PORTRAITS: The Artist as a Young Woman
By TOVA NAVARRA
"Draw me," said my aunt while sitting next to me at a Menlo Park Mall Art Show in the
1970s. I was hoping to sell the artwork I'd lugged there, in the era of the mall art show, and I used to believe in that battle,
the mall always won.
"What? I can't draw you," I said. But she insisted and there was gnarling and gnashing and I took out my charcoal
pencil and pad and started making marks on it that---Hmmmm!---began to look like my aunt. Now a crowd gathered around. Before
I got to the finishing touches of my aunt's portrait, someone shouted, "Hey, would you draw me? How much do you charge?"
I did 28 charcoal portraits on-the-spot that afternoon. The price I put on them? Two fifty a piece. Two dollars
and fifty cents. See, those were the times when I didn't reason that $2.50 was a fancy hot dog, not a work of art. Stupid,
stupid girl. Generous, eager, modest. After all, I wasn't Rembrandt.
No, I wasn't. But now I realize that no matter what, Rembrandt probably never equated his precious scratchings
with a large cookie, or worse, with "just something I tossed off."
Art is not what an artist blurts out mindlessly even if it seems a projectile rendering. Rather, it is something
that lurks and smolders deep down until it senses a crack of light and then---pow!
It bursts into the material world. One particular style? Seems unnecessary, at least for me. I remember sitting
(clothed) for a local art group in which one artist had decided every subject's face was round. My face was not round, and
her portrait sank into oblivion as, well, that of a woman with a round face, not my face. Haven't sat for a portrait since
then, 25-some years ago. I prefer to be the artist.
A statuesque blonde commissioned me to do her portrait. I arrived at her house and smack in the middle of
a marital row. As she sat and I sketched, the husband ranted, "Well, now I know where your priorities lie!" Her eyes registered
humiliation but she sat silent, and he eventually left. I imagined what might have happened to the portraits of women by da
Vinci, Rubens, Sargent, had some man childishly tried to thwart them.
In my career, the big question consistently was: How do you get the likeness? I don't know, save that I look
at the person's features, how unique all the shapes and lines, and take in the person's essence. I leave the medium to the
one commissioning the piece. Some prefer canvas; some like it hot. Everyone is far more concerned and fascinated with the
quality of the likeness than anything else.
I've made countless portraits of my children, for posterity as well as practice. I made several self-portraits,
one of which allegedly scares them and on that count may be the best likeness of me. Then the camera stole my heart and became
my brushes for a while, although I usually have a pen and pad at the ready for the quick portrait on a plane, in a restaurant.
The one sketching is more noticeable than one with a camera, I've discovered. Oooooh....is she drawing that
boy with the striped shirt? Is she drawing...me? I adore instigating this curiosity. It convinces me that art still woos people.