Harry Potter: The Order of the Phoenix
By the time this is printed, Potter-passion will have reached fever pitch, with many skimming the
pages of the latest book, “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows” to see which of their beloved heroes survives.
While Harry, Ron and Hermoine may cast their last spell
on page, fans (and nan-fans) can still drink in the magic potion on the big screen for a few more years, starting with the
just-released “Order of the Phoenix,” the fifth of the seven-part series.
Each film has gained momentum in terms of storytelling,
style and clarity. What makes “Phoenix” rise is what it leaves out.
Sheared of several subplots that the 807-page tome contained
(adios, Ron and Hermione storylines; sayonara house elves), screenwriter Michael Goldberg keeps the hocus pocus focus solely
on our titular wizard and the impending dread of a confrontation with Lord Voldemort (played by Ralph Finnes)
The result is the leanest “Potter” yet. At
a taut 138 minute, “Phoenix” cuts to the quick and cuts out the Quiddich, leaving a foreboding emotional core
that stands as one of the series' best.
Potter (played by the ever-studlier Daniel Radcliffe)
is once again taking residence with his wretched adopted family, after surviving a near-fatal attack against Voldemort, that
noseless nuisance of the Dark Arts and the one responsible for the deaths of Harry's parents.
When Harry is forced to vanquish two rogue underworld
spirits by casting spells, it placed him in front of the Ministry of Magic's counsel, who seek to expel the young sorcerer
from Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry for practicing magic in the human world before he turned 18 (apparently magic
and alcohol have a lot in common).
Rushing to his defense is Headmaster Dumbledore (Michael
Gambon), who gets Harry reinstated, but whose actions rouse suspicion with the ministry that he is seeking higher office and
that he actually believes that Voldemort could resurface from the depths of hell.
The deck of tarot cards seems stacked against Harry and
Dumbledore, as the ministry uses a series of smears in the Ministry-controlled press. It also unleashes one of its most ferocious
attack dogs upon the school.
This attack dog, however, is in the form of a fluffy pink
poodle named Dolores Umbridge (impeccably played by Imelda Staunton). Topped with a pillbox hat and dressed like a dumpy tuft
of cotton candy, Umbridge is all forced smiles and rigid rule-making. Her power spreads, and she ultimately replaces Dumbledore
as headmaster, sending the school back to the Dark Ages of education (the references to “creationism” being acceptable
in some current classrooms cannot be overlooked here).
Meanwhile, Harry leads a rebellious lot of burgeoning
witches, including longtime pals Ron Weasley (played by Rupert Grint) and Hermoine Granger (played by Emma Watson), potential
Potter flame Cho Chang (played by Katie Leung) and spacey newcomer Luna Lovagood (played by Emma Lynch), to prepare for the
imminent Voldemort standoff they may all face.
For the makers of “Phoenix,” there was a price
to pay for the film's condensed nature: many characters are introduced with little fanfare or backstory, so it's hard to invest
much interest in some of the action. But director David Yates, a veteran of British television, has signed on the for the
next Potter film, “The Half-Blood Prince,” so many of the development may take place in the near future.
For now, he continues to build on the franchise's momentum.
Where director Chris Columbus “birthed” the series, Alfonso Cuaron added the adult edge and mystery, and Mike
Newell followed up by giving “Potter” its first feel of epic sweep.
Yates manages to give his actors (and let's face it, he's
got the most impressive support ensemble from the other side of the pond – Maggie Smith, Gary Oldman, David Thewlis,
Julie Walters, Emma Thompson and perhaps the series' tentpole of acting, Alan Rickman) just enough time to shine without having
the film feel overcrowded.
His direction has helped to make “Phoenix”
Potter's most bewitching spell yet
|
 |
 |
 |
Transformers
I remember my first car. It was
a 1978 canary yellow Honda Civic given to me by my aunt and uncle. Had it the ability to transform, my guess is that it would
morph into a roller skate. Not a pair, mind you. A single skate.
Now, thanks to director Michael Bay and the fine folks at the Hasbro toy company, my imagination
can run wild with all the many wondrous things it could have been. Like, say, a convection oven or a waffle maker,
as the AC frequently did not work.
“Transformers,” this summer's tentpole motion picture, thunders into theaters like
an orgy of geek-boy (and -girl) fantasies.
Bay know the childhood of many who grew up in the 80s, as well as those still young enough to
play with toys, is on the line, as the “Transformers” played such a pivotal playtime role. And while the director
has certainly taken lumps for putting the “bomb” in “bombastic” (*cough* “Pearl Harbor”
*cough* “Bad Boys 2” *cough* “The Island” *cough*), he is certainly the
right man to direct what is essentially a two-plus-hour car commercial.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Packed from engine to trunk with every element necessary for a summer popcorn flick (aspects
of “Jurassic Park,” “King Kong,” “Top Gun,” “Fast and the Furious,” “The
Terminator” and “The Matrix” are all present and accounted for), “Transformers” marks the true
official start of the summer movie season.
For those of you who cannot distinguish an Autobot from a Go-Bot (Kenner's cheapie knock-off
toy released soon after Transformer's success), fear not. For there is much upon which to feast your peepers.
Industrial Light and Magic once again raises the bar, melding the computer generated with the
real world. The transformations from vehicle to robots are seamless and when battles begin, you can almost smell the charred
metal in the air. Though WETA (Peter Jackson's special effects company) still hold the crown for creating the most human computer
imaging, ILM knows a thing or three about shiny mechanical things.
The film is also indebted to the slight shoulders of Shia LaBeouf, on which the film's human
element rests. On a lesser actor, the role of a car- and girl-crushing teen may have been mere filler between fights. But,
as Sam Witwicky, LaBeouf creates a relatable, compassionate lead that lifts the film above the cliché-riddled script.
Many go through life without witnessing a celestial event, but they can surely behold the birth
of a star in “Transformers.” This kid has some sort of likability gene spliced in his DNA that few actors possess
(Will Smith, Tom Cruise and Tom Hanks are the most recent cases in which it has been found). He is capable of rooting in humanity
a film about giant battling robots.
Sam is an everyday kid, not thinking twice about pawning his great, great-grandfather's goods
so that he can obtain the car of his dreams (or, at least the car of his allowance savings), and therefore obtain the girl
of his dreams Mikaela Banes (played by Megan Fox, living up to her surname, if little else).
But his ancestral artifacts also hold a key to the whereabouts of an energy cube that could
decide the fate between two clans of rivaling intergalactic robots. It may also save civilization as we know know it.
If it sounds just too plain kooky for you, than perhaps your ticket would be best spent purchasing
the best-selling novel “A Thousand Splendid Suns,” by Khaled Hosseini and curling up on that beach chair. But
you may also be robbing yourself of one of the pure, simple concepts of going to the movies in the first place. To see “
Transformers” in a crowded theater with cheering, chuckling fans is one of the few joys left to watching films outside
the home (there is also an evil Transformer that changes into a cell phone, which cause some of the younger audience members
to think twice before flipping it open and chatting).
To catch it at home on DVD is missing the point.
“Transformers” may not change the minds of many who dismiss director Bay as a talentless
hack with an itchy finger on the explosives button, but for once the director has found a home for his munitions porn. He
can direct booming action sequences with all the finesse and grace of a ballet. And, thankfully, the film is constructed for
just that reason.
Silly, schmaltzy, loud and proud -- “Transformers” is comfortable with its niche,
and has the ability to shape-shift your cash into mindless cinematic fun.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Film versions of Broadway musicals are a little like recordings of concerts. They've
been cleaned up a bit, tweaked here and there and generally polished to a blinding sheen.
But this also takes away from the grit and grime of live performances that adds
to the overall thrill.
Just look at the graveyard of movie musicals based on plays throughout the past
few years -- “Rent,” “Phantom of the Opera” and “The Producers” are but a few (personally,
I'd toss “Dreamgirls” in there, too).
Lucky for “Hairspray” though, it's roots are showing. For it began
as a film, and sculpted by the grandaddy of garish garbage and glee, John Waters. After having plumbed the depths of depravity
with films such as “Pink Flamingos,” “Female Trouble” and “Desperate Living,” the director's
1988 original was perhaps his most mainstream film, but it still had the tart wit and social commentary for which Waters was
well-known.
That Waters vibe can be felt throughout this latest incarnation of “Hairspray”
(the director even turns up for a hysterical cameo in the film's infectious opening number “Good Morning, Baltimore.”
But those who never quite enjoyed a drink from Water's cinematic well (some may
say septic tank), the auteur's presence should not be a deterrent from viewing perhaps the most bubbly fun to be had at the
movies so far this summer.
Following the early '60s life of young zaftig Tracy Turnblad (played by newcomer
Nikki Blonsky), a marshmallow of a teen whose sole reason for living is to dance. Her main outlet to shake her generous assets
is “The Corny Collins Show,” a televised Baltimore dance program where the local kids go to get their groove on.
One day a week is deigned “Negro Day,” in which local black kids can
break out and boogie, so long as the floor is cleared of all white kids. The day further starches the shirts of the local
programmers, including manager Velma Von Tussle (played by a much-welcomed-back Michelle Pfeiffer) who does not want her daughter's
chances to be crowned the show's Miss Baltimore Crabs sullied by some dark-skinned hooligans. For the kids, of course, this
day is the soul of the show, where the latest, most mod moves are on proud display.
The chubby Tracy is an outcast herself in the squeaky clean, model-thin world of
TV. She soon befriends Seaweed (played by electric newcomer Elijah Kelley), one of the featured dancers on Negro Day, and
the son of the day's host Motormouth Maybelle (played by magnetic-but-underused Queen Latifah).
After learning a few bold moves from her new friends, Tracy earns a spot on the
show and her care-free hip-swiveling is soon earning her fans from all over the city, hon.
With the help of her best friend Penny (played by Amanda Bynes) and her parents,
Tracy is determined to integrate the show, regardless of the consequences.
The flick's philosophy is one of being comfortable with who you are – regardless
of size, age, race, etc. -- and there is room for everyone out there on life's dance floor. But the film never once feels
preachy or synthetic, and composers Marc Shaiman and Scott Williams have ensured that you will be too busy getting caught
up in the music to let things get too heavy-handed.
There is just one element of the film you may have noticed that I have yet to bring
up, and that is because I really do not know what to make of it. John Travolta as Edna Turnblad – packed behind pounds
of latex – a muumuu-clad mama made famous by the late Divine. His beady little eyes look like two raisins in a sea of
pancake batter plastering his face. His efforts to acquire a Bal'more accent are quite distracting as well.
There are a few moments in which he once again captures that “Grease”
-era exuberance, not necessarily in a dance number, but in his more tender moments as Tracy's shut-in mother. It is certainly
his best performance in years, yet it was still difficult to lose sight of the fact that it was John Travolta in a fat suit
(in contrast, Eddie Murphy became several diverse family members hidden behind his makeup in “The Nutty Professor”).
The one time that Travolta ceases to be an actor in drag is perhaps the film's best number, a touching duet with husband Wilbur
(played with feather-light feet by Christopher Walken), as they celebrate growing older with one that you love.
Overall, though, the film is completely engaging, bubbling over with heart and
song, and this “Hairspary” will hold up long after leaving the theater.
|
 |
|
|
|