Reflections of An Expatriate on Cambodia's Past, Present, and Future; by Naranhkiri Tith, Ph.D.

News & analysis of Cambodian economic, financial, political, social, & international events in 2006

Home
Let me introduce myself and my family
My Professional Background & Experiences Through Photos & Documents
How Obama can improve Cambodia's survival
My interviews with Radio Free Asia
News and analyses of Cambodia's economic, political, social and international affairs, 2008
Recent news and analyses on Cambodian economic, political international affairs, and social events, 2007
Recent News and analyses on Cambodian economic, political, social, & International affairs. 2006
Recent News & analyses on Cambodia's economic, political; social developments & International affairs in 2005
Speical articles & essays in Cambodian characters and behavior
Home page II: In Search for Real Heroes
Home Page III: Vietnam "Nam Tien" or imperialism against Champa and Cambodia
Home Page IV: Sihanouk/Ranariddh and Hun Sen Alliance
- Cambodia: Moving Toward a Treacherous and Uncertain Future
- Vietnamese Imperialism and Colonialism
Sihanouk and his Comrades the Khmer Rouge & the Viet Cong
Sihanouk- Hun Sen Deadly Alliance under Vietnam's Watch
Foreign perception of Cambodians and Cambodian society
G W Bush foreign policy in Asia
Some past direct comment for visitors on this web site
Some past direct comment for visitors on this web site
New Books & Reviews
Contact Me

____________________________________________________________________________________ 
 
Page Table of Contents
 
- My letter submitted to the New York Times on the Khmer Rouge Trial explaining why it may not be allowed by Hun Sen and Sihanouk to take place
  - Sihanouk recent public statement on his opposition to the Khmer Rouge trial
  - Hun Sen Brings Khmer Rouge Trial to Screeching Halt
  - Main Khmer Rouge leaders still alive, and their background
  - Editorial from the New York Times  on the Khmer Trial entitled "The Killing Fiields"
  - UNPO reported continued mistreatment and persecution of Cambodians from Kampuchea Krom
  - Comments and Response to Sihanouk opposing the Khmer Rouge Trial from US Ambassador to Cambodia, Joseph Mussomeli 
  - The Heng Pov reveals Grenade attack was Hun Sen's job
  - Hun Sen openly threatening opposition parties before the 2007 communal elections
  - The recent discovery of black gold (oil) in Cambodia, and its negative impact on that country 
  - Recently discovered oil and gas in Cambodia may benefit more Hun Sen and China than the majority of the Cambodian people
  - Is Cambodia really taking a decisive trun for the better?
  - Vietnam's entry into WTO is a threat to Cambodia
  - South Korea invested in ethanol plant in Cambodia
  - Cambodia was rated among the most corrupt countries in the world, and especially in Asia
  - Is Ranariddh now in the opposition party?
  - Cambodian-Australians protesting Hun Sen's recent visit to Australia, see letter from the Australain Prime Minister to Dr. Kang Kem
  - Ieng Sary may escape yet the UN-sponsored Khmer Rouge trial thanks to Sihanouk's pardon granted to him in 1996, at the request of Hun Sen; this treacherous act also legetimized the Kangaroo court that was set up by the occupying forces of Vietnam to try to Khmer Rouge leaders
  - Hun Sen politicizing the Khmer Rouge Trial by revising Cambodian History to shore up his power, an article by IDSS, Singapore
  - Please, see a penetrating article by David Chandler on the serious implication from the choice of Angkor Wat by Cambodia as the symbol of Cambodian national identity on Cambodian contemporary behavior and politics 
  - Letter from the White House (via the US Department of State) in Response to the Petition on Vietnamization of Cambodia
  - Please, look at a set of historical documents related to my efforts to help the Cambodian Resistance Movement under the chairmanship of Norodom Sihanouk to fight the Vietnamese occupation of Cambodia, in 1979-80
  - Letter to the Phnom Penh Post Editor in Response to Trudy Jacobsen's Accusing Cambodians of Racism against Vietnamese
  - Sihanouk and Hun Sen publickly declared eternal and Official Alliance 
  - Members of Royal Family appeared to agree with the Initiative to Create a Law to Protect their  Honor by giving up political role
  - A recent speech by US Ambassador J. Mussomeli rebuking Sihanouk for not supporting the Khmer Rouge trial
  - Sihanouk's attempt to fool the world by saying that he is ready to face the Khmer rouge trial, knowing full well that Hun Sen will never allow the trial to go ahead as long as the aging KR leaders are alive 
  - The Hidden faces of Communism as revealed and condemned by a specialist on Communism and by a resolution from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe declaring Communism as "evil" ideology
  - An Interview with Paul Hollander, the author of a new book entitled "From the Gulags to the Killing Fields" on the Crimes committed against Humanity under the name of Communism, by FrontPage Magazine
  - US Ambassador Mussomeli's interview with the Phnom Penh Post
  - Finally the World Bank starts to see that Hun Sen and his regime is totally corrupt and cut aid projects in Cambodia
  - File on a Power Point Presentation entitled; Frozen in Time, Discoinnected from a Fast Moving World, Cambodia has lost the Ownership of its Destiny; to be given in Long Beach on 4/28-9, 2006
  - File on a Power Point sequence of Historical maps showing how Cambodia came into existence, disppeared and reappeared again
  - File on how China and the USA are competing to get Vietnam's allegiance with grave implications for Cambodia's security
  - File on A brief Cambodian history from 1807 unitl the present day
  - File on Cambodian as a failed state
  - File on dilemma in US foreign policy between promoting democracy and fighting terrorism and its consequence on Cambodia
  - File on how Hun Sen has been ignoring governance reform set by the International Consultative Group of donor countries in exchange for international assistance (US $ 600 millions), contrary to Ambassador Mussomeli's painting a rosy picture of Cambodia
  - File on an article on human trafficking on the rise in Cambodia, contrary to Mussomeli's upbeat assessment of the situation
  - File on an artilce on how Cambodia is ripe for terrorism due to the presence of pervasive and systemic corruption in, contrary to Mussomeli's upbeat assessment of the situation in that country
   - Is US Ambassador to Cambodia, Joseph Mussomeli, different from any other US Diplomats posted in that country?
   - File on why and how Sam Rainsy is going after Kem Sokha so that he can be the exclusive ally of Hun Sen after having eliminated Ranariddh from the political scene  
   - File on Kem Sokha's visit to Long Beach to celebrate 2006 Cambodian New Year
   - File on US Ambassador to Cambodia, J. Mussomeli receiving surviving victims of  Khmer Rouge Genocide
    - File on Main Causes for Relatively more Successful of Vietnamese-Americans compared to Cambodian-Americans in Academic Achievement and integration
  - File on my letter to thank US Ambassador Joseph Mussomeli for his strong support for the Khme Rouge Trial
  - Interview with Professor Paul Hollander on his new book detailing the role of Communism in the mass killing in the world, by and large negating Alex Hinton's assertion that the Cambodian genocide was caused only by specificity in the Cambodian society
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Comments:

 

As expected, Sihanouk is again publicly opposing the trial of the Khmer Rouge. This time, he stated his opposition to the trial on the ground that the money could be used for better purposes such as to feed the Cambodian poor.  This Sihanouk 's decision, very clearly, shows that the former king does not understand the need for, nor does he believe in giving the long overdue justice and the return to the rule of law that the Cambodian people so much craves for.

 

However, if history is any guide to the understanding of the current tragic problem of Cambodia; here are some observations to keep in mind when analyzing this Khmer Rouge trial issue;

 

First, most Cambodians are fully aware that any financial assistance given to Cambodia by the international community would go to fill the Hun Sen and Funcinpec supporters' pockets, and not to feed the poor, as suggested by Sihanouk.

 

Second, Sihanouk, Hun Sen, and the Vietnamese have no reason to let the Khmer Rouge trial be taken place, as the trial may reveal incriminating details on the collusion between the former king, Hun Sen, and the Vietnamese, on the one hand; and between Sihanouk, the Chinese, and the Khmer Rouge on the other hand. 

 

Last but not least, by allowing the Khmer Rouge trial to go ahead, Hun Sen will loose the only basis of comparison - that is the Khmer Rouge regime - against which his murderous regime would continue to look more acceptable to the international community. Without this generous financial and other assistance from the international community, the Hun Sen repressive regime would not be able to last for very long.

 

Dear visitors, please, use the related documents posted below to form your own judgement on this vital and deadly issue for the Cambodian people.

 

Washington DC. July 10, 2006

 

Naranhkiri Tith, Ph.D.

___________________________________________________________________

 

To the editor, The New York Times

(Submitted for publication)

July 6, 2006

 

RE: “The Killing Fields,” Editorial, July 6, 2006.

 

The editor is perfectly correct in pointing out that the (Cambodian) tribunal has a responsibility not only to those survivors but to a world that has yet to learn how to deal with crimes against humanity.”

 

I am not very optimistic about the realization of this trial without strong US backing. If the recent past is any guide to the future, the international community knows that Hun Sen has been stalling for the last six years by invoking national sovereignty in order to gain full control of any Khmer Rouge trial.

 

In this context, I do not see how the Hun Sen regime and his supporters will allow this trial to go ahead as long as the current remaining Khmer Rouge leaders are still alive. Hun Sen - now with the full support of Sihanouk - stands to lose more than to gain from this trial. After all, Hun Sen was a former Khmer Rouge commander.

 

Only by defecting to the Vietnamese was Hun Sen able to become the dictator and ruler of Cambodia.  In this context, the Khmer Rouge trial may surface some undesired and implicating revelations regarding the Vietnamese and Hun Sen relations with the Khmer Rouge. Only by comparing his regime to that of the Khmer Rouge can Hun Sen claim any credit for being the leader of Cambodia.

 

Claiming that the trial cannot meet the international standard of justice, the Bush Administration has chosen not to play a prominent role. As the most powerful democratic country in the world, and as a former active participant in the Indochina war when it carried out secret carpet bombings of the Viet Cong sanctuary in Eastern Cambodia during the late 1960’s, the United States should be more deliberately committed to this trial. It is its duty if not its moral obligation.

 

If the Khmer Rouge trial is to have any chance of succeeding, the United States, as the main promoter of democracy and human rights in the world, must put all its political weight behind this crucial trial and not allow Hun Sen to manipulate the situation to perpetuate his corrupt regime. The positive impact of doing so would far outweigh the negative one. Only then will long awaited justice be given to not only the Cambodian people but also to victims in other parts of the world.

 

Naranhkiri Tith, Ph.D.

Former Adjunct Professor in International Economics

The School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS)

The Johns Hopkins University

Wahington DC.

______________________________________________________________________

  • Sihanouk Says He Opposes KR Tribunal
    The Cambodia Daily

Monday, July 10, 2006
Douglas Gillison
Additional Reporting by Yun Samean

Retried King Norodom Sihanouk announced Saturday that he opposes the newly inaugurated Khmer Rouge tribunal, saying it will only try a handful of those responsible for the regime and that its budget would be better spent on alleviating poverty.

While the tribunal is intended to try a handful of "old, sickly unrepentant individuals," the true number of those responsible was in the hundreds if not the thousands, the former King wrote in a five-page message dated Thursday and posted to his Web site.

"To be frank and call a spade a spade, I am against the special Tribunal that has been established in Cambodia to try five or six Khmer Rouge individuals," he wrote.

The budget for the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, which stands at over $56 million, would be best used developing Cambodia, he added.

"With the tens of millions of US [dollars] reserved for the "trial,"" he said, "one could provide immensely beneficial services to the Little People by offering them mechanical devices for their 'Water Policy,' machines for agriculture, land of which they are dispossessed, decent living quarters, plows, cattle... and other things to take them from their misery."

Tribunal spokesman Reach Sambath noted that the tribunal's budget was far less than those of either the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda or the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.

Both of those tribunals have spent hundreds of millions of dollars since they were established in the 1990s.

"We do not have any official reaction to His Majesty's comments: He has the absolute right to express what he thinks he should say," Reach Sambath said. "We all respect him."

The Cambodian tribunal is expected to indict between five and 10 individuals, although prosecutors and investigating judges would be able to bring charges against more, Reach Sambath said.

Youk Chhang, director of the Documentation Center of Cambodia, said the tribunal's budget was not excessive. "If we fail to prosecute the crimes committed by the Khmer Rouge, who killed two million people, it's a serious failure," he said.

He added that prosecuting the Khmer Rouge would help end a climate of impunity in Cambodia.

In his opinion, it is wrong to assume that the tribunal would charge only a handful of suspects. "We don't know who will be indicted," he said.

Co-investigating judge You Bun Leng declined to comment, while pre-trial chamber Judge Ney Thol could not be reached.

Norodom Sihanouk has previously offered mixed views on the tribunal.

In April 2004, he announced via his Web site that if the trials were not held at the International Court of Justice at the Hague in the Netherlands, they would not be credible.

But a week later, Norodom Sihanouk announced his desire to testify at the joint UN-Cambodian tribunal, and said that the trials should be broadcast on television.

In January 2005, the former King, who in 2001 signed the law creating the tribunal, called the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia a "comedy and a hypocrisy."

 

________________________________________________________________________

  • The Selling of the Great Supreme Patriarch Tep Vong to Hun Sen

The Venerable Tep Vong's cellphone rings with a generic tone-almost retro. He has two sleek modern mobiles stacked at his right side, next to an ornate offering urn, a bright red lighter and a pipe. When the top phone rings in mid-sentence, the Supreme Patriarch of the Mohanikay Order of Cambodia flicks it off, distractedly.

Centered deep inside the austerity of Wat Ounalom, Tep Vong's carpeted and book-shelved greeting chamber is a museum-like array of ancient artifacts, Buddhist iconography and sepia-tinged photographs of monks and monarchs past. The room is an eclectic clutter of carvings, Chinese urns and candelabras. It's an odd menagerie where wooden water buffalo heads share shelf space with an enormous stuffed sea turtle and a collection of many colored coral. A meter-high bronze statue of a seated monk and a miniature Eiffel Tower sit before a wall of seventies-era travel posters and a vintage tourist map of Australia.

Vong was born in 1932 to a farming family in Trapeang Chak village, Siem Reap district, Siem Reap province. He spent his childhood working on the family farm. When he was 10, his mother sent him to stay at Reachbo Pagoda to study and learn discipline. When his father died in 1947 he became a monk.

Between 1970 and 1979, Vong meditated on the Dharma. During the Pol Pot regime, when monasticism was outlawed, Vong was detained and tortured for 85 days.

In 1979, Heng Samrin, Chea Sim and Hun Sen, the triumvirate newly installed by the Vietnamese to rule Cambodia, asked Vong to return to the monkhood and help with the restoration of Buddhism. In the 1981 National Assembly election Vong was elected as a deputy for Siem Reap. In July 1981, he became the vice president of the National Assembly and in 1988 became a Monk Superior. Vong became Supreme Patriarch of the Mohanikay Order in 1992 and a member of the Throne Council from September 1993.

Today, Vong sits on a raised pillow. He has an orange shawl embroidered with gold thread draped over his left shoulder. A grin exposes a silver front tooth, and an translucent tattoo is barely visible on his right shoulder. Both good humored and august, he spoke to Sam Rith and Charles McDermid on December 13 about politics, religion and the past.

Why did you decide to become a monk?

Referring to the Dharma, I wanted to have serenity for myself, and to have serenity I have to stay under the shade of Buddhism. And when I have this peace, I would like other people also to have it. It's the same for all human beings, I would like myself to have peace and when I have peace I would like other people have peace all together.

What is the role of the monks in the society?

Monks play very important roles in society.

Of first importance: when I become a monk I must achieve serenity that could make other people also have serenity.

Of second importance: monks have the role to preserve the Khmer spirit and to protect Buddhism forever. When Buddhism is protected, it can help other issues - economic, cultural, educational and so on.

So I prohibited politicians from being bad people. In the regime three years, eight months and 20 days of the Khmer Rouge, 21,568 monks were killed and many other Cambodian people were killed gradually, causing a serious loss of the Khmer spirit and identity at that time.

This year, the Royal Government and the King offered me a greater role as a Sangreacheathepatey [Great Supreme Patriarch] ... that means they gave me a wider role.

Not only the Royal Government and the King offered me the priority, but also the United Nations, which observed my activities curbing the war in Cambodia and motivating people from having nothing to having food to eat, houses for shelter, the freedom to walk...

Do the monks have right to vote according to Buddhism?

According to Buddhist law and democracy, monks have right to vote. But after the chaos in 1998, all monks agreed not to vote. On November 29, 2006, it was agreed and announced that all monks can vote as citizens so that the election goes as stated in the Constitution.

What do you think about political parties today?

Political parties are always divided into two parties: the older party or host party, and the younger party or guest party. The older party or host party is the Cambodian People's Party which was supported to rule the country. So other parties are just the guest parties or younger parties.

To guarantee for the country to have peace, Buddhism in Cambodia supports having multi-parties, but not multi-regimes. So I request younger parties or guest parties to limit their opposition - do not look down, insult and make disputes that could lead to war, losing the peace, ownership and the result of 7 January [1979].

What is your understanding about creating people power?

There are two kinds of people power: One kind of people power is to protect what we already have. For example, when we have peace, we require people power to preserve it.

But the other kind of people power includes making strikes, demonstrations and terrorism that destroys existing peace. For example, Lon Nol's people power destroyed the social order of the King [Norodom Sihanouk] who had been enforcing and enlarging culture, the economy and building a lot of schools to develop the country, and having peace a hundred percent.

So religion has to check and to consider by cooperating with the Royal Government to curb people power leading to strikes, demonstrations, terrorism and coups d'etat.

Have any top government officials such as Hun Sen come to ask advice from you?

Even though they do not come here, they get my best wishes at their workplaces.

As I have seen, it is only the host party [the CPP] that brought back and protected Buddhism, such as building pagodas. But the guest and younger parties think only of destroying the national identity.

I request [guest and younger party politicians] do not make themselves become like Pol Pot and [they should] turn to helping establish the economy and culture like the host party.

 

Phnom Penh Post, Issue 15 / 25, December 15 - 28, 2006
© Michael Hayes, 2006. All rights revert to authors and artists on publication.
For permission to publish any part of this publication, contact
Michael Hayes, Editor-in-Chief

_____________________________________________________________________

  • The comments by Lao Mong Hai on Tep Wong pro Hun Sen stand
  • Equanimity would be supremely great in partisan Patriarch

Great Supreme Patriarch Tep Vong's views on political parties and people power in his interview published in the Post of December 15, 2006 did not reflect well on his erudition in and practice of Buddhism.

He was too much attached to and continued to defend the ruling Cambodian People's Party (CPP) which he belonged to and served. He named this party "the older party or host party" and the other political parties "the younger or guest parties" and "requested" the latter parties "to limit their opposition." Furthermore, Tep Vong had a dislike for "people power" as it could lead to "strikes, demonstrations, terrorism and coups d'etat," and he would use religion to cooperate with the government to curb this power.

To Tep Vong, the older party or host party, the CPP, would rule Cambodia for ever. By entertaining this idea he ignored the law of impermanence (anatta), which is one of the key tenets of Buddhism. He was very much Buddhist when he disliked terrorism and coups d'etat as these acts entail the use of violence. But his dislike of strikes and demonstrations, when they were peaceful, had no Buddhist character at all.

Strikes and demonstrations are but assemblies of people to voice their opinions and concerns on issues affecting their groups or their nation as a whole. They are very much part of people's participation in the national affairs, participation that is the first two of Buddha's seven teachings in governance for the country's prosperity: "First, people should assemble often to discuss political affairs, and to provide for national defense. Second, the people of all social classes should meet together in unity to discuss their national affairs." (See Society for the Promotion of Buddhism, The Teaching of Buddha, Tokyo, 1966, page 456.) The Khmer version of this book is available at the Buddhist Institute's library and at Hun Sen Library, Phnom Penh).

Furthermore, people power already existed in Buddha's days and Buddha himself accepted it with grace when it affected him personally. As told in the book Moha Vesandor Cheadok, Book II: Kann Hemapean, Buddha, then King Preah Bat Srey Vesandor of Srey Pireast country gave as charity his elephant to the people of Kaloeung Reastr country. But his own people held the elephant to be their country's sacred animal of blessing that he should not have given away at all. They were very angry with him. They exercised their people power and went to protest en masse to King Father Preah Bat Srey Sanchey against Buddha's gift of the elephant to the people of Kaloeung Reastr country. They held that the gift was a crime and at first demanded death for Srey Vesandor for this crime. But after negotiations with Srey Sanchey they settled for Srey Vesandor's exile. Srey Vesandor, Buddha, willingly accepted his people's verdict and went into exile with all his family in the Hemapean Forests.

Considering his position and status, Great Supreme Patriarch Tep Vong could and should provide spiritual leadership and a leading source of morality in Cambodian society. Unfortunately, his leadership and authority are ineffective and are not much felt. Morality is very low in Cambodian society. This society has many political and social problems. It is consumed in materialism. Immoral and unethical means, including abuse of power and corruption, are used to acquire material gains. Tension between political parties, killing of political activists, strikes, demonstrations and protests, and violent crackdowns on these expressions of people power continue to occur.

It is highly probable that his closeness and attachment to and protection of his favorite political party, and his prejudice and bias against the younger or "guest" parties and people power is a major obstacle. He could and should, however, overcome this handicap.

To start with, he should show in words and deeds more of the four sublime states of minds or the four immeasurables or Prum Vihearth (in Khmer) or Brahma -vihăra (in Pali), that is, lovingkindness (mettă), compassion (karună), sympathetic joy (mudită) and equanimity (upekkhă), as taught by Buddha and as Cambodia's greatest king, Jayavarman VII, a Buddhist, symbolized in the form of the four faces at the top of the many towers of his Bayon temple in Siem Reap.

At this particular juncture of Cambodian society, which is characterized by pluralism and conflicting demands, what would be most required from our Great Supreme Patriarch is his practice of equanimity, free of bias, attachment and anger, if he wishes, as he did in his interview, to use Buddhism to contribute to consolidating peace and stability in Cambodia.

Lao Mong Hay - Senior Researcher, Asian Human Rights Commission, Hong Kong

Phnom Penh Post, Issue 15 / 26, December 29, 2006 - January 11, 2007
© Michael Hayes, 2006. All rights revert to authors and artists on publication.
For permission to publish any part of this publication, contact
Michael Hayes, Editor-in-Chief

_____________________________________________________
 
Comments; all available informaiton from newspapers and Analyses by obejctive obeservers indicate that Sihanouk and Hun Sen will never allow the Khmer Rouge Trial to take place, as long as the main Khmer Rouge leaders such as Ieng Sary, Noun Chea, and Khieu Samphan are still alive. Because, these Khmer Rouge leaders may  reveal incriminating evidence against both Sihanouk and Hun Sen with regard to their past complicity with the Vietnamese and the Khmer Rouge.
  • Khmer Rouge trials 'obstructed' 

 

Khmer Rouge victims have already had to wait 30 years for justice

 

A human rights organisation has called on Cambodia to stop interfering in preparations for the trials of former leaders of the Khmer Rouge. Human Rights Watch blamed government interference for the recent failure by Cambodian and foreign judges to agree on rules for the UN-backed tribunal.

 

Cambodia dismissed the accusation as "politically motivated".

 

About two million people died during the years that the Khmer Rouge ruled Cambodia in the 1970s under Pol Pot.

 

The trials are due to start next year and aim to put the surviving leaders of the brutal Maoist regime - some of whom are still living freely - in the dock.

 

'Screeching halt'

 

A week-long meeting between Cambodian and international legal officials last month broke up following "substantive disagreement" over the rules that would govern the tribunal.

 

HRW said Cambodian officials had acted on instructions from government officials by delaying the adoption of draft rules.

 

"Many of the Khmer Rouge leaders are old and increasingly frail, but until the rules are adopted, prosecutions and trials cannot move forward," said Brad Adams, Asia director of HRW.

 

"Political interference has brought the whole process to a screeching halt."

 

But, government spokesman Khieu Kanharith adamantly rejected the accusations, calling them politically motivated and saying tribunal officials were just being thorough about working through complex legal issues.

 

Up to two million people were murdered, starved or worked to death between 1975 and 1979 under the Khmer Rouge regime.

 

Pol Pot, the founder and leader of the Khmer Rouge, died in a camp along the border with Thailand in 1998.

 

Other key figures have also died. Ta Mok - the regime's military commander and one of Pol Pot's most ruthless henchmen - died on 21 July 2006.

 

 __________________________________________

  • Key figures in the Khmer Rouge

Judges and prosecutors have finally begun gathering information against former members of the Khmer Rouge regime.

 

UN-backed trials are due to start in 2007, and could mean that surviving leaders of the brutal Maoist regime - some of whom are still living freely - will be called to the dock.

 

But the man most wanted for crimes against humanity in Cambodia will never be brought to justice.

 

Pol Pot, the founder and leader of the Khmer Rouge, died in a camp along the border with Thailand in 1998.

Other key figures have also died. Ta Mok - the regime's military commander and one of Pol Pot's most ruthless henchmen - died on 21 July.

As time goes on, some people are beginning to question whether it is too late to achieve a proper sense of justice for the Cambodian people.

But there are several surviving figures who have been implicated in the genocide that took place during the Khmer Rouge's four-year regime. One of these men, Kang Kek Ieu - more commonly known as Duch - is already in custody.

 

Duch was the boss of Phnom Penh's notorious Tuol Sleng prison, where thousands of people were killed during the Khmer Rouge regime. Now aged 64, he is the youngest surviving member of the movement's leadership.  Duch, who has since become a born-again Christian, is said to be eager for his chance to go to trial to tell his version of events.

 

Escaping justice

 

Other senior Khmer Rouge leaders are still at liberty.

Two of the top names, Nuon Chea and Khieu Samphan, live in Pailin, once the movement's jungle headquarters.

 

Both men deny being involved in the atrocities that went on during the Khmer Rouge regime, but critics suggest that at the very least they were fully informed of what was happening.

 

Nuon Chea was Pol Pot's second in command, and often referred to as "brother number two".

He defected from the Khmer Rouge in 1998 and was granted a pardon by Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen.

 

In December 2002 he was called to testify on behalf of the former Khmer Rouge general Sam Bith, who was sentenced to life in prison for ordering the kidnap and murder of three Western backpackers in 1994.

Khieu Samphan, as the official head of state, was the public face of the Khmer Rouge.

 

After defecting at the same time as Nuon Chea, the 73-year-old is now said to spend most of his time reading, listening to music or gardening in his Pailin home.

 

Another former leader, Ieng Sary, may yet escape trial. Known as "Brother Number Three", Ieng Sary is Pol Pot's brother-in-law and served as minister of foreign affairs during the Khmer Rouge regime.

He became the first senior leader to defect in 1996 - and as a result was granted a royal pardon.

The United Nations says such a pardon cannot protect someone from prosecution, but Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen has previously warned that going after Ieng Sary could re-ignite civil unrest in Cambodia.

 

Ieng Sary now lives in a luxury villa in Phnom Penh, as well as maintaining a home in Pailin. The 76-year-old is said to be ill with a heart condition, and travels to Bangkok regularly for treatment.

 

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/asia-pacific/2856771.stm

Published: 2006/07/21 09:33:25 GMT
 

____________________________________________________
 
(Comments: the article posted just below painted a rather optimistic picture of the outlook of the cambodian economy. Considering the pervasive and systemic corruption (Cambodia is the exception among members of the United Nations Organization that still does not have any anti-corruption law, also see the corruption perception Index by Transparency International, just posted below this article) now prevailing in Cambodia, combined with the firm grip on the economy by Hun Sen and his CPP, it is doubful that the majority of the Cambodian population would benefit anything from these grandiose projects.)Is Cambodia taking a decisive turn? 
 

Cambodia has unveiled an explosive economic plan [for the five years] to the end of the decade.

 

The scale of the projects announced is huge: establishing a stock exchange by 2009, exploiting oil envisaged by the end of 2008 or early 2009 (with potential revenues estimated at US$2 billion), construction of a hydroelectric power station in Kampot with a capacity of 193 megawatts due to be completed in 2010, and a cement factory in the province with a production capacity of two million tons per year to start operations in early 2008 and, finally, a proliferation of special economic zones, especially along the borders with Vietnam and Thailand. Add to this the emerging optimism that the number of tourists visiting Cambodia will increase to more than three million by 2010.

 

If all these projects are implemented according the timeframe, Cambodia will be ready enough to drive its economic growth.

 

Kang Chandararoth, director of the Cambodia Institute of Development Studies, believes that the country is poised to undergo considerable economic change if everything goes as written in the plan. For him, oil wealth will be able to serve as the driving force of the economy, allowing economic growth to stabilize.

 

If the Kampot cement factory is a success, it will encourage investors specializing in construction to engage in trade in the country. Regarding the stock exchange, if the market really is established and fares well, banks will be obliged to reduce interest rates.

 

“If everything is realized, the Cambodian economy will record unprecedented impetus,” he speculated before expressing caution about the reality of achieving these goals. Huot Pum, lecturer in economics at the Royal University of Laws and Economic Science, similarly concludes that it will be a remarkable opportunity for Cambodia. He expressed delight that [even] before generating state revenue, the projects would create jobs for the domestic labor force.

 

Cheam Yeap, president of the National Assembly’s Finance and Banking Commission, is also optimistic.

 

“I hope that the projects will contribute to alleviating the country’s poverty,” said the lawmaker, who himself wants to develop specific measures to control the exploitation of oil reserves In this context, Sam Rainsy, leader of the opposition party and a former minister of Economy and Finance when he was a Funcinpec member, believes the economic activity will rapidly bear fruit, although he is cautious regarding the risks of economic growth benefiting only a handful of people.

“[Concerning] economic development, if only the rich benefit from this growth then the poor will get poorer,” he worried. “Eventually, the gap between the poor and the rich will be even wider.”

 

On the other hand, the ending of quotas for certain Chinese garment items imported to European and US markets in 2008 is also an issue that needs to be addressed. So far, restrictions on Chinese garment imports to these substantial markets have helped [develop] niche markets for the textile products from countries like Cambodia.

 

The garment sector represents more than two thirds of Cambodia’s exports. Will potential problems in this industry affect other sectors?

 

For Huot Pum, [the solution lies with] the Royal Government creating favorable conditions for factories so that they can cope with problems, and increasing competition so that they can reduce production costs.

“Doing so will then enable the garment and textile industry to keep entrepreneurs investing in Cambodia,” he said.

 

(Cambodge Soir, August 17, 2006)

 _________________________________________________________________________________

  • Comment:

Good and bad news on Cambodian economy came in the same week; (1) bad news is on Vietnam's recent entry into WTO which may increase the level of competition from a more organized and industrious labor force of Vietnam; (2) good news about South Korea's investment in the production of ethanol in Cambodia. This FDI by Korea combined with the recent discovery of gas and petroleum along the Gulf of Thailand coasts, and around Tonle Sap, may signal a new direction for Cambodia to move ahead  from abject poverty, if, and it is a big "if" corruption which is endemic and pervasive, can be contained adequately and quickly.

  • Vietnam’s entry into WTO is threat to Cambodia
  • ASEAN Business # 8, December 10, 2006

Vietnam became the 150th member of the World Trade Organization (WTO) November 7 in an election held at the headquarters of the world body in Geneva, the entry makes Vietnam become a threatening opponent for Cambodia in the textile sector.

 

The agreement will be approved by the Vietnamese assembly on November 28 and they will officially join in December. Vietnam is a powerful nation in the textile sector, before its entry as into the WTO, it ranked second in importance only to kerosene with an income of approximately US$5 billion in 2005 whilst the Cambodian textile sector only reached a figure of US$2.1 billion.

 

Recently Vietnam has been enduring the effects of the end of the Worldwide Multi Fibre Agreement, which placed the country in direct competition with Chinese textile mills and garment factories, while Cambodia’s quota to export textile products has been protected by the WTO since late 2004.

 

Despite the obstacle, Vietnam still ranked twelfth among countries exporting garments in 2005. Vietnam’s entry as a member of the WTO means that it will not be restricted by any exports quota mechanism, and will protect the nation from any actions by other countries to block Vietnamese imports regarded as threatening to domestic producers. The future is worrying for people in the Cambodian textile sector.

 

Garment Manufacturers Association in Cambodia (Gmac) Deputy President Pour Kong Sang said that Cambodia is unable to compete with the neighboring nation due to the high cost of transportation and utilities. He added that Vietnamese workers are more capable than Cambodian ones - 90 percent of Vietnamese can read whilst 63 of Cambodians are illiterate -– he also expressed regret regarding the growth of strikes in Cambodia as in Vietnam the labor force remains placid.

 

“We have to wait and see if America will shift tax exemption on the import of Vietnamese products before making an evaluation about the consequences of Vietnam’s entry as the member of the WTO,” said Former Technical Councilor of the

Ministry of Commerce David Van.

 

However, he has also voiced concern over the lack of competition between Cambodia and the neighboring country and over bad relations between garment factory owners and unions. “Cambodia focuses mainly on respecting the rights of workers. It is just a sweet word, but buyers care about price….strikes are happening often - the International Labor Organization (ILO) has provided a great deal of education regarding the rights of workers, but rarely provides education concerning clients’ demands.”

 

Economic expert Kong Chandararoth said that Cambodia has a strong new opponent and will find it very hard. “The entry of Vietnam as a member of the WTO will allow foreign investors to choose between the two nations,” he said, adding that perhaps they will prefer Vietnam.

 

Sok Hach, president of the Economic Institute of Cambodia (EIC), holds a less pessimistic view. “It is not definite that Cambodia will be the victim. The issue depends on whether we are in the same market segment as they are or not. Vietnam may concentrate its efforts on sectors that have received more additional value than the textile sector and then it is Thailand, which will be the victim of the competition,” he said.

 

(Cambodge Soir, November 8)

____________________________________________________________________

 South Korean company to open ethanol factory

 

 

South Korean firm Muhak Alcohol declared on November 28 that it had established MH Bio Energy Group as a subsidiary in Cambodia last month in order to build a US$25 million ethanol factory in Kandal province, newspapers reported the following day.

 

MH Managing Director Choi Eun-jun said during a groundbreaking ceremony at the planned facility that the company will produce ethanol from cassava plantderived tapioca, wrote The Cambodia Daily.

 

People can use ethanol as an alternative to gasoline, and it is gaining global popularity as crude oil prices continue to rise, according to the newspaper.

 

According to Muhak Alcohol’s statistics, 2 billion tons of ethanol are used to blend with fuel worldwide, and that figure could increase by four times in 2012 due to a growing demand in the US, reported Cambodge Soir. Ethanol also reduces fossil fuel dependence and environmental pollution.

 

In its project statement, Muhak Alcohol said it has decided to engage i