Wild Blue Blog

Home
An Open Letter to Kids (Big and Little) Who Want to FLY!
Pilot Training
Training FAQ's
Private Pilot Course Syllabus
Keep it Simple
Flying, the Meaning of Life and Other Odd Stuff
Pitch or Power? Stick and Rudder!
Oh, no! Another Rant! Slips, Skids and Bananas
Side Trips
Picture Gallery
Reno '08
Reno '07
Miscellaneous Rumblings
Wild Blue Aviation Needs You!
Aircraft Restoration and Maintenance
Nanchang CJ-6 FAQ's
Nanchang CJ-6 Aircraft For Sale
Yak-52 FAQ's
Yak Aircraft For Sale
More Airplanes For Sale
Real Insurance, Financing and Escrow--Do it Right!
The Glider Page
The Legends
Mayday!!! Mayday!!! Mayday!!!
Links
About WBA
Wild Blue Blog

What's Happening?

Want to add your own something to my web page?  Now you can!  Just click on the link below and I'll add your message to this page.  Got something you want to say about flying technique, maintenance, a news item, stories, pictures, got a question or just want to tell the world about that great flight you just made to Alaska or about a recent fly-in or how you scared yourself silly?  Speak UP!

 

Just click here and get to it!  Wild Blue Blogosphere

Monday, June 1, 2009

Cody, Wyoming and Big Sky Country


Spring weather has finally made its appearance here in the rainy Pacific Northwest (actually its not so rainy here—a lot less than New York City—but we like to tell people it rains a lot so they won’t move here), so the warmer weather flying season is finally getting underway.

Saturday morning I got up early to fly a Yak-52TW to Cody, Wyoming. I hadn’t been to Wyoming in many years. My dad had an uncle who had a ranch in Jackson Hole (the “Elk Ranch”—appropriate given the elk antler arch in downtown Jackson), back before it became glamorous, and he and his brothers worked summers there and at West Yellowstone during the Depression. Once or twice we visited when I was a kid and my brother, sister and I and various cousins got to play cowboy. I drove through there in the mid-70’s expecting to find a place to stay without making reservations. Wrong. We arrived late at night and I was stupefied to find the sidewalks jammed and “No Vacancy” signs lit up all over town. Oh, well. We drove on down through Afton (then the home of Aviat, the Husky, Eagle and Pitts factory), passing through at about 2AM, lights out, as we continued down into Utah. Back then I could drive all day and all night, take a quick nap and do it all over again. No more.

Anyway, it was a long time since so I was looking forward to seeing the big sky and cowboy country again. There are some big mountains there, too.

The forecast was mostly VFR, except expect thunderstorms in the mountains, forecast to deliver lots of turbulence, wind, rain and even some hail. The forecast said thunderstorms would push through Billings, Red Lodge and Cody in the afternoon, so I was eager to get going. I got to the Arlington airport about 7AM after listening to the AWOS reporting fog. The fog was even thicker than reported, unusual this time of year, though pretty well confined to the airport and immediate vicinity. After about a three hour wait and leisurely breakfast at Ellie Mae’s I finally launched about 10:30.

Yak-52TW’s are fun and versatile airplanes. Fully aerobatic and light on the controls as a good aerobatic airplane should be, they’re also pretty good x-c airplanes, carrying 74 gallons of fuel. Cruise performance is a function of fuel flow and 400hp burns quite bit, so after climbing to 9500 feet to clear the Cascade Range I throttled back almost to “Granley Low Cruise,” so called because Bud and Ross Granley like to go REALLY SLOW to conserve fuel in their Yak-55 (Bud) and Yak-18T (Ross) when they travel to airshows, trying to stretch the range. But then -55’s and -18T’s don’t have 74 gallons. Still, I like having lots of fuel in reserve, and the engine has a sweet spot at about 1860RPM and 22” MAP, so that’s where I like to cruise. Fuel burn comes down to about 14GPH, so with 74 gallons I can fly for over five hours if needed to circumnavigate weather or whatever. Not a lot of places to stop in the mountains of central and eastern Washington, Idaho, Montana or Wyoming, so I like to keep my options open.

I flew by Spokane and through Mullen Pass without unexpected adventures, though there were some pretty big cumulus clouds in the pass, bases about 8-9000 feet, thermals that pulled the -52TW upwards at over 1500fpm at times and provided some pretty good bumps. Continued on through the mountains to Missoula for fuel and lunch. It was hot and I was glad I had on my baseball hat, long sleeves and long pants. Turned my collar up, too, but still got sunburned on the back of my neck. Maybe the glider guys are right, bucket hats do provide a little more protection. The air was nice and cool at 9500’ so the sun protection provided a little warmth, too. Fuel was $4.55/gallon at Northstar Jet in Missoula, compared to the $4.458 I paid at the Pilot Shop (hi Rick and Jan) in Arlington. I put on 41.0 gallons after covering about 340nm, the M-14PFXDK giving a little over 8nmpg at a true airspeed of about 125 knots. They loaned me a car and I drove over to the terminal for a quick lunch of a chicken salad sandwich and a cup of soup that looked like a combination of leftover chili, elbow macaroni and chicken broth. Don’t remember what they called it, but it was better than it sounds.

Got back on my horse at about 2:50PM and headed for Helena. Did I mention there are lots of mountains in Mountana? REAL mountains, not little kiddie stuff like some places. Lots of thunderstorms were brewing up, too, as forecast, so I detoured a bit, trying to pick my way over lower ground (such as it is in mountain country), past Bozeman, almost went as far as Livingston skirting weather and mountains, dropped by Red Lodge and finally to Cody. All in all uneventful, though there were some BIG cu’s in the mountains I’m glad I didn’t have to deal with, black, rain-filled air below them and hail forecast to be one inch diameter. Fortunately, the front stalled a bit and didn’t get as far east or north as fast as forecast. I made position reports (used Flight Following and filed a VFR flight plan, too—nice to have some radio company when there’s nobody around on the ground), there wasn’t a lot of traffic on FSS, Center or Flight Watch, but I gave them PIREPs anyway.

Cody is an interesting place. Home of the Buffalo Bill Museum and a 100-year-old hotel built by Buffalo Bill himself, it lies just east of Yellowstone at the foot of the mountains and is a big tourist attraction. The airport terminal isn’t much (fine by me), but they have airline service with Delta Connection and United. There are a few BIG privately owned hangars occasionally used by a few prosperous folks to park their Gulfstreams when they’re in town, but otherwise its a pretty sleepy place. While shutting down and pushing into the hangar, chatting and getting the circulation in my butt going again, I was not at all surprised there was zero airport traffic. The terminal was empty, too. Nobody home nowhere except the security folks who came by to see what we were doing. Guess I’m a dangerous looking character, especially in a Russian airplane.

I didn’t have time to see much of the town or environs, but it looks like a combination old western town and booming tourist spot. We had dinner at one of the old time watering holes and then I went to the “Beartooth Motel” close by the airport to spend the night. Got up at 3:30AM (Seattle time), caught a ride to the airport, arriving about 4:15, checked in, grabbed a quick bite and cuppa joe, got securitized and departed on Delta at 5:30. Arrived in Salt Lake after a quick ride, then waited a couple of hours for the flight to SEA and home just before noon, where I was met by my wife (thanks for the ride, sweetie pie!) and, after a not so quick stop for her to shop at the Bead Store, we finally got home about 4PM.

The Delta ticket cost $349.60 and the trip took eight and a half hours, including checking in an hour early and the drive home from SEA, but not including the shopping stop. The Yak burned about 70 gallons, or about $300 worth (I don’t have the exact figure because we didn’t fuel up in Cody before I left). My Yak flight time was about 5 hours from leaving home to arriving at Cody, and took about 11 hours total, including my 3-hour breakfast at Ellie’s and leisurely lunch and refueling in Missoula. Except for the fog, fuel and food time, it took me under six hours, home to destination, compared to more than 8 hours by airline jet. Not bad.

I not only saved $50 and a couple of hours flying the Yak, it was a lot more fun, too, though my butt got numb both ways. The cowboy and big sky country are spectacular places and I wish I could have stayed longer to see more, but I’m always glad to be back home

5:54 pm pdt

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

F-104's etc.
Today I received this month's Barnstormer's Eflyer. David Rose has a wonderful story about flying F-104's and Tom Delashaw. See www.Barnstormers.com for a link. His story reminded me of a post I wrote to the "Yak-list" (see www.Matronics.com) when Tom was killed a few years ago in a Hawker Hunter. Here it is.

From: "Jerry Painter" <wild.blue(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Tom Delashaw
Date: Jul 24, 2003



The death of a fellow airman is always a sad event, but for some reason
the death of Tom Delashaw strikes a particular chord. I never met Tom.
I never saw him fly. I don't know why they called him "Sharkbait,"
something from his military career, I suspect. Maybe its because he
flew F-104's, the absolute top of my airplane wish list, that I feel a
connection with him.

Today, airplanes are taken for granted by everyone, they're nothing
special. So we complain about FAA frufra, TFR's, delays, security
checks, lost bags and all the bureaucratic minutia that accompanies
flying, particularly on the airlines. When I was growing up in the
pre-jet-airliner 50's, flying could still be dangerous, particularly
military and test flying, and even airline travel was considered a bit
daring, to say nothing of expensive and fairly unusual. I kept up to
date (as much as a schoolboy can) on the latest X-planes, fighters and
bombers and read the same books and magazines from the school and public
libraries over and over again. I've seen "Strategic Air Command" and
all the other movies countless times. Russ Schleeh (record-setting B-47
pilot--the model for Jimmy Stewart's movie?--and unlimited hydroplane
driver) was one of my heroes. I had Green's and Jane's just about
memorized. I built hundreds of models and even had a "hobby shop" in
the basement to supply me and my friends with the special model stuff we
couldn't get otherwise. I knew all about Chuck Yeager, Pete Everest,
Ivan Kincheloe, Bob Hoover, Scott Crossfield, Eddie Allen, Bill Dana,
Bob White and all the other gods in the pantheon of test pilots. I even
had some of their autographs. They were what I wanted to be. They were
my heroes. I suspect many of you may have felt the same.

So, Tom Delashaw's death leaves me deeply saddened. But he didn't die
in an F-104. He died flying a Hawker Hunter, a jet from the days when
the British were still contenders in the aviation race. Hunters are
still standard equipment at many test pilot schools because of their
spin characteristics, among other things, and to my eye, beautiful
airplanes, but nothing like the F-104's Delashaw flew that drew my
attention to him. F-104's deserved their sobriquet of "the missile with
a man in it" and are the most extreme of the Century Series. Absolutely
gorgeous airplanes. They look like they're doing mach 2 parked on the
ramp. Nothing else can match their look of pure single-minded
aeronautical purpose--speed, speed, speed. You could seriously injure
yourself if you bumped against their leading edges because they are so
sharp they had to have protective covers. I have a cherished picture of
an NF-104 on my wall, climbing nearly vertically, rocket lit, on its way
to the neighborhood of 100,000 ft. I would love to be the pilot in that
airplane. But for pilots that didn't receive proper training or pay
proper respect, they were killers.

What I have read of Tom indicated he was a pro among pros, a man who had
earned his spurs (yes, F-104 pilots wear spurs for the ejections eats),
a veteran of combat and many hours in F-104's, a man who was
meticulously methodical around airplanes, especially the F-104, an
airplane that killed far too many good pilots, including Ivan Kincheloe.
He was the kind of pilot I still want to be, a man I could respect and
admire.

It is ironic that Tom should die in a relatively benign airplane like a
Hunter, a pussycat compared to an F-104. I know nothing of the cause of
the accident, but doubt carelessness played a factor. When someone like
Tom is killed it reminds me that airplanes are still dangerous, not
always trustworthy, that you can still be killed even when you have
taken every precaution. Those of us flying "experimental" airplanes
especially, without benefit of much in the way of documentation,
training, FAA, military or factory support or "supervised" experience,
sometimes to the airplanes' limits and with modifications of dubious
airworthiness, have to be especially cautious. Sometimes it feels like
this Yak-list and fellow pilots and mechanics are about all we've got to
lean on. And sometimes you have to wonder about them, too. Nobody
should die in an airplane. I can't think of many worse ways to die.
But some of us probably will, even though we've taken "every
precaution," or think we have. Doing what we love won't make it any
easier or more pleasant.

Blue skies, Tom.

And let's be careful out there.

Jerry Painter

10:02 am pdt

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Let's go Flyin'!
If you've noticed my "Reno" pages you may have figured out that every year a bunch of us get together to go to the races. Well, that's just a taste! We got lotsa places to go, things to do and folks to meet.

Here's a short list of some of the places and events on the schedule. You're invited so mark your calendar!

May 16 Paine Field (PAE) GA day w/warbirds!
May 20-26 "Aluminum Overcast" B-17 at BFI--rides!
June 12-14 Bellanca-Champion Fly-in Columbia, CA
June 12-14 Golden West Fly-in, Yuba City, CA
June 20-21 Olympia Warbird Show, Olympia, WA
July 8-12 Arlington Fly-in
July 27-Aug 2 Oshkosh
August 21-22 Madras, OR Fly-in
August 22 Tillamook, OR Fly-in
Sept 16-20 Reno Air Races

'Course we do lotsa little fly-outs to wherever strikes our fancy, like real short field training at real short fields. Mountain flying to real mountains (the Cascades, Siskiyous and Olympics are not little baby hills, dontcha know!) Plus lotsa $100 burgers. Lotsa seminar stuff, too! Drop me an email and I'll put you on the list for event notification. Stand by for news!

3:03 pm pdt

Back on line
If you're one of those loyal folks who checks my web site every now and then you may have noticed that things haven't changed much for a while. That's because your and my favorite phone company/web site provider managed to booger the works so I couldn't edit this site. Today they got it fixed. Thank you so very much Verizon folks!

Stay tuned for more useless diatribes! I got lots more coming!
2:49 pm pdt

Friday, September 19, 2008

The Wall Street Party and the Piper's Bill: we get to clean up the mess, again, but at least Great Depression II, the sequel, has been averted, for now
 
Well, the party's over and the bill's in the mail. The piper has played, he and his friends have fallen down drunk on debt, misplaced tax cuts and bad policies, soiled themselves, the furniture, the carpets and the floor, puked all over the place, stolen your car and wallet, robbed the bank, burned down your house, raped your wife and murdered your children.  And your neighbors' too.  So, now, (god bless 'em!) they're sending us the bill for the cleanup.  Its in the mail, though the blanks after the dollar sign haven't quite been filled in yet, but you're gonna love it.  And your children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren will, too. 
 
This is how all the great empires of history passed into oblivion.
 
Considering that the piper's song was played for the benefit of only a very, very few, and only they got to taste the wine, caviar and cigars, the bill's gonna be awfully, awfully big.  Really, really, REALLY big--like a $$$Trillion Dollar$$$ just for the Wall Street mess.  That's NINE zeros worth, added to $$$3Trillion$$$ for the Iraqi fiasco and a mounting national debt figure with another nine zeros.  But now that the bill's in the mail, we shouldn't be surprised.  That's the name of the game--has been since Nixon.  Like Rumsfeld says, "stuff" happens.  And McCain's pal, top economic advisor and compatriot in the fight against government oversight of any kind (maybe he'll get the nod for next Teasury Secretary), Phil Gramm (whose wife sat on Enron's board) is right:  stop whining.  What did you expect?  Everybody knows it's messy and expensive living in a whorehouse! 
 
Heads they win, tails we lose.
 
Of course, we could refuse to pay the bill.  But is the alternative any better?: meltdown of the international monetary and economic system.  In case you hadn't noticed, Russia had to close down its stock market (after a 57% decline) for several days this week . China, the rest of Asia and Europe were all gazing into the abyss, too.  That's the New World Order.  No, the WTO couldn't help.  It came down to some frantic calls between capitals and the obvious need to act in concert before the barn burned down completely--forget about the horse.  After more than a year of denial and dithering, with bloody toes dangling over the precipice, Bernanke and Paulson blinked and backed away from financial suicide while Bush just mumbled to himself about everything being OK, the economy is "sound."  And, just like the war in Iraq, you and I were lied to the whole way.  Just be sure to send in the money, if not blood.  If some of the malefactors walk away with multi-million$$$, that's just the magic of the market at work.  Not to worry. 
 
And, of course, McCain, who has been vigorously anti-regulation his entire political life, and was famously one of the prime recipients of largesse from one of the Keating Five bank robbery perps (wasn't that an awful lot like what's happening now?), to say nothing of Bush Brother Neil's Diablo Savings and Loan heist, is now calling for a "study" and--incredbly for him--"regulation" of the markets, whatever that might mean under a really, really laissez faire McCain administration. Right.  What's that term Republicans love so much--"flip-flopper?"  Especially if lying wins votes.  BTW, contrary to his campaign speech lies, McCain got TEN times as much money from Fannie and Freddie as Obama.  So much for his often touted military code of "honor."  Lies are so much better than the truth when you're running for President, especially if you have McCain's voting record.
 
Meanwhile, Bush is hiding under the bed, hoping it will all simply go away so he can go back to playing "war president."
 
Ever notice that all this turmoil happens when the Republicans are in charge?  Remember how Nixon gave us a "secret strategy" that prolonged the Viet Nam war for five years (yes, it was Johnson's war), wage and price controls (don't you just love the hypocrisy of these "free-market" Republicans when their policies go bad?), a recession and the first oil shock--the oil embargo of '73-74.  I remember it well:  unemployment, inflation and gas lines.  Reagan gave us another, really serious recession and the 23%-in-one-day stock market drop in October '87, Irangate (he sent the Iranians--yes, the Iranians--weapons in exchange for funding his illegal war on Nicaragua, remember?), plus some really hideous budget deficits. Reagan and Bush I teamed up to give us another recession, more monster deficits and the Savings and Loan bailout debacle of the late 80's/early90's.  Sound familiar?  Then Bush I gave weapons to Iraq so his buddy Saddam could bleed the Iranians (that's really smart--give weapons to BOTH sides), then went to war with his Iraqi friends and gave us another recession.  And more deficits.  And now W has given us even more monstrously gross deficits, another war in Iraq, Abu Ghraib, waterboarding--funny, but our friends in the Middle East don't seem to like us any more, can't imagine why not--Karl Rove politics, Alberto Gonzlez' politicized Justice Dept., Don Rumsfeld, the K Street project, Jack Abramoff, a diet of non-stop lies and the meltdown of '08, to mention just a few. 
 
And McCain has been right there with W the whole way, "maverick" grandstanding not withstanding.
 
Could it be something in their economic and political philosphy?  I thought Republicans were supposed to be war-averse and financially "responsible."  No?  Oh, well.  I guess they just love disaster, eh?  Especially if they and their buddies can profit from it.
 
You say you're worried you might lose your job and your house, to say nothing of your retirement, healthcare and all the money you put into your 401K?  Poor baby.  A little economic disaster from time to time is good for you.  Builds character.  Don't worry, your money's been going to your betters.  After all, as Cheney says, its their due.
 
At least we haven't gone to war with the Iranians and Russians.  Yet.  Of course, W still has until January--its only September, dontcha know.  Hang on to your hats because October is traditionally the month of the really, really big debacle.  Still time for another Surprise.  At least they didn't get away with their attempt to gut Social Security and Medicare.  Yet.  But don't you fret--that's just the job for McCain.  W is such a wimp.
 
Rigging the game is kids' stuff.  The hoi polloi never guesses what's going on until the bill's in the mail.  The "little people" (to quote Barbara Bush) are so "pathetic."
 
Am I a democrat?  Yes.  Of course.  And a Democrat, too.  Given the alternatives, what else is there?  Not perfect, but a damn site better.
 
Don't forget to vote in November.  Enough is enough.
 
And stop whining--we've had our "free" lunch.
12:16 pm pdt

Sunday, June 29, 2008

Helicopters
 
I have to tell you right up front that helicopters are a sore point with me.  No.  Let me re-phrase that:  helicopter pilots are a sore point with me.
 
Bear with me for a moment while I get this off my chest.  Arlington Muni, the home drome, was one of the sites of the late but not lamented Silver State Helicopters.  Oh, we've had helicopters for a long time, but not in concentrated doses like with SSH.  I'll let SSH die its painful and probably criminal financial death and let it go at that except to say that they did more to raise the hackles on airplane pilots hereabouts than anything I've ever seen in aviation--and in a very short time, too.  How?  By taking the attitude that they had the right of way at all times, that everyone else was just going to have to fit into their modus operandi, that runways and taxiways are really for helicopters and only secondarily for airplanes, that their stealth mode invisible grey paint (it rains a bit around here and the skies have occasionally been known to be severely overcast for prolonged periods--perfect camouflage for dark grey helicopters, even with their cloaking devices in the "off" position) was exactly how every helicopter should be painted, an insistence on flying traffic patterns (why would you want to fly a rectangular pattern in a helicopter?) that interesected with airplane patterns, and cutting off airplanes while they were at it, resulting in more than a few near-misses with airplanes and even gliders etc. 
 
I'll give them credit for a couple of things, tho.  They did paint a single blade on a couple of their rotors white, which helped some, and later they got a yellow helicopter, so they weren't entirely uncooperative. And with all their incessant radio chatter I finally learned the names of all the taxiways and intersections on the airport.  And they were absolutely right that FAR and AIM are virtually silent on helicopter operations, so no rules against their practices.  Except the rule that says needlessly endangering and pissing off people is just plain stupid.
 
So SSH is gone, good riddance, but their legacy lingers.  Seems now the monkey see monkey do factor is in force--if SSH did it, evey helicopter pilot seems to think that's the way to do it--even guys that formerly were perfectly sensible and cooperative!  Things like long straight-in approaches at about 50 knots (KAWO is an uncontrolled, er, "un-towered," ha ha, airport), followed by a prolonged hover over the numbers, then a hover-taxi the length of the runway (to where they're almost invisible at the far end), followed by a leisurely liftoff and pattern back to the runway, or maybe a taxiway (you never really can tell for sure until they're about ready to actually touch down) do it again, repeat, repeat again, dc al fine, do not pass go, don't collect $200.00, maybe throw in an autorotation or two through interesecting traffic flows, all the while completely pissing off every airplane pilot in sight.
 
In nearly forty years of pre-SSH flying I had never seen helicopters operate like that--hope I never do again!  Alas, "Phoenix" Rotorways (get it?  ha ha) is trying to resurrect the SSH torch, so the dog just won't die.  Worse, PR doesn't have their own fuel truck like SSH, so they want to land in the middle of a gaggle of airplanes at the pump, rotor blades flashing within inches of airplanes, pumps, windows, people etc., stirring up a big wind that just about blows half the airplanes away and then take off with a big flourish just to rub their arrogance and stupidity in.  Sheeesh!  Maybe part of the training for helicopter pilots should be a required Dale Carnegie course in acceptable behavior at the sandbox!  Come on, guys, can't you see that a little common courtesy and horse sense would go a very long way? 
 
Show a modicum of consideration will ya?  Please?  Let SSH die its welcome death!  We'd like to be friends.
9:23 pm pdt

Friday, May 2, 2008

L/D redux
From: Jerry Painter
Date: 5/2/2008 10:16:28 AM
Subject: L/D redux
 
Another factor that can play a big role is that many M-14 powered aircraft
have MT, Whirlwind and other 3-blade props that become very effective
airbrakes when pushed to high rpm at low power. I was reminded of this
yesterday flying with Jim Bourke, owner of RC Groups.com, in his Yak-54
(formerly owned by Eric Beard and known on the airshow circuit as Russian
Thunder). It has an MT. Jim likes to fly a "high-speed" (200-225 kph or so,
all the way to flare), close-in pattern, giving him better visibility, then
as he begins to flare he simply pushes the prop up to high rpm, followed by
reduced throttle. It's like flying into a big bowl of mush. The airplane
screeches to a halt, squats and lands. I've occasionally used this technique
myself, traffic permitting. The huge drag of the prop gives huge control of
speed at a moment's notice. If nothing else its a fun technique and keeping
the speed up on final can only be a good thing safety-wise. Not exactly your
typical (though it could be, in fact not a bad idea) practice "emergency"
landing technique, high, fast and steep. Not sure about MT's, but Whirlwinds
go high pitch with lost oil pressure.
 
There aren't many geared flat (or round) engines around any more and I've
read about alleged problems pilots of geared T-Bones and Commanders had with
reverse-loading of their engines, though I'm not sure "reverse-loading" is
actually happening, and its very short term during flare in any case. Anyone
have anything to offer on the subject re M-14's? Facts, not conjecture and
old-wives tales, please. Some of you old bomber pilots must have some info
on Pratts and Wrights, no?
 
On another subject, the -54 has very pronounced roll-coupling with rudder,
even though the rudder tapers significantly, with most of the area down low.
Not having much experience with big-rudder-optimized-for-gyros aerobatic
airplanes (like "none"), I'm wondering whether this is common and if it may
have contributed to some of the -54 "odd quirks" and "killer" stories, in
that that one was apparently spun in in Alaska (I understand it was the only
other -54 in the US). I didn't get much chance to explore it and its (way)
beyond my skill set anyway, but its a bit surprising to have the airplane
roll opposite rudder input, I.e., skid right and the left wing drops a bunch
  A big help for some tumbling maneuvers no doubt, but may make some typical
maneuvers (like say, slips) and, especially, recovery techniques a bit odd
if not plain inappropriate.
 
BTW, Eric and Bud Granley are the only people I've seen hover an airplane
(Bud in his -55, preferably while inverted, flying formation with a
helicopter at very, very low altitude), though it may be common now. Didn't
get a chance to try it myself, but would love to one fine day.
 
Jerry Painter
Wild Blue Aviation
425-876-0865
10:29 am pdt

L/D
From: Jerry Painter
Date: 5/1/2008 7:44:25 AM
Subject: L/D
 
This is an interesting discussion. Let's see if I can make some waves, just
for fun.
 
You can follow the same flight path power on/off flaps up/down etc. by
simply varying speed and drag. Power, speed, drag and flight path are all
interdependent variables--the Fab Four in the L/D equation. T-Crafts,
Cherokees, CJ's, -52's, 747's et al. I have to say I've never quite
understood what makes folks think that when you enter the pattern the
airplane suddenly becomes more likely to have an engine failure than while
en route, ergo power-off approaches, but that's another discussion. I fly
over mountains/water all the time. Yes, I understand that first power
reduction is the mostly likely time for engine failure, so take your time
about that, but we're talking approaches. I dare say "nobody," wannabees or
otherwise, "normally" makes power-off approaches in typical military or
civilian trainer, fighter or transport aircraft, feet wet or dry, recip or
turbine, though I'm sure there are exceptions (emergency/practice), but, hey
  I'm just a civilian. The X-15 had a near 1:1 l/d, I expect the Shuttle isn
t much better, most of the approach is less than that. In any case, there's
no point in slowing to best L/D or pulling the power off until you've got
the runway made, X-15 or otherwise--we're not talking timed approaches are
we? The only time speed really matters is on touchdown. Budd is absolutely
right about the need to fit into the flow, like it or not--cutting others
off isn't just bad manners, its dangerous. At the home drome, KAWO, on those
occasional sunny and even usual rainy days we have to mix it up with various
civilian single/multi/turbines, helicopters (what makes them want to
land/autorotate on the runways and taxiways inquiring minds want to know,
SSH is--for the better--gone, but, apparently, not forgotten), gliders,
ultralights, RV 360 gaggles, overlapping patterns left, right, parallel and
diagonal plus the odd P-47, Me-109 (thank you, Paul Allen), Apha Jet/L-39
and usual bizjets, practice ILS against the flow with missed right through
the downwind (tho not in the procedure). And once in a while the Navy drops
by in a P-3 for good measure, tho no B-1's or -2's, yet.
 
Constant speed power-off 60mph approaches in your J-3 or power-off manhole
cover in your Pitts ainna gonna cut it for spacing, 360 or otherwise, no
hurry for combat turnaround. Plus, as Barry says, if you're making a 60
degree bank be sure you keep the speed up because the stall just went to 1.
4Vso. The only good thing about a 45 degree bank in the pattern is max rate
of turn for altitude lost, so its good for that (absolutely necessary?) 180
back to the patch, but the stall goes up to 1.2Vso, so keep the speed up
then, too. And mid-airs ain't no fun, neither.
 
The ILS is 3 degrees (20:1) for good reason, but not many of us can do it
power-off. Emergencies ain't standard procedure.
 
Jerry Painter
CFI, A&P, Chief pilot, airport bum, permanent latrine orderly & c.
Wild Blue Aviation
425-876-0865
10:28 am pdt

Monday, March 31, 2008

The Next Depression?
 
 
You know, I'm in the flying business, I'm not a political commentator.  I've got better, more important things to do, like go flying and earn the money to pay my bills.  But every day I read in books, the papers, see on the news or hear on the radio about one disaster after another, right here in the US of A, in Iraq, Afghanistan, all seemingly beyond our control, but, we're assured, there's "nothing to worry about."  "The surge is working."  And it seems more and more that the federal government is bent on the destruction of the US economy, bankrupting state and local governments while charging us more and more for less and less. 
 
The government's solution:  We'll just borrow our way out.
 
"Nothing to worry about--stay the course."  Right.
 
Like the economy.  We've been teetering on the cusp of a major Depression-like meltdown for almost a year now, slipping into recesion, bailout after bailout, the slope getting steeper and steeper, slipperier and slipperier, the hole deeper and deeper. 
 
"Nothing to worry about.  The economy is sound."  Do you suppose there's any connection between the falling dollar (worth half of what it used to be against the euro when Bush took office) and the huge and rising debt we've taken on to pay for disastrous wars and financial roulette here at home?  Maybe.
 
It's all blamed on unscrupulous, irresponsible folks who took out "sub-prime" loans to buy a house, to achieve the American dream.  Out of more than 300 million of us here in the US, living in more than 100 million houses, about 30,000 that were financed by "sub-prime" loans are in danger of default, mostly because of hidden fees and time bomb interest rate hikes.  How can such a relatively small number of loan defaults, most only potential and completely avoidable, threaten not only the US economy, but the financial health of the whole world?  Those 30,000 loans are trivial, a drop in the bucket.  Why are they such a problem?  For better or worse, people default on loans all the time--what's so different?
 
Why are so many banks--including some of the very biggest in the world, like Citibank--giant mortgage companies (i.e., Countrywide), hedge funds, and stock brokerage companies virtually and actually bankrupt?  And why do we taxpayers have to bail them out?  What caused the fifth largest bank in the US, Bear Stearns, to go "bankrupt" (they weren't really bankrupt, they got crushed by a hedge fund liquidity short squeeze).  Why did JPMorgan Chase get to buy Bear Stearns for $2 per share (using money borrowed from the Fed, namely you and me), when a year ago Bear Stearns stock sold for more than $170?  Oh, I guess, now, they're gonna pay about $10 for it, seems too many stockholders complained about the sweetheart shotgun wedding deal, all brokered by the Fed.  I'd pay $2/share--or even $10--their NYC headquarters building is worth more than that!  If we're gonna pay for it, why don't WE, you and me, get the windfall?  What makes JPMorgan Chase the anointed one?  And besides, isn't the "market" supposed to automatically take care of this stuff?  That's what they keep telling us.  Why do CEO's get a huge bonus while everybody else gets downsized and the company goes broke?
 
Why?  Well, to quote Cheney, "It's our due."  He thinks They deserve to reap the windfall while everyone else pays the bill.  "Taxes are for the little people," says Barbara Bush.
 
I'm not making this up.
 
Are you one of those "irresponsible" folks who took out a "home equity" loan so you could fix up your house, send your kids to college or pay down usurious credit card bills?  Did you borrow money with little or nothing down so you could buy a rental or fixer-upper house hoping to increase your income and simultaneously realize some "safe as houses" capital gains via the never-ending increases in housing prices?  Are your payments going through the roof on your adjustable rate loan?  Have you been "down-sized" or had your job shipped offshore to some virtual slave labor sweatshop in China or the Philippines?  Taken a pay cut (I'm talking to all you airline pilots here)?  Losing your life's savings in your IRA, 401K, mutual fund or other stock market investments? Remember, you can't withdraw that money unless you want to pay a 10% penalty plus deferred taxes--you're trapped!  Has your employer cancelled or reduced your retirement benefits?  Lost your medical insurance or just wonder how you're going to pay for it?  Have your elderly parents been bankrupted by medical bills?  Wonder why the Fed has bailed out Bear Stearns, Fannie Mae, Freddy Mac and other "banks," but you're struggling to stave off bankruptcy?  Afraid you're going to lose all you've spent your lifetime working for? 
 
Have you noticed that in the burgeoning Light Sport Aircraft market nearly all of the airplanes are coming from our old enemies in Eastern Europe?  Why is Cessna going to build the Skycatcher in China?  Why has Boeing outsourced nearly all of the design and manufacture of the 787 overseas, leaving only final assembly for the US?  Why did Boeing move their headquarters to Chicago, where they have no engineering or manufacturing operation at all?  Why does Boeing want to become a hollow shell financial manipulation corporation, like FEMA ("great job, Brownie")?  Why is the US Air Force buying tankers from Airbus, the hated French?  Why is the national debt out of control?  Why are we being held hostage to the holders of that US debt, namely the Chinese government?  Why do we let the Chinese, in particular, but the Japanese, India and others, too, steal our intellectual property, flood our markets with sweatshop-slave-labor goods while they block importation of practically all US goods in return, thereby bankrupting US companies and taking virtual control over US national economic priorities?  If the per capita US GDP has increased by more than 150% in the last generation (which it has), why are almost all of us making less in real terms than our parents did?  Why can't you afford a house as nice as the one you grew up in?  And why have we pissed away more than $3trillion (and going up) in Iraq?  Why have we so devastated that poor country that almost 20% of all Iraqis are either dead, refugees or displaced?  Doesn't sound like a very smart way to win friends and (positively) influence people to me.  Do you suppose that some day they might want to return the favor?  Why is the hated Taliban gaining strength in Afghanistan and Pakistan? 
 
Are you spending more but getting less?  Have your promised "tax cuts" turned into User Fees?  Have your local and state taxes increased so you could pay--bribe--Wal-Mart, Cabella's or some major league sports franchise to move into your city?  Have the promised jobs and reveneue materialized?  Why do those companies get a free pass on paying taxes?  Some even get to KEEP the taxes they collect!  Here in Washington we get to pay more taxes to keep Boeing "here," though, in fact, they're nowhere and everywhere, working hard to become just another financial services company with a specialty in defense and aerospace.  Boeing, in return, gets a tax CUT.  And now they're just another deal maker, looking for the lowest taxes and the cheapest labor.
 
Are your neighborhood schools, roads and utilities crumbling?  Has it dawned on you that prospects for your kids are even worse?  Can you afford to send them to college?  Will they ever be able to buy a house of their own?  Do any of these things make you uneasy about the future, yours, your family's, the country's and the world's? 
 
The Bush administration and John McCain is proposing to do worse than nothing--more of the deregulation that caused all these problems, followed by taxpayer financed bailouts--that will only prolong--at best--and probably accelerate the long slide into national bankruptcy we're all facing.  I'm not so sure about Hillary or Obama, either, but at least they recognize that something has to be done and that more de-regulation is not the answer, it is the problem. 
 
According to Bush the "economy is sound."  Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil.  But down we go.  And when we go down, so does everyone else.  There's no place left to hide.  Worse, our own government has become what we fought against during the Cold War, an out of control "unitary presidency" (meaning Congress and the courts don't count--the President is above the law--really, that's what they've been insisting and acting upon for the last eight years), unlimited domestic surveilance, disappeareds, Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and extraordinary rendition.  And an Attorney General who's not sure waterboarding is torture.
 
Why does one of the richest men in the world, multi-billionaire Warren Buffet--buy his own admission--pay a lower tax rate than his secretary?  Yes, she really does pay a higher rate, and I'm not making this up, I'm taking his word for it.
 
It's called the Race to the Bottom and its been going on ever since the early seventies, gaining real momentum during the eighties and is now almost unstoppable.  "Trickle-down economics" really means "Gusher up" and screw the rest.
 
I'll tell you what its about:  unlimited profits for a few, hindmost for the rest.  Just ask yourself, "who gains from all this?"  Somebody does, a whole lot, but not very many, though the "many," you and me, our children and grandchildren, and great-grandchildren, too, get to pay the bill.
 
The banks and hedge funds have to be bailed out because their unregulated, highly leveraged speculation, with your money and mine, resulted in what wasn't supposed to happen:  they ran out of suckers to take the bait and pay the bill.  Because the suckers couldn't bear the burden of more and more debt.  The banks, hedge funds--and the government--all went a bridge too far.  It wasn't those "irresponsible" sub-prime borrowers.  They're chump change, pawns in the game.  It was the banks, playing with your money and mine, the ones we pay our mortgages, car payments and credit card bills to, the ones we deposit our savings in, the Mutual Funds we invest in, big names like Citibank, Washington Mutual, and Merrill Lynch, and the ones that actually hold our mortgages, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  They convinced the federal government (that tried to convice the rest of us) that they could regulate themselves, that they didn't need regulation or oversight.  Then they grossly over-leveraged themselves, often making huge loans ("bets") to highly speculative "hedge" funds, requiring as little as 0.3% (you read that right, 300 to 1) equity.  That's equivalent to you or me buying a $300,000 house with a $1,000 down payment and no job--unless you consider gambling a "job."  Talk about "sub-prime!"  Then the hedge funds used those huge loans to make speculative "investments" in things like "commoditized debt obligations" (meaning mortgages and loans of all kinds, paper contracts, some with little or no collateral, but with usurious fees and charges attached, "guaranteeing" high rates of return, which is what made them so "attractive").  Contracts intentionally bundled up in such a way that no one can put a real value on them.  Which is why there is a credit crunch--no one can determine the real value of the collateral used to finance huge loans. So now, since nobody knows whether bank balance sheets are truth or fiction, the other banks refuse to loan any more money, especially not to banks like themselves.  In fact, they can't make any more loans because THEIR collateral is in question, so they can't borrow any more money to loan out, and every bank wants full payment on ALL those loans to all the other banks right NOW.  So the squeeze is on, the cards fall and they ALL go broke.  And we, you and I, pick up the tab.
 
The problem is ALL the banks know that ALL of the other banks have been playing fast and loose, just like them, that one bank's collateral is no better than any other's, that it's all backed by a speculative house of cards.  When one goes down, they all do.  They've ALL been playing the same shell game, unregulated, with your money and mine.  The "plan" just unveiled by the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department is mostly just MORE shell games, musical chairs coupled with gutting the oversight of the Securities and Exchange Commission, turning over regulation to the hapless Fed, the same Fed that lit the fire and then sat on its hands and watched as the barn burned down.  And then strolled in at a leisurely pace to throw a glass of water on the ashes.  Do you want an arsonist in charge of Fire Prevention?
 
Today's absence of regulation looks an awful lot like it did in the late 20's, just before "Black Friday."  It wasn't the stock market crash that caused the Great Depression, it was bank failures--the same thing we face today.
 
How did the national sense of community that came out of the Great Depression and World War II get replaced by rapacious greed and an "every man for himself" mentality?  What happened to national pride and the "Made in USA" seal of quality and value?  Why are those of us who actually produce things held hostage to the gamblers and speculators of the financial markets, whose only products are fine print on incomprehensible contracts?  Why have so many manufacturers decided that its better to become financial services companies than to make things?  Why are we so fascinated by juvenile fantasies of get rich schemes and moronic dreams of becoming the next "American Idol"?  Have we become a bunch of hypnotized, mindless robots in a shrink-wrapped world of idiots?  Has winning the Lottery become the last shot at the American Dream?
 
More de-regulation, more tax cuts for an undeserving few and more debt for the rest of us isn't the solution, it's the problem.  But that's the Bush-McCain plan.  That's what got us into this mess.
 
Why isn't "global markets" synonymous with "fair markets," rising incomes and equality for all?  What happened?  Where's our country?  Where's our government?  Where's our community?  What's happened to our world?
12:25 pm pdt

Thursday, February 14, 2008

Rick Davis wins Golden Wrench Award
Award20Presentation2.JPG
 
Last night we were at the Cactus Moon discussing airspace and X-15 LOX tank pressure warnings when Bud Granley reached into his goodie bag and pulled out a piece of wood.  After an appropriate speech, Bud showed us what it was, the coveted North West Council of Airshows Golden Wrench Award and presented it to good friend Rick Davis. 
 
The Golden Wrench goes to the guy (or gal) NWCAS members recognize as being the year's top mechanic.  Not only is Rick a pretty fair country hand with a wrench, he's also one of the most helpful around, and can always be counted on to pitch in whenever needed to keep airshow airplanes and pilots flying. The Golden Wrench is dedicated to recognizing the cream of those hard working folks who keep things running smoothly and seldom get any credit.  The show must go on!
 
Rick has been working with Bud and Ross Granley, Kent Pietsch and others for a long time, always has a great attitude, is lots of fun to be around, and is always ready to help.  Bud had tried to lure him to the NWCAS awards banquet, but Rick begged off, so Bud had to make the presentation in a slightly less formal setting.
 
Congratulations Rick!
 
 
10:41 am pst

Russian Thunder!
Russian_Thunder_slide.jpg
 
You may have noticed the new RCGroups banner here on the WBA home page.  Lots of pilots fly models, too, or have at some time, including me.  RCGroups.com is the world's largest forum for all kinds of things about RC models.  And the proprietor of RCGroups is Jim Bourke.
 
I met Jim a few months ago when he came by to chat about Yaks.  He was looking to buy an airplane and was learning what he could before making the plunge--good idea.  A while later he called and asked if I'd be interested in going down to Tucson, AZ, to look at the only Yak-54 in North America, the airplane that had been owned and flown by air show veteran Eric Beard.  Eric had named the airplane and his show "Russian Thunder!"  In case you notice something about the paint, Eric was a graduate of Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Florida.  He was killed in an unfortunate accident near here a couple of years ago and his widow, Diane, had the airplane up for sale.  It was at Phil Parrish's place in Tucson.  Phil is one of those poor guys who lives at a private airport and has a hangar next to his house.
 
So we went to Tucson, met with Phil and Diane and looked at the airplane.  I had met Eric and talked with him a few times, but didn't know him well and had never had a chance to really inspect his airplane.  Although Yak-54's are roughly two-seat versions of the single-seat Yak-55, they are really quite different.  We didn't have a lot of time to really dig into it and that really wasn't what we were there for, but the airplane looked good. Jim and Phil flew it and we had a pleasant evening talking to Phil and Diane.  Later, Jim and I stopped in at a local watering hole (its pretty dry in Tucson) and talked about it.  He wasn't sure whether he was interested or not.  I went to bed thinking, nope, he's gonna pass her by.  Besides, someone else had already made an offer.
 
Next morning I was eating some "continental breakfast" when Jim walked in, sat down and said he'd decided to buy the airplane.  I like a guy who can make up his mind.  He made Diane an offer she couldn't refuse and became a proud new airplane owner!
 
Now he's got her home in Oregon and is working on getting her trimmed out and ready for the flying season.  Jim has been around aviation all his life, but is a relatively low time guy.  In fact, his insurance company wouldn't let him fly the airplane until he got some appropriate training and a little more experience.  I'm really impressed by his determination.  In the short time since buying the airplane he's gotten his instrument rating, tailwheel endorsement and has completed an aerobatic course with Rich Stowell.  Next he's going to get a little more aerobatic experience flying with Renny Price in Renny's Sukhoi, a close approximation to the Yak-54.
 
Take a look at RCGroups.com for more info about Jim's adventures, in particular take a look at his blog.  Good luck Jim!
 
 
10:09 am pst

Friday, December 21, 2007

Kent Pietsch Takes Scholl Award
jb_002.jpg
 
DSCN02290196.JPG
 
Congratulations to Kent Pietsch, 2007 Art Scholl Showmanship Award winner!  Coming as no surprise to anybody, Kent was presented the Award at the 2007 Internation Council of Airshows (ICAS) convention earlier this month in Las Vegas.  As viewers of this site know, Kent flies one of the best airshows anywhere, not in your typical high-G, slam-bam, high-powered aerobatic mount, rather he flies a 90hp 1941 Interstate Cadet!  Not only that, he uses the top of his motorhome or pickup truck for an airport!  The Scholl Award is the most coveted award an airshow performer can win, awarded by a jury of airshow peers, so the winners are only the best of the best. 
 
Great job and Congratulations Kent!
 
12:46 am pst

Friday, September 28, 2007

User Fees
 
Let's get right to the point:  The FAA has ALWAYS been of, by and for the airlines.  If there were no airlines there would be no FAA, pure and simple.  General Aviation has always been a poor relation, at best, in the FAA world. That's only reasonable--up to a point.  After all, a lot more people ride the airlines than fly their own airplanes.  And while "I'm here to help" can be the last thing you want to hear from the FAA, until a few years ago when they started into the "policing" business (i.e., ramp checks etc.) and went through all of the phony "down-sizing" "efficiency" measures, in most cases, they really were there "to help."
 
But that's all changed.
 
This latest round of "user fees," this time being proposed AGAIN by the Bushies (they never give up) in charge of the FAA, is just another example of economic class warfare being waged by the economically most powerful against those with less power.  In other words, its all about money.  It has nothing to do with "modernization" or "crowded" skies or airports or lost baggage or cancelled flights or poor service or delays.  It simply another example of the strong stealing from the weak for their own personal MONOPOLY economic advantage--facilitated and enforced by their greedy, corrupt underlings (somehow almost always Republicans, but Democrats, too) in government.  And then making the weak pay for crumbs of what the strong have stolen!  That's right, the tax breaks and corporate welfare subsidies are paid for by you and me.
 
In other words, THEFT.  But that's nothing.  After stealing the store,  they want tribute in the form of "user fees!" The THIEVES want the victims to pay AGAIN for scraps of what was stolen!  And don't forget the billion$$$ in corporate welfare in the form of hidden subsidies and tax breaks pushed down for all of us "little people" to pay for.  Kinda sounds like something the mafia would do, doesn't it?  It sure ain't got nothing to do with a "competitive" market place.
 
Theft?  Extortion?  That's pretty extreme!  Yes.   And they're very clever how they go about it.  Reagan and both Bushes "privatized" major potions of the government, including the FAA, major portions of the services provided by many now hollow-shell government departments and now the military, too, all in the name of "efficiency."  They ran into such fierce opposition from the public (rememer the plan to privatize Social Security?) they were forced to adopt a more subtle strategy, i.e., the "eat-the-elephant-one-bite-at-a- time" and the sleight of hand, hide-what's-really-happening so nobody will notice strategy.  Democracy?  Hardly!  This is how corrupt officials implement welfare for the rich the public wouldn't stand for if they knew what was happening.  And they are relentless in their determination.  It has nothing to do with "efficiency" or the "beauty of un-regulated competitive market forces."  It is THEFT.  Of, by and for the biggest corporations and wealthiest people in the country.
 
Still think that's too strong?  Remember Katrina?  The reason FEMA, the government agency charged with responding to disasters didn't respond was simple:  it really didn't exist as a department any more.  It was just a hollow shell.  Everything had to subbed out to "contractors," mostly through the mega-department of Homeland Security.  Not that they ever had any intention of "responding."  As one Congressman said, "God did what we could only dream of," meaning destroy both PRIVATE and public property, doesn't matter which, whatever, just so long as it gets those damn Democrats out of town.  Now they can sell off the condemned homes and land to casino and hotel operators for a dime on the dollar and turn New Orleans into what they've always wanted:  a theme park, complete with imported "actors" from concentration camp trailer parks located outside of town where none of the tourists will be have to see the slums they live in. 
 
Having seen exactly how "Homeland Security" operates I hope like hell we never have an emergency that involves a REAL enemy, instead of just unwanted US citizens, who happen to mostly vote Democratic.  Would you vote for a Republican who wanted to make you a homeless refugee or an inmate in a concentration camp trailer park, complete with razor wire and armed guards?  That's where all those dispossessed folks are today, years after the fact, living in concentration camps right here in the USA, administered by, not the government, but by grossly overpaid sub-sub-sub-sub-contractors.  FEMA and DHS (and now DoD, too, with FAA next in line) are just empty shells, contracting agencies whose job is to shovel taxpayer money into private "contractor" bank accounts (repeat after me:  just say "Halliburton, Halliburton, Halliburton, Halliburton," the prime contractor to both FEMA, DHS and DoD, too, with subcontractors ten deep for every task, grossly running up the cost.)  That's OK.  In fact its the whole idea:  no-bid, cost-plus covers it all.  Just send the bill to you, me, our kids and grandkids.  That friends is THEFT, on a grand scale, in the name of "public service" and "efficiency."
 
This FAA user fee thing is just more of the same.
 
Let's take a closer look at what they're doing to the FAA--this is nothing new--they're already well down the road.  It didn't start with Flight Service.  That's just the first really visible evidence of what's been going on for almost thirty years, and fits the model for what will follow. 
 
Flight Service is just the camel's nose under the tent.  The real prize is the whole ATC system.  It is huge profits, tax breaks and subsidies for a private ATC corporation that is the real goal.  All paid for by mandatory "user fees" and cuts in services.  But one bite at a time, can't let anyone connect the dots to see what's really going on.  So now its Flight Service.  And busting the controllers' union (so they can pay minimum wage with no benefits) is part of the prize!
 
Here's what they've being doing since Nixon, accelerated by Reagan, have nearly completed with Bush and are now doing to Flight Service:
 
Step one (which you may not have noticed):  Reagan, Bush I and the Republican Congress during the Clinton years (yes Clinton was an accomplice) and now Bush II slashed FAA funding.  That meant FAA had to cut services.  That's why there are no more field approvals.  That's why the controllers went on strike, got fired, the union destroyed and is why ATC is such a mess.  That was all part of the plan.
 
Step two:  Bush II slashed funding some more, which meant more cuts in services.
 
Step three:  Now that the FAA has no budget to perform the tasks they're supposed to, they've become "another bloated, inefficient government agency."  Big surprise! Can't have that!  What to do, what to do?
 
Step four:  Sub it out, no-bid, cost-plus, complete with tax breaks and huge subsidies.  So Bush II, in the name of "market efficiency" turned Flight Service over to Lockheed, one of Bush's biggest contributors.  Lockheed has, predictably, slashed the budget, cut more services, closed offices, cut the staff etc., all in the name of "efficiency," meaning "profitability."  Now they provide even worse piss-poor service because they don't have the necessary manpower to do a proper job.  What to do? 
 
Step five:  Slash services some more and start charging user fees. 
 
You can count on it.
 
Do I have something against profits?  Hey, I'm a (really) small businessman--profits are what pay my bills.  No, the problem is, some services are desirable and necessary, but are so expensive its simply beyond the means of most individuals to pay for them, which is why we join together to create government in the first place.  So we can have things like schools, roads and bridges, water systems, sewers, electrical grids, justice systems, individual and public rights, police and miltary forces etc.  Things we all need, individually and collectively, but that most of us couldn't afford if left to fend for ourselves.  You know, all the things you DON'T see in third world countries. 
 
So, now Lockheed owns Flight Service.  They want to make a profit, BIG profits.  It is a valuable, necessary service that benefits the entire air-traveling public, but one that costs more than the average individual traveler or GA pilot can afford.  The budget and services have already been cut to the bone.  Lockheed isn't making "adequte" profits.  What to do?  You can be absolutely sure Lockheed will start charging "user fees" for services they're already amply demonstrating they don't know how to provide. 
 
And FAA will make their "services" MANDATORY if you want to fly. 
 
Remember, its now required by law that we check notams before every flight to make sure we're up on the latest security data.  Suppose you had to PAY for that briefing and it was (and is) MANDATORY--no briefing, no pay, no fly.  Would that affect how much you fly?  Suppose you had to pay $25 or more, every time you called Flight Service to get that briefing, get weather or file a flight plan.  More fees every time you talk to ground, the tower, departure, center and approach, get flight following, get a clearance, landing and takeoff fees etc.  That's what's coming.  All in the name of "cost-cutting," "free" market "competition" and "efficiency." 
 
I call it extortion and theft.  And its what we're gonna get if we open the door to user fees.
 
It isn't about "service" or "efficiency" or "pay for what you get" or "free markets" or any of the other misleading slogans they hammer us with.  It's about MONEY.  Private corporations want to take over government services so they can make money, lots of money, MONOPOLY money (the government is monopoly). 
 
It's about ELIMINATING competition so they can gouge us but good.  And they way they start down that road is with huge tax cuts and subsidies for a few, cutbacks in services and "user fees" for the rest of us.
 
When the FAA starts talking "user" fees, what they mean is another subsidy and tax cut for those who the politicians have anointed as the blessed ones.  Like Lockheed.  The airlines think they're cutting a fat one.  They're fools.  Yes, airlines are the real users of the services, who don't need, but will get tax cuts and subsidies, all at the expense of those less able to pay (the public and general aviation).  But that's just part of the clever strategy to turn over FAA services to private corporations, MONOPOLY corporations, who will charge way more than the cost of letting the FAA keep doing  the job.  The airlines are gonna get screwed, too.  That's why they're screaming about gate fees taht are supposed to improve airport "efficiency."
 
Bullshit.
 
The "market" economy politicans, the bought-and-paid-for running dogs of the greedy corporations who want to take over government for their own benefit, are very sneaky about it.  They NEVER say anything about profits for their benefactors, it's all about "efficiency."  They don't call it a "tax," they call it a "user fee" so it sounds more like you're getting something for your money.  Of course, we already own and pay taxes for Flight Service, the airspace and the FAA--except now they want us to PAY some "contractor" AGAIN for what we already own!  Of course, the airlines--by far the biggest "users"--and the biggest contributors--won't pay a thing (they think), only GA will be subject to the fees. 
 
The FAA is small change.  What they have in mind is the biggest hostile takeover, the biggest theft and income transfer in US history, but they have to keep it quiet, one bite at a time, so nobody will notice what's going on.
 
Bottom line: folks like you and me will simply have to forego flying if we have to pay a fee every time we have to get a MANDATORY weather briefing, file a flight plan, get a clearance etc.  That's what they call "efficiency."  I guess we're just not "competitive," we're just some of the unfortunate "losers" in the game of rapacious cut-throat monopoly capitalism. 
 
"Stuff happens," to quote Rumsfeld.  Looting isn't a problem--it's the whole idea!
 
It's all part of a systematic PLAN to destroy public resources and turn them ALL over to private monopoly interests at a huge discount to value so they can re-sell them to us at enormous profit.  They've already "sold" FSS to Lockheed, next they'll sell the rest of the FAA and the airspace to the airlines.  Imagine where us Cessna and Cherokee pilots are gonna fit into their scheme of things, who is going to be numero uno for all of the benefits and who will get the hindmost, albeit paying for it in the form of escalating "user" fees.
 
The user fees now proposed will pale in comparison to those the airlines will charge once they own the FAA outright--which is exactly what Reagan and both Bushes proposed.
 
Ever notice that, somehow, the biggest beneficiaries always seem to turn up as the biggest campaign contributors?  Coincidence?  Lockheed is one of Bush's biggest contributors.  Don't think that's "corruption," that the administration is just being "efficient," trying to save us all some money?  Funny thing, Ken Lay (Enron CEO) was one of Bush's "best friends," was THE biggest single Bush contributor and had visited the White House more than 400 times.  400 times!  They must have had a lot of really important things to talk about, eh?  Funny thing, but after Bush de-regulated utility companies, like Enron, they suddenly became hugely profitable.  Of course they had to slash services to the public who paid for the electrical systems etc. in the first place and raise rates through the roof.  That's just "market" forces at work in a "competitive" (i.e., MONOPOLY) world, "efficiency" etc.  It was only when Enron got caught doing exactly what they had always intended and were expected to do (rig the system to cut services, create "deficits," power "shortages" and gouge the public--nothing new for utulity companies and the major reason they have been regulated since the Great Depression), after Bush de-regulated them, that they became exposed as the corrupt bunch they always were--and after all the big-shots sold their stock at hugely inflated prices.
 
They went to prison because they were CRIMINALS.
 
Amazingly, after all of the campaigning Bush had done for "de-regulation", and it became clear what a scam it all was, he just couldn't seem to remember who his buddy "Kenny-boy" was.  Hmmm.  Cheney is one of the biggest share holders in Halliburton, who just happens to be getting the biggest slice of the cost of the Iraq war.  Coincidence?  Odd that they never have to bid on anything, and, in fact, simply sub-sub-sub-subcontract most of their "services" to others, grossly increasing costs to us taxpayers.  That's what they mean by free-market (monopoly) "efficiency."
 
It's not about "bloated, inefficient big government," it's about stealing public services so MONOPOLY corporations can then use them to gouge like crazy!
 
Since when do National Parks and wilderness belong to concessionaires?  Since when does the airspace belong to the airlines?  Since when do we have to pay for vouchers for wealthy students to attend private schools? Since when are public schools and hospitals not only disposable but for sale to private companies at a huge discount (see post-Katrina New Orleans etc.)  Since when is the military a private force, i.e., Blackwater etc.--MERCENARIES?  Since when is torture SOP?  Since when does the government have the right to continuously spy on the public?  Since when do we employ totally unaccountable armed MERCENARIES (Blackwater again) for "policing" within the US (New Orleans, again)?  Since when does the government conspire with private companies to create unregulated monopolies so they can gouge the public--Enron etc.  Since when is it our government's right to threaten or overthrow non-threatening soverign governments, destroy their infrastructures and economies and then conspire with banks and private companies (i.e., big contributors) to steal their resources (many examples, not just Iraq) opening the door to bankruptcy, chaos and puppet dictatorship (Pinochet et al) government?  Since when do public utilities belong to private companies?  Since when are publicly chartered and insured lenders (banks and mortgage companies) virtually unregulated--loan sharks in other words--so they can sell worthless securities to ignorant investors, charge hidden fine-print time-bomb predatory fees knowing full-well their customers will have to default and thereby threaten the economic well-being of the entire world?  Since when does (favored, big-contributor) private industry have the right to pollute at will with government complicity and then say there really isn't a problem with pollution, that market forces will magically make it all go away?
 
Since when does the government keep their activities secret and then LIE LIE LIE about what they're really up to, claiming "Executive Privilege" or some other specious flagrant horse shit?  I remember the Cold War very well.  That's when we called the Russians our enemies because they were doing the very same things we now do in the name of the "unitary Presidency."  Ever notice that many of the Bush crew are holdovers from the Nixon administration?  Nixon's "Imperial Presidency" was chump stuff compared to what Bush has been doing.  After all, when Nixon said "I'm not a crook" (which was tecnically correct, he was just an ordinary "criminal"), he at least acknowledged that the Congress and the courts still had some relevance beyond rubber-stamping the foisting of a "permanent majority" (that's what we used to call "dictatorship") on what we used to call "democracy."
 
It's been the same old story for more than thirty years:  tax breaks and huge "subsidies" for the (really, really, big-contributor) wealthy few to run up huge deficits and thereby create a false sense of impending economic doom, slash services and charge "user" fees to "balance" the budget, cut taxes some more, create huge deficits, more doom, more "user" fees, repeat, repeat, repeat etc etc etc.  Then finally sell the service providing government agencies to profit making monopoly corporations who will then cut services even more, fire the remaining staff, disband the union, ship everything of to some low-wage off-shore country, get another big tax break and subsidy payment for off-shoring and raise the fees some more!  Since when does our government make it more profitable to fire US employees only to replace them with sweatshop (and even SLAVE) labor in foreign countries, gutting the industrial base of the country?  Since when is it our government's job to protect the Chinese and other sweatshop economies at the expense of our own?  Why is the Air Force considering buying tankers from Airbus?
 
BULLSHIT!!  ENOUGH!!!
 
The airspace does NOT belong to the airlines.  The FAA does not belong to Lockheed. The government is not a private, for profit corporation!
 
Since they're already calling ALL--including US citizens--who challenge their criminal strategy "terrorists," or "foreign combatants," arresting them in the middle of the night and shipping them off to Gitmo or treating them to kidnapping, imprisonment and torture in some "unknown" foreign country (Romania, among others, comes to mind) via "extraordinary rendition,"--our own version of Pinochet-style "disappeareds"--I don't know how much more they can think of on their way to creating a permanent dictatorship of the oligarchs, but count on it, they will.
 
But its actually even worse than that.  How could it get worse?  Let's talk about the privatization.  How about war?  Blackwater is getting a lot of attention lately because they are completely run amuck and beyond the reach of law--Iraqi or US.  Ever wonder how much a mercenary costs?  The US commander, general Petraeus, makes less than $600/day, which is LESS than the average pay for a Blackwater mercenary.  But that's only the tip of the iceberg.  Blackwater doesn't work for the US government.  They're just a subcontractor.  In fact, they're a sub to a sub to a sub to the prime contractor, who just happens to be No-Bid, Cost-Plus Numero Uno, you guessed it, Halliburton, in which our dearly beloved president in charge of vice just happens to own a huge number of shares of stock, even though that's against the law.  He has simply refused to divest himself (so did Rumsfeld) of his major (and increasingly profitable) interest in Halliburton.  Does that surprise you?  The Bush administration is not only the most secretive and repressive administration ever, its also the most corrupt.  Halliburton charges more than $5000/day for a Blackwater mercenary--who earns more (about $650/day) than General Petraeus!  Pretty "efficient," eh?  Isn't "competitive" free enterprise a thing of beauty?  Where does the other $4350 go?  To say nothing of $20 billion--that's right, $20 billion--that just, somehow, got "lost."
 
Ever wonder what a US infantryman makes while putting his/her butt on the line to serve his/her county?  It ain't more than General Petraeus makes, that's for sure!  So much for "cost savings," "efficiency" and "competition!"
 
But war isn't the only thing being privatized.  Wonder why government keeps getting more and more expensive while they're slashing services?  More privatization is why.  The feds (and states, too) have contracted MANY, MANY basic services, often on no-bid, cost-plus terms, to private corporations who then sub-sub-sub out the work, often to off-shore tax haven subsidiaries, grossly inflatings the costs so they can charge way more than any government department could ever dream of budgeting for the same work.  Just like Blackwater mercenaries making way more money than General Petraeus.  And of course it all done in the name of "free market economic efficiency."  Did you know that right now there are about 180,000 "contractors" (i.e., mercenaries) in Iraq costing us $5000 each per day.  There are "only" 160,000 US military--and they're being paid less than a tenth of what the "contractors" get.  Do the math and tell me what's more "efficient."  Remember the hated Hessian mercenaries that fought for the British during the Revolutionary War?  Do you think the Iraqis feel any different about Blackwater than we feel about the Hessians?
 
I am NOT making this up.
 
Think I'm over-reacting?  Just another soft-headed liberal nut case?  If Iran gets bombed in the not-so-distant future (got to create another crisis to drum up some more flag waving to hide the economic sleight-of-hand), even if our surrogate Israel does the bombing (and then gets a big helping of congratulatory economic aid and military equipment), if there are major demonstations here in the USofA (and around the world), don't be surprised if Blackwater gets called in to disperse the crowds and Bush suspends civil liberties or declares Martial Law.  He's got plenty of time to finish the job he started.
 
This whole thing has nothing to do with "competition" or "bloated big-government inefficiency."  It's about money, MONOPOLY money.  And you and I get the bill.
 
If we don't act now it will only get worse.  What we need is not "efficient" "market-driven" government, what we need is GOOD, honest government.  The pulic at large is hugely in favor of retaining or expanding almost ALL government services--that's why they have to use the excuse of deficits to create chaos and demand cuts in services.  Don't be fooled.  This has been going on for a long time, behind our backs, based on LIES and is at root, CRIMINAL.  FAA user fees is just the latest attempt at budget sleight-of-hand designed to divert our attention from what's really going on.
 
Call and write your Congress people.  Don't forget to vote.  Don't be just another bite for the elephant.
8:38 am pdt

Saturday, June 2, 2007

Terry McLaughlin
 
 
Today my good friend, Terry McLaughlin, died of pancreatic cancer.
 
This flying stuff is a funny thing.  Seems like all my best friends are pilots, people I've flown with, that I taught to fly and who taught me about flying and life. 
 
I met Terry about thirty-five years ago.  I was a pea green flight instructor working at Boeing Field at a place called Hangar No. 1.  Of course, I thought I knew all about flying and was the best instructor anywhere.  Terry showed up one day and wanted to learn to fly.  Neither of us had any notion that we would become great friends, that we would learn together so many things about so much more than just flying.
 
Terry was a guy who, like me, had wanted to fly all his life, now he had the chance and was going for the gold.  He was a few years older than me, a child of the Great Depression, with a bit of an underdog mentality and an impressive streak of determination.  When we met he worked as a computer technician at the University of Washington, a post he would hold until retirement.  Although computers were glamorous, strange and mysterious things in those days, his pay wasn't very good, not bad, but not very good.  Further, Terry had recently divorced and we all know how that goes.  Plus, Terry had a, shall we say, "frugal" approach to life.  Later, when he had amassed a few bucks, he stuck to living the low-budget life, investing every cent, wasting nothing, driving beater cars and wearing raggedy clothes.  But under that veneeer was a man with a brilliant memory, voracious curiosity and appetite for learning.  And he loved to fly.
 
During the Reagan Depression of the early 80's I became unemployed.  I tried to earn money however I could, with little success.  By then Terry had saved enough to buy a Cessna 150 in partnership with mutual friend Bruce Gorham.  Then Bruce went to Alaska, so Terry bought out Bruce and then bought a 172, too.  I was dead broke.  In my desperation to earn enough to put food on the table I approached Terry to see if we could make a deal so I could use his airplanes to do a little instructing.  When I say I was broke, I mean I was broke--absolutely at the end of my string.  I wasn't just broke, I was hungry, and I mean hungry as in needing something to eat.  I'm not sure Terry realized that, but he wanted to go to a hamburger joint to talk things over.  Only problem was, I was so broke I couldn't even afford a burger.  I said as much and Terry offered to buy.  When I reminded him of it years later, he'd long forgotten the episode (the only time I ever caught him forgetting something), but I hadn't.  His $5 kindness was something I'll never forget because it literally put food in my mouth.
 
Although I had taught him to fly and we were friends, we'd sort of gone our own ways, so he wasn't so sure loaning me his airplanes was a good idea.  Eventually I talked him into it and I set up a really, really small time operation I called Flight Proficiency.  This was about 1981 or '82.  As things often go in the flyin' biz, I made a little money during the summer, but when the weather cooled things slowed down and I had to think of something else.
 
Life improved.  One day we went over to Doug Sapp's place to look at a couple of unusual airplanes nobody knew anything about.  Chinese airplanes, "Yaks," whatever that meant.  Doug had three or four of them for sale.  Terry and I had never even heard the word "Nanchang" before, but we were curious, had seen Doug's ads and other ads for something called a "Yak-52," whatever that was, so we flew over to Omak to have a chat with Doug.  Very interesting.  Later, Terry made a deal with Ron Keesling to buy a couple of CJ-6's and import them directly from China.  One of those was the very first CJ I ever flew.  We taught each other how to fly the airplane, with its "strange" pneumatic systems and round engine.  Later we woud partner up to import  more CJ's.
 
I guess it was a little over a year ago I learned that Terry had been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer.  Not good.  Very poor remission rate.  Terry took chemo therapy.  He lost weight.  More chemo.  Lost more weight, he was in pain.  But he kept plugging along.  He didn't come around the airport as much, but he still had his 150 and 172 plus a few CJ's he was working on.  Eventually, he sold the CJ's to Barry Hancock.
 
A couple of weeks ago he came by to take a look at the Yak-52TW I'd recently flown up from Texas to sell for T.D. Kelsey.  Terry liked it.  But he didn't look very good.  He was in pain, had lost more weight and had no energy.  His old girlfriend, Terry Burt ("Miss Two," or "Terry Two" as we call her), called to tell me he was staying with "Al the Pal" Hurst because he was getting weaker and needed someone to keep an eye on him. 
 
Last Thursday night I went over to Al's to see how Terry was doing.  Not good.  He had jaundice, was down to 117 pounds, and although he'd been driving a car just a few days earlier, he'd pretty much spent the day in bed, unable to eat, tired, in pain.  He told me a hospice nurse was coming over the next day to take a look at him.  He just wanted to get it over with.  We said our goodbyes.
 
I talked to Al the Pal yesterday. He said that when the hospice nurse came Terry was rushed to the hospital because he was in such poor condition.  From there he'd gone to hospice care.  A couple of the old Hangar No. 1 guys came by, Dan Skarperud and Ron Keesling, but Terry couldn't talk, though he was conscious. I was flying until 10 last night and again today, so I couldn't get down to see him until tomorrow.
 
About 3 o'clock today Terry Burt called again.  Terry McLaughlin had died about an hour earlier.  She had been at his bedside, along with his daughter, Carol.  It had come suddenly, sooner than expected, but was no surprise.  Quiet, peaceful, a good way to go.
 
So long, amigo, I'm going to miss you.  I do already.
 
 
6:41 pm pdt

Thursday, May 10, 2007

All Red Star 2007 Porterville, California
 NX221TSatDVT.jpg
 
I  tried.  Really.
 
Undid hydro lock, then left (or is that right?) Texas (near Guthrie/Seymour) Saturday AM but got ambushed (GPS 120 and less) most of the way to ABQ, worse west of there at Grants (90 GPS), no way I could land the TW for fuel in the x-wind (full rudder, tried twice), back to ABQ (180 GPS) throttle way back bingo for a runway into the wind, please expedite.  Deteriorating to the west, spent the night.  Sunday all was well but overheard lots of air file IFR in NM and eastern AZ, had to detour south to Phoenix to stay in the blue.  Saw one unpainted CJ launch and a CJ 3-ship land while I ate lunch at DTV, lots of PanAm (Rove-speak oxymoron?) Cherokees in the pattern both runways, various accents.  AIRMET/SIGMET weather mostly failed to materialize :>) in the SoCal area, arrived PTV about 6PM.  Finally got to see the pretty flush riveted -50 (sitting near the gas pump when I refueled).  Square tips?  Too bad it doesn't have the slick little teardrop canopy and fixed gear any more.  Otherwise nothing breathing.  Oh, well.  Continued to MYV, landed in the dark (good lighting on the TW).  Spent the night, uneventful back home to KAWO yesterday.  Good to be in the green and blue with mountains again.
 
BTW most expensive fuel $5.36 at ABQ, $3.95 PTV, cheapest $3.79 at Cottage Grove, OR, though I'm told Scapoose is cheaper.  Nice having 74 gallons on board the TW, easy 3+30 legs @ 60% and 150 with healthy reserve except for my butt on a chute.  32 or even 40 gallons would have been troublesome in BF nowhere most of the route Texas to SoCal, especially dodging weather.  Did I mention TW she be for sale?  193TTSN etc.  Nice.  400hp feels good.  Pussycat.  $135K.
 
Also BTW, as reported by AOPA et al, the Lockheed/FSS takeover has all the earmarks of "tax-cut-privatization" (more Rove-speak), i.e., it don't work but costs more.  Ergo "user fees" bailout, layoffs, closed facilities, gross deficits, big bonus for CEO.  See also national parks, Medicare v. private insurance, donut hole prescription plan, Iraq etc.  To-wit:  Briefed over the phone before leaving Texas, filed, launched.  Reached ABQ, please close my flight plan.  What flight plan, there must be some mistake?  Hmmm.  Lunch at DTV, brief via Seattle FSS (800-WXBRIEF) with various system snafus, filed VFR, launched, no, testy Prescott Lockheed/FSS man sez, we don't have no stinkin' flight plan on file, so you wanna air-re-file you idjoe?  No, I didn't take a 3-hour lunch after filing.  And it ain't the environmentalists' fault or a socialist plot.  Better fatten-up your wallet, Craig, it's happening here, nose, ears, front feet and hump in the tent already.
 
Next year?
 
PS
 
The Yak-52TW is one terrific airplane.  Power, good speed (150 cruise at 60% and 10.5K) , 3+30 legs with a healthy reserve, room for bags, sweet Yak handling and fully aerobatic.  All at a price way below a new 172 to say nothing of a T-34, T-6 or any other American warbird.  One of life's great bargains.  Every hangar should have one (or two).
6:42 pm pdt

Saturday, December 16, 2006

Kent Pietsch Gets New Aircraft Carrier
kentpietschtruck.jpg
Here's a shot of Kent Pietsch testing out his new Aircraft Carrier at Everett, WA's Paine Field (KPAE) in preparation for shipment to Dubai for the big International Air Show next month.  You can see him looking down to make sure he's made a good trap.  That's Rick Davis driving the "carrier."
 
Kent's old mohome carrier has been sent to Sun City and replaced by a standard Chebby pickup with a few minor mods.  Kent and Rick worked feverishly to get it finished in time to pack the Carrier and Interstate into a 40 foot container to ship to Dubai in time for the Big Show--and barely had time to test before packing up.
 
The picture was taken by one of the tower crew from a chase car--who says the feds have no sense of fun?
 
"Interstate 361, Paine Tower, cleared to land; Chebby carrier, cleared to trap; Boeing heavy, hold at the outer marker."
 
Kids, don't try this at home.
 
click here for a video of Kent landing on his carrier:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sx_ol281-C8
 
 
9:19 am pst

Saturday, September 23, 2006

Jim Peitz joins ICAS board of directors


Jim Peitz was named to the ICAS board of directors during the national convention held December 6-9, 2004 in Las Vegas. Jim is looking forward to working with the ICAS team to continually build the reach and quality of the airshow industry. Also joining the board for his first three-year term is Bob Rice of the Commemorative Air Force in Midland, TX. Rodger Sorsdahl, of the Nova Scotia International Air Show, was re-elected to his second three-year term on the Board. For more ICAS news visit www.airshows.org.

This may be old news, but not to me.  I met Jim at the Reno National Air Races a couple of years ago and liked him immediately.  This year I joined up again with Jim, Rick Davis, Kent Pietsch (great show guys!) and others at Reno for good times, to renew friendships and a few wing levelers.  Until today I never knew of Jim's involvement in ICAS--he's that kind of guy, friendly, low-key, not trying to impress anyone.  Today I was browsing around and came across this at the ICAS homepage.  Also, see Jim's website at http://www.jpaerosports.com/index.html  Congratulations and Good Luck, Jim!

5:13 pm pdt

Friday, April 21, 2006

Scott Crossfield
 
When I was a kid in the aftermath of the Big One, when jets were dangerous
New Things and rockets had men for guidance systems, I read avidly about the
exploits of Bill Bridgeman, Joe Walker, Al White, Mel Apt and many
others--real heroes forging new paths in engineering and
aeronautics--dreaming that some day I would do the same. I, too, wanted to
be an experimental test pilot, the guy in the pointy end, a renaissance man
of aeronautics, part engineer, part Leonardo, part athlete, part warrior, a
man of intellect, daring and skill.
 
Scott Crossfield was one of my heroes.  I'm a Seattle boy and he had studied
aeronautical engineering at the University of Washington, in my home town.
Boeing was a bomber and airliner factory, it was the Cold War, Seattle was a
hard core airplane town and us kids designed and built tons of models, read
the books and magazines, drew pictures of airplanes all day long in school
and thought "Strategic Air Command" was the best movie ever made.  We all
wanted to fly.  I even had a hobby shop in the basement because no store
would stock the stuff we needed to build competition models.  My AMA number
was 10124.  We were boy engineers, control line and free flight test pilots,
too poor to afford radio control, longing to grow up and do the real thing.
 
Two airplanes really captured my imagination:  the F-104 and the X-15.  Those
were the airplanes I hoped to fly someday, or more powerful, faster, higher
flying successors.  I wanted to go Mach 6, too.
 
Years later, dreams partly fulfilled, watching and listening to Crossfield
on TV describing test running the XLR-99 rocket engine in the X-15, the first
throttleable rocket engine, he again personified my idea of what a pilot and
man should be.  He told a story that went something like "the airplane is
firmly chained to the ground, they strap you into the cockpit, get
everything prepared and then all go inside a concrete block house before you
actually fire the thing off.  This is called building the confidence of the
pilot."  Code words describing the potential for violent death that awaited
the unlucky, unprepared or less skilled.  "The Right Stuff" wasn't just the
title of a book or movie, it was what you hoped would keep you alive and
Scott Crossfield was the man on the leading edge of the the greatest
adventure ever.
 
You've seen the film:  after they all go to the block house, Crossfield
fires the XLR-99.  Everything seems to be going well, then it looks like he's
throttling it back, but the fire sputters and goes out.  After what seems
like a very long pause, the whole thing blows up in no uncertain way.
Miraculously, Crossfield was unhurt.  A crewman, mistakenly thinking
Crossfield was in great danger and probably seriously injured, rushed to the
cockpit.  Crossfield tried to wave him off, he was OK, but the crewman
opened the canopy with bare hands, suffering terrible burns and dragged
Crossfield to "safety."
 
Later, during an early test flight, he encountered control problems and had
to return to land, still heavy with fuel.  On final approach he got into
serious pitch PIO, finally landing on the skids attached to the aft fuselage,
then the nose slammed to the ground and the fuselage broke in two just
behind the cockpit.  Again, Crossfield was unhurt.
 
When the Wright brothers centennial came around there was Crossfield again,
working on a replica.  He was at Oshkosh.  He was in Seattle at the Museum
of Flight.  He was on TV.  After almost fifty years, almost forgotten, he
had made his way back into the spotlight.  He owned a Cessna 210.
 
I was in the hangar when a friend came by to ask if I knew who Scott
Crossfield was.  Yes, I knew who he was, why?  He was dead.  Killed in an
airplane accident, no details.  When I checked my email later, EAA had a
bulletin saying it was true.  Killed in his 210.  He was 84.
 
A lousy way to die.
 
I didn't know you and you didn't know me, but you meant more to me than you could ever know, Scott, and I will miss you, but I won't forget you.
9:30 pm pdt

Thursday, April 6, 2006

GROUND SCHOOL!!!
May 8-13 7-10pm $150
LIMITED CLASS SIZE SO SIGN UP EARLY
Call NOW to reserve your seat 425-876-0865
9:21 am pdt

Thursday, March 30, 2006

FACTORY NEW NANCHANG CJ-6JIA's

NEW!! NEW!! NEW!!--SORRY--new CJ's are no longer in production

The Nanchang Aircraft Mfg. Co. still builds new CJ-6's, though in limited quantities.  They're not easy to come by, but we've recently made arrangements to get Factory Brand New CJ's.  Because they're new, we can custom build them from the ground up to suit your every desire.  Prices, of course, depend on just exactly what you want, but you can start with a bare airframe, add the engine, prop, instruments, avionics etc. you've always dreamed of and we'll have it built just for you.  You can have a factory new 400hp, custom built airplane for less than the price of a new Cessna 172, in fact, for about the same price as a Diamond DA-20 or a Liberty XL!!  This is an unbelievable bargain, but it takes a little time, so get your order in NOW!!

INTRODUCTORY SPECIAL

FACTORY NEW WHOLE ENCHILADA Full Tilt Boogie Superformer with 400hp M14PF, Whirlwind or MT 3-blade prop, custom interior, paint, Dynon glass panels, Garmin IFR moving map GPS avionics package etc.  This is the Real Deal for only $199K!!!  Spec your custom-built airplane any way you want it and we'll have it built just for YOU!  This is an introductory deal for the first three airplanes only, so you'd better HURRY UP!!  Volume discounts for you and your squadron buddies!

6:41 pm pst

2009.06.01 | 2009.05.01 | 2008.09.01 | 2008.06.01 | 2008.05.01 | 2008.03.01 | 2008.02.01 | 2007.12.01 | 2007.09.01 | 2007.06.01 | 2007.05.01 | 2006.12.01 | 2006.09.01 | 2006.04.01 | 2006.03.01 | 2005.12.01

Link to web log's RSS file

click here to download "The Ballad of Flight Service" song

Company LogoWild Blue Aviation
Hangar 28
18228 59th Dr. NE, Arlington, WA, 98223 USA
Arlington Municipal Airport (KAWO)
mail to:  1521 Wetmore Ave., Everett, WA 98201-2057, USA
phone 425-876-0865