[from wikipedia]
The positional style is distinguished by
- a positional goal and
- a formation of semi-complete linkages between the initial step and final outcome.
“Unlike the combinational player, the positional player is occupied, first and foremost, with the elaboration
of the position that will allow him to develop in the unknown future. In playing the positional style, the player must evaluate
relational and material parameters as independent variables. ( … ) The positional style gives the player the opportunity
to develop a position until it becomes pregnant with a combination. However, the combination is not the final goal of the
positional player—it helps him to achieve the desirable, keeping in mind a predisposition for the future development.
The Pyrrhic victory is the best example of one’s inability to think positionally.”[8]
The positional style serves to
a) create a predisposition to the future development of the position;
b) induce the environment
in a certain way;
c) absorb an unexpected outcome in one’s favor;
d) avoid the negative aspects of unexpected
outcomes.
The positional style gives the player the opportunity to develop a position until it becomes pregnant
with a combination. Katsenelinboigen writes:
“As the game progressed and defense became more sophisticated
the combinational style of play declined. . . . The positional style of chess does not eliminate the combinational one with
its attempt to see the entire program of action in advance. The positional style merely prepares the transformation to a combination
when the latter becomes feasible.”[9]
[8] V. Ulea, The Concept of Dramatic Genre and The Comedy
of A New Type. Chess, Literature, and Film. Southern Illinois University Press, 2002, p.p.17-18])
[9] Selected Topics in Indeterministic Systems Intersystems
Publications: California, 1989, p. 21