Homilies 2003
Homily June 28, 2003 (B)
Homilies 2003 home
Main Home Page - Msgr Magee
Homily January 5, 2003 (B)
Homily January 11, 2003 (B)
Homily January 19, 2003 (B)
Homily January 26, 2003 (B)
Homily February 2, 2003 (B)
Homily February 23, 2003 (B)
Homily March 2, 2003 (B)
Homily March 9, 2003 (B)
Homily March 16, 2003 (B)
Homily March 23, 2003 (B)
Homily March 29, 2003 (B)
Homily April 6, 2003 (B)
Homily April 27, 2003 (B)
Homily May 11, 2003 (B)
Homily May 18, 2003 (B)
Homily June 1, 2003 (B)
Homily June 8, 2003 (B)
Homily June 15, 2003 (B)
Homily June 22, 2003 (B)
Homily June 28, 2003 (B)
Homilia - 5 de Julio, 2003 (B)
Homily July 12, 2003 (B)
Homily July 19, 2003 (B)
Homily July 26, 2003 (B)
Homily August 3, 2003 (B)
Homily August 10, 2003 (B)
Homily August 17, 2003 (B)
Homily August 24, 2003 (B)
Homily September 6, 2003 (B)
Homily September 14, 2003 (B)
Homily September 28, 2003 (B)
Homily October 12, 2003 (B)
Homily October 16, 2003 (B)
Homily October 19, 2003
Homily October 26, 2003 (B)
Homily November 2, 2003 (B) All Souls
Homily November 9, 2003 (B)
Homily November 16, 2003 (B)
Homily November 23, 2003 (B)
Homily November 30, 2003 (C)
Homily December 6, 2003 (Wedding)
Homily December 7, 2003 (C)
Homily December 14, 2003 (C)
Homily December 25, 2003 (C)
Homily December 27, 2003(C)

Solemnity of SS. Peter & Paul – Year B

 

                From being an impetuous, self-concerned coward, Simon, Son of Jonah, became Peter, the Rock on which Christ built His Church; he became our leader in the faith, the Vicar of Christ, the first Pope! He who had once been a hair’s breadth from the mind and the heart of Judas Iscariot, became chief of the two Princes of the Apostles. He who had protested his own sinfulness to Jesus saying, “Leave me, Lord, I am a sinful man”, and yet had groveled in that very sinfulness when three times he said in the courtyard of Caiaphas, “Leave me alone, I do not know that man”, became the one whose profession of faith brought words of blessing from the Heart of Jesus. And that same Jesus longed so dearly for the reassurance of Peter’s love that he asked him three times: “Do you love me more than these others?” From fearing to be known as a friend of the crucified, Peter himself was at last crucified near the Vatican hill in Rome for love of the Crucified.

                Then there is Paul. From being a violent-tempered, zealous persecutor of Jesus and His followers, and what he himself describes as “the worst among all sinners”, Saul of Tarsus became Paul, Apostle of the Gentiles, the fearless teacher of the faith, the apostolic voyager, the founder of Churches. From wishing to cut out at its roots the infant Church, Paul became one whose head was cut off that the blood of his martyrdom might give growth to the Church. It is symbolic that tradition locates his beheading at “Tre fontane”, the “three fountains”, in Rome.

                And what is the reason for this 180 degree turn-about in the lives of these two miserable men? The most compelling answer is that each of them, in their misery, turned to the suffering Jesus for mercy and healing. It was the look of mercy from the deep wells of the eyes of Jesus that penetrated the heart of Peter and broke it, that he might weep his way to recovery. It was the blinding light of Jesus asking Saul of Tarsus, “Why are you persecuting me?” that planted deeply within him the seed that would transform him into the greatest preacher of Christ’s passion, death and resurrection. To put it another way: both these men in their misery were open to the Lord of mercy, who, while He surely made them understand the depths of their misery, made them also experience the infinite depths of His Mercy.

                We all experience all kinds of misery: as pain of all and any kind, as sin of all and any kind. Peter and Paul teach us to look to the suffering, merciful Lord in our misery, whatever its nature, causes or dimensions, that we might be healed. The Lord’s plans for them were not plans of condemnation, but of salvation. Indeed, that very experience of their own misery in the light of His mercy was what enabled them to become the heroic martyrs for Christ, the Princes of the Apostles of Christ!

                For each of us, too, our misery contains the key to our glory, since the suffering, merciful Lord has no plan of condemnation for us either, but only of salvation. All He asks is that we trust in the power of His merciful love, that we recognize the truth about ourselves and about Him and seek to live and love His will, which is our salvation. That is the goal of the apostolic message: to know, love and proclaim Jesus as the merciful Lord of all creation, as the source and destiny of all that exists.

                At the same time, the mercy of Christ is not to be taken presumptuously for granted. For His mercy comes to us only through the mystery of His passion. We cannot treat lightly the shedding of Christ’s blood. Rather, what He has done for us requires of us a like-minded response: a willingness to be faithful in word and deed to the truth of God’s creative and redemptive will, unto the shedding of our blood.

                Nothing that exists, exists by chance: “For in Him all things were created; they exist for Him and through Him.” When Jesus took our flesh he took to Himself something that He Himself created. When we read the early passages of Genesis we read of the order of creation, an order which proceeds from very mind and will of God. When mankind is given dominion over creation, it only exercises that dominion in truth to the extent that it is itself subject to the Creator. Human autonomy, or freedom is not something absolute or disconnected from God or from the order of God’s creation: rather it depends on it, otherwise, as we have discovered to our grief through the centuries, man will tend to destroy himself and creation with himself.

                So we cannot truthfully seek the mercy of Christ in our misery if at the same time we wish to do violence to Him by introducing or passively tolerating disorder in His creation. The quintessence of original sin, and thus of every sin, is that man seeks the fantasy of a creation without God, without God’s order, without the truth and the laws which reveal and protect that order, in its integrity, balance and hence beauty.

                People criticize the Catholic Church for being out of date, especially when it comes to Her doctrine on moral questions. But that very criticism is symptomatic of a mentality that has forgotten, or has never known, that what the Church teaches in moral questions does not, or should not, proceed from the passing dictates of social or cultural behavior. The Church is the living memory of Christ for every generation, of Christ the Creator and Christ the Redeemer. The essential truths about human moral behavior as taught by the Church proceed from Her call and mission to remember and proclaim Christ’s truth about man, about man and woman, about life and death, about sexuality and justice. If it is thought that Christ can really be removed as the foundation of that truth, then effectively anything goes. And when anything goes, everything will eventually perish with it.

                The moral teaching of the Church takes what we call the natural moral law, e.g. the ten commandments, and lets the light of Christ shine fully upon it in order that its full meaning may be brought to light and be set up as a wonderful, beautiful vocation for the human being to strive towards. The natural law would say: “Thou shall not commit adultery”; the truth of Christ enlightens that even further: “Even if a man lusts after a woman in his heart, he has already committed adultery with her.” Now we all make mistakes, commit sins, in striving to live those ideals, but that makes those ideals neither unattainable nor unrealistic; it simply means we need humility, patience and perseverance in exposing our misery to the mercy of God, so that His grace can eventually lead us there.

                The Supreme Court of the United States a few days ago, among others things, decriminalized homosexual behavior. In doing so, because of its status in this country, it has effectively given a legal or juridical blessing to such behavior. But a legal blessing is not a moral blessing. Unfortunately, many civil laws have simply cast aside the law of God and the moral vision of the human person that derives from that law, a vision which inspired the founding fathers of many nations. Now, while not every sin can or should be punished socially as a crime (otherwise we would all be in jail!), it is wholly inappropriate that a behavior which, even socially, has been considered for centuries as morally unacceptable should now effectively be sanctioned by the highest court in the land as if it were a mere matter of personal preference or, indeed, something to be emulated.

                Undoubtedly, this is a very difficult question, and every case has to be taken individually to evaluate a person’s real or reduced responsibility. But silence does not serve to clarify it. I do not intend to say, nor can I say, everything on this complex matter here, but I feel compelled as a minister of the Gospel to give you at least some basic elements of the Church’s teaching on this question. How that teaching is applied in individual cases will depend on a whole host of factors and circumstances. But the teaching itself remains.

                The Catholic Church as Mother loves all her children, whatever their state of moral or spiritual weakness or strength. But as Teacher, She must teach them what is and what is not compatible with being a Christian, what is and what is not worthy of Christ, so that they can mature as Christians. The Church teaches (cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2357-2359) that the homosexual orientation is of itself morally neutral, yet also that it is, for the many complex causes no-one yet completely understands (2357), not in accordance with the created order (2357). God does not create what is disordered: He redeems it! People with this orientation often suffer greatly precisely because they sense, not just a social stigma of rejection or discrimination, which is totally unjustifiable and counter-productive, but also an intrinsic lack or brokenness within their own spirits (2358). This is deep suffering and requires all our respect, all our assistance, all our understanding and compassion. And we must be sincere! Our brothers and sisters in Christ who have a homosexual orientation are called, as are we all, to holiness of life: prayer in search of close and tender intimacy with the Heart and Body of Jesus, deep devotion to Our Lady and the saints as real, loving and concerned people, the other sacraments, the virtue of chastity, the cultivation of healthy friendships and all other means that help one grow in the sense of one’s true dignity and inner freedom: these are all means through which a person with a homosexual orientation can seek to live their situation in accordance with the will of the Lord (2359).

                But when it comes to homosexual behavior, the Church teaches that it is “intrinsically disordered” (2357), for two reasons. First, because it contradicts the natural created order regarding the truest meaning of sexuality as the expression of the complementarity of man and woman “created in the image and likeness of God”– not just spiritually and psychologically, but also physiologically, since God also created our bodies. Secondly, homosexual behavior closes the sexual act to God’s gift of created human life (2357). So, with the greatest respect for the highest court of any land, let it be said that no man-made law can change the moral law of God.

                Rather, we must all reach out and help one another to live as Christ teaches, but be vigilant that when we are weak and fail –whoever we are and whatever we have done- that we do not give in to the earliest temptation known to man, viz. to tear down the law of God and set up our own “law” in its place. For the sinner who accepts his sin, there is always mercy; but for the sinner who makes a virtue out of his sin, either for himself and/or for others, mercy is all but gone, since they themselves choose not change their lives as the mercy of God requires of them.

                What are often called private choice behaviors are never private in this sense: if they are morally wrong, they violate the moral order, hence the order of creation and of redemption. To put it simply, they wound Christ “in whom and for whom all things were made” and by whom all things were redeemed, because His all-seeing eyes see with pain that the beauty He has created for our good is being marred by the very ones with whom He wanted to share that beauty. The Cross of Christ stands before every moral decision we make, and if that Cross is not our standard then, in the chilling words of St. Paul, “we empty the Cross of its meaning”. That is we waste with terrible wantonness the mercy of Christ.

                On this solemnity of Peter, our leader in the faith, and of Paul, its fearless preacher, each of us is called to look at the suffering, merciful Lord for his or her own healing. And each of us is called to lead and be fearless in our homes and communities in preserving and in witnessing to the order of creation and of redemption, sustained powerfully, as it is, in the Sacred Heart of Jesus Christ, the Son of the living God. It was for this that St. Peter was crucified and St. Paul beheaded.

 

Msgr. Peter Magee

Saturday, June 28th 2003, Vigil Mass at Mother Seaton’s, Germantown;

Sunday, June 29th, 10.00 am at St. Matthew’s, DC; 12.00 noon at St. Thomas, DC; 6.00 pm, St. Raphael’s, Rockville