|

News
August
5, 2003 BAD NEWS FOR BOATERS IN NEW JERSEY SHORE COMMUNITIES!!! NEW NO DISCHARGE ZONE WILL AFFECT YOU MIDNIGHT
LAW MAKERS ARE UP TO NO GOOD!!
A variety of people listed in the Federal Register Notice were responsible for a new
NO DISCHARGE ZONE which will affect tens of thousand boaters on the New Jersey coastline. Read the list and remember their
names! A new NO DISCHARGE ZONE will now extend to the bottom of Long Beach Island. The clandestine act was keep secret by
government officials and also was kept out of the newspapers until it silently ran the course of the Federal Register to become
law. The New Jersey DEP never mentioned it in their news briefs and Bob Scro seems to have controlled the entire matter by
keeping it from becoming common knowledge to any boating group including this one. In the past, when he worked for the DEP.
he was very interested in promoting pumpouts and communicated with boating clubs. Looks like he found a new avenue.
Federal Register: June 12, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 113)] [Notices] [Page 35214-35215] From the Federal Register
Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr12jn03-44]
Notice is hereby given that EPA has made a final affirmative determination regarding the petition dated
March 27, 2002 that was received from the State of New Jersey. The Regional Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), pursuant to section 312(f) of Public Law 92-500, as amended by Public Law 95-217 and Public Law 100-4 (the Clean Water
Act), has found that adequate facilities for the safe and sanitary removal and treatment of sewage from all vessels are reasonably
available for the waters of the Barnegat Bay, Ocean County, New Jersey. This petition was made by the New Jersey department
of environmental Protection (NJDEP) in cooperation with the Barnegat Bay Estuary Program, New Jersey Marine Sciences Consortium,
Ocean County Planning Board and Ocean County Vocational-Technical School. Upon the receipt of this affirmative determination,
NJDEP will completely prohibit the discharge of sewage, whether treated or not, from any vessel in the Barnegat Bay Complex
in accordance with section 312(f)(3) of the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 140.4(a). On April 1, 2003, EPA published a receipt
of Petition and Tentative Determination and accepted comments from the public for a thirty (30) day period. EPA received
letters from the following individuals: 1. A. Jerome Walnut, Chairman, Ocean County Planning Department,P.O. Box 2191,
Toms River, New Jersey 08754. 2. Christopher Claus, President, Ocean Nature and Conservation Society, 21 Winding River
Drive, Toms River, NJ 08755-5122.
3. David J. McKeon, Assistant Planning Director, Ocean County Planning Board,
P.O. Box 2191, Toms River, NJ 08754-2191. 4. William deCamp, Jr., President, Save Barnegat Bay, 906-B Grand Central Avenue,
Lavallette, NJ 08735. 5. Angela C. Andersen, South Jersey Coordinator, American Littoral Society, P.O. Box 1306, Tuckerton,
NJ 08097. 6. Cindy Zipf, Executive Director, Clean Ocean Action, P.O. Box 305, Highlands, NJ 07732-0505. EPA received
emails from the following individual: 1. Bob Scro, Barnegat Bay Estuary Program Director, Ocean County Planning Department,
P.O. Box 2191, Toms River, New Jersey 08754. Mr. Scro identified some typographical errors made in the original petition
submitted to EPA: ``Ocean County Vacation and Technical School'' should read as ``Ocean County Vocational-Technical School''
and ``Ocean County Municipal Utilities Authority'' should read as ``Ocean County Utilities Authorities''. Mr. Scro also commented
that since the petition was submitted, a third pumpout boat had been purchased and is servicing boaters in Barnegat Bay. These
corrections have been made to this Final Determination. Several of the commenters expressed support for the establishment
of a No Discharge Zone (NDZ) and commented that this Final Determination was an important step in protecting the water quality
of Barnegat Bay and its marine resources. The Ocean County Planning Board forwarded a Resolution, passed by the Ocean County
Board of Chosen Freeholders, supporting the NDZ. Many of the commenters, especially the Ocean County Planning Board, stated
that there were a number of threats to Barnegat Bay including non-point source pollution and that this designation was just
one of many action items in the Barnegat Bay Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan.
The American Littoral Society (ALS) expressed support for the establishment
of the NDZ, but asked several questions Regarding education, enforcement, water quality improvements and legislative issues.
Regarding the issues of education, ALS commented that a mechanism should exist to inform boaters about the requirements of
a NDZ. As part of the petition, an education program is outlined. This program is part of the New Jersey Clean Vessel Act
Program and the Barnegat [[Page 35215]]Bay Estuary Program. Regarding the Enforcement of the NDZ, the U.S.Coast is responsible
for the enforcement and the state of New Jersey has a Memorandum of Understanding, with the Coast Guard, designating the New
Jersey State Police as the lead law enforcement agency. The petition submitted to EPA states that the State Police will enforce
the boating safety standards and marine sanitation device regulations. ALS raises a question regarding improvements in water
quality and whether EPA or NJDEP will attempt to quantify the improvements in water quality as a result if this designation
is approved. Certainly, improvements in water quality can be demonstrated through routine ambient sampling. Since there
are several ongoing programs to improve the water quality in the estuary, it is difficult to attribute these improvements
to a specific program. Currently, EPA is undertaking a national study to evaluate the efficacy of the NDZ Designations and
will publish the results when they are available. ALS asked whether EPA is aware of a legislative bill that was introduced
by Congressman Saxton that would eliminate NDZ restrictions for vessels that use state of art treatment devices. ALS raised
certain concerns about this bill and asked if EPA had comments or concerns. In response, EPA is aware of the legislative bill
but chooses not to comment on the bill at this time.
|