![]() |
|||||
NYC Movie Reviews
Breakfast with Hunter
|
|||||
|
Breakfast with Hunter Directed by Wayne Ewing A documentary of Hunter S.
Thompson with John Cusack, Benicio Del Toro, Johnny Depp, P.J. O'Rourke, George Plimpton and Ralph Steadman 91 minute runtime Unrated—Probably R
for language Release date: Not released
as of July, 2004 Finally, a movie about one
of 17 years in the making, according
to writer, director, editor and cameraman Wayne Ewing, the odyssey revolves around three classic Hunter Thompson escapades. The first is his running for Sheriff of his adopted home of The documentary is formed
from a series of interviews with the author and readings of his work, combined with real life scenes of his interactions with
friends and co-workers. The scenes appear to be candid and to show a fair and
balanced look at Thompson, nearly all of which is bad. Social commentary on the
nature of art in The movie doesn’t go
into Thompson’s background—born privileged and then unhinged to the point of jail time before high school graduation,
his family estranged. But he tries to re-establish those lost familial ties with
a nation that never accepts him as their native son. In the role of artist and
social critic, Thompson is anything but passive in his actions; he is a control freak from the get-go and cannot accept the
fact that he cannot control those around him. The lack of acceptance in his life
works for him as it makes his pain a self-fulfilling prophesy. Like Neil young (in his biography,
“Shakey,” 2002) Thompson surrounds himself with “no” men. And
if his followers are not “no” men from the start, he does everything in his power to turn them against him in
his continued struggle for complete anarchism. Unfortunately for his causes,
he becomes, at times, more interested in the chaos than in the cause. He needs
chaos to create, and he doesn’t seem to care what he destroys or who he alienates in the process. His fights with the conservative
elements of The best scene in the movie
is a sequence filmed in Thompson’s home in which he discussed the “tidal wave” scene planned for the movie
version of “Fear and Loathing” with director-writer Alex Cox and his co-writer Tod Davies. The sequence starts out with Thompson excited about the visit and the imminent completion of the script. In an ominous sign of dark things to come, Thompson prepares sausages for the (unbeknownst
to him) vegetarian pair. The trio proceeds to discuss the treatment of parts
of the book and ends up at the passage wherein Thompson describes his return to Long prior to the meeting
at Thompson’s house, the writers agreed that the metaphor was central to the story and struggled to find a way to include
it in the movie. Their solution was to extend the gonzo artistry of the book’s
illustrator, Ralph Steadman, to an animated portrayal of Thompson riding a tidal wave to Vegas. This was a gutsy move on their part and one that showed an amazing ignorance of Thompson. Even those in the audience who knew nothing about Thompson probably guessed he was not a big fan of cartoons. Predictably, Thompson goes
ballistic. As for Thompson’s work
as a writer, he reports that he always knew he would be a writer, even at an early age.
In his words, “I knew I would be a writer because it was the only thing I could do.” The only thing he could do? In fact, he was smart, handsome
and rich, and could have done anything. He choose writing, one has to assume,
because that was the best way to infuriate his family, who had raised him to join their club of controlling elite. And, although writing is lonely, it does give one the ability to control at least the words that go on
the page. “Gonzo Journalism”
is the term that has been coined to describe “Fear and Loathing.” The
movie version of the book did Thompson a great injustice by framing Gonzo Journalism almost exclusively in a drug context. The idea seems to be that the journalist ingests drugs and alcohol, writes a story,
and the result is gonzo. But this is just a fabrication by the mass media to
make the work more understandable and provide the masses with a cop out to avoid confronting the horror in the words. Like the explanation the next day after the first homosexual experience, “I
did it because I was drunk.” Hunter Thompson drank like
a fish, but, unfortunately for him, he was rarely drunk enough to do anything out of character. Drinking was an attempt to take the edge off so he could walk the earth in some relatively human form and
not vaporize people by his very stare. Few people can understand a person who
spends their life torturing themselves by rejecting their family and confounding their supporters. And even if such understanding existed, it is not considered politically smart for any established publication,
even an unorthodox publication, to advocate despair to the extent that French kissing cats is the only conceivable way out
(“Screwjack”—1978). Yes, I kissed the cat. But I did it because I was drunk… When P.J. O’Rourke
(Rolling Stone journalist and friend of Thompson’s) asked him how he put the drug experience on paper, Thompson replied
that it took him two years of hard work to write about being stoned. He first
had to get very stoned, then concentrate on remembering what it was like, and then put it down on paper when he was straight. Then repeat the experience over and over. Not
exactly every college tripper’s idea of a good time (at least, not the remembering and writing part). Great guest appearances by
alternative pop rocker Warran Zevon (“Send Lawyers, Guns and Money,” “Roland the Headless Thompson Gunner,”
and “Werewolves of London”), Johnny Depp (star of the movie “Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas) and a surprised
John Cusack who is spontaneously asked to do a Hunter Thompson reading in the Viper Room.
Some of the best “reality TV” footage yet when Thompson sprays the editor-in-chief at Rolling Stone with
a live powder-based (not “clean” CO2) fire extinguisher, more-or-less trashing his office in the middle of a phone
call and, of course, the scene where Thompson drives his director/writer team out of his house under threat of violence. A must see movie for today’s
anarchists, even if you don’t have an inflatable sex doll. |
||||