|

460x. Two hundred 1600 by 1200 pixel fine quality
images each recorded at a quarter of a second exposure were stacked via Registax, processed in Maxim DL to realign color
planes and unsharp masked and reduced in size with AstroArt. 19 September 2004.

460x. Two hundred 1600 by 1200 pixel fine
quality images each recorded at half a second exposure were stacked via Registax, processed in Maxim DL to realign color
planes and unsharp masked and reduced in size with AstroArt. Cassini's division at a third of the way from the outermost
portion of the ring as well as some shading on Saturn itself is apparent. 19 September 2004.
_______________________________________________________________________

Jupiter at 288x. One
hundred 1600 x 1200 pixel sized images taken at 1/4 s shutter speed were aligned and stacked with Registax. Then processed
for color balance, contrast and sharpness with AstroArt.

For comparison
here is the result at 264x. Twenty-six 1280 x 960 pixel sized mages
taken at 1/8 s shutter speed were aligned and stacked with Registax. Then processed for color correction, brightness/contrast
and sharpness with Adobe Photoshop Elements.
*
In both images, Jupiter's North Pole is at the
2 o'clock position. The Equatorial Belts are immediately obvious. As are the shaded Polar Regions. The Great Red
Spot is not seen. Although, in the first image, there is something over in the 10 o'clock position in the South Equatorial
Belt. That's where one would have expected to see the Spot.
The oblateness of the Jovian disk (especially
in the first image) became truly apparent to me on seeing this image. Indeed the ratio of the polar to equatorial diameter
is 15:16 according to Norton's 2000.0 StarAtlas. This degree of oblateness is the net result of a tug-of-war
between centrifugal and gravitational forces; the former arising from Jupiter's relatively high speed rotation of
9.8 hours (nearly two-and-a-half times faster than the earth's) and the latter from its mass which is 317.8
times the terrestrial one.
Recorded before sunrise, between 5:34 and
6:14 am, on 15 November 2004.
_____________________________________________________________________


Topmost is Mars on 28 October 2005 at about 8:15
to 8:30 pm EST one day before closest approach of 29 October. 54 images were recorded continuously at 1/15th
sec and mag 230x. They were processed in Registax under the following conditions: lower quality setting of 95% which
eliminated 31 images; wavelet processed in layer 2 at a value of 30.3 (default value of 1 in all other layers); used
the RGB option to adjust color planes; tweaked HSL and, finally, rotated image to facilitate comparison with the
corresponding image in "Mars Previewer II" (shown directly below my work). South is therefore up (and East
is left). Incidentally, a gibbous Mars is not uncommon en route to full opposition (this time around on
6 November).
Note: Mars Previewer II is a freeware program developed by Argentinian
amateur
Leandro Rios. It can be downloaded from
Looking from left to right, along an axis from 7
o'clock to 1 o'clock, my image shows Syrtis Major on the extreme left of my image as a slight dark shadow extending downward.
That is followed on the right by Mare Tyrrhenum which passes over to Mare Cimmerium. Polar caps are visible.
____________________________________________________________________

72x. 23 August 2004.

Mare Imbrium with Apennine Mountains @ 115 x.
23 August 2004.

Registax aligned, stacked and wavelet processed
result of 17 out of 21 images each of 115 magnification taken at a 60th of a second. Unsharp masked in AstroArt.
Original image size being 2272 by 1704 pixels. 10 September
2004.

Eastern side at 230x. "Registaxed" 23 images
each at 30th of a sec. 36 hours after full moon. 18 October 2005.

"Last Easy Old Moon" at 76x on 30 October
2005, 48 hours before new. Horizontally flipped Questar's mirror image. Stacked 33 out of 46 images. Optimized using
Wavelets in Registax 3.
________________________________________________________________________

72 x. Enlarged to show sunspots. 7, 17
July 2004.
For solar images, a Baader full aperture solar
filter was employed. It produces rather dull gray images. Consequently, Adobe Elements was used to introduce color.
The magnetic field in a sunspot is ~ 3,000 times
stronger than the average field of the sun. The temperature in a sunspot is lower than that of its surroundings. As regards
its structure, it has a dark umbral center surrounded by a relatively light penumbra. This feature can be seen in the image
below. It is particularly evident in the expanded image (click on original image).
According to Norton's 2000.0 StarAtlas,
the diameter of a visible sunspot is > 10,000 km and that of a large group of sunspots is 100,000 km. By these standards,
the largest of the sunspots seen below (which I estimate to be roughly 43,500 km inclusive of the penumbra) obviously belongs
to the average-sized or a lesser category.

Spots in the 8 o'clock position shown enlarged
to 322 x.
___________________________________________

115x. Tip of the sword in the Orion Nebula M42. Distance is
1,600 light years. Obtained by stacking 20 images each image being obtained at a shutter speed of 8 s. Trapezium stands
out in the top right-hand corner. The presence of the heated dust cloud surrounding the 'Trap' makes it evident
as to why this is an emission nebula.
Referring to the four stars in Trapezium, Canadian
astronomer Terence Dickinson writes
"four blue jewels embedded in a delicate celestial
cloud".
19 September 2004

Zeroing in on the northeast section of the Pleiades
cluster at 70x. This is a single high quality image obtained after an exposure of nearly half a minute. The noise
reduction feature in Nikon 4500 was turned on.
While the clock drive in my telescope tracks well along
the azimuth, lacking a device to compensate for errors in elevation, I have to make continuous manual adjustments during
the time the image is being actually acquired. This trial and error approach requires me to
strike a balance between using longer exposure times to bring out more detail while incurring greater tracking error. Many
images have to be discarded before a decent one can be found.
I processed the original image in AstroArt
so I could use color balance to bring out legitimate details. While color balance introduces an artifical graininess suggesting
a glow that, given my exposure time, I do not expect Pleiades to have, it is pleasing that a comparison of the
above image with a textbook diagram of Pleiades as shown below validates my approach. What is seen in my image is indeed present
in Pleiades.
For stellar or deep sky astrophotography
a longer exposure time will win out over stacking many shots at a shorter exposure time. 12 February 2005.
To aid the viewer relate my images to the
components of Pleiades, shown below is a textbook diagram of Pleiades with numbered stars. It is taken from p. 60 of
Crossen and Tirion's "Binocular Astronomy" (Willmann-Bell, 1992). The diagram can be expanded by doubleclicking on it.

|