|
Lady Di's death
The Mercedes Lady Di ( Princess of Wales ) and Dodi were traveling in to the Fayed crashed into an one Nourishing belonging
to the columns of the bridge of Paris, the August 31, 1997. The
inquest on the couple's death was postponed soprendente to next year.
The
fact that the real family be afraid that you handcuff the one that went of the prince Charles have Egyptian children, and
that they be stepbrothers of the future heirs of the crown they seem motives enough as if to want her to remove of in between.
One mercies with drivers than when they circulate under the bridge have a deadly accident
they die in all except one of the drivers. You were spoken to even of that one of the drivers would be able to be a patriot,
that you be totally in accord in sacrificing his life in favor of the dignity of the crown. This certainly
not himself desclasifique never, just like the Caso Kennedy. Perhaps our bisniestos know it; Nowadays only there
are judgments, mayordomos..de's desmentidos..biografías first of drivers..., I create a fuss that does not interest
anybody and that only makes to feed this that I bring aquí..yo than to Lady Di were wanting her dead person.
They run many theories on Lady Di's death in internet and to the Fayet. So
many that are a surprise . Lady Di shows off the record guiness to be her you have monopolized people what else carried
of magazines. It is for it that the theory you think of that is not died happens, rather the French secret service
arranged for a fictitious death in order that so much she as Dodi may rest tranquil now someplace else of the world. Fictitious
death, we go .
You speak another theory of the MI5, English secret service,
than obeying the real British family's orders, you sent off an agent motorized that you fired a shot at the head of the driver
of the car that was transporting Lady Di and Dodi, doing it finishing as we see in the photo.
I imagine than only we will know within many years what it happened .
POLEMIC LETTER
According to Daily Mirror, just before dying,
informed Diana wrote a letter of fist and letter a his steward Paul Burrell: " this stage of my life is the most
dangerous. My husband is planning an accident with my car, some
kind of failure that a head wound, in order to leave his free road in order that you may get married be produced ".
The missive, written in October 1996, a year before his death, she was devoted by way of life insurance
to Burrell, at that time his personal assistant, that revealed his contents to the newspaper of London last year, but than you could not be known until recently for legal reasons. Burrell
has delivered the letter to the district attorney Bourgeois.
" you have fulfilled
his purpose. You wanted to give strength to him the argument that this investigation must take effect in Great
Britain, pronounced Burrell, that recently threw his book To Royal Duty " ( A real duty ), with controversial revelations
on the life of the princess of Wales.
PLOT
The accusatory letter against the inheritor of the British crown, you confirm the fears for conspiring theories in
Diana's death. Store owner and Dodi's father Harrods, Mohamed to the Fayed, you have affirmed in several occasions
you affirmed than to his son and to the princess of Wales Lady Di, killed them the British low secret services queen Isabel's
express orders II, in order that this way Carlos may marry Camilla Parker Bowles.
The news for the letter right now you caused general turmoil in Great Britain and it is
expected that the officials of Buckingham's palace try to forbid that the morning paper continue with the real British
family's revelations.
SUSPENSION
You postponed the official session of opening of the investigations after the ad that Burguess will investigate speculations,
the judge in enter 12 and 15 months. Burgess said that he will be able to dedicate oneself to the true investigation
and to witnesses' interrogation before the year 2005 once the great quantity of material was
given and the need to recollect more data.
In spite of the great
expectation than was existing regarding knowledge the whole truth on Diana's, Lady Di's death, and Dodi, the Britishers and
the relatives of the dead persons will have to have something over patience. That is worth the Fayed most of all.
With serious face and making gestures very much with the arms, the Egyptian millionaire showed
up for yesterday the inaugural session. " I expected this moment during six years. I hope that now at last
you assume light on so much darkness, you said in front of the journalists, although you admitted that he felt disappointed
by limitations " in the judge Burgess's task.
You reiterated the Fayed besides that Diana and Dodi were a victim
of a terrible murder and you held responsible the prince Charles of it.
The only official investigation accomplished on the case until now was done
by the French justice, in 1999, that you determined that the cause of the accident was due to that Diana's and Dodi's driver
conducted the effects of alcohol to a lot of velocity, basses.
|
|
|
|
In his book Diana: Secrets and lies, the British
author Nicholas Davies insures that Diana's and Dodi's death was not an accident, but a plot in the one that they intervened
in the MI5 domestic British secret service, and the DTS, the French services and his equivalent at Gallic territory.
The reason would have been that Diana had become a drama for the real family and in a politic time bomb, that you did not
listen to reasons. According to Davies, the operation had all the check marks of the secret service. For the author, the Mercedes
Benz they died in was been stolen 15 day befores and they had installed listening-ins for trawling to him and elsistema of
brakes had been sabotaged. The safety belts had also become unstable and, between
the photographers that were chasing Lady Di in his motorcycles, there were several agents of the secret service. EI cause
an accident to, according to Davies's hypotheses, it would have been produced
when, from a white Fiat, two agents shot a white light used by the OTAN and the North American forces directly to the
eyes of Diana's driver to do him to lose the control of the vehicle. Dodi and the driver died immediately, Diana survived
some hours and his bodyguard saved himself .
ACCIDENT Or plotting?
For Horacio Velmont
Oceans of consultants ask us constantly on the details of
such and such crime and also be more than enough who or that they have been murderers, issues that would be able to become
clear easily through Luz's Teachers, than, as it is obvious, everything they know it since from the spiritual diagrams the
physical diagram is perceived in the same way like we we see a fishbowl, where
everything is plainly visible .
And from now on that one of the bigger consultations is her relating to Lady Di's death, concretely to
if it was an accident or directly they murdered her.
But the problem that presents itself is than in certain cases revealing data that only you know them the
police or the or the murderous, would focus the Group Elron.
What does this mean? Simply that we would be exposing oneself
to risk that they give us an appointment in order that we explain how we know what we know, since the aforementioned data
were not given to publicity, or in order that let's say which one is our source or anything else with regard to this matter.
If this happen, and until we clarify everything, they would make us a precious time that we would have
him that to remain to our mission lose. And they always are things that seem simple to solve but than after they become complicated
.
Besides, there is room for the logical question on if they would accept without no animosity our simple
explanation that the source is exclusively spiritual.
Risk must be worthwhile and this is not worth it. Besides, the Grupo Elron does not have the show to take
the place of the police investigators in their commitment.
Perhaps some consultant claim that it is something remote that a certain amount of this type happen .
Yes, we agree, but remote it is not impossible .
This is an one belonging to the reasons. The other one is that our fundamental purpose is to spread out
all that Luz's Teachers without concealing nothing, fuere teach us that go .
As we have said uncountable times, and following the policy imposed by Ron Hubbard in Cienciología to
hit to know all that you were discovering, the Grupo Elron does not have occult lines.
It is obvious we would not be being honest if we find out things stops after to keep them for us.
Starting now fully Lady Di's death, the truth is that definitely we asked him in session and the Teachers'
answer was categorical: An accident failed to match .
Immediately we balanced out the subject and we did not ask more because we understood that the answer
also implicated who the intellectual author of murder had been, that is, the principal applicant in the princess's death.
It is known than the first suspect always is the one that is interested in the victim's death in a murder.
The circumstances written down, however, do not make it impossible to give my personal opinion on Lady
Di's death, since the to hold an opinion is not to press charges, and on the other hand she definitively accords practically
with give it all, so that what hold an opinion will not constitute a new thing.
On the other hand, you noticed the same Lady Di clearly that his own husband plotted together against
her to murder her simulating an accident.
And who better than the own wife to know it?
From now on that I consider that they are in an error that they impeach like intellectual author II to
queen The Isabel, or that the supposed dead persons are alive and occult enjoying the delights of life jointly
Extra it is to say than if for some reason the justice verify undeniably that he received treatment of
a plotting and condemn we are skeptical to the intellectual author of murder with regard to this matter, we would return on
the theme consulting it with Luz's Teachers and immediately we would put the whole bag of tricks in the Net as always we do
it.
And this is all that I have to say for the moment on the princess Lady Di's murder. Than the fact that
you have an eye for seeing, that you see .
Did Luz's Teachers tell us the name of the intellectual author of murder?
Dear professor Velmont: I do not have a doubt, like you and like all, that the intellectual author of
the plot that finished with the princess's life has been his own husband, but that I doubt he is Luz's Teachers have not said
it directly who era
Ingrid M.
ANSWER
Dear Ingrid: I am going to reiterate what right now I have said one more time: The Grupo Elron does not
have occult lines, that signifies than, like an issue of beginning, all that Luz's Teachers teach us we expose it in public.
An issue is of ethics, therefore, not asking around to them on issues than after, for a reason or for
other, we must be stored for us.
In the event of Lady Di, as soon as we touched upon the issue they warned us that you would not be prudent
to tell someone to know the details that produced his death ( reasons were obvious ) and then we abstained from asking ourselves on the details.
The dialogue that we held, therefore, was very plain:
Speaker: Was Lady Di's death an accident or a plotting?
Rum Hubbard: I second you.
Speaker: Is the intellectual author the principal suspect
and to the one that practically everybody points the finger at ?
Hubbard: Correct.
Speaker: Then am I right to the thinking that he was who
plotted everything?
Hubbard: That's right.
And that was everything, moving immediately on to another theme. It is obvious to know who the intellectual
author had been era the crux and that more were not needed not because secondary
details would be the rest merely.
Welcome to the club. Kind regards.
Horacio Velmont.
The 26/4/05's session
Psychic: Jorge Olguín.
Speaker: Horacio Velmont.
Entity that was presented to dialogue: Rum Hubbard, founder
of Dianética and Cienciología.
&
Speaker: In order to go ending session you want to ask him on some details of the plotting that he culminated
with the death of Lady Di because I believe that right now he has said him so much on this subject than it so to speak we
now you are going to go by unnoticed.
Rum Hubbard: Ask and I will tell you that may say him We Know †that it was
an attempted murder and that what you were looking for was to draw it from the midway. And this is not a new thing because
it has practically been saying for whichever you had gotten busy of the theme.
Speaker: Yes, I know it because I have read it in Internet ad nauseam. The thing is that they all present
it like hypotheses, but the Grupo Elron gives it to like certain fact.
Rum Hubbard: Correct.
Speaker: Were you pregnant as Dodi's father accuses AI Fayed,
that is the one that was Lady Di's bridegroom?
Rum Hubbard: That's right.
Speaker: That one was one of the motives of the attempted
murder?
Rum Hubbard: Correct.
Speaker: Did queen The Isabel conspire also?
Rum Hubbard: Queen The Isabel has the so damaged decodifier that is not ready to conspire neither of giving
oneself count of nothing.
Speaker: Concretely, then, did you not conspire?
Rum Hubbard: No, at all.
Speaker: Was the only intellectual author of the attempted
murder the husband then?
Rum Hubbard: The husband and his surroundings.
Speaker: Do I understand †The arm executer, in order to call him somehow, who
went really?
Rum Hubbard: Was the one that accomplished the attempted murder the British Secret Service MI6?
Speaker: Did there be some laser beam, as they say some investigators,
throw on the driver's eyes that blinded it?
Rum Hubbard: No, nothing of the kind was not . Directly they fixed the vehicle.
Speaker: I do not understand †For Example did they damage brakes?
Rum Hubbard: They affected all the relative part to conduction.
Speaker: That means that did something that they damage of the vehicle upon the attempted murder fail
to match?
Rum Hubbard: That's right, the vehicle was prepared of beforehand.
Speaker: What I do not understand is that somebody may prepare the vehicle and that he come up against
the accident so perfect
Rum Hubbard: You did not appear to them perfect of one, because there were several foolhardy attempts.
Speaker: Ah!, Now I go understanding
Rum Hubbard: The one that had success was the third party recently.
Speaker: Now all clearing is, is like the one that fires a shot several times with a rifle until you guess
right
Rum Hubbard: Clearing, because if one does not know when you erred he can think that the thrower is a
wonder.
Speaker: Now see it all clearing
Rum Hubbard: And if the accident had not worked out in that place they would go back to attempt it someplace
else and in another one until it happen . It is not something so calculated same as for that you come out perfect to the first
attempt.
Speaker: Good, Master, this subject got totally obvious, and now I obey my promise to not to do more questions
Rum Hubbard: A hug for all and I leave them with all my Light.
Speaker: So long, Maestro, and thanks.
