Those who have encountered insomnia problems can vouch for this. 

It has been in the realm of engineering to model these issues;
this is not a Hollywood activity.

Why this admonition? 

If we have been wishing for lighter and lighter to reduce energy requirements, and greater and greater portability to share our presents with others, we have met our wish with tombs of books that can now be carried on a few-ounce CD PLATFORM, and cellular devices….

If one considers the upper/UPPER MOST levels of a building structure, it would be ideal if it were lightest portion of the building.  Too light, and the building would appear to sway, and too heavy, and the building may fall apart even before construction is completed.  There are many permutations in between.  So, democracy operates between these limits.

In 2007, we stand in danger of books becoming antiquated , and the home phone line, similarly made into historical antiquity (quickly unserviceable due to competition with wireless lines and services).

Herald the computer, and the wireless cellphone (even though a jail phone and a cellphone, for some, bear little difference (a frighteningly close resemblance)).

So, we tend not to consider engineering constructions, new vs. old, as a reason for war.  My building vs. your building, my power plant vs. your power PLANT.

Engineers have long struggled to unify methods of construction.  Many of these efforts have been unmocked (relegated to the heap) by the protocol-less wireless movement. 

Perhaps art has trammeled too far into the realm of actual engineering. 

The blame?  On HOLLYWOOD.  Hollywood’s role in promulgating DVD format, must be attributed to Hollywood.

DVD format resembles the upper levels of certain buildings.  The cellphone, if a brave engineer had dared to complete a design with a light upper level that swayed, would resemble that constructed design.  To this engineer, it would be obvious not to fly around the world with a cellphone.

Did all the physicists go to Hollywood?  Perhaps the only other option was to go to Iran.  To study certain phenomena in their natural environment, Iran might be ideal to visit after ALL².  The complaint?  That no formal complaint was lodged about the wireless vibrations induced by wireless devices.

Even as the War in IRAQ nears an end, and the New York World Trade Towers are reconstructed as Liberty buildings, NEW YORKERS might be assisted² with an image of “Life, Liberty or Death” as security for these buildings.  All else would need to see the bedrock underlying Manhattan island, as a reminder of what ELSE holds the building up.

An independent security design protecting one feature, might be a cause for suspicion later.  But to release that design for all to use, could be critical MISTAKE, already made.   Some features are intended for advanced users, but tend to exclude, the already gentrified.    If there were a mistake made already, with the mass production of internet and cellular machines, it would be to not coordinate between other industries, by instead circulating an existing security code.  

Could security come from the people alone?

So, “LIFE, LIBERTY, or DEATH”.

If we could turn away from our cellphones for a minute, we might see a building that requires our assistance in standing UP. 

Most items or ISSUES of importance do not stand on their own.

The reconstruction of the world towers does not have to obey cellphone laws.  The building could be urged to be more visible, and to have a greater quantity of non-electronic safety features than usually present.  Our history is still our strength.  What is known already about construction in New York City,
is already known about in New York City.  Let’s not antiquate that too, by adding foreign surveillance features, that hardly holds up a SINGLE beam, but encourages yet another tracking device to land on the 90^th floor.

If the building could not be constructed with such recognition, it would be better not constructing.  The Another bad engineering example is not necessary.

Let ART BE ART, 
Engineering be engineering.

The Sydney Opera House is an opera house, that stands NOT more than 20 flrs up from the ocean.  A There, on the 87^th floor, there is nothing.  

A glass dome, is a glass dome.

If one were looking for Sydney [AUS], in the USA, it is in Houston, TX.  It is not in the City of the Big Apple.  Apples obey gravity, at least partially.

Or, one might see the Tower of London.  If one had complaint about the earlier WTC, it might be the cruelly rectangular steel skin.  A liberty building, should never resemble a jail.  An air tunnel or a TUNNEL OF LIGHT might be a compromise.

When contemplating the designs in progress, I tend to see a cellphone skin light feature necessary at the top of the new buildings.  That much light would ward off all flying objects with sight from hundreds (easily 500 MILES) AWAY.  Perhaps also, a building ceiling structure that is like a draw-bridge, allowing visitors passing through a spectacle of LIGHT.

The building, most safetly, would be an entity, harboring individuals that take care of it, and not just passing through.  This signifies a new age of democracy.  Those who can take care of what they own,
can own it securely.    If a new hybrid design confuses⁴ too many divergent elements of life, such that it can not be understood OR maintained, there is insecurity. 

With wireless we are experiencing change, possibly TOO FAST.  Recombinant forms of engineering technology, may need a new test market AFTER ALL.   If the PhD could not operate the vehicle, could someone else Take CARE of it?

When looking at the status of democracy, is security an orbiting satellite, or a safe landing?  Those who have been to space remind us it is both.  Those who have not been, do not know the answer.   They know when they have food, water, and a home.  All else, they leave up to US.  If safety is up, as it was during the wireless TOWER construction period of this 2^nd millennium AD,  then, the world must be FLAT.  If you understand curvature, or curve BALLS, you should fight for recognizing DOWN is also security. 

Firefighters used to rescue cats and other animals from the tops of trees.  Perhaps the animal was not afraid, but the owner, or an individual passing by, thought it was appropriate to perform a rescue.  Mostly, fire hoses, are removed from a building, after a fire.

So, connections (new engineering constructions) that leave things hanging in mid-air, should be evaluated over a greater PERIOD of time.   If Hollywood would want to substitute itself as engineering construction, it might also have to be evaluated over a greater period of time.

If capitalist democracy is simply receiving money, without respect to any other considerations of a societal or justice nature, democracy will cease to exist.  The capitalists are not listening.  If Hollywood has been confused with the freest form of liberty, an error has been made.  Freedom is in education.   

When there is no freedom there,  WE HAVE TOO MUCH DEBT TO HANDLE.  It is a right to handle that DEBT first.  College is no requirement of democracy, and could not be accomplished over an overburdening debt.⁵   Cellular deceives us in weight.  Only orbiting objects need to be made that light.   

FOOTNOTES: 

¹In promotions, this is also obvious.

²Iran and Taiwan are both warm countries, year-round, for observing human behavior in long-industrializing countries, with many intelligent people.

³assures

⁴and combines