what gives the bestevidence
for causation |
|
|
|
6. Explain the criteria for establishing causation when experimentation
is not feasible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
