Webcam Astrophotography
Digital Camera Astrophotography With Nikon 4500
Digital Camera Astrophotography With Leica D-LUX 3 (New)
Total Lunar Eclipse
Techniques and Limitations (Updated)
Hand Sketches

Digital Camera Astrophotography With Nikon 4500

 

* Note that if a "hand" symbol appears when a cursor passes over an image then clicking will expand the image. *

*

$ The techniques used to obtain these images are described in my Techniques and Limitations (Updated) page. $

*

The pictures on this page were obtained with a Nikon 4500 Digital Camera. The technique used is "Afocal Astrophotography" in which a camera takes photographs while coupled to a telescope's eyepiece.

My telescope is a 1979-made Questar. It is a 3.5 inch Maksutov-Cassegrain with a focal length of 1300 mm. It has a battery-operated Powerguide II that guides the telescope along the Right Ascension coordinate compensating for the earth's rotation.

*

It is instructive to compare the images of Jupiter, Mars and our Moon on this page with those obtained by a Philips ToUcam PRO II webcam as shown on my Webcam Astrophotography page. The webcam, in conjunction with image processing software such as Registax, achieves a wonderful and superior level of detail.

*

460x. A single high quality 2274 by 1704 pixel image at 1 s exposure as intercepted through a Baader Neodymium Glass Filter. Unsharp masked and reduced in size. 30 August 2004.

 

460x. Two hundred 1600 by 1200 pixel fine quality images each recorded at a quarter of a second exposure were stacked via Registax, processed in Maxim DL to realign color planes and unsharp masked and reduced in size with AstroArt. 19 September 2004.

 
 
 
 

460x. Two hundred 1600 by 1200 pixel fine quality images each recorded at half a second exposure were stacked via Registax, processed in Maxim DL to realign color planes and unsharp masked and reduced in size with AstroArt. Cassini's division at a third of the way from the outermost portion of the ring as well as some shading on Saturn itself is apparent. 19 September 2004.

_______________________________________________________________________

Jupiter at 288x. One hundred 1600 x 1200 pixel sized images taken at 1/4 s shutter speed were aligned and stacked with Registax. Then processed for color balance, contrast and sharpness with AstroArt. 
 
 

For comparison here is the result at 264x. Twenty-six 1280 x 960 pixel sized mages taken at 1/8 s shutter speed were aligned and stacked with Registax. Then processed for color correction, brightness/contrast and sharpness with Adobe Photoshop Elements.
 
*
 
In both images, Jupiter's North Pole is at the 2 o'clock position. The Equatorial Belts are immediately obvious. As are the shaded Polar Regions. The Great Red Spot is not seen. Although, in the first image, there is something over in the 10 o'clock position in the South Equatorial Belt. That's where one would have expected to see the Spot.
 
The oblateness of the Jovian disk (especially in the first image) became truly apparent to me on seeing this image. Indeed the ratio of the polar to equatorial diameter is 15:16 according to Norton's 2000.0 StarAtlas. This degree of oblateness is the net result of a tug-of-war between centrifugal and gravitational forces; the former arising from Jupiter's relatively high speed rotation of 9.8 hours (nearly two-and-a-half times faster than the earth's) and the latter from its mass which is 317.8 times the terrestrial one.
 
Recorded before sunrise, between 5:34 and 6:14 am, on 15 November 2004.
 
_____________________________________________________________________

mars200510282ndtryregistax.jpg
marspreviewer200510282015.jpg

Topmost is Mars on 28 October 2005 at about 8:15 to 8:30 pm EST one day before closest approach of 29 October. 54 images were recorded continuously at 1/15th sec and mag 230x. They were processed in Registax under the following conditions: lower quality setting of 95% which eliminated 31 images; wavelet processed in layer 2 at a value of 30.3 (default value of 1 in all other layers); used the RGB option to adjust color planes; tweaked HSL and, finally, rotated image to facilitate comparison with the corresponding image in "Mars Previewer II" (shown directly below my work). South is therefore up (and East is left). Incidentally, a gibbous Mars is not uncommon en route to full opposition (this time around on 6 November).  
 
Note: Mars Previewer II is a freeware program developed by Argentinian amateur
Leandro Rios. It can be downloaded from
 
Looking from left to right, along an axis from  7 o'clock to 1 o'clock, my image shows Syrtis Major on the extreme left of my image as a slight dark shadow extending downward. That is followed on the right by Mare Tyrrhenum which passes over to Mare Cimmerium. Polar caps are visible.
 
____________________________________________________________________

Note: The lunar images below should be compared to those produed by the Leica D-LUX 3 as shown in my Digital Camera Astrophotography With Leica D-LUX 3 (New)  page.

 

 

      72x. 23 August 2004.
 
 
 

Mare Imbrium with Apennine Mountains @ 115 x. 23 August 2004.

 
 
 
 

moon-sw-115x-2272-1704-60th-sec.jpg

Registax aligned, stacked and wavelet processed result of 17 out of 21 images each of 115 magnification taken at a 60th of a second. Unsharp masked in AstroArt. Original image size being 2272 by 1704 pixels. 10 September 2004.

 
 
 

fullmooneastcraterspartialview30thsec230x.jpg

Eastern side at 230x. "Registaxed" 23 images each at 30th of a sec.  36 hours after full moon. 18 October 2005.

moon-30thsec-76x-30oct2005-0600hrs-stk33of46.jpg

"Last Easy Old Moon" at 76x on 30 October 2005, 48 hours before new. Horizontally flipped Questar's mirror image. Stacked 33 out of 46 images. Optimized using Wavelets in Registax 3.
 
________________________________________________________________________

72 x. Expanded to show sunspots.

72 x. Enlarged to show sunspots. 7, 17 July 2004.

For solar images, a Baader full aperture solar filter was employed. It produces rather dull gray images. Consequently, Adobe Elements was used to introduce color.

The magnetic field in a sunspot is ~ 3,000 times stronger than the average field of the sun. The temperature in a sunspot is lower than that of its surroundings. As regards its structure, it has a dark umbral center surrounded by a relatively light penumbra. This feature can be seen in the image below. It is particularly evident in the expanded image (click on original image).

According to Norton's 2000.0 StarAtlas, the diameter of a visible sunspot is > 10,000 km and that of a large group of sunspots is 100,000 km. By these standards, the largest of the sunspots seen below (which I estimate to be roughly 43,500 km inclusive of the penumbra) obviously belongs to the average-sized or a lesser category.

 

 

Spots in the 8 o'clock position shown enlarged to 322 x.

___________________________________________
 
 

115x. Tip of the sword in the Orion Nebula M42. Distance is 1,600 light years. Obtained by stacking 20 images each image being obtained at a shutter speed of 8 s. Trapezium stands out in the top right-hand corner. The presence of the heated dust cloud surrounding the 'Trap' makes it evident as to why this is an emission nebula.

Referring to the four stars in Trapezium, Canadian astronomer Terence Dickinson writes

"four blue jewels embedded in a delicate celestial cloud". 

19 September 2004

 

Zeroing in on the northeast section of the Pleiades cluster at 70x. This is a single high quality image obtained after an exposure of nearly half a minute. The noise reduction feature in Nikon 4500 was turned on. 
 
While the clock drive in my telescope tracks well along the azimuth, lacking a device to compensate for errors in elevation, I have to make continuous manual adjustments during the time the image is being actually acquired. This trial and error approach requires me to strike a balance between using longer exposure times to bring out more detail while incurring greater tracking error. Many images have to be discarded before a decent one can be found.
 
I processed the original image in AstroArt so I could use color balance to bring out legitimate details. While color balance introduces an artifical graininess suggesting a glow that, given my exposure time, I do not expect Pleiades to have, it is pleasing that a comparison of the above image with a textbook diagram of Pleiades as shown below validates my approach. What is seen in my image is indeed present in Pleiades.
 
For stellar or deep sky astrophotography a longer exposure time will win out over stacking many shots at a shorter exposure time. 12 February 2005.
 
To aid the viewer relate my images to the components of Pleiades, shown below is a textbook diagram of Pleiades with numbered stars. It is taken from p. 60 of Crossen and Tirion's "Binocular Astronomy" (Willmann-Bell, 1992). The diagram can be expanded by doubleclicking on it.
 

Vasu Jagannathan * Washington, DC