|
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
The End of Racism
It is certainly a dark day when the country has elected a socialist to the White House.
Most of it seemed to be fueled by young, first time Kool-Aid drinkers. One could say that these are merely kids and
most kids are liberal. When they become true adults, they'll change. The problem is that by the time they start
to think straight, a new set of sniveling brats will take over, fueled by ACORN or the next set of liberal criminals.
There is much to fear in this presidency, and it has all been laid before us. Some simply chose not to see.
So through all of this, I needed to seek solace in some small victory for the good guys, and
I see it as this. Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Reverend Wright, and all the others who have been whining about racism
their entire lives can now shut their darn pie holes. Racism has come to an end in our country, (white on black racism,
that is for the reverse is still prevalent--see above list). It has to have ended. If blacks make up approximately
13% of the populace, and BHO won so handily, did not most of his support come from the whities? So, this should officially
end it; no more disenfranchisement cries, no more job discrimination lies, no need for affirmitive action. It's over.
This is the victory we must take to balance the fact that our freedom ends in 76 days.
- All during the election, the liberals claimed that using Barry's middle name was racist. Today, in their election
announcement, the New York Times said that Barack Hussein Obama has won the presidency. I guess it is okay now since
he is in.
- I wonder if the Black Panthers who were strong arming voters in Philadelphia will be hired by Barry for his new civilian
army a.k.a. Hitler Youth.
- Obama has already said that it may take two terms to get all of his stuff done. Gee, God made the whole world in
seven days.
- Hold your heads up, conservatives, and join me in the continued fight against the disease of liberalism. We will
win the war someday.
JF
Monday, October 27, 2008
Power to the People
One thing people in this country should never forget is that the politicians in charge are accountable
to us. This means that they need to be accessible to our questions. True, there are secrets that must be kept
for national security purposes, but questions of domestic, economic and philosophical subjects should never be ignored.
Joe, the gaffe machine, Biden couldn't handle a few tough questions from an anchor woman at a local station in Florida, so
the campaign informed the station that they will likely not grant any further interviews due to the nature of the inquiries.
They also canceled Michelle "My Belle" Obama's interview with the same station.
Now I understand that slick Joe is not used to any questions that don't ask, "Oh Joe, how are
you and Barry Hussein going to save the world?" but for a man who is likely to become our VP to act in such a childish manner
as to get hot under the collar and ask the journalist who was writing her questions is unnacceptable. Can you picture
future press conferences with only CNN and MSNBC lobbing love notes at the administration. How will this pair deal with
diplomacy? "I'm sorry Mr. dictator with your finger on the button, we don't like what you said so we are going home."
This is a serious situation. It is just one more example of why this country has to come to its senses and realize that
BHO is extremely dangerous and definitely not ready to lead our great nation.
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Drinking it all in!!
It has been a while since my last post. Frankly, I have not had the desire to write.
I feel like we have been in a quagmire. Neither candidate for president has said anything new of substance, although
McCain did much better in the final debate. I do think that people are beginning to see BHO for who he really is.
The only question is, "Is it too late?" The polls are nonsense, ranging from one point up to thirteen. The best
news out there is that BHO seems to be coasting while McCain is stepping on the gas. I just truly believe that a lot
of American voters have their minds set to vote against George Bush. We are in a time when the radical ideas of Obama
can cause such a downfall in our country, we may never recover. Every economic expert will tell you that the worst time
to raise taxes is during a poor economy. And that is where we are. You can debate whose fault it is. There
is plenty to go around, but that is not productive. We need some common sense.
The BHO supporters need to realize that all of the promises, especially universal health care,
is impossible at this juncture due to the financial situation. People need jobs. The private sector provides them.
BHO wants to increase taxes on these wage providers. This is an undeniable fact. One of his surrogates on Fox
News admitted that the Obama plan raises taxes on those with GROSS receipts of $250,000 not those making a profit of the same
amount. This is nearly every small business out there!! This will have a dual effect--raise prices, and layoff
workers.
Joe the gaffe machine Biden showed his extreme optimism by saying that the world will test the
USA under BHO and pleaded not to hate their administration when it happens. All of the left wing attack forces that
have accused Sarah Palin of being stupid ought to reassess the definition. The man can't even count to four.
Paul Kanjorski, in a rally in Hazelton, said that McCain is probably going to die in office
because of his bouts with cancer, yet Biden won't allow his brain scans to surface that he had taken since his aneurism.
Could it be because there would be a big, blank space on the scan?
The bottom line is that voters must decide if they support:
1. High taxes
2. A grossly increase welfare state
3. The redistribution of wealth
4. A commander-in-chief who has terroristic ties
5. A president with next to no experience
6. The fairness doctrine
7. More government control of every aspect of your lives
8. Every variety of abortion known to man at record quantities
9. The open assault on religion.
10. The great USA floundering in mediocrity.
Vote McCain/Palin--You know it's the right thing.
JF
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Keith Olbermann vs. Rush Limbaugh
Each and every single day in our beloved United States, we can see examples of the double
standard that exists in the media. Keith Olbermann is a shining example of the fact that as long as your comments are
liberal, you can get away with it. Hearken back to the days when Rush Limbaugh was hired as a commentator for ESPN.
His job was supposed to be to comment on the side of sports that are beyond the playing field, and yes, to put things in a
political perspective on occasion. His downfall came when he said that the media had inflated the skills of Donovan
McNabb in a desperate attempt to have a black quarterback succeed in the NFL, a position formerly chock full of white players.
There had been the exceptions like Warren Moon and Doug Williams, and Steve McNair but there were nowhere near the amount
of black quarterbacks as there are today. Rush's comments were immediately tagged with the "racist" label. Few
sought to understand the fact that he never said anything disparaging about black quarterbacks but that he was pointing out
a conspiracy in the media, thereby exposing the racially motivated agenda of the leftists therein. ESPN summarily dismissed
Rush.
Fast forward to this NFL season. Keith Olbermann, who started out in sports, and ended
up in the most liberal media outlet, (and most ignored), MSNBC. Keith has been a poster child for scathing, liberal
hate during his tenure at the network. Now he has landed at NBC as a commentator in a limited and pointless capacity.
Last week, as the highlights of the games crossed the screen, he made a comment more egregious and obviously biased than Rush's.
In a spot that showed Buffalo Bills quarterback Trent Edwards being sacked and suffering a concussion, Olbermann injected
that Edwards must have been saying "I can see Russia from here!" This was a clear jab at Sarah Palin straight from "Saturday
Night Live." He equated Edwards' scrambled brains with that of the Alaskan governor. Keep in mind that Keith's
job is sports-oriented only, whereas Rush's was supposed to be issue-oriented. Has Olbermann been fired? No.
Will he? I think that one answers itself.
JF
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Why Not Mail in the Answers?
Last night's debate proved that the entire system is in total chaos. The debate
format was supposed to be a "town hall" style. However, Tom Brokaw selected the questions, choosing those that could
have been easily written by middle school students. Most of them were of the "What can I get?" ilk. This is analogus
to the style of government that will be offered under Barry Hussein Obama. It may have the images and facades of democracy,
but like that wizard behind the curtain, someone will be pulling the switches and controlling the path of what will be "a
once great country."
Under Obama, we can hearken back to the age of the Roman Empire where the concept of Bread and
Circuses kept the people in line. We have already seen the young children singing praise to Obama on video. We
have seen the Obama youth groups chanting about how, because of Barack, they can actually become a lawyer, or doctor, or whatever
they choose. You mean those were not options before the mighty BHO arrived? Is this not repulsively similar to
the Hitler Youth? Are you ready for the government to tell you how much to charge for a product in your business?
Are you ready for the government to tell you which operation you can have and what treatment is valid for you? The government
already runs health care in the Verteran's Administration hospitals. Have you experienced the care? It is horrendously
inefficient! Now a new government agency is going to run health care for everyone? Who is going to pay for this?
Check your pay stubs. Are there already too many areas of deduction? Wait until
your check is parceled out into the services that BHO deems as being important. There will be the regular deductions
plus a universal health care deduction, plus a green (global warming) deduction, plus deductions for sex education, gay rights
awareness programs, reparations for slavery, etc. Does it sound farfetched? It's not. They will all be disguised
under names that our future socialist government will concoct.
McCain had his chance last night and he blew it. If he had attacked, brought out more
of the truths about the socialist sitting next to him, he would possibly have a chance. Republicans should not throw
in the towel even though it looks bleak. Keep hammering away at relatives, colleagues and friends. Pull that curtain
back so everyone can see that the wizard isn't so wonderful after all.
- The media is hoping that the more futile they paint McCain's chances that many will choose not to vote.
- Obama has been involved in these groups like ACORN which are registering low income people, blacks, and college students
while promising the world in exchange. This is wrought with fraud.
- They caught the little puke who hacked into Palin's personal e-mail and Eureka!! he is the son of an Illinois Democrat.
Isn't that the community organizer's state?
- The connection between Obama and the terrorist Ayers keeps being proven to be more and more intimate by the minute, yet
many do not care. Did you ever think that we would elect a person in league with a man who bombed American soil?
JF
Friday, October 3, 2008
Palin's Definition of the American Dream
Sarah Palin did America proud last night. She took to the stage and after a little nervousness,
delivered a courageous, substantive, and determined message. Of course both sides have claimed victory. That is
always the case. But she did something in a manner that may have been lost on a lot of viewers. She reminded the
American people what the American Dream entails and what are its misconceptions.
The American Dream does involve a good job, a comfortable home, a
family, etc. The difference between the traditional view of it and the distortion of the modern view was brought to
light by a woman who has lived it. The American Dream does not guarantee anything. It does not provide anything.
It merely rewards hard work and determination. It is time to stop looking to government to solve your problems.
If a hurricane is coming, seek refuge. Don't wait around and then complain that the government didn't come within your
demand of twenty-four hours. If you need a job, find one. If you needs skills for that job, obtain them.
If you need a home, put yourself in the position to afford one. The crux of the housing/financial crisis is highly due
to the fact that the democrats wanted to grant that American Dream to everyone, like a band of merry men and women riding
a parade float and tossing candy to the minions. The incentive to achieve in our country has been thoroughly suppressed.
Sarah Palin, with the words "personal responsibility" reminded a nation that not only should accountability be a hallmark
of any efficient government, but also a mainstay for every citizen.
In contrast, Joe Biden continued to press the message that only he, along with Barry Hussein
Obama can grant that American Dream to you. It cannot be achieved without them. It is the same message democrats
have pulled out every four years to shore up the vote. The American people need to realize that the government is not
the provider, the nurturer, the parent as the left tries to state. With their way of thinking, the American Dream will
stay but a dream, as the blaring of the alarm grows steadily louder.
- Biden, like BHO, showed himself to be so intolerant of Palin with all of his smirks and gestures.
- Palin put the moderator in her place early by telling her that she would not tailor her answers to fit her or Biden's
expectations.
- Sean Hannity thoroughly mopped up the floor with some liberal congresswoman after the debate.
Sunday, September 28, 2008
Looking Forward, Looking Back
Friday night's debate showed a stark contrast in the way that Democrats and Republicans approach
things. John McCain used his time to look forward at the future America he envisions and will build, while Barry Hussein
Obama did little more than dwell in the past and invoke the Bush administration's perceived failures in a futile attempt to
attach them to McCain. In typical leftist fashion, the pundits tried afterward to accuse McCain of living in the past
in order to deflect Barry's lack of vision. However, there is a fundamental difference in pointing out your strong record
in the senate to taking pot shots at the outgoing administration. If BHO had merely focused on his past accomplishments
when looking back, there would be no criticism here, but therin lies the illegitimacy of his candidacy. Barry has no
past to speak of. He went from community trouble maker, to state representative, to U.S. Senator where he practically
pioneered the vote of "present." That's quite a record. Fifty-four yeas, forty-five nays, and Barry Hussein
voting, "present."
Throughout the debate, McCain referred to his opponent as Senator Obama, yet Obama kept calling
his opponent, John, John, John. This attempt at establishing superiority was so childish that it showed the character
of this pretender of a candidate. Additionally, BHO teetered on the verge of a full blown tirade several times while
McCain pointed out some of Obama's misunderstandings of the issues. This undoubtedley was a goal of McCain's--get under
the skin of Barry and watch him explode. He came very close. He smirked, pursed his lips, shook his head, and
showed his arrogance and air of superiority. If a simple debate raises this man's temper so much, what will he be like
when he has his planned coffee clatch with Achmedinijad? (and if I spelled this tyrant's name wrong, I don't care).
The critics on both sides have claimed victory as always, though it seems clear that McCain
was the clear victor. Nevertheless, even if Barry slighty edged him out, it is an empty victory, for the next debate
is going to be a town hall style, and without pre-arranged speeches, Barry Hussein is a wobbling weeble that will fall down.
JF
Saturday, September 20, 2008
Colorado's Unfair and Unbalanced Professor
Talk to any liberal and they will espouse the so-called "separation of church and state" for
any issue they see as pro-religion. Anyone who can read the constitution understands that the only restriction is in
enforcing an official religion, not in recognizing religion. Simply put, the government can be involved to a degree in
Christmas, Easter, Yom Kippur, Ramadan, etc. A similar situation exists in the school system. There is nothing
wrong with discussing religion, or celebrating holidays, yet we have seen the all-out assault on Christmas in recent years
by the liberals, and to a greater extent, the liberal atheists. To extend this concept one step further, the arena of
politics is not taboo in the classroom. It can be discussed, evaluated, critiqued. However, it crosses the line when
a teacher allows only one side of an issue. I will go so far as to say that a teacher can even voice his or her political
views so long as they are not delivered in a way so as to influence unfairly, a student's understanding of the issue.
As long as a teacher qualifies his opinions with stating that they are his, and not a matter of fact, he has not crossed the
line.
At the college level, where free thought should be encouraged, and healthy debate emphasized,
unbalanced bias can be most damaging. A Colorado professor has crossed the line of offering an opinion, and embarked
on the path of forcing his ideology upon his students while disallowing dissent. He assigned an essay
to freshmen students to write a negative critique about Sarah Palin. He did not assign a critique,
he assigned a negative critique. He has crossed the line. If this were an isolated
incident, it could be classified in the "lunatic fringe" file, but the fact is that it is happening more and more on campuses
throughout our nation. Try and voice a conservative opinion at many colleges and universities and you will find yourself
ostracized.
College is a time when one develops ideology, when one formulates political views.
Yet these views often change when one gets older. Why? Because young, impressionable minds are geared toward emotion
over logic-- a prime reason why this professor's assignment is so dangerous. Colleges are already filled with liberalism.
Teachers like this keep tipping the scales in order to force their agenda. Winston Churchill said, "If you are not a
liberal by the time you are eighteen, you have no heart, but if you are not a conservative by the time you are thirty, you
have no brain." His words ring true. If it is a mere case or human nature at hand, it certainly does not
need a human hand to nurture it.
- It is disgusting how Joe Biden has suddenly found Scranton again in order to shore up votes. I'm surprised he remembered
where it was.
- Sarah Palin has a great sense of humor and is not afraid to laugh at herself (Saturday Night Live).
- Front page of the CV had a picture of this amphitheater construction by the river-- a terrible waste of taxpayer money,
Kanjorski Style!!!
- Speaking of Kanjo, I think he is preparing for a royal ass-whooping from Mayor Lou.
Saturday, September 13, 2008
McCarthy May Have Been Right!!
For years we were inundated with the notion that McCarthyism was this dark, sinister time in
American History. The senator believed that there were communists in Hollywood. Well, that sure sounds accurate
in today's film industry and much of entertainment as a whole. Perhaps he was on to something. Now I do not believe
that all of Hollywood is communistic, but a vast majority is leftist which borders on the former. There are few actors
whose movies are watchable without a stomach pump to relieve the nausea from the thought of their socialist agendas.
Let us take a look at the list.
1.Barbara BS Streisand--hypocrite who scorns conservatists while charging a month's salary to attend one of her concerts.
Meanwhile, her mother lives in abject poverty.
2. Sean Penn--believes Bush exploded the towers, loves Hugo Chavez.
3. Harry Belefonte-- Chavez lover
4. Danny Glover-- mega-Chavez lover.
5. Baldwin (who cares which one) --said he would move to Canada if Bush won in 2004.
6. Susan Sarandon & Tim Robbins--always in the news tearing down the administration and spewing lies.
7. The Dixie Chicks--went to a foreign country to badmouth America.
8. Matt Damon--a recent addition to the list. He recently ridiculed Sarah Palin for her religious beliefs.
This is typical leftist. They cite the first amendment for everything from teaching kindergarten children to put a condom
on a cucumber to trying to control elections by making up stories in the New York Times or on CBS when Dan Rather was there.
Yet, Governor Palin's right to freedom of religion, (1st amendment also) is attacked.
10. Whooppee Doo Goldberg: She compared the name of our president to a similarly named part of her anatomy.
(The image is too much to bear). She also said that constitutionalists want to make her a slave again showing her low
IQ by not realizing that this document changes but does not erase.
11. Rosie O'Donell: another conspiracy nut who blamed our commander-in-chief for the towers falling.
The list could go on and on: John Cougar Mellencamp, Bruce Springsteen, Matthew Modine,
Martin Sheen, Spike Lee, Martin Scorcese, Oliver Stone...
Why is this such a dangerous thing? It is dangerous because of how many uninformed Americans
follow the nonsense and hatred spewed by these people. If they are a celebrity, they must know what's right, right?
Perhaps if more people watched fair and balanced Fox News instead of viewing disgusting, irreverent shows like "South
Park" on the Fox Network, they would see the truth better.
JF
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
Corbett Gets it, Corbett Gets it!!!!
The planets must have aligned like they never have before, for I am about to praise
Steve Corbett. Steve has long been a card carrying liberal. He has written and said some things that make my blood
boil. I think we have finally found common ground, and if true, the United States stands alongside us.
Corbett rabidly supported Hillary Clinton for the presidency. Logic would
dictate that he should now support Obama. Lefties with lefties, right? Not necessarily! I have not heard
Corbett come out in full support of the McCain/Palin ticket, but he has spoken well of them lately. This is the position
that I believe most Americans who are undecided will migrate to. Many will say that it is the female vote. However,not
just any woman could evoke such enthusiasm amongst the electorate. Certainly Palin has struck a chord with the genuine
twenty-first century woman. She is the model for what feminists SHOULD admire and hold up
as a model, yet the radicals spurn her. It has become something more than gender.
The reason why people like Corbett may well break ranks with this Democratic ticket
is because the Democrats of today are not that of years past, not even of the Clinton administration. Obama, Biden,
Pelosi and the gang are so far left that they do not connect with those who are Democrats because of unions and black lung
benefits. These are not the Dan Flood Democrats. These are the far left socialists who aim not for equal opportunity,
but for equal subservience. They set the rules. They decide who gets the slice of pie. The Republican ticket,
on the other hand represents most of America. Cut taxes, limit government, and let the people run their own lives.
Allow the free market to create jobs, not government.
Now before one thinks, "Of course a conservative would say this," it can be argued
that the same would be true of the radical right. Who are the radical right? The are the militias. They
are the white supremecists. They are the ones who want no government social programs at all. Here is where the
difference lies. In no way would the vast majority of Republicans support anyone as far right as the above described,
yet millions have supported the candidate who is just as far left--until now. People have begun to awaken to the pomous
nature of Obama/Biden. They are seeing through the barren promises that are impossible to keep. Obama
wants to transfer wealth at such a drastic clip that the effects would be an ecomonic
catastrophe when businesses start to go bankrupt and the tax base to pay for his utopian dream dries up.
The American public is educating themeselves. They are not willing to put
up with the slander shoveled by the Democrats. McCain is ahead now in the polls, and if he gets Corbett fully in his
corner, Northeast PA may well play the deciding role in the election. So when I say to you, Steve Corbett, "C'mon into
the fold," you better listen!!
Sunday, September 7, 2008
The Liberal Times Leader
If anyone is still under the delusion that the majority of the media is not leftist, check out
today's Times Leader. The opinion section is overwrought with scathing letters about Sarah Palin, filled with the lies
perpetrated by the big shots at the major (lack of) news outlets. Furthermore, Kevin Blah Blaum's article has the audacity
to bring up John McCain's cancer episodes. Mr. Blaum, (and I know you frequent this site), it was one of the most
treatable cancers known, and he is more than healthy. His genetics suggest that a long life is in store for this
honorable man. Did you not see his ninety-six year old mother at the convention? She seemed pretty spry.
Of course it is understandable that a tax and spend liberal like Blaum would be of this persuasion. He was the man who
tried to stick the Wyoming Valley tax payers with the bill for the arena from which he earned quite a nice nest egg.
*************
The assault on Chritianity is increasing. There is a film out called "The God Who Wasn't
There," another desperate attempt to disprove the existence of Jesus Christ. Along with that, Bill Mahr--socialist and
atheist--reportedley has a film that tears into religion quite irreverently. Of course just like all of the anti-Bush,
anti-War movies, they will flop at the box office, but the question of why there is such a fervor with this subject looms.
What do they fear in Christianity, for this is the only possible reason to release such hate-filled trash? Why are there
not more films about how the Islamic religion is the one to be feared? Are there radical Christians who have hurt or
killed in the name of their religion? Of course there are. Any group has members inconsistent with their majority.
But the scales are tipped to a great degree. Terrorism has become a driving force in Islamic Dogma, while Christianity
continually supports kindness and peace. I cannot imagine the emptiness of an atheist's life and fortunately, I don't
have to.
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
A Matter of Class
As the Republican Convention continues, the stark differences between this version and the one
the Democrats displayed has become increasingly evident. Aside from the fact that this is a dignified, cost-effective
convention as opposed to the pompous "look at me" coronation of Barack Hussein that costs an inordinate amount, the essence
of message and behavior become center stage. The behavior outside of the convention by the far, far left loons borders
on terroristic. They showed today their lack of civility by physically attacking delegates, one as old as seventy-one
years old. There were protestors at the DNC, but they were not as violent.
Inside, the messages delivered were specific and substantive. There were no "I'll give
you __________" speeches like at the DNC, where future tax dollars flew out the window with every liberal breath that found
its way into the microphone. By contrast, the Republicans spoke of policies that would limit government interference
in people's lives and not play "Barackinhood" with your money. There was no tugging at the heartstrings with messages
of the hardships of the candidates. For one particular soldier, a film was shown depicting his committment to his country
and told the story of how he sacrificed his life to save others by falling on a grenade. The message was not "Bush killed
me," or "Get out now." It was a message of duty and honor.
Of course the lambasting of Sarah Palin continues. The party of tolerance condemns her.
The party that celebrates every sexual perversion known to man, ridicules her pregnant daughter. The party that preaches
equal rights for women has deemed her to be unqualified and biting off more that she can chew.
And so the circle goes on. Last week's freak show is over. This week is proving
to be a showcase of those who can sucessfully lead this nation. After all, it's a matter of class.
JF
Saturday, August 30, 2008
A Short Play Between a Conservative and a Liberal
Con: I'm not voting for Obama.
Lib: You are a racist.
Con: I don't like Hillary's
ideas.
Lib: You are a sexist.
Con: But I really like the views of Sarah Palin.
Lib: Uh, er...gee
wiz..uh...You're still a sexist.
Con: I support the troops.
Lib: You're a war monger.
Con:
There is a hurricane coming.
Lib: And it is Bush's fault.
Con: It's hot out today.
Lib: It's global
warming.
Con: Last week was unseasonably cool, though.
Lib: It's global warming.
Con: Well, I've
got to go. I have a wedding this afternoon.
Lib: Is it a gay wedding?
Con: No
Lib: You are filled
with hate.
Con: Actually, it is my best friend getting married. He's is African- American. His wife is
the CEO of my company and the best boss I've ever had. He is a doctor who does volunteer work at a clinic.
Lib:
You are a ...a...a...a. Damn! What's left? Obama! Help! What do I accuse him of now?
The End
A Real Woman in the White House
For all of the liberals out there who try to say that minorites and women are only welcome in the Democratic party, meet
Governor Sarah Palin, the next Vice-President of the United States. As I have said with Obama, it is not that I don't
want a black man in the White House, I just don't want that particular black man in the White House. It is the same
with Hillary. The rejection of her was not because she is a woman but because she is...well...HERSELF! Now there
is a real woman on the ballot. She is a mother, a hunter, a business person, and above all, a conservative. When
you hear her speak, when you see her, there is none of the plastic facade that Hillary exudes. She can be best described
as "genuine," a true Renaisannce woman. Her speech of acceptance was both substantive and dignified. Hillary's
speech at the DNC was flat, boring, and delivered not to support BBHO but to keep herself in the spotlight as long as possible.
As for that disgusting, ostentatious display at the DNC, I have never seen a more pathetic self
annointing. First, the rear of the stage was set up to look like an executive political office similar to the oval office.
This was supposed to send the message of BBHO as legitimate in the role of president. The Roman columns that surrounded
the stage subliminally transmitted the idea that Barack was , in fact, building a mighty empire. The island of circles
where the podium rested placed BBHO alone amidst a sea of disciples symbolically telling us that he indeed does stand alone,
a sort of superhuman/deity. Though his hands were empty, he stood there offering the keys to the kingdom, ready to dole
out the goods to his minions courtesy of the future tax rate increase. The man is gearing up to spend our money
like a drunken sailor.
Nevertheless, we made it through and this week we can watch a dignified display at the RNC
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Kennedy's New Bill Of Rights
I truly hope that Teddy Kennedy survives his illness he suffers from. I hold no ill will
for the man. However, I cannot support his philosophies. Last night at the DNC, he said that universal health
care should be a "fundamental right," something everyone is entitled to. If one looks at the "Bill of Rights," the
most cherished of them refer to what government won't do, not what they will provide. They will not infringe upon your
free speech, your religion, your right to bear arms. The will not conduct illegal searches, nor will they quarter soldiers
at your home. The Founding Fathers sought only to protect your lives, not run them, or provide for them. Logically,
this is the slipperiest of slopes to ski down, because there can be no end to the entitlements. Perhaps housing should
be a fundamental right. How about a car for everyone. As much as the liberals would like you to believe that their
ideas of giving away the farm is somehow equivilent to "a chicken in every pot," there is a clear distinction. Certainly
the hungry should be fed. We have soup kitchens and food banks for that. Certainly, the naked should be clothed.
We have clothing drives for that. Certainly, the homeless should be housed. We have shelters for that. But
the government's job is not to provide. Does the book 1984 ring a bell? Does no one remember the Soviet Union's
lack of bread and shoes, and other items simply because it was up to the government to supply it and there were no capitalists
to ensure a healthy supply of goods? People today want to look at oil companies as being evil, but is it not nice that
there is a gas station on every corner? In the Soviet Union, there was such a shortage of gas that one had to buy it
on the black market. Government run systems do not work. There is little incentive for excellence.
Health care is no different. If it is universally doled out, the money will come from
all of our pockets in taxes. The government will never pay the doctor's the fees they deserve so in turn, the true achievers
of the world will not go into medicine. Do you want the less talented, less intelligent cutting you open on the operating
table?
For the truly impoverished, health care exists. There are clinics available in nearly
all cities. There are a few in the Wilkes-Barre area that I am familiar with. The access card is taken by plenty
of doctors for those on welfare, and they also receive prescriptions with it. This is undeniable! The leftist
notion of socialized medicine is nothing more than another attempt to run people's lives. Elitists like Obama somehow
feel the need to say, "I can run your life better than you can." No one is being denied anything. The private
sector and the charitable organizations can do a much better job of offering health care to the less fortunate than another government
bureau can.
JF
Saturday, August 23, 2008
Princeton's Pathetic Promiscuous Play
I remember what college freshman orientation was like. You learned of your schedule, professors,
campus clubs, the layout of the school. Princeton has taken orientation to a new level. As reported on Glenn Beck
this evening, this paragon of the educational landscape has as part of its program a play called "Sex on Saturday Night,"
in which it promotes the virtues of the "hook up," a slang term for the one night stand. According to the students and
administrator who appeared on the show, the play encourages casual sex as part of the normal college lifestyle. Now,
of course, no one is blind to the fact that college is a time when sex can be quite rampant. I offer no delusions that
these institutions are monestaries. However, this play surpasses what most people consider to be the
norm, actually encouraging a promiscuous lifestyle on campus. It is eerily reminiscent of the society in Aldous Huxley's
Brave New World in which families were outlawed and the government encouraged short-term relationships of a few nights
or weeks, and frequent sexual partners.
Now this play comes under the guise of informing students about safe sex, condom use, etc.
However, the incoming freshmen are required, yes required, to attend as part of the orientation process. Is this what
parents envision when their kids go away to college. Visions of upperclassmen in "Student Leader" shirts telling the
newbies where to buy your books or what local pizza place is the best is suddenly clouded by visions of Roman orgies.
Colleges today push the liberal idea of tolerance for all. Where is their tolerance for the religious or the simply
moral students who do not want to be part of this? Somehow, the word orientation has suddenly become much more literal.
Perhaps they should use a stronger moniker like indoctrination.
- The media coverage of the anticipation of Barry Barack Hussein Obama's V.P. announcement is totally over the top.
It shows the absolute pomposity he exudes.
- A meth lab in Glen Lyon? Yikes!! Write the epitaph for small town America.
- The Old Farmer's Almanac announced that this will be a harsh winter, further proving that Al Gore is a moron.
- Don't blame the Chinese for faking the fireworks at the opening ceremonies of the Olympics. It came out today that
they had to sell all of them to Obama to use when he announces his VP candidate.
JF
Thursday, August 21, 2008
All the Medals belong to the U.S.A.
This has been a wonderful Olympics for the United States. It is likely that we will win
the medal count and there have been some great moments--Phelps, of course, men's and women's gymnastics, the women's beach
volleyball victory just last night, etc. However, as I watch, I keep hearing of how so many of these foreign athletes
live in America and train here. If this is the case, I think their medal should belong to us. It is tiring to
watch the greatest country in the world continually fed upon by parasites. Everyone wants us when they need us.
It is no secret that some of the athletes receive free tuition at colleges and universities--money that could lower tuition
rates for U.S. citizens. I do not believe in the "global" movement. This is one more indicator of the need to
keep Barry Barack Hussein Obama out of office. His "citizen of the world" philosphy is dangerously close to the "one
world government" concept.
- The bigfoot discovery was found to be a hoax. The mystery lives on!!!!!!!
- B.H. Obama has a brother that lives in abject poverty. This kind of flies in the face of his socialistic, redistribute
the wealth concept.
- Why does the Citizen's Voice go out of its way to publish letters to the editor from outside the area? Answer:
As long as it's liberal, it's fit to print.
- How refreshing to see that Carrie Walsh thanked President Bush last night for providing inspiration. I'm surprised
they didn't use a delay and edit it out.
- So the left is actually going to get spoofed with the new movie coming out about Michael Moore. Even though it is
a comedy, it will likely have more truths in it than most of Moore's pathetic films.
JF
Monday, August 18, 2008
The Downside of the Wall's Fall
For the most part, two great men caused the downfall of the Berlin Wall and communism throughout Europe, especially in
The Soviet Union--Pope John Paul II, and President Ronald Reagan. There is no doubt that they changed the world for
the better. However, there is a negative effect of no longer having communism so readily available, except for China.
The young people of our nation have little to no concept of what communism is, or what the cold war was like. How is
this negative? It is negative simply because they do not understand the danger of it. They don't see the oppression,
the lack of freedom, or the looming threat of nuclear holocaust. In two decades, it has been erased. Political
correctness deems that any mention of communism in the classroom must be painted in a benign color. This is why the
situation with Georgia is so difficult. The remnants of the Soviet Union may be at play here, and to not recognize the
dangers is detrimental.
Another reason why the unfamiliarity with the horrors of communism is dangerous is in the acceptance
of Barry Barack Hussein Obama. Listen closely to his ideas and they are communistic: penalizing companies if they make
"too big a profit," or redistributing the wealth from one person to another. Our constitution says we are created equally,
not that we must stay that way. See the '80s film, Moscow on the Hudson. It will be a fine reminder of
diamentrically opposed societies.
JF
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
China the Cheaters and NBC Red Communist Lovefest
The Chinese have clearly cheated in women's gymnastics.
The new rule is that all competitors must be sixteen years of age. One look at their team and it is clear they are at
most fourteen, and more likely eleven. Compare them to our "women" and the difference is stark. Our girls are
much taller and weigh more, plus they look like youg women, i.e. they have curves and boobs. Libs can call me a pig/sexist
here if you want, but it is clear. So how does this help the cheaters? It is simple. The place where we
lost was mostly in the floor excercises where all three Americans stepped out of bounds during their routines. They
seemed to spring higher and land farther. Their bodies are heavier and of course will take more force to do the tumbling
and therefore, more opposite force to stop (in this case more room). It is simple physics. The tiny tots on the
communist China team didn't need the full length of the floor because of their tiny frames. It is what it is!!!!
Nevertheless, a wonderful silver for our legal women.
I, for one, am sick of how NBC is praising China
as if they were the greatest nation on the earth. The three idiots who cover the gymnastics were almost rooting for
the Chinese team. So many criticized President Bush for going. By that logic, should not everyone stay away?
The president did an excellent job of diplomacy in keeping the focus upon the athletes, yet still being firm with the Chinese
government.
- Obama is in Hawaii. He should stay there.
- Bill Clinton is getting his own special night at the convention while scumbag
John Edwards has been uninvited. What is the difference?
- If you want to envision the U.S.A. under Obama, listen to the conditions in
China.
- Lou Barletta's ads start today. Go get 'em, Lou!
- Gas is down to $3.59--it's a start!!!!
Monday, August 11, 2008
Gay Pride on the West Side
The local gay pride crowd held their rally this
weekend in Kirby Park. There were protestors there to tell them their lifestyle is wrong. This is a touchy issue.
The media and the P.C. police will tell you that if you are one of those protestors, you are a homphobe, bigot, hate monger,
etc. Now I was not there in person, but I do protest this event. I do not judge their choices. I do not
want to hurt them or discriminate against them. There is only one thing that bothers me: DON'T FLAUNT IT IN PUBLIC.
I don't see the need to promote homosexuality. Since they all claim that being gay is innate and they were all born
that way, wouldn't they come to this realization on their own without a big, public, ostentatious display of freakishness.
Children do see this and I firmly do not believe that they need to be exposed to alternative lifestyles in their young lives.
Secondly, why do the gays need to have a rainbow
as their symbol? I don't think the pot of gold at the end of one is a gay romp in the hay. I don't think Judy
Garland was singing about a gay pride rally in The Wizard of Oz, nor is Kermit the Frog when he sings The Rainbow Connection.
The symbol of the rainbow has been tainted.
- The Olympics are going well for the U.S.A. so far. Keep winning!!!!!!!!
- I don't think the U.S. should get involved with the Russia-Georgia conflict,
but I'll leave it to our excellent commander-in-chief to decide.
- I would like to invite Al Gore to come dip his ass in my ice cold pool
and then explain this global warming theory again.
- McCain and Barry Hussein are virtually deadlocked. Getting scared,
Barry?
Monday, August 4, 2008
Angels Among Us
I have been to New York City many times. I have occasionally ridden the subway.
The greatest feeling I ever had on the subway was when I saw one of the Guardian Angels sitting a few seats away from
me. As a NEPA born soul, I have always had my fears about the city. Here in the valley, we don't ride subways
so it is natural to fear that which we do not deal with on a regular basis. The Guardian Angels have set up shop in
Wilkes-Barre, and how have we greeted them? We have a mayor and a police chief who refuse to acknowledge their presence.
The buzz is that they are afraid of "condoning" vigilantism and want to avoid a future lawsuit if one of these "law enforcers"
gets out of hand. Only in Luzerne County could local government be so myopic. This is what embodies the coal miner
mentality. Now I respect coal miners a great deal. The coal miner mentality has nothing at all to do with their
honest work ethic and way of life. It refers to the idea that this area must stay thirty years behind the times.
It says that we are inferior. The Guardian Angels have successfully made the streets of many cities safer through their
efforts. Our local police cannot handle the amount of crime that has been plagueing our city as of late. Let these
people do their jobs and welcome them!
- Morgan Freeman, a great actor, was in a bad accident today. I hope he is alright.
- Boscov's filed for Chapter 11. This is a shame. They do not advertise well.
- Why do other cities plant flowers and cut the weeds along roadsides and medians and W-B is a jungle?
- Why doesn't someone buy the Hart Restaurant?
- Why is Barry Obama calling Paris and Brittany airheads. McCain simply put them on a commercial.
JF
|
