Laboratory-acquired infections
are a reemerging problem. In 1984, as research on pathogens was intensifying
and laboratory-acquired infections were on the rise, the Center for Disease Control and Protection (CDC) published a comprehensive
set of guidelines under the title ‘Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories’, known as the Guidelines,
now in its fourth edition (http://www.cdc.gov/od/ohs/biosfty/bmbl4). The impact was immediate and the guidelines probably prevented
many infections in research and clinical laboratories and saved lives. But are
the guidelines adequate today?
With the advent of bioterrorism,
and the emergence of various infectious diseases (from HIV, to E. coli O157:H7
and SARS), public consciousness and the level of research activity on human pathogens is at an all time high. It is therefore predictable that the frequency of laboratory-acquired infections has
risen in proportion. No one really knows for sure because data are lacking. The CDC does not routinely reports laboratory-acquired infections, because they are
not considered outbreaks. This suits the research institutions that prefer to
avoid the negative publicity of accidents in their laboratories, and the federal agencies that prefer to look the other way. Too often, laboratory accidents are either entirely covered up or sanitized for public
consumption. The victims of this indifference and of the cover ups are the researchers, who pay with their health, their careers,
and sometimes their lives.
The establishment of a mechanism
of surveillance of laboratory-acquired infections, with systematic reporting and institutional accountability is long overdue. The continued indifference to this problem by federal agencies on the pretense that
this is a difficult issue to report on is no longer tenable. It is also permissive
of recklessness and negligence in laboratories with potential disastrous consequences for the researcher and the associated
public.
The scientists who maintain this
site were themselves recently victims of a laboratory-acquired infection. Their
specific story is one of reckless experimentation in full violation of BMBL4, a misdirected investigation by CDC, and a researcher
whose health and career have been taken away. Documents pertaining to this particular
incident are posted on this web site. In particular, the report of the flawed CDC investigation of the incident and a rebuttal (still unanswered) are posted.
We invite visitors to send their
comments and their own stories of laboratory-acquired infections for posting on this web site.