use soap

taste the happy

Home
taste the happy
more mayhem
jack's wasted life
huge mistake
for the young at art
fun, sexy times
You want some of this? For the masochists I have compiled my previous reviews as well as what's on DVD... please clean up after yourself.

also in theaters

rushhourposter.jpg

Stuck in traffic

I can't do it.


I can't even muster up the courage to say, “Well, at least Chris Tucker is back up on the big screen again.”

Really, that was my only hope for “Rush Hour 3,” the most cliched, hackneyed, watered down, homogenized slice of big-budget drivel to be coughed out of a computer in recent memory. And this is coming from a fan of the series.

Every cliché is covered, every plot point is clearly mapped. They don't even bother to reheat these leftovers. They are just served cold.

This film is a swimming pool in Jackie Chan's back yard. It's a new Ferrari for Chris Tucker's garage. It's an escort service debt paid off for director Brett Ratner.

What it is not, is entertainment. Everyone involved in this bloated, belated sequel makes as little an effort as possible to fill the franchise's six-year absence (not that anyone was particularly longing for another installment).

As mentioned I truly enjoyed the first films, appreciating them for their breezy chemistry between Jackie Chan's Keaton-esque physicality and Tucker's motor-mouthed histrionics. It was derivative, but there was just enough humor and heart to buoy it above the fray.

But there is never a moment during “Rush Hour 3's” run time that convinces me that everyone was in this for something other than a paycheck. Hell, this may even classify as a zombie movie the way everyone – and I mean behind the camera as well – seems to have lumbered about like a somnambulist convention.

You can rattle off the buddy-movie bromides with ease:

  1. Humor derived from ethnic stereotypes.

  2. Horribly trained henchmen who can't hit the side of a barn at three feet.

  3. A bound-and-gagged female hostage.

  4. Wherever Tucker and Chan travel in the world (this time, France), the only black and Asian females in the room flirt with them.

  5. The third-person shooter who, out of nowhere, kills a bad guy mere nanoseconds before said evildoer is to shoot our hero.

  6. The chief villain's expository speech before attempting to kill the heroes.

  7. The duplicitous government agent who at first seems like a helpful fella.

  8. The closing door that our hero narrowly slides under seconds before closing.

  9. A gun being out of ammo just as the dramatic music swells to a crescendo.

  10. The ubiquitous, unnecessary car chase.

Sadly, the list could continue. But since screenwriter Jeff Nathanson obviously put no effort into this, neither will I.

And if sheer boredom from these tired formulas don't work, “Rush Hour 3” seems as though it's trying to be offensive. I am far from a prude and an admirer of his work, but what was the reason to cast the reclusive director Roman Polanski, a convicted rapist of a 13 year old, as a jelly-fingered Parisian cop who performs a cavity search on our heroes then winks at them when they later complain about it?

There was a little-seen film released last year called “Idiocracy,” which (quite hilariously) depicted the dumbing down of our culture in the near future. The most popular film of the year (which went on to win the Oscar)? “Ass,” a shot of a hieney for two hours that would occasionally pass gas or get scratched or something. After viewing “Rush Hour 3,” I yearn for “Ass 2: Breaking the Wind.”

Tucker was a talented man before he decided to sell his celluloid soul to become some wide-eyed buffoon ... Here is the site for the Chris Tucker Foundation ( http://www.christuckerfoundation.org/), which promises to give help to children of South Africa infected with HIV.

I urge you, if you are contemplating even renting “Rush Hour 3” on DVD, donate your money here instead.

DVD highlight
more DVD reviews can be found on i am jack's wasted life

bladesposter.jpg

'Glory' hole

Selecting men’s ice dancing as a source of parody in a sports film is like picking on the scrawny, bespectacled, asthmatic kid on the playground. When “Blades of Glory” was announced, it seemed too easy a target, and perhaps would be no more than a drawn-out film version of that classic “Saturday Night Live” skit on synchronized swimming (if you hurry, you can check it out on Youtube before NBC’s lawyers strip it away). What is surprising is that despite the one-joke premise, despite the potential parade of same-sex jokes, and despite the incredibly limited ability of lead Jon Heder, “Blades of Glory” is funnier than it has any right to be.
It has more than one weapon in its arsenal of amusement.
First, the film features that slave to silliness, Will Ferrell, in yet another variation of his arrogant, clueless man-child as Chazz Michael Michaels. I fully realize there are two Ferrell camps, so those who rate his appeal just below chaffing, might I suggest you just turn a few pages of the paper and head right to Fritz Schrank's always-excellent column.

Second, the filmmakers had the intelligence to give Ferrell formidable foes on the rink with the real-life husband-and-wife team of Will Arnett (from the best sitcom in the history of television, “Arrested Development”) and “Saturday Night Live’s” Amy Poehler.

But what ultimately saves “Blades” is its humanity. Sure, it goes for the several cheap gay jokes that would obviously accompany a film featuring male ice dancing, but those are vague, throwaway gags that find humor more in the awkwardness from the alpha males than the overtly homophobic contempt found in lesser comedies from the likes of Adam Sandler and that ilk.

“Blades” freezes, though, every time things are left in the dainty hands of Jon Heder. Not only does he mangle his own time on screen, but he acts as a comedy vortex, actually siphoning humor from other aspects of the film and deadening the pace. All I can say is that Heder must have some pretty nasty pictures of some of the Hollywood higher-ups in order to continue to get work.

In “Blades,” the costume department does its best to squeeze humor out of Heder’s appearance – peacock plumage, a hideous ‘70s shaggy hairdo and two protruding front teeth that look like glistening Chiclets; he resembles the mutant lovechild of magician Doug Henning and a Care Bear.

Heder plays Jimmy MacElroy, a figure-skating prodigy picked from an orphanage by a shifty, filthy rich businessman (played by and amusing William Fichtner in an all-too-brief role) who solely wants to turn the boy into a world class champion.

But MacElroy’s effete preening and prancing across the ice is in direct contrast to Michaels’ pelvic thrusts and lewd moves (he’s been known to rip off his jockstrap and toss it into the crowd of fawning female ice groupies) and who is described by an announcer as an “ice dancing sex tornado.”.

After a tie, the two scuffle and are subsequently banned from the sport, only to find that a Skating Federation loophole will allow them both back into the sport – as a couple.

That's it really, storywise. But the film is able to glide along on the appeal of its actors whose last names aren't Heder and a sprinkling of left-field humor.

As for the actual skating (of which there is relatively little, oddly), it’s up to Arnett and Poehler to offer up the film’s most inspired bits. Their “Ode to Hip-Hop” routine and JFK-Marilyn Monroe dance interpretation are the surreal moments that set “Blades” ablaze.

“Blades” could have benefited from more moments of this sharper edge, but it has enough momentum, heart and heat to keep it from dipping into Tonya Harding-like depths of despair.

Feedback, submissions and ideas accepted only if you can spell:
Email beachrun113@verizon.net